iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Mitt Romney: Obama 'Threw Israel Under The Bus'

Mitt Romney

PHILIP ELLIOTT   05/19/11 09:35 PM ET   AP

HANOVER, N.H. — Republicans looking to unseat President Barack Obama charged Thursday that he undermined the sensitive and delicate negotiations for Middle East peace with his outline for resumed talks between Israelis and Palestinians.

Former Utah Gov. Jon Huntsman said Obama, whom he served as U.S. ambassador to China until last month, undercut an opportunity for Israelis and Palestinians to build trust. Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney said Obama "threw Israel under the bus" and handed the Palestinians a victory even before negotiations between the parties could resume. Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich called it "the most dangerous speech ever made by an American president for the survival of Israel."

Foreign policy has hardly been the center of the debate among the still-forming GOP presidential field. Instead, the candidates and potential candidates have kept their focus – like the country's – on domestic issues that are weighing on voters and their pocketbooks. Obama's speech provided one of the first opportunities for Republicans to assert their foreign policy differences with Obama and his Democratic administration.

Obama endorsed Palestinians' demands for the borders of its future state based on 1967 borders – before the Six Day War in which Israel occupied East Jerusalem, the West Bank and Gaza. That was a significant shift in U.S. foreign policy.

Campaigning here in the state that hosts the first presidential nominating primary, Huntsman also said the United States should respect Israel and work to foster trust between Israelis and Palestinians.

"If we respect and recognize Israel as the ally that it is, we probably ought to listen to what they think is best," said Huntsman, who served in the administrations of Presidents Ronald Reagan, George H.W. Bush and George W. Bush before surprising his party and serving Obama, a Democrat.

He acknowledged he didn't watch Obama's speech and was reacting to news coverage – or, as he called it, "the aftermath."

"It is disrespectful of Israel for America to dictate negotiating terms to our ally," Romney said in an interview with The Associated Press. "It is not appropriate for the president to dictate the terms."

Instead, the United States should work with Israel to push for peace without acceding to the Palestinians, he said.

Gingrich said Israel simply cannot go back to the 1967 borders and expect to remain secure, given technological advancements that would allow its enemies to fire rockets deeper into the state.

"Get a map of the region and look at what Hamas does in firing missiles into Israel," Gingrich told The Associated Press. "The president should have said that Hamas has to abandon its determination to destroy Israel."

Obama urged Israel to accept that it can never have a truly peaceful nation based on "permanent occupation." That follows what other Republicans have painted as hostility from this administration toward a stalwart ally in the Middle East.

"The current administration needs to come to terms with its confused and dangerous foreign policy soon, as clarity and security are the necessary conditions of any serious and coherent American set of policies," Santorum said in a statement.

Obama's speech at the State Department addressed the uprisings sweeping the Arab world. Speaking to audiences abroad and at home, he sought to leave no doubt that the U.S. stands behind the protesters who have swelled from nation to nation across the Middle East and North Africa.

"We know that our own future is bound to this region by the forces of economics and security; history and faith," the president said.

But the remarks only muddied things, especially on the dicey issue of Jerusalem, said former Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty.

"The city of Jerusalem must never be re-divided," Pawlenty said. "At this time of upheaval in the Middle East, it's never been more important for America to stand strong for Israel and for a united Jerusalem."

Rep. Michele Bachmann of Minnesota, a tea party favorite who is leaning toward a run, called the border suggestions "a shocking display of betrayal" to Israel.

"Today President Barack Obama has again indicated that his policy towards Israel is to blame Israel first," she said in a statement.

On Twitter, former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin didn't directly address the speech but urged Obama to publicly welcome Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu instead of ushering him into private meetings away from reporters, as has occurred on Netanyahu's previous visits. The two leaders will talk Friday at the White House.

"Dear Mr. President, please allow our ally, PM Netanyahu, to respectfully arrive through the front door this time. Thanks, Concerned Americans," she tweeted.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
HANOVER, N.H. — Republicans looking to unseat President Barack Obama charged Thursday that he undermined the sensitive and delicate negotiations for Middle East peace with his outline for resume...
HANOVER, N.H. — Republicans looking to unseat President Barack Obama charged Thursday that he undermined the sensitive and delicate negotiations for Middle East peace with his outline for resume...
Filed by Adam Goldberg  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 309
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (11 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Forrester1
04:19 PM on 06/06/2011
And exactly when did the President throw Israel "under the bus"?
These "negotiations have been under the bus for more than 4 decades now.
Palestinians deserve a state, but to get one they have to renounce the extremists, act to control them, and accept the state of Israel. If they had done that, they would have a state today.
Assuming they can DO that, Israel will recant on the territory issue because world pressure to do so will be overwhelming, U.S. Security Council Veto or no U.S. Security Council veto.

I support most every effort on the part of people to gain self determination as we move into the 21st century, but they must include the rejection of terror and war. As people vote, they need to do so with a realistic eye on their goals.
photo
littlebrowngirl
Brevity is the soul of wit - Shakespeare
12:07 AM on 05/22/2011
Still a Mormon. We have not forgotten.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Nwo2012
Sue me, I boycott products from the settlements
03:05 PM on 05/21/2011
Israel has been occupying Palestine for so long the Israeli government have completely forgotten its not their land.

The Palestinians haven't, however.
01:16 PM on 05/21/2011
"Republicans looking to unseat President Barack Obama charged Thursday that he undermined the sensitive and delicate negotiations for Middle East peace............"

