iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Meat Industry Recruits 'Masters of Beef Advocacy' To Promote Meat Eating

Meat

ALAN SCHER ZAGIER   05/18/11 07:10 AM ET   AP

COLUMBIA, Mo. — The national beef industry has enlisted college students across the country in its public relations fight for America's hearts, minds and stomachs.

The Masters of Beef Advocacy program also recruits farmers, ranchers, high-end chefs and school dietitians to spread the gospel of red meat consumption. But the National Cattlemen's Beef Association, which started the outreach effort two years ago, has placed a strong emphasis on the Twitter generation. At least 20 percent of the nearly 2,200 program graduates are age 21 or younger.

The online program – called MBA in a nod to the more commonly known graduate business degree – is available in 47 states and particularly popular at public land-grant universities with strong agricultural schools, such as the University of Missouri, Iowa State, Kansas State and Western Kentucky.

"We know what the science is," said Dennis Fennewald, a fifth-generation farmer, former bull semen salesman and beef production instructor at Missouri. "The emotional part, that really is being controlled by people who don't know or understand our science."

Fennewald and professors at other schools typically offer the six-hour course as extra credit rather than a required assignment. Students who finish it are expected to speak to school groups and civic clubs or build online buzz through social media.

Missouri senior Erin Mohler and other members of the school's Collegiate Cattlewomen's club spent a recent afternoon sharing their "Meet Your Meat" message with passing students on a busy pedestrian mall.

Volunteers sold rib-eye steak sandwiches from a portable food trailer while a 1,600-pound Simmental beef cow named Summer grazed nearby in a temporary enclosed pen.

Students passed out recipes for Moroccan-style beef kabobs and tenderloin salad with cranberries and pears, while other brochures touted beef's high content of zinc, iron, protein and other essential minerals and vitamins.

Mohler, a senior animal sciences major whose parents live in Maryland and own 40 cattle on a north Missouri "hobby farm," said her perspective isn't always embraced on campus. Yet she remains undeterred.

"A lot of people have a hard time grasping why I would promote the cattle industry," she said. "More people need to understand where their food comes from. You eat three times a day."

The reactions to Summer and her handlers were decidedly mixed. Last year, the "Meet Your Meat" mavens convinced several passers-by to renounce their vegetarian ways, group member Kaitlyn Lee said.

Freshman David Adams had a different reaction, calling the display "kind of gross."

"I don't want to see an animal and then go buy a sandwich made from its relative," he said. "I guess I'd like to remain oblivious."

The grassroots campaign is just one part of the beef industry's effort to reverse a five-decade slide in meat consumption by Americans. Seed money came from the $1 per head of domestic and imported live cattle that producers pay under a 1985 federal law. Fifty cents of each $1 goes to the national cattle group's Beef Promotion and Research Board.

Pork producers use their $1 surcharge to operate a similar program called "Operation Main Street."

Focusing the outreach on college campuses – usually considered friendlier terrain for People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals and like-minded groups – is an obvious and needed approach, said Daren Williams, executive communications director for the Denver-based National Cattlemen's Beef Association.

"There's a political, social and economic discussion going on about food production," he said. "(Beef producers) have felt left out of the discussion."

At Western Kentucky University, animal sciences professor Nevil Speer offers the Masters of Beef Advocacy curriculum as an extra-credit assignment for the mostly freshmen and sophomores in his introductory-level classes. The units cover beef safety, production techniques, animal care, environmental stewardship, nutrition and the national program that provides marketing and research money.

"It's not a coercive type of thing," Speer said. "It's an external and an objective voice about the food system ... It's not set up as propaganda."

Nathan Runkle disagrees. The executive director of Chicago-based Mercy for Animals, which promotes a vegetarian diet, said that "a more accurate title for this offensive program would be the Master of BS."

"Centers for higher learning should not become dumping grounds for propaganda programs that push increased profits for an industry that subjects animals to extreme cruelty and exploitation," he said. "Cruelty and violence has no place in the classroom."

Speer said he doesn't expect all of his students to embrace the beef industry's viewpoint. Like any good college class, the program ultimately forces students with entrenched views to consider other perspectives, even if they don't agree with them, he said.

