iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Mitch Daniels Not Running For President In 2012

Mitch Daniels

First Posted: 05/22/11 03:09 AM ET Updated: 07/21/11 06:12 AM ET

By Philip Elliott

WASHINGTON (AP) — Gov. Mitch Daniels, R-Ind., said Sunday he won't run for president because of family concerns, narrowing the field but making a wide-open race even hazier.

"In the end, I was able to resolve every competing consideration but one," said the former Bush White House budget chief, disclosing his decision in a middle-of-the-night e-mail to supporters. "The interests and wishes of my family, is the most important consideration of all. If I have disappointed you, I will always be sorry."

A two-term Midwestern governor, Daniels had considered a bid for months and was pressured by many in the Republican establishment who longed for a conservative with a strong fiscal record to run.

He expressed interest in getting in the race partly because it would give him a national platform to ensure the country's fiscal health would remain part of the 2012 debate.

But Daniels always said his family – his wife and four daughters – was a sticking point.

WATCH:


Had he entered, Daniels would have shaken up an evolving field that lacks a front-runner against President Barack Obama and that has been unpredictable in its early stages.

Daniels had donors and grass-roots supporters at the ready for a national fundraising and political organization that some aides privately said would rival those of announced candidates.

Instead, Daniels becomes the latest Republican to opt against a bid as the GOP searches for a Republican to challenge Obama in 2012.

Daniels' close friend, Mississippi Gov. Haley Barbour, surprised much of the GOP when he pulled the plug on a candidacy in April, and. Barbour privately encouraged Daniels to run. A week ago, former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee, the 2008 Iowa caucus winner, bowed out, followed quickly by celebrity real estate developer Donald Trump.

"He's a terrific talent," former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, a Republican presidential candidate, said of Daniels on CBS' "Face the Nation" on Sunday. "He would have been a very formidable competitor. I really thought he would be in the front-runners from Day One if he'd decided to run."

Rep. Paul Ryan, R-Wis., the chairman of the House Budget Committee and, like Daniels, a proponent of bringing fiscal issues to the forefront of political debate, said the governor's decision was disappointing.

"I think his candidacy would have been a great addition to this race," Ryan said on NBC's "Meet the Press." The Wisconsin congressman waved off any suggestion he was considering entering the presidential race himself.

Polls show that Republican primary voters want more options in a race that includes former Govs. Mitt Romney of Massachusetts and Tim Pawlenty of Minnesota, as well as ex-House Speaker Newt Gingrich and others.

In the wake of the decisions by Barbour and Huckabee to skip the race, the clamoring among establishment Republicans for Daniels to run – including from the Bush family circle – had become ear-shattering.

"The counsel and encouragement I received from important citizens like you caused me to think very deeply about becoming a national candidate," Daniels said in the e-mail message.

"If you feel that this was a non-courageous or unpatriotic decision, I understand and will not attempt to persuade you otherwise," he added. "I only hope that you will accept my sincerity in the judgment I reached."

Daniel had sounded more optimistic about a run in the past week than he had in months, though he never had sounded particularly enthused. His advisers had reached out to Republicans in Iowa and other early nominating states for private conversations.

But as he talked about a candidacy, he always pointed back to his family as the primary issue that would hold him back.

His wife, Cheri, filed for divorce in 1993 and moved to California to remarry, leaving him to raise their four daughters in Indiana. She later divorced, and she and Daniels reconciled and remarried in 1997.

Mrs. Daniels had never taken much of a public role in her husband's political career.

So it raised eyebrows when she was chosen as the keynote speaker at a major Indiana fundraiser earlier in May.

Both husband and wife were said to be pleased with the reception they got, and advisers suggested that the outcome could encourage Daniels to run for president. Even so, Republicans in Washington and Indiana with ties to Daniels put the odds at 50-50.

A former budget director under President George W. Bush, Daniels used his time considering a run to also shine a spotlight on rising budget deficits and national debt, even though his former boss grew the scope of government and federal spending during his tenure.

Daniels, a one-time senior executive at Eli Lilly & Co., caused a stir among cultural conservatives by saying the next president facing economic crisis "would have to call a truce on the so-called social issues."

He is looked with admiration in GOP circles for being the rare Republican who won office in a Democratic year – 2008 – in a state that Obama had won. And, since being re-elected, he has leveraged Republican majorities in the state Legislature to push through a conservative agenda.

Daniels made his intentions clear in a characteristically understated e-mail.

It was sent by the governor through Eric Holcomb, the Indiana Republican Party chairman and one of Daniels' closest advisers, and confirmed by others close to the governor on the condition of anonymity to avoid pre-empting his announcement.

