More

Huntsman Was For Health Care Mandate Before He Was Against It

Huntsman

First Posted: 05/20/11 05:20 PM ET Updated: 07/20/11 06:12 AM ET

HANCOCK, N.H. –- To hear Jon Huntsman and his advisers tell it, he is a bedrock conservative on health care who took a free market approach as governor of Utah that stands in stark contrast to plans approved by President Barack Obama on the national level and by Mitt Romney when he was governor of Massachusetts.

John Weaver, the top political aide to Huntsman in his exploration of a possible presidential bid, told The Huffington Post Friday that the Utah plan is "a clear alternative to Romney and Obama."

It's true that -- unlike Obama's and Romney's plans -- the bill Huntsman signed into law in 2008 did not include a mandate requiring health insurance or many rules compelling citizens to participate in the government-facilitated health plan exchange.

But it would have looked far different if Huntsman had his way, according to interviews with leading players in Utah politics. They said the former governor actually favored a mandate, but ran into fierce opposition from the conservative state legislature.

Huntsman disputed that version of events when asked about it on Friday. "I didn't push mandates with the legislature. You want to get that right," he said while stumping in New Hampshire.

Dr. David Sundwall, who was executive director of Utah's Department of Health under Huntsman, tells a different story. One month before the 2004 election, Huntsman invited Sundwall to his home to ask him to join his administration if he won the gubernatorial race. Sundwall said in an interview this week that he asked Huntsman what he wanted to do.

"He said, 'I'd like everyone in Utah to have health insurance. It's something that all of us long for. This business of the uninsured costs us a lot of money,'" Sundwall recounted. "It made sense to me."

Sundwall accepted the job. As soon as Huntsman was sworn in, the administration convened a group on health care to hash out a reform plan. They met for regular dinners at the house of a supporter who lived near the governor's residence. The group concluded, Sundwall said, that you couldn't do reform without a mandate.

The governor, he added, signed on to the idea. "He was supportive," Sundwall said. "It was something he would have liked to have happened."

But, he said, "we ran into a brick wall." The obstacle he referred to was Utah's Republican speaker of the House, Greg Curtis.

"I met with him in his office and he laid down the parameters," Sundwall recalled. "We pitched the idea of the mandate. And that was not going to fly, according to the speaker."

"We would have liked everyone to have had insurance. … And a mandate would have worked."

Judi Hilman, executive director of the nonpartisan Utah Health Policy Project, also hasn't forgotten Huntsman's support for requiring individuals to buy health insurance. "He did want the mandate. He certainly had advisers around him that understood none of this works without a mandate," she said.

Hilman could even remember the exact day -- May 3, 2005 -- when Huntsman organized a conference on health-care reform. One of the keynote speaker’s was Robert Moffit, a Heritage Foundation wonk and one of the key architects of Romney’s health reform. Another of the three keynote speakers was Dr. Joseph Jarvis, a physician and community leader who has long advocated in Utah for a single-payer style system.

Jarvis said in an interview that he ran into one of Huntsman's cabinet members prior to the conference.

"He said 'I know who you are. Governor Huntsman really likes what you say about health care reform,'" Jarvis said.

Hilman said the governor and some legislators were particularly enthralled with Romney's overhaul of his state's system. "His interest piqued when the Massachusetts reforms came together," Hilman explains. Huntsman and legislators "saw it as this product that came out of the Heritage Foundation. They really loved this idea,” he added.

Moffit, in an interview Friday, said he was less clear about where Huntsman stood at the time. He met with Huntsman briefly at a conference in Salt Lake City in 2005 convened by the then-governor to discuss potential approaches.

"He was not demonstrative in terms of having any specific ideas about where he wanted to go on this. If the question is, 'did he indicate any kind of clear direction at the time?' No he didn't," Moffit said.

But Sundwall, Moffit said, "was his chief guy." And Sundwall was vigorously pushing a mandate.