"You have all kinds of students going through this program, and all of the sudden they're talking to each other," he said. "As long as we have dialogue going, that's a good thing."

___

Alan Scher Zagier can be reached at http://twitter.com/azagier

FOLLOW HUFFPOST COLLEGE

Filed by Rebecca Harrington  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 175
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Raven1970
Do not be a pre-checked box, opt out
08:44 AM on 05/21/2011
Speaking of common sense...as a nation, we eat more fast food today than ever in history...the number one sold product in fast food joints are burgers, yet this article states that the sale of beef is on a five decade slide? More burgers.....less beef.....hmmmmmmm...........

This reminds me of that 1980's commercial, "Where's the beef?"
09:15 PM on 05/22/2011
A lot of fast food burgers are mixed with soy, aren't they? Plus, they're probably getting smaller to cut costs.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Raven1970
Do not be a pre-checked box, opt out
07:11 AM on 05/24/2011
Soy and allot more than that I am sure. That's my point, if we actually stuck to eating real grass fed beef, if we didn't allow companies to fill foods with anything that increases profit margin than we would all be better off.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SuperMom101
What's on your plate?
03:49 PM on 05/20/2011
With all due respect it only took four clicks to see that you're industry (unlike the "academia"... that only took two clicks.)

Anyway...still not adjusting "my beliefs" about no dairy in my diet ever or feeding my family hamburger that is made from a clone cow, that eats GMO corn, administered growth hormones and antibiotics, its carcus is spun and rinsed with ammonia and placed in a package that has a gas inserted to give it a longer shelf life.

Tell me I'm wrong about the hamburger meat and maybe I'd listen (I'm not), but please don't tell me your industry funded study shows...

Curious, do you factory farm?

p.s. Also find it odd that so many posters here are new to The Huff?
05:38 PM on 05/20/2011
I assume this post is directed at me (I could be wrong) - I assume you don't need a copy of my medical records too? You seem to forget that academics (no doubt your google skills show that I am actually in academia and I have not pretended otherwise in these posts) eat food too and are just as entitled to our opinion as you are. Let's keep this civilized shall we?

I would suggest that if you're interested in this subject you do some research into the relative concentrations of estrogen endogenously produced in pre- or post-menopausal women vs. bovine milk.

As a matter of note, there are about 9 million dairy cattle and 35 million beef cows in the USA and only 600 cloned cattle - your concerns about cloning seem to be a little misplaced.

I used to farm grass-fed sheep in the UK but have no animals over here unfortunately.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SuperMom101
What's on your plate?
08:15 AM on 05/21/2011
Common sense is not so common - Voltaire

I leave the research to academia and follow common sense. We have plenty of PhD's, industry experts and government agencies telling us everything is fine with our food supply. Meanwhile, America (and her children) have never been fatter or sicker.) I don't believe it's because I haven't done my research.

So, for me, it really is a matter of common sense:

If everything is fine...where are the labels?

Labels on meat or dairy products from cloned cows?
Labels on meat that has been injected with growth hormones, antibiotics or steroids?
Labels on dairy products that have received the artificial growth hormones?
Label meat that ammonia is used in processing and gases inserted in packaging?
Label GMO products?

Don't you find it curious that England doesn't allow the use of the artificial growth hormones in dairy cows and we do in the states? So, I guess it's not uncommon for scientists and researchers to not always agree that even though they would be (one would assume) reading the same studies in peer reviewed journals and discussing their research. Guess science is a practice just like law, medicine...

Wishing you continued good health!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Chester Erickson
(R) moderate
03:27 PM on 05/22/2011
Bovidiva,

Sometimes belief trumps fact, and sometimes "common" sense is open to interpretation.

You can't do anything in those circumstances, education will not help. I saw a study the other day that said when people are faced with facts that contradict valued beliefs, they simply ignore the facts. I can try to find a link later if you'd like.

I've never raised sheep, is it as difficult as my cousin makes it out to be?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SuperMom101
What's on your plate?
01:30 PM on 05/20/2011
That's it! My food choices are now based primarily on common sense and not science. (It's not the artificial growth hormone in the dairy products...it's that the cow's are milked while pregnant and since the tumor was hormone receptive and there are naturally occurring hormones in the cow's milk....)

