More

Greenpeace Activists Arrested At Chicago Coal Plants, Protesting High Levels Of Pollution

First Posted: 05/25/11 10:42 AM ET   Updated: 07/25/11 06:12 AM ET

UPDATE:

The Chicago Sun-Times reports Wednesday morning that activists who had climbed the smokestack of the Fisk Generating Station have come down and are now in police custody. The climbers faced thunderstorms and heavy rains starting around 8 a.m. Police have not yet detailed the charges they will face.

***

Eight activists from Greenpeace have been arrested for blocking a shipment of coal on Chicago's Southwest Side, while eight more continue their occupation of the smokestack at one of the city's coal-burning power plants.

According to Greenpeace, those arrested had rappelled down from the Pulaski Bridge, near the Crawford coal plant in Chicago's Little Village neighborhood, to stop a coal barge from passing. They dangled themselves in the boat's path, holding signs that read "We can stop coal" and "Nosotros podemos parar el carbόn," according to a Greenpeace blog post. The barge was unable to pass.

Police arrested the group shortly before 5 p.m., and charged them with misdemeanor reckless conduct, as well as the more creative charge of performing an aerial exhibition without a net.

The detained protesters were all from out of state, according to the Chicago Sun-Times: Jeanne Kirshon, 23, of Rockville, Md.; Kaitlin Finneran, 24, of Norwalk, Conn.; Daniel Strandquist, 28, of New York City; Shea Schachameyer, 27, of Milwaukee; and Harmony Lambert, 22, of Shasta, Calif; Carolyn Auwaerter, 25, of Melbourn, Penn.; Laila Williams, 24, of Rockville, Mass.; and Michael Alilionis, 21, of Floral Park, NY.

Meanwhile, at Chicago's other coal-fired plant, the Fisk Generating Station in the Pilsen neighborhood, eight other activists were still 450 feet up on the plant's smokestack Wednesday morning, as storms came rolling in to the Chicago area.

On Tuesday morning, the eight scaled the giant smokestack, bearing signs reading "QUIT COAL." They also began painting the phrase in large yellow letters on the edifice, a process they had planned to finish Wednesday.

"We're going to stay up here until Edison International hears our message," said Kelly Mitchell, one of the activists who climbed Fisk, referring to the company that owns both of the city's coal plants. But if the impending weather threatens their safety, they may come down, Mitchell said in the morning.

The city's two aging coal plants are known producers of massive amounts of particulate matter and pollution, and have been reported to cause increased rates of lung cancer, heart attacks and asthma in the communities that live nearby.

Their fate was a major issue in this year's city election, with one alderman on Chicago's City Council forced by pressure from his challenger to end his years-long support of the plants and sign on to a measure to regulate them. That measure, the Clean Power Ordinance, did not pass the last City Council, but is expected to come before the new one early in its tenure.

See photos from activists at the top of the smokestack:

A message in the fog
1 of 16
A team of Greenpeace activists works for a second day as the clouds and rain move in as they finish painting their "Quit Coal" message on the smokestack of the Fisk coal-fired power plant in Chicago, Illinois May 25, 2011. The activists were getting their "Quit Coal" message out to the company and the wider Chicago area. The team is asking Midwest Generation to shut down both of the Chicago outdated coal-fired plants Photo by Greenpeace
Total comments: 64 | Post a Comment
1 of 16
Rate This Slide

  • 1

  • 2

  • 3

  • 4

  • 5

  • 6

  • 7

  • 8

  • 9

  • 10
Current Top 5 Slides
Users who voted on this slide
loading...