Local press reports from the time also reflect a different picture than the one Huntsman relates now, as he tries to win over the decidedly right-leaning Republican primary electorate.

Far from quickly dropping the idea of a mandate, Huntsman was "suggesting Utah should mandate health coverage for residents," according to a July 12, 2007, Salt Lake City Weekly piece.

An August 11 Salt Lake Tribune story described the governor's ambitious reform this way: "John T. Nielsen, who is working with the Governor’s Office in spearheading legislation for the plan, would mandate that all Utahn have health insurance through a nonprofit exchange that would facilitate the purchase of insurance."

In his 2007 state of the state address, Huntsman pressed for at least a mandate on insuring children. "In addition to the children, there are hundreds of thousands of uninsured adults," he said.

Huntsman called on the business community "to actively engage with advocates for the working poor as well as with health care providers and insurers to craft a solution for this growing crisis."

Soon, the United Way of Salt Lake City formed a committee comprised of high-profile business and civic leaders -- bankers, CEOs of large companies, Chamber of Commerce executives, and municipal bosses -- to come up with a reform plan of their own.

Huntsman sent along his encouragement and even lent staff support to the committee, said Bill Crim, senior vice president of community impact and public policy with the United Way of Salt Lake City. Crim served as the lead staff person on the committee.

"Governor Huntsman's staff was very much involved," confirmed Bruce Reese, the committee's co-chair. "We had really good involvement and monitoring from the governor's office."

Huntsman was still formulating his own plans, which would include a government subsidy to help the poor pay for insurance, and a mandate.

By the end of the summer of 2007, the committee, Crim said, came up with a framework for reform that married up with Huntsman's ideas. The United Way plan would include a health-insurance exchange similar to Romney's Connector and a mandate.

Three Utah officials involved with the reform effort said Huntsman fully endorsed the United Way plan.

"He was so enthused because he thought he had so many community leaders behind it," said Jarvis, who served on the committee. "He and his staff immediately tried to find sponsors for the legislation."

Jarvis adds that Huntsman went to the legislature and gave a presentation on the United Way plan. The sales pitch flopped.

"The resistance from the legislature was incredible," Jarvis said. "And he dropped it like a hot potato. … I get what he's up against. I have a hard time being severe with him."

Huntsman settled on the Utah Health Exchange, a mandate-less reform aimed at helping small businesses insure their employees. The Exchange does not include an individual market.

Sundwall explained it this way: "It’s like Travelocity. You get on and determine what benefits your family would need. The employer would contribute." Utah citizens then go on the Exchange and purchase from an array of private insurance plans. It began in earnest in 2010.

Weaver, Huntsman's top political adviser, said Friday that "at the end of the day, you're judged by what you do. And at the end of the day, he chose a free market health care approach."

"Just because you listened to the debate as the chief executive of the debate -- you had presentations made about all the options -- what is fundamental is that his belief in the free market system drove him to the current plan,” Weaver said in a brief interview.

And Huntsman defended his consideration of a mandate. "As governor, you've got to explore every approach, every policy option there is. You'd be disingenuous as a leader if you didn't," he said. "So when you're doing something as important as health care reform -- and something as important as closing the gap on the uninsured -- you've got to live with the idea of what mandates will do, how people will respond, the benefits or burdens to small businesses."

"And after you argue it with all the experts, then you've got to come up with what you think is the best solution." Ultimately, Huntsman said, he believes that mandates are "an unnecessary burden on individuals and on businesses."

But Huntsman's openness to a mandate -- if not an inclination for one -- shows that, had he governed a more liberal state like Massachusetts, he would likely be in the same position as Romney is currently in.

When Romney signed his health care plan into law in 2006, he saw it as a political victory. Now -- in large part because of the way that conservative concerns about the size and role of government have evolved -- Romney's health plan is his single biggest challenge to winning the GOP nomination.

