More

Los Angeles' Deutsche Bank Lawsuit: One Fight In A Nationwide Crisis

Deutsche Bank

By CHRISTINA HOAG   05/22/11 11:31 AM ET   AP

LOS ANGELES -- A dead dog lies among the knee-high weeds, a sign to Guillermo Elenes that the burned out, boarded up house is being used as a dump. Inside, soiled diapers, fast-food trash and the strewn beer and vodka bottles indicate squatters have been living there.

The dumping ground-crash pad serves as a squalid symbol of how the foreclosure crisis is riddling communities with blight because no one wants to shoulder the responsibility of maintaining foreclosed homes.

"There's one on every block," said Elenes, a community organizer with the Alliance of Californians for Community Empowerment in Watts, a low-income South Los Angeles neighborhood pockmarked with foreclosed homes. "All we want is for the banks to step up and be good citizens."

Communities across the nation have made little progress in getting banks to maintain foreclosed properties, and as the ongoing crisis matures and bank-owned homes fall into advanced stages of disrepair, cities and residents are getting desperate. In a keenly watched move this month, Los Angeles forged a new strategy – it sued one of the world's major financial institutions, Deutsche Bank, to force it to take care of 166 properties, both vacant and renter-occupied, charging the blue-chip German giant has turned into the city's largest slumlord.

"The buck stops with the owner of record. We're saying, `You are an owner like any other owner,'" said Julia Figueira-McDonough, deputy city attorney.

Not according to Deutsche or other banks. They say they aren't really the owners, despite the fact that their name appears on the property title. They also say they are not responsible for maintenance.

Representatives of Deutsche, as well as U.S. Bank, BNY Mellon and HSBC – three other major lenders that Los Angeles is investigating with an eye to suing, all said that loan servicers are responsible for property upkeep, as well as tasks such as sending default notices, modifying loans, selling homes, and collecting rent and mortgage payments.

"We're there in name only," said Teri Charest, spokeswoman for U.S. Bank. "We're trustees. We have a very limited role."

The real owners, the banks say, are the holders of the mortgage-backed securities – financial instruments comprising a pool of mortgage loans that are held in a trust and sold. The banks maintain they are simply distributors of the proceeds from the securities – the payments of a homeowner's loan principal and interest – to the investors.

Although the bank contracts the loan servicer, the bank's role does not include pressing servicers to properly maintain the trust's assets on behalf of its beneficiaries, bank representatives said. U.S. Bank, however, has sent notices to loan servicers that they must maintain properties in accordance with applicable laws, a statement said.

Loan servicers, however, usually have a contract loophole that allows them an easy out from the maintenance burden.

Typically, they're only required to spend money on upkeep if they believe the outlay is recoverable, according to Laurence Platt, a Washington D.C. lawyer who has represented banks in foreclosure-related litigation.

"Who pays for a pig in a poke?" he said. "This is a collateral issue of the whole foreclosure crisis."

Calls to two of the country's largest loan servicers – Ocwen Financial Services of West Palm Beach, Fla., and Statebridge Co. of Denver, Colo. – were not returned. Houston-based Litton Loan Servicing declined to answer questions from The Associated Press. Many servicers are also owned by Wall Streeters such as Wells Fargo.

The issue of loan servicers is an attempt to dodge responsibility, Figueira-McDonough said, because the banks are the owners of record, plus have a fiduciary duty to their trust beneficiaries.

Officials in Los Angeles and other cities say they're infuriated with the back-and-forth finger-pointing while an epidemic of eyesores is devastating neighborhoods.

"We're left holding the bag. Someone has got to be held accountable," said Robert Triozzi, law director for the city of Cleveland, which unsuccessfully sued Deutsche Bank over different foreclosure-related issues three years ago. "Not only have these institutions caused this mess, they have continued to perpetuate it."

Silvia Lobato of South Los Angeles just wants repairs to the one-bedroom apartment she's been renting for the past 14 years – named as one of the neglected Deutsche Bank properties in the city's lawsuit.