Anyway, my oncologist suggests:

Best way to get vitamin D...15 minutes of sunshine
Build strong bones...weight bearing exercise

Let food be your medicine and medicine be your food. - Hippocrates
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Karl Wilder
Chef Stirring The Pot Harlem
03:00 PM on 05/19/2011
Grass Fed, Grass finished. It is healthier for the animal and the human. I have no quibble with beef but if it is fed corn I equate it with toxic waste.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Finnegans Wake
riverrun, past Eve and Adam's, from swerve of shor
01:43 PM on 05/20/2011
We're a corn-fed nation.
12:22 AM on 05/19/2011
I've shown cattle for FFA, worked on ranches and at vet clinics, been to feed yards and processing plants. The beef industry cares for its animals and utilizes safe, productive method's that produce safe, healthy, & wholesome food for their families and yours. We use land that is not fit for crop production and produce a viable protein to help feed the world. The MBA program was started by ranchers to tell our side of the story, to talk about the way of life we love and to discredit the propaganda that is spread by animal rights extremists and those that oppose the beef industry and want to end animal agriculture. Wither it's grass fed or conventional, beef is good for you and provides needed antioxidants, vitamins and minerals (such as Zinc, Iron, and Protein that everyone needs). If you think the MBA is bogus, as some of your comments suggest, I invite you to talk to us, and to your local rancher. We would be more than happy to discuss how cattle are raised and harvested for beef, with you.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Karl Wilder
Chef Stirring The Pot Harlem
03:01 PM on 05/19/2011
Grass fed is good for you. Conventional meaning loaded with hormones, antibiotics and corn is NOT good for you.
11:14 PM on 05/19/2011
Not sure I see the basis for "loaded for corn" is NOT good for you? Care to share the science?
InYourWorld
Progressive, educated, redneck but fan of no party
07:13 PM on 05/19/2011
Thank You! Oddly enough I have a very similar background, but people would rather tell me (from their cityscape) that I am mis informed.....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jumbotron16
a slight improvement over jumbotron15
03:12 PM on 05/22/2011
Woefully uninformed city folk with their book larnin' and no real world experience about that which they are discussing--far too common here on Huff Po.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bea Elliott
11:49 PM on 05/18/2011
"MBA" Masters of Brutal Acts
10:03 AM on 05/19/2011
Brutal acts? More than a million creatures can live on a single acre of perennial grassland, and when that land is plowed for plant agriculture the habitat for all of those creatures is annihilated, with many of them dying horrible deaths in the process, being crushed to death and torn apart at the seams. The particularly gruesome sight of a turtle that was ripped in half when the organic vegetable farm on my land was plowed comes to mind. The microorganisms in the soil, which are the backbone of all the life in the land, are obliterated by oxidization in the process as well, wreaking havoc on the surrounding ecosystem over time, and leading to desertification, as with the dust bowl.

Conversely, my neighbor's pastures next door are teeming with life! If a cow is pastured on that same acre, biodiversity and soil vitality can actually increase! And the meat of one large cow could be the beef source for an adult for several years. Apparently the million+ creatures on a single acre whose ecosystem is obliterated, and who die absolutely horrific deaths in the process of plant agriculture, are just fine with you, but if a cow is raised on the same acre instead, that is brutal in your eyes. Vegangelical logic betrays a complete divorce from the realities of sustainable food production.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Finnegans Wake
riverrun, past Eve and Adam's, from swerve of shor
03:35 PM on 05/19/2011
Bea Elliott hates bunnies.
12:15 AM on 05/25/2011
I may be beyond my prime, but I'm still with it enough to know that if we humans ate only plants, far less land would have to be plowed to feed us. The majority of the animals we eat are not grass-fed, they live in feedlots and we feed them corn and soy which requires the same plant agriculture you discuss. It's very inefficient for us to feed the animals these plants when we could just eat the plants ourselves and get our nutrients that way.