"It's turning out to be one of the most unpopular features of the law. People don't want to be pushed around," said Moffit, who helped Romney design the plan and lent the Heritage Foundation's conservative imprimatur to the plan.

The other Republican presidential hopefuls -- Indiana Governor Mitch Daniels and former House Speaker Newt Gingrich of Georgia -- are also now facing the health care mandate litmus test.

Thursday, Daniels beat back assertions that he had once favored requiring individuals to purchase health insurance. And Gingrich wrote in 2008 that "everyone should be required to have coverage" by the government.

The mandate might not be popular, but reform in Utah without it has done little for the uninsured -- in stark contrast to Massachusetts. So far 114 small business have joined the Exchange; 1,035 employees have enrolled. Only 25 percent of those employees did not have insurance before the Exchange started. Utah, according to newspaper accounts, has roughly 300,000 uninsured residents.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
HANCOCK, N.H. –- To hear Jon Huntsman and his advisers tell it, he is a bedrock conservative on health care who took a free market approach as governor of Utah that stands in stark contrast to plans...
HANCOCK, N.H. –- To hear Jon Huntsman and his advisers tell it, he is a bedrock conservative on health care who took a free market approach as governor of Utah that stands in stark contrast to plans...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 4,336
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (92 total)
  1 of 10  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
photo
azxff 07:47 PM on 05/20/2011
This is pure speculation but...I can see the possibility of the GOP running am extreme right candidate to appease their Tea Party base and then getting p*wned by a moderate like Huntsman running as an Independent. Sure he is making far right noises now to try for a party nomination but in truth this guy is what Tea Partiers call a RINO. He has actually been to the left of some of the Dems blue dogs in the  Read More...
12:27 AM on 05/30/2011
Here's one for the philosophy textbooks' chapters on logical fallacies.

Republicans hate paying for the medical care of "freeloaders" who don't have health insurance.

Republicans also hate the remedy of requiring everyone to have health insurance.

I'm confused. I don't think this makes any sense.
iflew
Dyno Remediator
02:25 PM on 05/27/2011
The new undesirable now includes those elderly who are not wealthy. Since they are not to use resources like health care, the right will have to create a plan to make the most profit at the least cost from the extermination of the aged. They will probably set up "chop shops" like the ones in countries where transplants now originate.

The "Chop Shop" plan will help maintain the entitlement of the wealthy to really low tax rates. They can probably get tax reductions for costs associated with setting up and running the human "Chop Shop".
04:42 AM on 05/25/2011
Huntsman is already turning right, repudiating previously held principled postions in order to garner the GOP nomination---of which he has no chance in winning.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Cleverboots
08:55 PM on 05/23/2011
Why do so many who aspire to be President suffer from Flip-Flop Disease?
photo
sus2222
My micro-biology is FULL
05:33 PM on 05/23/2011
Why can't republican'ts go back to NORMALCY like this...

"Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired, signifies in the final sense a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed."
Dwight D. Eisenhower Former ( Republican ) President
& U.S. Army General United States of America
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lena22
03:09 PM on 05/23/2011
He was for it, before he was against it!!! LOL!
photo
sus2222
My micro-biology is FULL
05:31 PM on 05/23/2011
And if you quote what Gingrich SAID, he will refute it !!!!!!!!!!!!!!

more LOL !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Hopefor08
11:19 PM on 05/22/2011
I wouldn't have to despise republicans like Huntsman if he would stand tall against the right's attacks against health care, against Medicare, against the environment, against taxing the wealthiest, against science and just against all that has made this country endure.
04:43 AM on 05/25/2011
But it's precisely those previous positions that make him an unlikely nominee---he's not whacky enough.
09:51 PM on 05/22/2011
Governor Jon Huntsman was not "for mandates", nor did I "vigorously push" for him support an individual mandate for health insurance, as my friend Bob Moffit of the Heritage Foundation seems to recall. As this article states, in the early months of Huntsman's first term as Governor of Utah we were looking for all options to expand health insurance coverage for the 10 - 11 % of Utah citizens who were ( and remain ) uninsured. As a thoughtful leader for our state, he charged me and others to explore how we might address this problem, and this included "mandates" on either employers to provide such for their employees, or on indviduals to obtain such for themselves and their families. However, he chose not to support this policy. For him to have carefully considered this option as well many other aspects of the complexities of "health reform" is indicative of his studied appropoach to policy. In my experience he is motivated by doing what is in the public's interest, not his own nor to what might be politically popular.