It ended: "Many thanks for your help and input during this period of reflection. Please stay in touch if you see ways in which an obscure Midwestern governor might make a constructive contribution to the rebuilding of our economy and our Republic."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
By Philip Elliott WASHINGTON (AP) — Gov. Mitch Daniels, R-Ind., said Sunday he won't run for president because of family concerns, narrowing the field but making a wide-open race even hazier. ...
By Philip Elliott WASHINGTON (AP) — Gov. Mitch Daniels, R-Ind., said Sunday he won't run for president because of family concerns, narrowing the field but making a wide-open race even hazier. ...
Filed by Whitney Snyder  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 3,775
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (67 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nenitaB
Not the talk. What good result would it hav
04:51 AM on 05/24/2011
Unless you have that earnest desire, and courage to face challenges at this crucial and consequential juncture this country is in , it's with your own accord and decision to or not to join the presidential race. It's a wise move to consider which is weighty between two choices.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
eaarth2
“An era ends when its illusions are exhausted
07:58 AM on 05/23/2011
Daniels nows the GOP T Party has no solutions for the nations problems. Just Deny they even exist! Daniels knows more severe reforms will be needed ahead- and the GOP's denial of global warming is perhaps the biggest mistake they are making.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
peter777
09:07 PM on 05/22/2011
If I were a mediocre candidate for the presidency, which would be a compliment to most in the Republican field and those being mentioned, I would not consider running, unless I were a masochist. Obama is going to beat almost any GOP candidate like a drum.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JustABriefThought
DEMS want Prosperity4ALLofUS - Not just 1%
09:05 PM on 05/22/2011
Gosh, I was really hoping we could get the BUDGET guy from George Bush!!! I wanted to hear him explain the DEEP DEEP hole it took 8 years to dig and the justification for running the car - not into the ditch - OFF THE CLIFF! I really wanted to see the debates. Thank heavens (for him) he has a semi-crabby wife.
08:56 PM on 05/22/2011
The Daniels family no doubt noted the way the Regressives have bashed the First Lady and probably realized there would be pay back for that. If he cares for his wife and children, why would he want to expose them to that for a long shot at beating President Obama? While he may be a favorite of the Regressives, there's a lot in his history that would not be acceptable to the moderates. Also, he does not appear to have much of a personality, doesn't speak particularly well and, while not ugly, he is not very attractive. Not one of the potential candidates the Regressives have mentioned has made me consider for one second not voting for President Obama.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nenitaB
Not the talk. What good result would it hav
04:20 AM on 05/24/2011
As the Regressives have hinted out, Daniels hope maybe placed halfway to the finish line because of his link to the past leader . The impact still strong and visible, thus his backing out is not a surprise .
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MadamDeal
08:00 PM on 05/22/2011
Looks like it is Mittens' turn
with TPer TPaw for Veep as a sop to the fundies.

Interestingly, Steve Schmidt (quite vocal about Palin post-08) is working for Mittens and a former COS for Bachmann is working for TPaw. Would present an interesting dynamic amongst them.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Wong23
Card-carrying Progressive
07:29 PM on 05/22/2011
Will the last adult Republican please turn out the lights when you leave the room?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
David Jeffers
The Divided States of America...
09:42 PM on 05/22/2011
Newsflash: Republican party nominates Rocky and Bullwinkle...No one else willing to take the beating .
gconners
A Hard Rain's A-Gonna Fall
07:22 PM on 05/22/2011
"He (Mitch Daniels) expressed interest...partly because it would give him a national platform to ensure the country's fiscal health..."
Really?
REALLY, Mr. Daniels???
Weren't YOU George Bush's budget director from Jan. 2001 through June 2003?
And YOU and Bush "ensured the country's fiscal health" in what way? Because I don't remember seeing any "fiscal health" resulting from that time period. Do you really think anyone else does?
Do you think even YOU could possibly point to that period as a "positive"? I don't think so!
07:39 PM on 05/22/2011
indiana is in the black.It is not by accident but by design.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
peter777
09:04 PM on 05/22/2011
Apples and Oranges- Mitch Daniels set the course for large deficits in the Bush 2 Administration. How? Big tax cuts, which are still causing a huge deficit, a tanking economy with spending cuts, and two wars that he did not budget for.

