iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

State Education Laws Focus On Expanding Charters, Bolstering Vouchers

Education Reform

First Posted: 05/23/11 02:33 PM ET Updated: 07/23/11 06:12 AM ET

NEW YORK -- Since the Republican takeover of state legislatures around the country, states have been passing loudly-trumpeted laws that revamp teacher evaluations and tenure, tying performance reviews to standardized test scores.

What has been equally pervasive but received less buzz and more muted pushback, according to Education Week, is a spate of other K-12 reform laws that have enacted voucher programs, allowed for the expansion of charter schools and altered academic standards.

For example, Indiana approved a law that allows middle- and lower-income families to use tax funds for private school tuition. Arizona, Florida and Oklahoma also passed laws that created or expanded voucher programs, according to EdWeek. Laws in Wisconsin, Idaho, Indiana and Ohio now restrict teachers' collective bargaining rights, while academic standards are changing in Utah, New Mexico and Oklahoma. And charter school laws are expanding in Florida, Indiana and Idaho.

Yet many of the statehouse changes will not be felt in the classroom until they hold their ground in court.

As EdWeek notes, few governors and state legislators ran in November with articulated education plans in their platforms. But upon taking office, many unveiled comprehensive school-altering plans.

Why now?

EdWeek writes:

Lawmakers went to work during bleak financial conditions, with the vast majority of states facing budget shortfalls in the coming fiscal year. Some states responded by cutting money for K-12 education--which makes up a huge chunk of state budgets--while others protected school funding.

"A lot of this is driven by economics, and wanting to try to reduce costs," Charles Russo, Panzer Chair in Education and adjunct professor of law at the University of Dayton, told The Huffington Post. "But I can't help to think that they're not going to reduce quality as well."

Joe Nathan, a former public school teacher and administrator who now directs Macalaster College's Center for School Change, attributed the barrage of school-related legislation to the prominence of new Republicans in office.

"A number of new [Republican] governors have come into office with ideas about what to do in public schools," Nathan said.

But a recent law passed in Illinois ‪would make teacher tenure contingent on student achievement, give Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel the power to extend his city's school day and make it easier to dismiss teachers deemed ineffective based on student achievement.‬ That law passed in state with a Democrat-controlled legislature and Democratic governor.

Jonah Edelman, the chief executive officer of Stand for Children, an advocacy organization that helped push the Illinois legislation through congress, told EdWeek the Illinois legislation could influence further reforms for precisely that reason. "There are some states where these reforms weren't a particularly heavy lift," he said. In blue states like Illinois, these bills are "encouraging, because of their transferability to other states," he said.

And while money -- or lack thereof -- may have something to do with it, other motives are at play, Nathan explained. "There's also a recognized need to elevate the performance of youngsters," he said.

Legislators want to see student improvement, Nathan said, so some resort to vouchers. "A number of people are frustrated at the pace of change for improving education for low income families," he said. "There's more support from Republicans of public funds going to private schools."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST EDUCATION

NEW YORK -- Since the Republican takeover of state legislatures around the country, states have been passing loudly-trumpeted laws that revamp teacher evaluations and tenure, tying performance reviews...
NEW YORK -- Since the Republican takeover of state legislatures around the country, states have been passing loudly-trumpeted laws that revamp teacher evaluations and tenure, tying performance reviews...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 253
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
07:13 PM on 06/10/2011
I switched my kids to a private school after my son experienced a lost year at the hands of an incompetent 5th grade teacher. The school administrators knew the teacher was a failed educator, the other teachers knew it, even most of the other parents knew it. We didn't and our son suffered as a result. The school had no tools in place to get rid of the guy, as much as they wanted to. Finally, after years bad teaching he was caught in inappropriate behavior with a student in his class. We genuinely felt bad for the school system. Until the unions realize how unsupportable their position on incompetent teachers is they will have zero credibility with parents and voters.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Retrofuturistic
see things as they really are
01:58 PM on 05/27/2011
"A lot of this is driven by economics, and wanting to try to reduce costs," Charles Russo, Panzer Chair in Education and adjunct professor of law at the University of Dayton..."

Apparently Adjunct Professor Charles Russo has never heard of the Shock Doctrine. This is pure Friedman economics, using a crisis to change things in a way that results in profit or the removal of rights.

