More

2011 Tornadoes: Deadliest Year For Twisters Since 1950

Joplin Tornado

NOMAAN MERCHANT   05/28/11 10:39 PM ET   AP

JOPLIN, Mo. — The numbers look increasingly bleak for families hoping for the best after a monster tornado that devastated the town of Joplin, as the city has raised the death toll to at least 139 and state officials say 100 people are still missing.

Thousands more people far beyond Joplin had been waiting for good news about a teen believed to have been ejected or sucked from his vehicle on the way home from graduation. Several social-networking efforts specifically focused on finding information about Will Norton.

But his family says he, too, is among the dead – found in a pond near where his truck was located.

"At least we know that he wasn't out there suffering," his aunt Tracey Presslor said, holding a framed portrait of her 18-year-old nephew at a news conference. "Knowing that he was gone right away was really a blessing for us."

Joplin City Manager Mark Rohr said Saturday during a news conference that the death toll rose by three to at least 142, but later revised that figure down to 139 without elaboration.

Mike O'Connell, a spokesman for the Missouri Department of Public Safety, told The Associated Press on Saturday that he could not confirm the city's updated death toll number. He said the state of Missouri currently places the death toll at 126, saying they have no reason to raise that number.

State officials say there are 142 sets of human remains at the morgue handling those killed by the storm and some could be from the same victim.

If the death toll does stand at 139, it would place this year's tornado death toll at 520 and make 2011 the deadliest year for tornadoes since 1950. Until now, the highest recorded death toll by the National Weather Service in a single year was 519 in 1953. There were deadlier storms before 1950, but those counts were based on estimates and not on precise figures.

On Saturday night, the Department of Public Safety made public a list of 73 people who had been confirmed dead and whose next of kin had been notified.

The tornado – an EF-5 packing 200 mph winds _also injured more than 900 people. Tallying and identifying the dead and the missing has proven a complex, delicate and sometimes confusing exercise for both authorities and loved ones.

Missouri officials said Saturday that the number of people unaccounted for stands at 100. The Missouri Department of Public Safety said that within that number, nine people have been reported dead by their families, but state officials are working to confirm those.

Newton County coroner Mark Bridges said most, if not all, of the people brought to the temporary morgue could be identified this weekend. He described officials there as "making real good progress."

After a mistake immediately after the storm – four people thought they had identified one person's body, only to be wrong – authorities are relying instead on dental records, photos and unique tattoos or piercings, Bridges said. They've also used DNA tests in a handful of cases, he said.

"We learned the hard way at the start," he said. "It's bad for the families."

Asked about calls to open the morgue to all families of the missing, Bridges said doing so would be impractical. He described the site as a number of dark, refrigerated trailers holding body bags.

"There's no place to let them into," he said.

There have been 1,333 preliminary tornado reports in the U.S. through May 27, officials said, while the average number of confirmed tornadoes in a single year during the past decade has been 1,274.

Presslor said Saturday that the family received confirmation of his death late Friday night. She said her nephew's body was not found sooner because there was so much debris in the pond.

Family members had previously told The Associated Press that Norton and his father were still on the road when the storm hit. Mark Norton urged his son to pull over, but the teen's Hummer H3 flipped several times, throwing the young man from the vehicle, likely through the sunroof.

Mark Norton remains in the hospital and is "having a really tough time" after being told his son's body was found, Presslor said.

About a dozen of Norton's classmates stood in the back of the room as she spoke. His funeral arrangements are pending.

Presslor thanked the thousands of people who posted good wishes for Norton on Facebook, Twitter and other social media sites, and thanked all those who helped look for him. She urged those volunteers to keep looking for other people still missing.

"Please don't give up," she said.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

JOPLIN, Mo. — The numbers look increasingly bleak for families hoping for the best after a monster tornado that devastated the town of Joplin, as the city has raised the death toll to at least 1...
JOPLIN, Mo. — The numbers look increasingly bleak for families hoping for the best after a monster tornado that devastated the town of Joplin, as the city has raised the death toll to at least 1...
Filed by xxXTeri D'angeloXxx  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 910
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (11 total)
05:13 PM on 05/30/2011
HOW TO HAVE CLEANER AIR.....

Hemp BIO-ENERGY

Subbituminous coal is common in the US. It has an energy content of about 18 million Btu per ton, and is used mostly in coal-fired power plants

Coal generates about half of the electricity used in the United States. ... Each person in the United States uses 3.8 tons of coal each year.

Some 965 million tons of coal were consumed for the generation of electricity. This amounted to 86% of total U.S. coal production

U.S. soybeans 76.6 million acres

U.S. corn 90 million acres

Half of the acres 83.3 million acres

Hemp yields an average of nine dry tons per acre
(more in southern areas)

749 million tons hemp fiber

Bio-diesel Hempoline can be made from leaves and stalks.

You would also have the hemp seeds as a food source too.

U.S. annual anhydrous ammonia 22.90 million tons used.

U.S. ROUND-UP use100 million pounds
Contaminated with 1,4 dioxane

HERO-INSECTIDE SYNGENTA INSECTICIDE Soybeans and corn
photo
stunsitfel
Liberale sind verlorene Schafe
08:48 AM on 05/30/2011
AUNTIE M, AUNTIE M!!!!
banana republican
Provoking Progressives with unwelcome perspectives
07:28 AM on 05/30/2011
With any luck, it will rise far enough above the 1953 level to enable us to claim it is due to climate change w/o there being any evidence to contradict it.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
spriddler
02:22 PM on 05/31/2011
Whether you are being honest or not, that is a pretty sick thing to say.
02:55 PM on 05/31/2011
The depressing thing is that there probably are greenies that are hoping this...

