More

Robert Gates On Pakistan: 'Somebody Knew' Osama Bin Laden Was Hiding There

Osama Bin Laden Pakistan

LOLITA BALDOR   05/18/11 08:14 PM ET   AP

WASHINGTON — Pakistan has already paid dearly for its failure to know or acknowledge that Osama bin Laden was hiding for more than five years in a compound a short distance from a Pakistani military facility, Pentagon leaders insisted Wednesday.

Pushing back against angry public and congressional accusations that Pakistani officials were complicit in bin Laden's sanctuary there, Defense Secretary Robert Gates said he's seen proof that leaders there were unaware of bin Laden's whereabouts.

"I have seen no evidence at all that the senior leadership knew. In fact, I've seen some evidence to the contrary," Gates told reporters at the Pentagon. "We have no evidence yet with respect to anybody else. My supposition is, somebody knew."

He wouldn't say who, but suggested it could have been retired or low-level Pakistani officials.

The Obama administration is reassessing its fragile and sometimes hostile relationship with Pakistan after the bin Laden killing, which may change the stakes for both sides. For the U.S., it may provide greater leverage in its argument to prod Pakistan to go after the militants that target the U.S., instead of only those that target Pakistan.

For Pakistan, outrage and shame over what is seen as a breach of national sovereignty will color leaders' willingness to cooperate with the U.S.

Gates and Joint Chiefs chairman Adm. Mike Mullen issued a broad defense of Islamabad's leadership Wednesday. And they urged patience as the "humiliated" country worked through the problems emanating from the U.S. clandestine raid deep into Pakistan that killed bin Laden on May 2.

"If I were in Pakistani shoes, I would say I've already paid a price. I've been humiliated. I've been shown that the Americans can come in here and do this with impunity," said Gates. "I think we have to recognize that they see a cost in that and a price that has been paid."

That argument, however, may hold no sway on Capitol Hill, which has seen more than $10 billion in aid go to Pakistan over the past 10 years.

If a U.S. aid package to Pakistan came up for a vote in at least one Senate Appropriations subcommittee, "it would not pass at all. I don't know how I would vote on the issue," said Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., chairman of the Appropriations subcommittee that oversees foreign aid.

The comments came as the Pakistani Taliban vowed to fight with "new zeal" in the wake of bin Laden's death to complete the al-Qaida chief's mission of waging holy war against the West, the deputy commander of the militant group told The Associated Press.

Waliur Rehman's remarks appeared designed to deflate expectations that bin Laden's death would slow down insurgent groups allied with or inspired by al-Qaida. And it also could be an attempt to boost morale among the insurgents who are facing a tough fight against U.S. and coalition forces in Afghanistan.

Gates and Mullen said the Pakistanis are well aware of the swelling frustration in Washington. And they've heard the demands that Islamabad pay a price for its inability or unwillingness to more aggressively target insurgents that are planning and waging attacks against U.S. and coalition troops across the border in Afghanistan.

"I don't think we should underestimate the humbling experience that this (has been) and in fact the internal soul searching that's going on" inside Pakistan's military, said Mullen.

Mullen has forged a close relationship with his Pakistani counterparts, encouraging them to move against high-level terrorists known to be hiding in Pakistan, including al-Qaida's No. 2 leader, Ayman al-Zawahri, and kingpins of the Afghan insurgency such as Mullah Omar and Siraj Haqqani.

Pakistan's continued support is critical for the continued passage of supplies into Afghanistan, as well as its sporadic military operations in some of the insurgent strongholds such as South Waziristan and the Swat Valley.

Mullen said the U.S. must continue to work with and provide aid to Pakistan. But, amid rising anger and distrust of Pakistan across America and on Capitol Hill, both men acknowledged that Islamabad must take concrete action to eliminate the safe havens where militants are hiding along the border with Afghanistan.

Sen. John McCain of Arizona, the top Republican on the Armed Services Committee, said as lawmakers are under pressure to cut all U.S. spending, he suggested establishing a "set of benchmarks" for Pakistan to meet, such as going after the Haqqani network, border security and focusing on North Waziristan.

While he cautioned against a rush to cut aid to Pakistan, he noted that the U.S. set similar types of benchmarks as it prepared to withdraw troops from Iraq.

In other comments, both Gates and Mullen complained that too much information has been disclosed about the raid by the elite U.S. SEAL team that stormed the compound in Abbottabad and killed bin Laden and four others.