FOLLOW HUFFPOST CHICAGO

UPDATE: The Chicago Sun-Times reports Wednesday morning that activists who had climbed the smokestack of the Fisk Generating Station have come down and are now in police custody. The climbers faced...
UPDATE: The Chicago Sun-Times reports Wednesday morning that activists who had climbed the smokestack of the Fisk Generating Station have come down and are now in police custody. The climbers faced...
Filed by Will Guzzardi  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 64
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
02:50 AM on 05/28/2011
Coal burns to generate steam, forcing turbines to turn giant alternators, like the alternator used in your car but much larger. Magnetic fields spin by wires that end up powering a home. The current in those wires generates its own magnetic field, the result is a magnetic brake. This is why coal is required, why nukes are required: because massive force is needed to overcome the alternator acting as a brake. No matter what fuel is burnt, the alternator is the same. By reinventing the alternator, we solve the problem. We solve the "energy crisis" by using alternators which don't act as magnetic brakes. Then the fuel is not necessary. This is how to "quit coal".
photo
SOD
As kind as possible and as unkind as necessary.
11:44 AM on 05/28/2011
You get right on that. I'll expect a progress report in the next 50 years or so.
photo
thereisonlyoneparty
more amazing than you
12:34 AM on 05/31/2011
Almost all methods of energy generation (except some forms of solar) rely on magnetic principles to create energy. Not just coal and nuclear. Wind turbines, solar thermal energy, geothermal and such are rely on turbines as well. there are other options (batteries and fuel cells use chemical processes to "create" energy), but nothing that is viable for widespread use right now.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GandenT
09:46 PM on 05/27/2011
Don't trespass on coal, just wait for coal to trespass on you, your family, your property, and those of your neighbors: you're welcome!
photo
John Mainstream
I'm a Clinton Democrat that is now an independent.
08:45 AM on 05/27/2011
Very dumb. Coal will continue to be the primary fuel used to generate electricity for the next 50 years. The focus is on cleaner coal, not no coal.
11:20 AM on 05/27/2011
HEMP BIO-MASS COULD REPLACE ALL COAL!

Coal has mercury and lead and processing swamps that COST$$$$$$
Just take hemp and compress into BLOCKS 3"x3" bone dry.
I BET IT WILL BURN GOOD RIGHT IN THE COAL FURNACES AS IS!!!!
QuantProgrammer
Cap welfare benefits at two kids.
12:24 PM on 05/27/2011
Will generate more particulate pollution- and THC to boot. Not that most Greenpeace activistst would mind.
03:01 AM on 05/28/2011
Coal companies want us to believe coal generates energy. But all coal generates when we burn it is steam. That steam, driven against turbines, forces giant alternators to turn. Just like the alternator in your car, powering the headlights, these giant alternators power cities. Inside the alternator, giant magnets rotate past coils of wire, and the electricity from this process generates its own, second magnetic field. These magnetic fields repel, opposing the motion between them, acting like a brake. To push against the brake, requires so much force we burn huge amounts of coal to overcome the braking action. Solving the coal problem simply requires modern alternators which no longer act like brakes. By spinning freely, we burn far less fuel -- or none at all. Coal is obsolete the moment we reinvent the alternator. But the first step in this process is believing such an invention is possible.
photo
SOD
As kind as possible and as unkind as necessary.
11:49 AM on 05/28/2011
"Coal companies want us to believe coal generates energy. But all coal generates when we burn it is steam. That steam, driven against turbines, forces giant alternator­s to turn."

Coal does generate energy you dolt.

Coal generates heat energy, turbines convert the heat energy to kinetic energy, and magnet coils coupled with an armature convert the kinetic energy to electricity.

Regardless of the steps involved int he process, the energy originates with the burning of coal.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tribilin219
AND NO ONE IN JAIL YET, Why?
09:12 AM on 05/26/2011
You know, It's funny how the owners of the coal company that killed 26 people never to this day spent a day in jail? Yet who knows when these people who killed no one will be getting out? funny right? There is something wrong in this country when we have two laws, one for the haves and one for the have-nots. I feel like I'm living in China. and not the USA.
03:44 PM on 05/26/2011
You don't have to just "feel" like you're living in China...
photo
datanonjon
In your Liberal FACE !
04:32 PM on 05/26/2011
If the liberals or progressives, or what ever they change their name to, get their way........you WILL be living in Russia, China, Venezuela, Cuba , or any country that wants to DICTATE instead of negotiate. We could have nuclear energy, but these green freaks, see evil behind every corner. Just like Communists it's their way,OR NO WAY. They will also LIE about the efficiency of their wind farms and Solar farms. Also as usual, they won't use their own money to advance their agenda. Like typical Socialists they'll use OTHER PEOPLES MONEY. .........No wind No power.........No sun No power.......LIGHTS OUT !
photo
JWerner
Beware Macduff; beware the thane of Fife!
09:05 PM on 05/26/2011
Nuclear energy is a non-starter. Not only have we yet to find a good way to dispose of the waste products, but the FUEL for nuclear energy plants is rather limited and difficult to acquire. There's a REASON we're pushing for solar, wind, etc. . .because they WORK, and the market is gradually getting off the ground. Other countries are well ahead of the US in regards to wind and solar (including China, for Pete's sake). It's time we got our heads out of our @sses and stopped listening to people like you.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GandenT
09:42 PM on 05/27/2011
If you knew what you were talking about you wouldn't have to shout and offer up needless insults in a desperate bid to get attention for your one man crusade to re-start and re-win the last century's cold war propaganda battles in order to defend the century-before-that's power source. Also, just for your information, the coal industry and many others use plenty of "other people's money" to advance their agendas, they lie plenty themselves, and they are constantly accusing, as you do, their critics of being evil or socialist or communist, just as you do. You should at least TRY to hide your ignorance and hypocrisy if you're determined to be so belligerent.
07:22 PM on 05/25/2011
I'm sure we can power this country with wind power. If we tear down every building and cut down every forest and completely cover this country with wind farms, maybe we can power New York for a few hours.
photo
JWerner
Beware Macduff; beware the thane of Fife!
09:08 PM on 05/26/2011
Spoken like someone who doesn't know a godd@mn thing about wind energy production.
07:23 PM on 05/28/2011
If it woked then someone would be doing it.
forwarddownthefield3
A charging team that will not yield...
05:39 PM on 05/25/2011
wimps
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rwextthoughts
slowly the swamp is draining
04:44 PM on 05/25/2011
Clean Coal is used PROUDLY to run the physical plant at Southern Illinois University Carbondale