For-profit charter schools and/or for-profit religious schools are little more than carpetbaggers who want to profit from the current economic crisis. Their goals are money and segregation, not the education of children.
01:52 PM on 05/24/2011
What I don't understand is why MY tax dollars should go to fund PRIVATE schools, where they do not have open enrollment (meaning they pick and choose who gets into their school), do not usually accept and don't have to accept students with physical/learning disabilities, do have to make their children take the state standardized tests, but do not have to release the results (at least in WI), and where (some of them) practice some sort of organized religion? I believe that if you want to send your kid to a private school, you should use your own money, not get a tax break or a voucher (no matter how rich or poor you are). If you do not like your neighborhood public school, then work together with the community to try and change it. If I wanted my hard-earned money to go to a private school, I would donate to them directly.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jerry Bourbon
03:31 PM on 05/24/2011
Your tax dollars go to fund private and religious universities and colleges through financial aid right now. Is that a problem?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bella Lee
12:13 PM on 05/24/2011
Taking away money from public schools and then crying that they are failing? Set something up to fail then act get angry that it does fail?

Private schools only take successful students, can't compare them to public schools since their success is already guaranteed.

Charter schools aren't doing much better than public schools.

Doesn't make any sense to continue to force public schools into failure by taking away their funds.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MilesToGo
12:31 PM on 05/24/2011
Good post...Assessment studies are showing that vouchers for private schools (mostly religious schools) don't improve student's academic learning. Facts about this can be had from reading today's Center for American Progress' "Progress Report."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jerry Bourbon
03:33 PM on 05/24/2011
As per the post below, the United States is number three in the whole world in per student spending. No one is "taking money away" from education.

This whole "private schools only take successful students" line is bogus. If students in a public school have the capacity to be successful, but can't, either due to incompetent teachers or a chaotic environment, who are you to tell them no to go be successful at a private voucher school?
11:47 PM on 05/24/2011
Evidence shows they're more likely to be successful at a public school, actually.
11:10 AM on 05/24/2011
Yes, let's fund more charter schools and less in public schools so that we can continue to give the illusion to parents that we're trying to help their children. In reality, we're trying to keep them from complaining too loudly. Charter schools as a whole do not have a great deal of evidence that show they are better for students then public schools, testing results are not showing an improvement in most schools. The dozen charter schools in this country that are fantastic are great but what does that mean for public schools? Are they going to replace them? Or will public schools change how they work to fit successful practices? Oh wait, that is hard when they have to do layoff's and shut down programs because they have no money, I forgot. Here's another bandaid and a shot of whiskey, good luck with that. But what do our legislature folks care, their kids are all in private schools so it's no skin off their back.
09:05 AM on 05/28/2011
It's a touchy question.The legislators' kids ,like the teachers' kids seem to be in private schools.I,for one,think many of the calls for vouchers/charters could be muted if someone could just convince parents to not want the best for their kids.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
williamg
Obamacare = law of the land...forever
07:09 PM on 05/23/2011
Sadly, too many people refuse any changes, but instead argue for the status quo by default. Ask anyone who is against charter schools and vouchers what should be done, and they offer up little more than "we need to fund the public schools."

We do fund our public schools, and this is what we get for it:

Education Expenditures Per Student by Country


1 Switzerland: .................$11,129
2 Norway: ........................$10,448
3 UNITED STATES: .......$10,267
4 Austria: ............................$9,910
5 Denmark: ........................$9,270
6 Iceland: ...........................$8,877
7 UK: ...................................$8,306
8 Italy: ..................................$8,204
9 Sweden: ..........................$8,123
10 Netherlands: ................$8,109
11 Belgium: ........................$7,980
12 Canada: .........................$7,774
13 France: ...........................$7,712
14 Japan: ............................$7,661
15 Australia: ........................$7,459
16 Ireland: ...........................$7,318
17 Spain: .............................$7,016
18 Germany: .......................$6,985
19 Finland: ..........................$6,891
20 South Korea: .................$6,089
21 Portugal: ........................$5,967
22 New Zealand: ...............$5,589
23 Czech Republic: ...........$4,532
24 Hungary: .........................$4,188
25 Poland: ...........................$3,568
26 Slovak Republic: ...........$3,032
27 Mexico: ............................$2,072
28 Turkey: ............................$1,286

http://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/2010/section4/table-ifn-1.asp


Student Performanc­e in the Reading

1 Korea
2 Finland
3 Canada
4 New Zealand
5 Ireland
6 Australia
7 Poland
8 Sweden
9 Netherland­s
10 Belgium
11 Switzerlan­d
12 Japan
13 United Kingdom
14 Germany
15 Denmark
16 OECD average
17 Austria
18 France
19 Iceland
20 Norway
21 Czech Republic
22 Hungary
23 Luxembourg
24 Portugal
25 Italy
26 Slovak Republic
27 Spain
28 Greece
29 Turkey
30 Russian Federation
31 Mexico
32 Brazil
33 United States
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
williamg
Obamacare = law of the land...forever
07:10 PM on 05/23/2011
http://www.geographic.org/country_ranks/educational_score_performance_country_ranks_2009_oecd.html


The United States ranks number 27 in math, and 22 in science.