Indiana in the black should be automatic- like most states. Most have constitutional requirements to be in the black, for your info.
gconners
A Hard Rain's A-Gonna Fall
08:00 PM on 05/22/2011
From CNNMoney, Feb. 2011:
"Indiana's CURRENT budget is being squeezed by the disappearance of federal stimulus money, which had HELPED the state avoid being forced to make even deeper cuts over the last two years."
"Indiana largely AVOIDED the housing boom and bust, but it was hit harder than most states by the economic downturn. With its dependence on manufacturing jobs, its unemployment rate has been ABOVE the national rate in most months since the financial meltdown.
"...a rebound in revenue from an improving economy, especially a pickup in the AUTO INDUSTRY that still has a major presence in Indiana, is helping."
And, finally, "Daniels admits that the lessons of Indiana aren't as easy to apply to the federal budget deficit..I think there's limited application. The huge changes we need for the nation to get out of its fiscal ditch are not going to be achieved in this way."
(CAPS added.)
07:08 PM on 05/22/2011
I do believe that any republican who runs is going to win now.
09:18 PM on 05/22/2011
huh?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
David Jeffers
The Divided States of America...
09:47 PM on 05/22/2011
Win like Charlie Sheen?
Clevelandinwi
Progressive is good; regressive, not so much.
05:51 PM on 05/22/2011
The palinista is ready to ...... wait, she's not ...... oh, false alarm.
Clevelandinwi
Progressive is good; regressive, not so much.
05:49 PM on 05/22/2011
I don't get the interest in him in the first place. He's gw's former budget director which makes him a 'big spender' and his marriage is, to say the least, a little different. These two things alone should make him poison to Regressives but, of course, the hypocrisy runs very deep among right-wingers.
07:46 PM on 05/22/2011
cleveland? Ohio your in the red and dems have run your state for years. Are going to talk facts or just make it up as you go. In fact check all the states that have been run by the libs. Compare the budgets.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
David Jeffers
The Divided States of America...
09:50 PM on 05/22/2011
Repubs are wearing out that little black phone book looking for someone to bite.....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
idisVA
05:01 PM on 05/22/2011
BREAKING- Huntsman in his Meet and Greet in Franklin, NH just said his view is that the revenue side of the ledger is going to be what he will be preoccupied with as opposed to the expenditure side. Now, that is a departure from the battle cry of the Republicans : "We do not have a renevue problem, what we have is a spending preblem.". It would be interesting to see the reaction (if any) from the media and the GOP.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Daniel Kemetick
It's PRESIDENT Obama not just Obama
05:08 PM on 05/22/2011
Watch out Foxers will be on this so quick.
Clevelandinwi
Progressive is good; regressive, not so much.
05:50 PM on 05/22/2011
That how you 'reach out' in New Hampshire - he'll sing a different tune in Iowa and South Carolina.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Fernando
My Micro-bio is empty? Really?
06:28 PM on 05/22/2011
Thank god for youtube.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
idisVA
04:53 PM on 05/22/2011
I am glad Daniels share my concern the moment he came on the scene: the more I get to know him, the less he looked impressive. He gave the impression he's not in charge, but rather it's the wife that runs the show.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
IssuesInFocus
04:33 PM on 05/22/2011
Clearly the GOP is running on empty. Drip, drip... I can see a very dry well ahead. Daniels made his exit because politically like Newt, there was /is much dirt around to create more than a mud pie. The same is true when I think Palin.

So much mud. It would be a field day for Democrats. With Huckabee, Haley Barbour, Newt (unofficially) out, who' s left? Let me think---Perry of Texas, Paul Ryan (Wisconsin), Huntsman, Hermain Cain and Chris Christie of New Jersey. Christie would lose his state, (already there are advertisements against him). Perry what does he bring to the table, really? Nothing meaningful when I think issues which impacts beyond tea party members.
Oh, I forget there's Mitt Romney former governor of Massachusetts and Tim Pawlenty-- Minnesota. Possibly either could be benficiaries given Republicans cannot find a standard bearer who can pass the values test.
For some reason, I see a primary season for 2012 without any razzle-dazzle. But should any of these become the 'one' against Obama, despite some of my disagreements with the present administration, I would be ready to kick my shoe off and get to work. The 'least' objectionable given what I see still remains in the blue column. Neither attracted by the ultra left/right --I'm ready for a dynamic, meaningful political contest.
Please, let the games begin!
photo
Hooponopono
From Maine to Hawaii
04:24 PM on 05/22/2011
This is a damn shame. Why, with the incredible job this man did during the Bush 2 Administration like, running gigantic deficits, keeping the costs of 2 wars off budget, and helping create the worst economic meltdown in our adult lifetimes.....how could he possibly lose??