So, any way you slice it, it's a win/win to eat a vegetarian diet. Good for you. Good for the planet. Good for the animals.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Joshua Ozersky
Food Columnist for Time Magazine
11:40 PM on 05/18/2011
How am I not part of this?
09:46 AM on 05/19/2011
Perhaps you should contact them Josh. It seems like a good thing for everybody if there are more foodies in the dialogue.
04:33 PM on 05/22/2011
Agreed. Though, since they are using young persons and going to schools and using social media, I imagine they're going after the possible peetah crowd (thanks to sjvg for alternative spelling).

Probably no offense intended, Josh. :)
02:26 PM on 05/18/2011
Best is game meat or wild meat such as ostrich, boar, buffalo and even more exotic ones like bear, crocodile, etc.

The taste is like an orgy for tastebuds.

It does come at a price that I just cannot afford right now.
02:35 PM on 05/18/2011
For game meat, luckily hunting licences are still relatively affordable for state residents. Guaranteed low-fat and organic.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
deweydecimal
@DeweyMai on Twitter
12:22 AM on 05/19/2011
I don't know what your housing situation is like but maybe consider raising some quails for that delicious hit of gamey, I would recommend rabbit as well but it's taste is more subtle than gamey.
02:24 PM on 05/18/2011
You could get beef directly from the rancher; guaranteed grass-fed.

But that may require going to a red state, and I know that's a bridge too far for many here.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Finnegans Wake
riverrun, past Eve and Adam's, from swerve of shor
03:10 PM on 05/18/2011
I agreed with your post up to the "red state" oddity: pastured dairy, meat, and eggs are available everywhere. No need to divide this by red and blue states.

www.eatwild.com
mothergrace
If they knock you down, bite 'em on the ankle.
07:19 PM on 05/18/2011
Not true. Lots of places to buy pastured meat everywhere. May be a little more of a problem in heavily urban areas but I wouldn't divide it by red/blue.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SuperMom101
What's on your plate?
01:44 PM on 05/18/2011
Do the students take a field trip to the confined feeding operations (CFO)? Do they show the cattle being administered growth hormones, steroids, antibiotics and eating genetically modified corn instead of grazing in the fields? Do they offer them a big juicy steak after they've been to the slaughter house?

Their slogan is "Meet your meat?" Don't think our teenagers have eaten fast food since they saw the TV show on how most hamburger is made from by-products and mixed with ammonia.

It's so strange...America (and her children) have never been fatter or sicker and we can't seem to figure out why.
mothergrace
If they knock you down, bite 'em on the ankle.
02:27 PM on 05/18/2011
Eating junk is what made America fat and sick, not eating meat perse.

In fact, a lot of our unhealthy diet was driven by the supposed need to cut out fat, especially saturated fat.

That led to trans-fat in the form of margarine instead of butter. To make up for the lack of mouth feel from fat, a lot of manufacturers started upping the sugar content. Along comes HFCS and before you know it, instead of eating a diet that supported the evolution of humans and their big brains, people are eating weird tortured food like substances. (Including the meat with ammonia, but not pasture raised.)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SuperMom101
What's on your plate?
02:59 PM on 05/18/2011
Dear Mother Grace (like the name BTW) -

Had a hormone receptive tumor at the age of 38 and had no idea that the dairy products I consumed on a daily basis as well as the meat I ate and fed our children had naturally and artificially occurring growth hormones in it. (Most beef as you may know are administered growth hormones to make them grow faster and fatter.)

Anyway, I was shocked! Never had a weight issue and my lifestyle was pretty active chasing around kids, walking to/from schools, etc. I actually thought I was eating healthy.

Thankfully, I changed what's on my plate and have been healthy ever since and that was 11 years ago.

p.s. So true about HFCS. Have you read Dr. Hyman's post here on the Huff? It is unbelievable!
photo
PalaceOfWisdom
Want gun control? End the MIC
02:55 PM on 05/18/2011
"The grassroots campaign is just one part of the beef industry's effort to reverse a five-decade slide in meat consumption by Americans."

My money is on the increase in sedentary lifestyles.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SuperMom101
What's on your plate?
03:24 PM on 05/18/2011
How about both the sedentary lifestyle and our highly processed, growth hormone administered, franken food supply?