Clearly, funding is not the issue. Its the education outcomes that are the problem.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lisa Shields
Poet & Advocate For Special Needs Children
07:11 PM on 05/23/2011
http://www.farbrook.org/RelId/606878/ISvars/default/Tuition_and_Fees.htm

I figured the SCHOOL websites would probably know what they charge better than the DOE "averages". Back to you...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
williamg
Obamacare = law of the land...forever
07:14 PM on 05/23/2011
Lol @ you quoting a SINGLE schools tuition -- as if it is indicative of national average.

Speaking of need for proper education and education reform.....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
williamg
Obamacare = law of the land...forever
07:15 PM on 05/23/2011
Uh, you are quoting a single school.

Hahahaha
photo
SeptimusDSX
Always question the obvious.
06:26 PM on 05/23/2011
Rob Peter to pay Paul...what a joke! Stop designating schools based on property tax revenue. The property tax based school funding model is the bane of education.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
iblogleft
Certifiable
05:53 PM on 05/23/2011
The first step to any education reform is to make the money go where the children are.

Nobody will touch it, because they know they will inevitably be shown to be elitists that believe only the children who's parents make enough money should be educated, and those who cannot afford it should have second rate educations, or no education at all.

So instead of having the funding conversation, they will allow private profit gangsters to steal from the poor and the ignorant, while claiming the success of another private profit scheme where a few excel (because they could afford it) and the majority fail miserably.

Enron about bankrupted California. The banks about destroyed the word economy with the help of Realtors, appraisers, and other get rich quick profiteers. There are hundreds of examples.

What will they do to our kids? It is not a question even being asked. And it is not a question of "If" they will exploit our kids, but "when".

We cannot just sell shares of our kids to other companies and move on after the exploitation is done, this will be a permanent destruction of human potential, all for a buck.

I really hope folks are proud. The fact that we are even discussing privatization of our schools show the massive ignorance that is so pervasive in everything America does these days.
10:49 PM on 05/23/2011
Even if you oppose privatization as a large-scale strategy (I do), I think there's a certain value in expansion of voucher programs and charter schools, if they can provide evidence that students can overcome demographics to achieve academic success. Of course, that's a big IF, but should it come true, it just may light a fire under low-performing public schools.
10:15 AM on 05/24/2011
It's been tried, and it hasn't worked yet. If there was a glut of education funding, I could see a limited place for charters. They should be sticking to their original mission, which was to be opt-in experimental schools, not mechanisms for private profit to come from public funding. But I could see allowing a few, if the funding was there.

But it's not. Funding is being slashed, and education is being gutted. When that's the case, as it is now, we should restrict funding to what has been the most reliably effective model so far: the traditional public school.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:51 PM on 05/23/2011
That should have been, all teachers should NOT have a job. Everyone is just not cut out for the job of dealing with young minds. Especially in these times. In the "olden days" we were taught at home to respect our elders. And if we got into trouble at school we were in MUCH more trouble at home. I got my hand hit with a ruler when I was in the sixth grade.. I was talking in class. When my Dad heard about it, it wasn't my hand that was spanked. And I had a very good Father. He believed in respecting other people and his children behaving themselves.

Can you imagine what kind of education Bachmann's home schooled kids got?

I really NEED to stop posting with an iPad. It's too easy to miss typos.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:36 PM on 05/23/2011
I can't truly say this is a bad thing unless it's abused. And what are the chances of republicans not abusing everything they touch? It's to their advantage to keep people ignorant. But it is true that every teacher in the US should have the job. When I was young and going to a rural school we were taught just what we needed for basic life. And for the majority of what it was deemed we needed wasn't much more than how to fill out job tickets. 60 years ago, in my case, there was no hope for me to go to college. Kids of my class was born for the mills and furniture factories. I was lucky enough I loved to read and had some curiosity about life in other places. And we had a good library.