"We are close to jeopardizing this precious capability that we have, and we can't afford to do that," said Mullen. "This fight isn't over."

He and Gates said that former and current U.S. officials have spilled too many details of the operation, risking the security of the special operations forces involved and their families. "It's time to stop talking," he said.

In a separate development Wednesday, a new report by the Asia Society said that the U.S. and other allies must make a long-term commitment to Pakistan in order to prevent the country from further deterioration. It called for assistance to improve the country's failing education system, reform its weak judicial system and end its conflict with India.

___

Associated Press writers Pauline Jelinek and Donna Cassata contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

WASHINGTON — Pakistan has already paid dearly for its failure to know or acknowledge that Osama bin Laden was hiding for more than five years in a compound a short distance from a Pakistani mili...
WASHINGTON — Pakistan has already paid dearly for its failure to know or acknowledge that Osama bin Laden was hiding for more than five years in a compound a short distance from a Pakistani mili...
Filed by Mark Hanrahan  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,383
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (45 total)
08:47 AM on 05/21/2011
"I have seen no evidence at all that the senior leadership knew. In fact, I've seen some evidence to the contrary,"

Not having "seen no evidence" does NOT mean, there exists none nor that Gates believes that there is no evidence.

It only means that GATES HAS NOT SEEN ANY.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nmaddog7
07:46 PM on 05/19/2011
Amanpour,2008,Bill Maher's HBO show:http://bit.ly/lIaM7M
OBL is living in a comfy villa according to high up source
photo
alanposting
Get you head out of the sand!
06:17 PM on 05/19/2011
Gates, YOU should have known....tell me again how we spend billions of dollars on intelligence?
photo
captainindustry
just a better con artist
05:32 PM on 05/19/2011
where was all of his dialysis equipment?”

Am I the only one who remembers that he is on dialysis? THAT is how they should have found him.
01:38 PM on 05/19/2011
Gates is echoing what most Americans are thinking and suspecting but both have the same problem; no proof whatsoever. Personally, I think that low ranking Pakistani security official(s) may have known but without the knowlege of their superiors because they don' have a system to check for such improprieties--- ofcourse I too have no proof.
01:34 PM on 05/19/2011
All true. the only reason Obama acted was Geraldo Rivera had tunneled halfway through the compound wall using only a soup spoon and was going to interview him.
01:13 PM on 05/19/2011
He was the Neo-Cons bogeyman. Bush and his regime never wanted to catch him.

He was justification for a couple of occupations, Iraq and Afganistan.
05:02 PM on 05/19/2011
And for what purpose? You state that Bush never wanted to catch OBL because that was his hustification for Irag and Afghanistan. So now that Obama "caught" him does that mean we can pull out now?
12:59 PM on 05/19/2011
six years ago I was in Europe three different countries, everyone I met, not related, but very typical informed Europeans,knew that Bin Laden was under a control and predicted that the curent administration would be re-elected. Remember a few days before the election Bin Laden appeared with his usual threats.
12:44 PM on 05/19/2011
Really? Ya think--Geeze
12:43 PM on 05/19/2011
The Pakistani govt. may not have known he was there but you can bet certain people in our govt. did.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Harrison Meeske
12:39 PM on 05/19/2011
gee you really think so? duh
12:37 PM on 05/19/2011
It seems to me that both Washington and Islamabod are trying to find a way to mend their fences because we need each other. We couldn't fight a war in Afghanistan without Pakistan. They know it and we know it. We'll never know who knew in Pakistan because everyone wants to forget the whole thing. In a government hierarchy, blaming a "low-level" Pakistani official is equivalent to blaming no one. After all of this "indignation" on Capital HIll, we will continuet to give money to Pakistan, not only because of the war we are fighting also to keep China from completely co-opting Pakistan with money of its own.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JABBER2
12:34 PM on 05/19/2011
YEP, AND HE USED IT TO BETTER HIS CAMPAIGN!!!
12:10 PM on 05/19/2011
And a big DUH to him as well. Anyone that can add two + 0ne is well aware of that.........
photo
Gestas
Mountain Man
12:07 PM on 05/19/2011
Gates must mean...Who knew binLaden was hiding in Pakistan, besides Bush and Cheney..?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JABBER2
12:34 PM on 05/19/2011
OBAMA!!!!!
08:50 AM on 05/21/2011
And precisely that's why Obama approved the attack to kill Bin Laden ......

And Bush and Cheney did NOT!