hope these criminals spend their time at Cook County lock up
photo
blackwind
Relax, nothing is under control
06:08 PM on 05/25/2011
Carbondale sounds like the sort of place one might hear such a goofy expression as "clean coal."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BurtR
03:48 PM on 05/25/2011
wind farms downstate are held up because they are given no incentives. the Hasterts (Dennis and his son) are lobbyists for coal and object to wind. they spread anti wind nonsense propoganda in communities where the projects are trying to get going
photo
JWerner
Beware Macduff; beware the thane of Fife!
09:10 PM on 05/26/2011
Indeed. If wind and solar were given the kinds of subsidies coal and oil are given, we'd be farther along when it comes to development of the technology. It works now, and it would be even better.
QuantProgrammer
Cap welfare benefits at two kids.
12:26 PM on 05/27/2011
Actually, coal and nat gas get very little in the way of subsidies. Meanwhile, wind gets a 1 cent/kwh subsidy. Nuclear would kill to be able to get that- then again, since nuclear generates so much of our nation's electricity, such a subsidy would be incredibly expensive.
photo
datanonjon
In your Liberal FACE !
02:58 PM on 05/25/2011
Just great.........Electricity at 3 times the cost. That's what they aren't telling you. Libs, always ready to help other people spend their money . Enjoy your clean air........from the poor house.
photo
Sixtracks
Pleased to Meet Me
03:27 PM on 05/25/2011
you overlook all of the hidden costs of coal & fossil fuels
pollution, infrastructure (roads, rail $$$), health, ...
photo
blackwind
Relax, nothing is under control
06:11 PM on 05/25/2011
True. There are studies that demostrate that some of the clean air regulations not only pay for themselves, but make money too, from the health care costs saved.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:00 PM on 05/25/2011
"All progress has resulted from people who took unpopular positions." - Adlai Stevenson

Yay Greenpeace!!
06:41 PM on 05/25/2011
That's a pretty ignorant statement. Both of them.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:13 PM on 05/25/2011
Scotty, are you related to the toilet paper scotties?

Perhaps you should read a little history, ignoramus. Or is that kockskr money just too good to ignore.
01:33 PM on 05/25/2011
There is no clean coal.

LEGALIZE HEMP
6X more btus than corn.

7% of the USA planted with hemp will replace all COAL and OIL and NG use!

Hemphasis.net ~ Hemp Fuel & Energy
1) Biomass has a heating value of 5000-8000 BTU/lb, with virtually no ash or sulfur ... Hemp can produce 10 tons of biomass per acre every four months. ...
www.hemphasis.net/Fuel-Energy/fuel.htm -
photo
SparkyGump
It's time for the party of NO to Go
01:39 PM on 05/25/2011
Well said!
photo
datanonjon
In your Liberal FACE !
02:39 PM on 05/25/2011
You probably smoke 10 tons of hemp every 4 months.
01:05 PM on 05/25/2011
I wonder if they drove gas guzzling SUV's or Pick up trucks to get there?
photo
Toddynho
Slartibartfast made me do it.
02:05 PM on 05/25/2011
And cue the boilerplate miffs from the mental lightweights.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
up2uamerica
12:32 PM on 05/25/2011
Thank you Greenpeace!
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
photo
yukonsam
This space reserved for self-referential irony.
11:30 AM on 05/25/2011
"performing an aerial exhibition without a net"

That made me chuckle... until I looked it up and saw it's a class A misdemeanor with a sentence of up to a year in jail. Apparently Chicago is running short of actual criminals to keep prosecuters occupied.