Things have changed in some respects and I don't see it's that much better. I have never gotten over my grandson bringing a two paragraph note home, with three words misspelled. And at least we had good food in the cafeterias and some education about nutrition. Learned how
to balance a checkbook. Now the jobs are long gone. Our hard labor jobs were some of the first to leave.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
eschenk718
05:13 PM on 05/23/2011
Just think about it. It is like all the city governments who are privatizing. If you have $10 to spend and $5 pays the teachers and $5 is for building maintenance and administration and then you privatize. You have now added another equation into the $10.00. How much of the $10 are they going to take. So in order to pay someone else someone has to take less money. We already don't have enough money and now we are going to take what little we have to pay a corporation to open charter schools. Somebody is going to get short changed and you can bet it won't be the corporations. We as a middle class are getting less and less and the powers that be are telling us about all the money they are saving. They are taking it out of your pocket and mine. Your neighbor who use to pick up trash for the city at a decent wage is now making much less and the corporations are making the rest. They think we only hear the part about saving us money. We are not stupid.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
williamg
Obamacare = law of the land...forever
05:11 PM on 05/23/2011
How hard it is to fire an incompetent teacher:


Typical case in the Chicago Public Schools system:


REMEDIATION: 1 YEAR

• Step 1: A principal decides a teacher's class performance is "unsatisfactory." State law requires that the principal observe the teacher in the classroom on "at least two different school days" before making this determination:
• Step 2: Principal appoints a "consulting teacher as a coach (3 days).
• Step 3: Meeting with tenured teacher and consulting teacher to commence remediation plan (7 days)
• Step 4: Remediation plan is developed (30 days)
• Step 5: Plan evaluation (1st)
• Step 6: Plan evaluation (2nd)
• Step 7: Plan evaluation (3rd)
• Step 8: Final remediation meeting (90 days)
• Step 9: Principal's final evaluation (110 days)


PRE-HEARING: ABOUT 4 MONTHS:

• Step 10: Principal issues final evaluation -- teacher fails assessment (10 days)
• Step 11: Teacher served with notice of charges (1 month)
• Step 12: Teacher can demand a hearing before the Illinois State Board of Education and argue with CPS regarding suspension withou pay.
• Step 13: Schools CEO sets date for suspension without pay (20 days)
• Step 14: ISBE notified of move to dismiss teacher and request a hearing.
• Step 15: ISBE sends list of five hearing officersP; only one will be chosen.
• Step 16: Either side can reject the panel and ask for another. Hearing officer is selected. (30 days)

continued....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
williamg
Obamacare = law of the land...forever
05:11 PM on 05/23/2011
ISBE HEARING: ABOUT 6 MONTHS

• Step 17: Two-day hearing but may not necessarily be consecutive days (at least 1 month).
• Step 18: Transcripts generated and provided to all parties (up to 1 month).
• Step 19: Post-hearing briefs (closing arguments)
• Step 20: ISBE hearing officer makes a recommendation to Chicago Board of Education whether to fire teacher.
• Step 21: Board of Education decides to whether to accept or reject the recommendation.
• Step 22: Teacher fired, but... If the teacher is fired, he or she can appeal to Cook County Circuit Court.


APPEALS PROCESS: 2-3 YEARS

• Step 23: The court reviews whether the Board of Education decision was arbitrary, capricious or "against the manifest weight of the evidence" (6 months to 1 year)
• Step 24: If a judge affirms the board's decision to fire the teacher, he or she can appeal to the Illinois Appellate Court (1 year).
• Step 25: If the Appellate Court upholds the lower court, the teacher can appeal to the Illinois Supreme Court. If the court takes the case, that typically adds another year to the process.
• Step 26: If the Supreme Court rules for the school district, the teacher has no further recourse.



http://tinyurl.com/3wjlnh7
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tultican
Thomas Ultican, MEd. BS Mecahnical Engineering
05:18 PM on 05/23/2011
How many teachers move on in the first 100 days and how many teachers exhaust the process? Also, how many years does an Illinois teacher teach without these due process rights when they can be let go at any time without reason?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tultican
Thomas Ultican, MEd. BS Mecahnical Engineering
05:09 PM on 05/23/2011
Basic ignorance is driving ill-conceived and damaging reform. SB7 seems to be another such effort.

1) Standardized tests do not provide any information about teacher or school quality. They only indicate the knowledge of a set of students. Because factors outside of the classroom have a much larger influence on the results of these exams it is extremely foolish to make value judgments based on them.

2) Improved standardize test scores do not indicate improved teaching. Improvements in standardized test scores come from narrowing curriculum and teaching to the test.