BTW... Like your name & tagline. "I vote the person not the party" - which doesn't always leave me many options.
01:31 PM on 05/18/2011
Makes me think of McDonald's old commercials claiming that hamburgers grow in the hamburger patch. But this just goes to show that more and more people are choosing vegan foods and the meat industry is panicking. I mean, heaven forbid people make humane, healthy, green choices.
mothergrace
If they knock you down, bite 'em on the ankle.
02:30 PM on 05/18/2011
A vegan diet is not that green.

Rice fields are one of the biggest contributors to green house gases.

http://www.ghgonline.org/methanerice.htm
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
deweydecimal
@DeweyMai on Twitter
12:26 AM on 05/19/2011
A lot of vegans simply just do not understand or willfully ignore just how intensive rice farming is. And the fact that sown in with those rice fields, traditionally stocks of shrimp, fish & other seafood is also raised in the same paddy.
01:22 AM on 05/19/2011
Okay, so vegans are responsible for rice production? Logic fail.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Finnegans Wake
riverrun, past Eve and Adam's, from swerve of shor
03:08 PM on 05/18/2011
You can make humane, healthy, green choices and still eat meat.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bea Elliott
11:44 PM on 05/18/2011
No... I don't believe that's true. "Humane" means to be concerned with the alleviation of suffering. These animals are delivered healthy. They are not injured or in aging pain. They are by all means "fit for life". So there is no "suffering" to end - only terror and death to cause. Humane does not describe what you want it to... You mean to say: You can make healthy, green choices and still remain indifferent to animals. That's more like it... But "humane meat" just isn't going to work. Sorry.
photo
75thRanger
Though I Be The Lone Survivor
01:22 PM on 05/18/2011
Awesome!

RLTW
01:03 PM on 05/18/2011
Remember when the tobacco industry had cute coeds handing out free smokes on Spring Break.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
elcerritan
My bio is not micro
02:43 AM on 05/19/2011
And how even now PETA pimps scantily clad (or nakes) "babes" in its ad and its "events"?

Anyway, I don't see anything in this article that suggests that this campaign, regardless of what you happen to think of it, is particularly focusing on recruiting "cute coeds."
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
elcerritan
My bio is not micro
02:44 AM on 05/19/2011
Ooops "naked" not "nakes"
11:48 AM on 05/19/2011
Calm down Grandpa, it was a joke.
photo
French Toast
MAPLE SYRUP
12:39 PM on 05/18/2011
Trying to fake a grassroots movement is full of failure.

"It's an external and an objective voice about the food system ... It's not set up as propaganda."

What is even remotely objective about an industry group cherry picking various incomplete statistics and calling them science to try to indoctrinate people into eating as much of their product as humanly possible?

It's propaganda. Poor and transparent propaganda. America needs to eat far less animal products than it currently does. The beef industry should be relegated to a niche product.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Finnegans Wake
riverrun, past Eve and Adam's, from swerve of shor
01:10 PM on 05/18/2011
I agree with all this, though, save the conclusion that America needs to eat (fewer) animal products: they just need a paradigm shift in how those animals are raised, and how sold. But the larger point is that fake grassroots is bogus. We have real grassroots (literally, GRASS-roots) people who are trying to make real change in the industry.
photo
French Toast
MAPLE SYRUP
01:22 PM on 05/18/2011
Yeah, paid commenter, we do need to eat less animal products. It's a fact that we're eating too much. Grass fed doesn't make a difference. Our portion sizes are inverted as to what they should be even for those who choose to eat meat.

You don't have a grass roots and the industry is dominated by large players. I don't care how much they're paying you. Go foist your "we need to treat animals better before stunning them and bleeding them" argument elsewhere. I'm not even a vegetarian and I see through that bogus argument.

Livestock is an inefficient, land intensive, incredibly flawed diet that the rate at which America eats it is well beyond what is healthy. But I get it. You're going to be pro-beef no matter what. The industry can change. Really. Hit the bricks while I still let you.
12:33 PM on 05/18/2011
Sign me up!