iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Medicaid Poll: Paul Ryan Block Grants Unpopular

Paul Ryan Medicaid

First Posted: 05/25/11 05:29 PM ET Updated: 07/25/11 06:12 AM ET

The special election in New York's 26th district Tuesday made it clear that the unpopularity of the GOP's proposed changes to Medicare could be a major issue for Republicans candidates in 2012. But a new poll released by the Kaiser Family Foundation suggests that alterations to Medicaid would also be unpopular with voters.

The Kaiser poll finds that 60 percent of respondents would prefer to keeping the government health insurance program for low-income and disabled Americans as it is now, "with the federal government guaranteeing coverage and setting minimum standards for benefits and eligibility."

Only 35 percent would support changing the program "so that the federal government gives states a fixed amount of money and each state decides who to cover and what services to pay for." That suggestion is part of Wisconsin Republican Paul Ryan's proposed 2012 budget, which passed in the House with overwhelming support from GOP Reps.

Republican voters are also more in favor of the Ryan plan's changes to Medicaid. While 57 percent of self-identified Republican voters said they would support changing it into a block-grant program, majorities of both independents (60 percent) and Democrats (79 percent) in the poll said they support keeping Medicaid as is.

The survey suggests the Republican Party might make some inroads in changing public opinion, but likely not enough to attain majority backing. When researchers explained to respondents supportive of keep Medicaid as it it now that "those who favor this change say it will help reduce the federal budget deficit and give states greater flexibility to tailor their Medicaid programs to match their residents' needs and their own state budgets," 14 percent of them said they would change their minds and support the switch to block grants. That tipped the group's balance of support to 49 percent in favor of maintaining Medicaid versus 44 percent in favor of changing it.

However, an even larger percentage of those who initially said they would favor the changes said they would be swayed to keep Medicaid in its present form by a potential Democratic argument. When told that "[o]pponents of this change say it will increase the number of uninsured, increase financial pressure on states and health care providers, and cause more low-income people to go without health care and long-term care services, particularly during tough economic times," 26 percent of those initially in favor of the change said they would now be opposed, for a total of 25 percent in favor of block grants to states and 69 percent opposed.

Of course, neither argument is likely to be made in a vacuum (or even to reach everyone whose mind might be changed), making it less likely that an argument in either direction would have that great an impact.

More generally, the survey finds that cuts to funding for either Medicaid or Medicare as a part of a federal debt reduction plan would be very unpopular.

Only 13 percent of respondents said they would support major reductions to Medicaid and 20 percent would support minor reductions, but 53 percent said they would not support any cuts at all to the low-income and disability health program.

On Medicare, 59 percent said they would not support reductions, while only 10 percent said they would support major reductions and 29 percent would support minor reductions to the elder health insurance scheme.

The survey also hints at the possibility that at least a handful of respondents could have confused Medicaid with Medicare.

Although 65 percent of respondents correctly identified Medicare as "the primary source of health insurance for people over age 65 regardless of their income," 21 percent said that program was Medicaid.

Meanwhile, 56 percent of respondents said Medicaid was "the primary source of health insurance coverage for many low-income families regardless of age," but 20 percent thought it was Medicare. However, in the questions noted above Kaiser did explain that Medicaid was the program for low-income individuals.

The Kaiser poll was conducted May 12-17 among 1,203 adults by Princeton Survey Research Associates, and had a margin of error of 3 percentage points.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
The special election in New York's 26th district Tuesday made it clear that the unpopularity of the GOP's proposed changes to Medicare could be a major issue for Republicans candidates in 2012. But a ...
The special election in New York's 26th district Tuesday made it clear that the unpopularity of the GOP's proposed changes to Medicare could be a major issue for Republicans candidates in 2012. But a ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2,148
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (34 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tigereon
03:14 PM on 05/30/2011
What amazes me is how short everyones memory is. doesn't anyone remember that last year to try and get elected the GOP was promising to create jobs, save and protect medicare, and cut spending...yet 5 months in they have done the exact opposite and no one seems to remember.

I wrote a blog explaining why i think we should gather together the GOP supporters and smack the stupid out of them before they create more of a mess