DAVID. N SUNDWALL, M. D., Professor of Public Health, University of Utah
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mustlovecats2
12:24 PM on 06/01/2011
spoken like a true republican...interesting that the article quotes you saying otherwise.
12:37 AM on 05/22/2011
Who gives a crap about Huntsman. Our president jammed it down our throats. He would love it to be named ObamaCare if we loved it. It has never polled approval. All those who got waivers just makes it more sad. I thought my president represented all of US and now he is picking and chosing who has to follow his flawed law. Unions who spent big money to promote it is now exempt. He lied to me. My premiums went up immediately. You can blame insurance co. but the impact on my family was lied to me by Obama. He is so lost
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Azsin
i need a wife
01:58 AM on 05/22/2011
Your premiums went up causd eof greed
not because if somehting that wont happen til 2014

and u idiot a bill that took 9 months to get through congress is not jaming it down our throats
and since the president is not in charge of congess
to say he did it
just proves you dont understand how CONSTITUTION WORKS
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tom Distad
not my father's GOP
08:39 PM on 05/22/2011
The GOP worked on a health care bill for decades, and if they hadn't been so childish, they could have made the bill even better. But their goal was to win the presidency, NOT to help the American people, as Obama did.
Thank your own party if you don't like the health care bill.
But over 50% of Americans like the bill, so fix it instead of gutting it.
Tha it the mature way to lead...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:38 PM on 05/21/2011
Anything to get a vote. This is an extremely bad strategy in this muddled Republican primary. None of these candidates will get behind what they said last week. How will anybody even know what their plans are for tomorrow? I'll stick with the boss we have right now, thank you.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
CountryBeforeParty
We are against misconduct, not against wealth
11:33 PM on 05/21/2011
It's really a shame. Huntsman is actually a good guy, one of the last of the moderate, reasonable Republicans out there. And yet he knew he had to sell out in order to get any kind of attention, give in to the right wing extremists that are the Tea Party.

He's going to soil his reputation as a result. I would have told him to sit out now, run for the office in 2016, maybe as a Democrat.
04:46 AM on 05/25/2011
The Republican party is no longer the party of Lincoln, Teddy Roosevelt or Eisenhower--in fact, none of these men would have a chance of succeeding in today's GOP.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TheRoosterman
Crazy Texan
10:32 PM on 05/29/2011
Dwight was the last good one. (if one could say good and republican in the same sentence today)
10:39 PM on 05/21/2011
Question! Why are people "for it before they are against it?" Why can't they ever be "against it before they are for it?"
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nkurland
I'm going to leave this planet alive
10:30 PM on 05/21/2011
Now that Huntsman's former positions in favor of the stimulus, health care reform and cap and trade are out, there's no hope in trying to run as a conservative. What would be nice is the selection of someone like say, Walter Jones, and running towards the center as an antiwar ticket. Appealing to antiwar sentiment could seriously damage the Tea Party.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nkurland
I'm going to leave this planet alive
10:27 PM on 05/21/2011
Now that Huntsman's past positions of the stimulus, health care reform and cap and trade are out, there's no way he'll get many Tea Partiers to vote for him. He'd be better running to the middle and picking someone like say, Walter Jones for an antiwar ticket as regards to Afghanistan. Appealing to antiwar sentiment could seriously damage the Tea Party.
09:41 PM on 05/21/2011
its not what I would have done http://71-37-61-112.tukw.qwest.net/727b.htm