3) Charter schools and private schools do not provide better education than public schools. Standardized testing data says so, but that really does not mean much. There have been NO dramatic improvements demonstrated from vouchers programs or charter schools.

4) Teachers in public schools do not have a job for life and are evaluated. The evaluation system is actually quite professional and rigorous. In California, a teacher must go through a formal written evaluation every 2 years and has regular (monthly or more) informal evaluations with feedback. These evaluations are all conducted by professional educators or groups of professional educators.

5) Public schools are regularly evaluated by accreditation groups. It is a big deal when a school comes up for accreditation review.
10:19 AM on 05/24/2011
Standardized testing generally says that charters do a worse job than traditional public schools. And if we control for student demographics, it says that private schools do a worse job than publics.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tultican
Thomas Ultican, MEd. BS Mecahnical Engineering
02:49 PM on 05/24/2011
These results are not surprising. Public schools have better trained and better supervised teachers.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
williamg
Obamacare = law of the land...forever
04:59 PM on 05/23/2011
"But a recent law passed in Illinois ‪would make teacher tenure contingent on student achievement, give Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel the power to extend his city's school day and make it easier to dismiss teachers deemed ineffective based on student achievement.‬ That law passed in state with a Democrat-controlled legislature and Democratic governor."

========================================================================


Is this a bad thing?

The process of firing an incompetent teacher in Chicago takes 2-5 years.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
iblogleft
Certifiable
06:59 PM on 05/23/2011
Of course it is.

There is abuse, fraud, and waste in all systems. Public or private.

We can fix it without tossing out the baby with the bathwater.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
williamg
Obamacare = law of the land...forever
07:12 PM on 05/23/2011
So you are arguing that tying tenure to student achievement is "throwing the baby out with the bathwater?"

That's odd, because even the NEA agrees with such a reform. In fact, that is the NEA's own recommendation.

You should take it up with the NEA.
photo
capt hastings
exercise the little grey cells
11:53 AM on 05/24/2011
How do you figure in the compentence of all the other teachers a child has had before the one you want to fire? Education is cumulative.
Add in the child's home experience, health care, nutrition, parents' parenting skills, etc.
Then factor in the resources at school, ongoing ed opportunitites for teachers, class sizes, school climate/culture, etc.
How is one teacher, after having a few months of contact with a child, responsible for this child's ability to take a test?

How do you explain a teacher's students having good test outcomes one year and the same teacher's students in the next year having a vastly superior or inferior performance on the same test? Simple: it's a different group of students and teachers are but one influence on their learning and test taking.

I totally support teacher compentence standards being tied to evaluations and compensation: I don't think these standards should include student performance.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lisa Shields
Poet & Advocate For Special Needs Children
04:58 PM on 05/23/2011
So you are going to hand parents a "voucher"...let's call it a coupon.
It might be for 10K....but if the schools are charging 20-30 K, what have you given them actually?
ANOTHER bill.
Public education isn't supposed to be a rebate for the well off, who would send their kids to private school anyway. But that's what vouchers do.

And the failure rate of Charter schools is scary...if the interest is not in wasting money, why are we paying for something that isn't working either?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
williamg
Obamacare = law of the land...forever
05:03 PM on 05/23/2011
--Average PUBLIC school expenditure per pupil: ......$12,018

--Average PRIVATE school tuition: ..................................$8,549


Public data here: http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d09/tables/dt09_182.asp

Private data here: http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d09/tables/dt09_059.asp
06:17 PM on 05/23/2011
Uh-huh. Do you know that public schools cover the cost of private school transportation and special ed services?
10:24 AM on 05/24/2011
Average non-religi­ous private school tuition (secondary­): $27,302
Average non-religi­ous private school tuition (elementar­y): $15,945

Religious schools should not be eligible to receive public money, and in any case their costs are defrayed by the church. When you compare public schools to nonreligious private schools, you see the real story.

And when you compare private and public school results while controlling for student demographics, you see that public schools typically do a better job for less money. But that doesn't fit your narrative, so it's unsurprising that you're ignoring the facts and trying to mislead people.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
williamg
Obamacare = law of the land...forever
05:08 PM on 05/23/2011
The average private school tuition is $8,500.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lisa Shields
Poet & Advocate For Special Needs Children
06:47 PM on 05/23/2011
And what state might that be? Not mine.

Even the catholic schools in my state are DOUBLE your "average" figure.
But thanks for playing!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lisa Shields
Poet & Advocate For Special Needs Children