http://thetop10.squarespace.com/the-politics-of-it-all/2011/5/30/the-gop-and-their-lying-hypocrisy.html
07:16 PM on 05/27/2011
ALL I HEAR IS ALOT OF WHINING.BUT I HAVENT HEARD HOW LIBERALS ARE GOING SAVE MEDICARE?
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Bronxdude
Integrity has no need of rules
04:03 PM on 05/27/2011
If competition is the lynchpin of free-market capitalism, then let greed-drunk health insurers compete against each other under the individual mandate banner. Restricting choice drives up cost, increasing profit for a select few, while also delivering huge “look-the-other-way” PAC donations, which is why Republicans support the monopolistic stranglehold insurers currently enjoy. Since Republicans openly endorse exploitation and fleecing by ruthless insurers like UnitedDeathcare, the average working-class American needs the feds to act as a buffer to level the playing field, making quality, affordable healthcare accessible to everyone, not just the wealthy. Amazingly, and even though as a practicing physician he raked in millions as a Medicare and Medicaid provider, Rand Paul recently argued that access to food and healthcare is not a guaranteed human right, but, instead, a privilege based upon wealth or status. Through mendacious scare tactics, Republicans continue to incite baseless fear by denigrating the individual mandate, claiming it will lead to rationed healthcare or “death panels,” all scripted lies authored and perpetuated by Republican lobbyists. Contrary to specious talking points advanced by greed-drunk Republicans, as it stands right now, without the type of marketplace competition the individual mandate would provide, for-profit health insurers are free to conspire and dictate not only the cost of healthcare, but how, when, and where care is doled out. Prior to 2008, Gingrich, Hatch, Grassley, DeMint, McConnell, McCain, Bachmann, Inhofe, and Cornyn supported the individual mandate; however, in a purely partisan political move to discredit Obama, they now unanimously oppose the same individual mandate they once supported, insisting that what they supported in 2008 as “constitutional” is now “unconstitutional.” The Republican flip-flop tango!
photo
blinkthink
Tax Wall Street Trades Now
03:30 PM on 05/27/2011
"Chairman Ryan’s sweeping budget plan has been labeled “courageous,” but it’s a cowardly budget in a crucial respect. It proposes a dramatic reverse-Robin-Hood approach that gets the lion’s share of its budget cuts from programs for low-income Americans — the politically and economically weakest group in America and the politically safest group for Ryan to target— even as it bestows extremely large tax cuts on the wealthiest Americans. Taken together, its proposals would produce the largest redistribution of income from the bottom to the top in modern U.S. history, while increasing poverty and inequality more than any measure in recent times and possibly in the nation’s history.

That’s because the Ryan plan would generate nearly two-thirds — about $2.9 trillion — of its $4.5 trillion in budget cuts over 10 years from programs for people of modest means, while making permanent all of President Bush’s tax cuts for high-income Americans as well as a new estate-tax giveaway in the December 2010 tax package."

Robert Greenstein, President of the CBPP
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JoanMeijer
Author of Relentless: The Search For Typhoid Mary
03:16 PM on 05/27/2011
How about giving the rich 400 - those 400 richest people a tax break down to 25%.... That's also in this stupid bill. Really?
07:18 PM on 05/27/2011
THATS CORPATE RATES .
photo
dave6686
upholder of for the people by the people
02:42 PM on 05/27/2011
Also the continued R@ping of the American economy by further reducing the tax rates for the rich and business to an all time low....
maruski
Liberal Lutheran; lean left, save America!
01:30 PM on 05/27/2011
If you are the person who lives and works and saves and does everything "right" then gets multiple sclerosis, cancer, severe rheumatoid arthritis or some other disabling crippling job killing disease, what are you supposed to do?

such folks have no healthcare and no way to pay for even the cheapest insurance plan since they have no job prospects. A country as rich as ours should be able to handle taking care of such people so they don't have to worry ... very few of us will be the one to go through such a terrible thing. Those few deserve care.

Should America be like third world countries where you walk down the street and step over disabled beggars with little cups asking for a dollar to pay for medicine...

Apparently the GOP thinks that would be OK or that some private company can magically fix this. There is only one way to fix it--tax the population so that those few who are the unlucky ones to get something like that are taken care of.
labman
Make Civics a Required Subject
02:23 PM on 05/27/2011
The plan could have a provision where the government could set up a care center for older or disabled citizens. Perhaps in Alaska where there is a time honored tradition of caring for the elderly. They could be given their own personal cruise on an ice floe.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
FreedToChoose
...lest my wife says I'm not.
01:12 PM on 05/27/2011
I repeat (because it's the best line I've had this year): The movie will be:

Saving Ryan's Privates.
photo
blinkthink
Tax Wall Street Trades Now
02:45 PM on 05/27/2011
That's the good part of the Plan......LOL
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
zdeedle
Keep safe all who gather here.
12:59 PM on 05/27/2011
at what point does being an american outweigh being from a particular state? we fought a war in this nation to settle that argument. being an american should guarantee you some things: a basic education, for example, and fair treatment anywhere you live. for states to basically be able to target a group that might prove "too expensive" is a way of cleansing. people will be forced to move to states that are more compassionate and fair. of course, with the population switch, that's also more representation... interesting....
S M V
Give me your tired, your poor, Your huddled masses
05:29 PM on 05/27/2011
Real rights are negative. i.e the governemnt can not arrest you without due process. There is not such thing as a positive right because to provide positive rights you have to violate someone elses negative rights. The right not to have the governmet confiscate your property and give it to someone else.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RAYZR
Mourning the death of irony
12:08 PM on 05/27/2011
Paul Ryan has made quite clear his great admiration for Ayn Rand and her philosophy. Anyone who knows anything about that philosophy should realize that Ryan is at odds ideologically with the entire concept of government insurance programs like Medicare and Social Security. Assigning him the task of fixing these programs is akin to asking Paul Mc Cartney to revise the menu at The Sizzler Steakhouse.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
zdeedle
Keep safe all who gather here.
01:01 PM on 05/27/2011
ironic, since he is part of the entity he claims is a problem. "fixing from within" has another name: cancer.
S M V
Give me your tired, your poor, Your huddled masses
05:30 PM on 05/27/2011
We shoudl go with option 1 and eliminate them altogether at the federal level.
photo
Nelle
bah-weep-grahna-weep-ninny-bon
11:59 AM on 05/27/2011
I giggle when I see Republicans baffled about why Paul Ryan's Medicare plan is so unpopular...here's a hint Mr. Ryan, IT'S JUST A BAD IDEA, AND YOU CAN'T FIX STUPID!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
zdeedle
Keep safe all who gather here.
01:01 PM on 05/27/2011
given them stubbornness on this issue and their failure to see reality, i think i might go invest some money in kool -aid.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kimbanyc
LIBERAL NY DEMOCRAT
11:52 AM on 05/27/2011
NATIONAL DEBT GOES UP DUE TO RYAN PLAN

MEDICARE IS DESTROYED DUE TO RYAN PLAN

HEALTHCARE COSTS GO UP DUE TO RYAN PLAN

ANY MONEY SAVED UNDER RYAN PLAN GO DIRECTLY TO THE RICH

VOUCHERS WON'T PAY FOR ELDERLY HEALTHCARE UNDER RYAN PLAN

DEFENSE SPENDING GOES SKYHIGH UNDER RYAN PLAN

SOCIAL SECURITY DOESN'T ADD ONE DIME TO THE DEFICIT

MEDICARE AS FLAWED AS IT MAY BE IS SOLVENT FOR AT LEAST 26 YEARS

REPUBLICAN­­'T'S SAY IF YOU ARE 54 OR YOUNGER TOUGH YOU'VE GOT TO FACE
THE FACTS OF LIFE

THEIR FACTS OF LIFE
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
HLL
My little dog — a heartbeat at my feet ^..^
11:54 AM on 05/27/2011
Perfect summation, per your usual! ☮
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
zdeedle
Keep safe all who gather here.
01:02 PM on 05/27/2011
so bush was right: "some people call you the haves and have mores, i call you my base."
satyrday
If my micro-bio is way too long, will it be trunca
11:29 AM on 05/27/2011
Ryan is simply trying to serve his insurance company masters. Has nothing to do with what benefits the country from a health standpoint, nor an economic standpoint.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
zdeedle
Keep safe all who gather here.
01:02 PM on 05/27/2011
i hope he loses his next election.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
olderthan
01:49 PM on 05/27/2011
You are so charitable. I would rather he is carried away by a tornado or flood. Far, far away to never return.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
HLL
My little dog — a heartbeat at my feet ^..^
11:25 AM on 05/27/2011
I would have thought the 2 lightning-rod issues in this Ryan-GOPTP-budget was not only abolishing Medicare but also lowering taxes for the wealthiest even more! I'm amazed that last point hasn't also become a bonfire issue ☮
photo
Brush with Death
Retired First Sgt. tree hugger.
01:07 PM on 05/27/2011
Agreed, I bring this up whenever I can, but it seems to be lost as an issue.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
HLL
My little dog — a heartbeat at my feet ^..^
01:20 PM on 05/27/2011
I don't understand why either but happy to find a like-minded soul! #26 ;-)
photo
blinkthink
Tax Wall Street Trades Now
02:53 PM on 05/27/2011
I've certainly been bringing it up and telling everyone to look at the analysis of the CBPP. It doesn't begin to effectively reduce the deficit, it gives the biggest tax cut ever to the rich. To do it, it takes food out of the mouth of very poor mothers and children.

It's absolutely sinister, raising taxes on the poor and middle class WHILE THE GOP SCREAM NO TAX INCREASES FOR THE WEALTHY.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
HLL
My little dog — a heartbeat at my feet ^..^
04:05 PM on 05/27/2011
Agree with you 1 trillion% That is exactly what this draconian plan does. Kathy Hochul campaigned on BOTH issues. She said her constituents wanted to raise taxes on the rich and NOT cut Medicare which is what got her elected over the GOPTP candidates in that historically GOP district. I still don't know whyRyan's lowering taxes on the rich isn't just as explosive as abolishing Medicare!!! And BTW, when the congress votes to lower taxes on the wealthy, they're actually helping themselves because this current congress has 261 millionaires!! http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20023147-503544.html
photo
Cthulhu On Call
As soon as I'm done with my nap, you're all in tro
11:12 AM on 05/27/2011
The good news is that it didn't take long for the GOP and Tea Baggers to set themselves on fire. They're going to lose big, and this bill is going to be the biggest issue for them.

Going after Medicare, talk about your epic flame-outs....