I just have to ask. What "sensitive and delicate negotiations"? If you quote out of context....to the extent you don't even quote the ENTIRE sentence, you might be able to develop some offfensive comment....might!
11:14 PM on 05/20/2011
No Mitt. Obama is trying to save Israel from Netanyahu's policies, which will destroy Israel as a Jewish state. Professor Sergio DellaPergola of Hebrew University has reported that Jews already represent a minority in Israel, the West Bank, and Gaza combined. Without a viable Palestinian state, there is no two-state solution. Without a two-state solution, Israel cannot remain both a Jewish and democratic state. It can either be a Jewish state ruling over a Palestinian majority through the use of force and oppression or a democratic state in which Jews are the minority.

It is ironic that the most fanatical Zionists are the ones who will bring about the destruction of Zionism.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Forrester1
04:30 PM on 06/06/2011
Seems like 40 to 50% of the world's violence problems are associated with religious conflict. Just like with our social problems here in the U.S..

Getting rid of that friction will allow us to focus on the more significant problem of our age- how to control the emerging global businesses and kep them from achieving state-free status and becoming unaccountable to ethics of any kind.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:05 PM on 05/20/2011
It is getting really full under that bus - his mom his grandparents rev wright the police that he "had no facts but I do know the police acted stupidly", ayers etc etc etc
07:56 PM on 05/21/2011
Stella: It's time to turn off the Republican Lie Machines and think for yourself.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:25 AM on 05/22/2011
These are the pundists I listened to last week - maddow o'donnel combs and hannity. I watched cnn msnbc cbs and some fox and I was on HP.

If they are lie machines they are certainly not repub lie machines.

The sign of a closed mind is only going to where you hear people that agree with you and are not expose yourself to the other sides. Do you have an open mind? - does not sound like it but thank you for repsonding.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:25 PM on 05/20/2011
Romney said, Obama threw Israel under the bus because Obama advocates the lines be drawn at the pre 1967 war lines.
People, in this day and age, where everything is captured on film, there are film fottage of Geo. Bush in Israel,back in 2007 telling the jews, to their faces, they must go back to the pre 1967 lines of demarcations. Obama is simply reiterating Bush's claims.
With Republicans, it's no longer a thing about the "message", for these deceptive liars it's all about the messenger. They CAN'T beat Obama on facts, so they must revert to marinating the American people with their lies, but no matter, they tried it in 2008 and it didn't work,and they will also fail in 2012 because, they have absolutely nothing to tell - in the form of SOLUTIONS for the nation and our people problems.
Before the mid-term election, coming out of these people's mouths were a noun, a verb and JOBS. They got the House because of their promissary notes of creating jobs, but,since taking control, when was the last time they spoke of jobs ?.
Rest assured, their smoke screens will be plenty- anything to get Americans off the issues cuz, they have NO SOLUTIONS.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:05 PM on 05/20/2011
Romney. Would it be possible to be a more vapid panderer?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Waiting for Something
My micro-bio goes to 11. It's one louder.
08:53 PM on 05/20/2011
Not likely, unless maybe the queen of vapid pandering, , , Ms. Fire in the Belly Palin.
photo
Aussieposter
And so it begins
04:35 PM on 05/20/2011
In 1917 The British captured Palestine from the Ottoman Empire. It had a total population of around 700,000 and less than 10% of that population were jewish. From that time until now the Palestinians have been denied the right to deside their own fate. Others have made those choices for them.

From that time No foreign goverment or international body has made a decision on behalf of the Palestinians that had at its core the best interest of the Palestinians. I also include in this the governments of Egypt and Jordan.

It is now over 40 years of Israeli occupation America offers protection for civilians in Lybia, I guess that offer is not valid in Gaza and the West Bank
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:56 PM on 06/11/2011
Aussie..Israel existance made the "Palestine Region" sing! They could have had a state in 48..but the blew it! The Arab nations attacked and guess what...they LOST! When we in the USA give back Texas to Mexico then Israel should get out of town too.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rajoro
03:38 PM on 05/20/2011
What a joke. We know who this guy wants to be in bed with. Sorry the evangelicals hate you. They dislike Mormons even more than Jews who they only expect 144,000 to survive Judgement Day. That is tomorrow right? LOL
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dan Same
12:21 PM on 05/20/2011
"Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich called it "the most dangerous speech ever made by an American president for the survival of Israel."

We should care what Gingrich thinks about Israel because?

Gingrich, Bachmann, Palin, Romney; who needs enemies with friends like these?

""If we respect and recognize Israel as the ally that it is, we probably ought to listen to what they think is best"

How about listening to both sides?
photo
marecek
What has always made the state a hell on earth has
11:43 AM on 05/20/2011
No, Mittens, Israel threw the US under the bus - a long time ago. I for one am very tired of having our policy hijacked by a few MPs from extremist parties in Israel. The US should pursue its own interest, which do not include backing Israel on anything and everything it wants to do.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Waiting for Something
My micro-bio goes to 11. It's one louder.
08:54 PM on 05/20/2011
I like when you call him Mittens.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
sonoffestus
Got smart & got out!
11:33 AM on 05/20/2011
Hey it's another pandering panderer.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
omobob
left coast, usa
11:28 AM on 05/20/2011
Mormon panders to the Jewish vote,check. Next go to Florida and say nasty things about Castro, Hispanic vote, check
10:46 AM on 05/20/2011
It is getting really crowded under Barry’s bus – preachers, grandma, about a zillion campaign promises, unsavory aging radical weathermen, allies of various degrees of unscrupulousness, and now Israel. It is dangerous being this guys friend.