The kitchen sink plumbing has a leak that has caused the unit to rot and breed worms. The bathroom ceiling is covered with mildew. A city inspector told her the gas connection to the water heater is dangerous. Mice scramble in the walls.

Everything was fine until the owner lost the duplex two years ago, said Lobato, who lives in the apartment with her three kids and another mother and her three children. Since then, she's been unable to get the landlord to make repairs.

"I call and call. They say they don't have the money. I pay $680 a month in rent," she said. "I worry about the kids in these conditions."

Governments have tried various tactics.

Los Angeles, like many cities, last year enacted an ordinance mandating that banks register defaulting properties and pay a $155 fee so the city can track the property and collect funds for expenses.

But despite the penalty of $100,000 fines for non-registration, the ordinance hasn't worked because it relies on banks to self-report the properties. "There's been minimal compliance," said Figueira-McDonough.

Other cities, including Fort Lauderdale, Fla., have tried to crack down by declaring unkempt homes "public nuisances," and charging owners, including banks, with the cost of boarding up windows and mowing lawns. In cases where no owner can be found or bills are unpaid, a lien is placed on the property.

Residents, incensed about homes on their blocks turning into drug dens, gang hangouts and vermin nests, are galvanizing.

Watts resident Lynn Mottley drives around her neighborhood looking for telltale signs of foreclosure, such as chain link fences with no trespassing signs, jotting down the addresses in a notebook she keeps in her car.

Mottley, an activist with the Alliance of Californians for Community Empowerment and the Home Defenders League, reports the addresses to the city and to lahoodwinked.com, an activist website that encourages residents to list foreclosed properties so the city can pursue owners for upkeep.

Her notebook keeps filling up. "Wow, there's another one," she said, driving by a ramshackle bungalow with broken windows and an overgrown, junk filled yard. "Who wants to live next to this? Something has to be done."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST LOS ANGELES

Filed by Anna Almendrala  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 26
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dieter Zerressen
Don't attack the messenger - give me a fact.
12:35 PM on 05/25/2011
When a bank says "it's not our house", the city should claim eminent domain, re-title it, tear it down and sell the vacant land. If there's blocks and blocks of that kind of property turn it back to a park. Do that a couple of times and the banks will come around.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
whyus
San Francisco native
01:51 AM on 05/24/2011
Once a bankster, always a bankster. Their only responsibility is raking in the money.
09:34 PM on 05/23/2011
we're so dumb - we let them come to this country and do what they could never get away with doing at home
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Scott Zwartz
08:59 PM on 05/23/2011
People should move into the vacant homes. Clean them up and start living there. If the bank comes along, they can offer to return the house to the condition in which they found it or live there until the bank actually sells it.

I favor a law that requires a bank to fix up any foreclosed home to livable standards and to sell it within 6 months of the foreclosure or allow a homeless family to live there rent-free for one year.

I also favor a similar law that requires any CRA Project which has not rented all the apartments or sold all the condos within 6 months of the Project's completion be compelled to let a homeless family live in the vacant properties rent-free. The CRA has an affirmative mandate to house the homeless, and if the CRA can steal tax dollars to construct $1 M condos, it can then give that apartment or condo to the homeless when it turns out that CRA vastly over-built for the very rich. Rumor has it only 10 out of the 147 W Hotel condos sold.

It makes no sense to have both tens of thousands of homeless and thousands of vacant homes, apartments and condos.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jessica Suarez
Run for the hills
06:25 PM on 05/23/2011
This is too insulting and ridiculous even for banks. They foreclose on the owners, and then pretend they have no responsibility for these properties. They could have worked something out with the homeowners, instead of kicking them out of their homes. I think the cities should take over these properties, rent them, make money off of them so they can be maintained; people can live in nice homes, neighborhoods will improve, and then more people would be willing to invest in those properties and communities. We have to fught back and take back what was stolen by the banks.
02:20 PM on 05/23/2011
Across the nation? Every foreclosure in this town, no matter what bank owns it, is promptly mowed and inspected once a week by various mowing crews. Maybe LA should enact harsher penalties for homeowners that don't maintain their property. Here, if you let your grass get out of hand, or pile garbage in your yard, the city will send in a crew to clean the mess up and then bill you hundreds of dollars for doing so. Seems to keep everything in order pretty well. I know there's a foreclosed house across the street that has one of the best looking yards on the block.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kinogod
word farmer
12:03 PM on 05/23/2011
More BS from the banksters. The game is so rigged. We citizens are required to live by laws, but these banks both foreign and domestic just hire lobbyists and politicians to make sure they don't have to live with the laws on record. BS.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jessica Suarez
Run for the hills
06:27 PM on 05/23/2011
The city should take over these propertiers, rent them out and see what the banks do. Tit for tat I say.
photo
Halsey
"There is a price to pay for speaking the truth. T
11:12 PM on 05/22/2011
So someone is behind on mortgage but still making some payments and keeping up the property they live on. Idiot banks foreclose thus,yes, creating a slum. All the BIG (14) banks are guilty to some degree as is every president since Reagan (both parties!) that allowed this MBS mess in the first place. And yes, the big 14 making record profits, again. This is not capitalism as defined by Adam Smith, this is pure corporate fascism.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AngelaQuattrano
I just like to write comments
10:02 PM on 05/22/2011
Two words: eminent domain.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
propitiousmoment
the journey is the destination....
09:19 PM on 05/22/2011
This is absolutely criminal. If there is no owner of the note, then the borrower does not owe anyone that money and should never have been kicked out of their home in the first place. And then to push off all responsibility for maintaining the value of the asset. This is what globalization gets you, folks - big corporations with absolutely no stake in the communities they ravage for their almighty profits. I have to bring this comment to a close, I can feel my blood pressure going up as I type, just thinking about this stuff makes my blood boil. I hope the city uses their eminent domain powers to fix this situation.
photo
Gwbsucks1
use yur head 4 sumthin other than a hatrack
07:45 PM on 05/22/2011
welp , this would be a fine example of how localities could begin to use eminent domain - take the cost of what it takes to update the property and sell the house themselves - and with the cost of repairs necessary should certainly exceed the value of the property - so the locality could easily sue the title holder for the necessary repairs or just take ownership of the title - your choice - then sell the home off to someone who's been kicked around their entire life and give them that dream - but make sure they can afford the home first and don't attempt to make huge profits off these homes , it just might work and would be nothing more than a win-win situation .it might help with localities loss of revenue as well its nothin but profit - maybe sell the homes to people lookin for fixer uppers - think about it - what does the government do when a person doesn't comply - whats the difference if its a corporation or buisness - ?
photo
LuLou Murder
Don't robocall me if you want my vote
07:42 PM on 05/22/2011
The only option the banks will have is to abandon the properties. Ideally the city can figure out a way to get people back into these houses at reasonable prices.
06:42 PM on 05/22/2011
The simple fact is if a Bank forecloses on a property and they take it back then the Bank now owns it. And once they own it, they are subject to the same city maintenance laws as all other property owners.

I wish all cities would go after the Banks and do this, I'm sure it would encourage bank to become more willing to work with the existing homeowners rather than going straight to for closure.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Carmen Madonna Campos
dude! it's me!!!
05:19 PM on 05/22/2011
Bankers! Forever finding new and innovatives way to scru you, even if you don't own them a cent!
10:10 PM on 05/22/2011
Well you know who lets them have these little loop holes they use? THE GOVERNMENT thats why all the banks and big corperations give so much money to washington. Makes it all nice and legal. Just ask the supreme court.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Hardyman1966
The antonym of liberal is INTOLERANT.
03:50 PM on 05/22/2011
It's amazing the lack of conscience these people display while making record profits once again.  The moment you ask them for even five cents, their sphincters tighten-up crazier than a snare drum.

Clearly, no one has learned a damn thing.