A larger body count would be a "sacrifice to the greater good" for the advancement of the Great Late Climate Scam. At least according to these green crazies.
photo
CivilDebate10
Practical Independent Libertarian
12:34 AM on 05/30/2011
Population is more concentrated now so the likelihood of a tornado doing more damage now than 61 years ago is greater. This is an El Nino (or is it Nina) year. Reporting is more accurate now than 61 years ago so more tornadoes can be identified and reported.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
truly moderate
Reform Party, a third way
04:33 AM on 05/30/2011
I do see the logic in your assessment and I do believe that explains PART of this phenominally bad year. However, I do believe this is also an exceptionally bad year for tornados, and certainly the worst weve seen in the past 20 years (considering technology for the past 20 years has been realtively consistent though upgrades have taken place in the past few years). Even if its just been the worst tornado record on season since 2000, its still a very bleak year in terms of both damage and lives lost.
12:33 AM on 05/30/2011
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
BrettnCalgary
(5:35 PM)
(hint, this dude is a nut who's been posting his blather for years, pay no attention, you'll get no sense from him)
It is advice to another person about my post.

My question: is it policy for the Huffington post, or it is community moderateor opinion?
03:02 PM on 05/31/2011
This IS the Huffington Post. Right is Left and Up is Down. And Forward is Backwards. But it's fun nonetheless. I also warn you, this place is on the level of Yahoo!, if not lower.

"Pundit" badges are given to those that are clearly mentally deficient based on their posts. Most of the "badges" here are handed out like candy to those that parrot the leftist mantra. You know, "teabaggers love Bush"...

I have a very sharp eye. I know when my own posts get "lost".
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
truly moderate
Reform Party, a third way
11:52 PM on 06/01/2011
YOU are full of yourself elitest.

On certain topics like afghanistan involvement, there seems to be somewhat of an overly libertarian, but asside from that subject, this place general has a wide range of views......which is more than I can say for yahoo, which seems to be most conservative rednecks.
11:25 PM on 05/29/2011
Science and politics are not related when it comes to formulating theory.

If you "believe" a scientific precept, then you're doing it wrong. That goes for both sides. Opinion has no place here.
12:08 AM on 05/30/2011
Ethanol production is good example how scientists could be corrupt.
"98% of scientists support", "Debate is over!"
Are these statesment scientific? Who are from scientific community stay against these stupidity?
Climate change science is more political, than scientific, and yes, Al Gore as politician made it happen.
He admit that supporting ethanol production was his mistakes for political reason.
Only persons, who shut their mind can't see that his vision of climate change is also huge mistake.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
truly moderate
Reform Party, a third way
04:37 AM on 05/30/2011
Soooooooo, what you are telling me is that a socially conservative democrat (enter Tipper Gore as well) made this all up? Perhaps he was trying to blend environmental conservatism with social conservatism and it was a failed experiment? I'm not buying it!

The reason I'm not buying it has little to do with Al Gore. The reason I'm not buying it is because so many scientists have said climate change is happening.

The million dollar question is........Just how much are WE responsible for? We don't have a clear answer on that yet, but I have a feeling that when we do come to an accurate conlusion, that we will see that yes mother nature is responsible...but so is man!
05:20 AM on 05/30/2011
The debate on things like the earth being flat is over, yes. You have a lot to learn about what is actually known.

Stop allowing Fox News to teach you science, and go out and teach yourself. You'll realize how much we know.

Also if you're relying on ad hominid attacks, then your scientific points are more or less immediately invalidated.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Zilo
Independent/Republicans hate freedom
09:28 PM on 05/29/2011
Wow this thread is absolutely over brimming with religious nutters.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Steve Rockett
09:05 PM on 05/29/2011
Hey, you republican aholes in Congress, this is where I want my tax dollars to go.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Steve Rockett
08:58 PM on 05/29/2011
...and the republican members of Congress are blocking emergency relief funds.
mothergrace
If they knock you down, bite 'em on the ankle.
07:15 PM on 05/29/2011
Living in earthquake country, with earthquakes having no warning and having lived in hurricane areas, lots of warning, tornadoes are still the scariest thing to me. There is some warning and yet it never seems to be enough for these powerful events.

I hope they get the help they need to rebuild.
05:54 PM on 05/29/2011
Lead story on HuffPo Canada? Why? We very rarely get tornadoes in Canada. And PS, we don't live in the US.
mothergrace
If they knock you down, bite 'em on the ankle.
07:12 PM on 05/29/2011
Aw, com'on don't be like that!

I always thought it was dumb how the Weather Channel in the US shows weather maps that make it look like the weather stops at the Canadian border. But when we lived in Canada for awhile you guys showed weather on both sides of the border!

Don't pick up our bad habits!
04:57 PM on 05/30/2011
I saw the same kind of thing while I stayed in Juarez a few years back. I don't think the US news stations are doing that by their discretion. I'll bet it's from Canada and Mexico to keep their news ratings up, so they can show the weather on both sides so that people who do travel across the borders for work will watch the non US stations.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
BrettnCalgary
07:26 PM on 05/29/2011
Tornadoes are far from uncommon in the prairie provinces, and they suck when you see them.
chinchilla
They say I need to write something here.
05:03 PM on 05/29/2011
Perhaps those red-neck Southern Baptists should be asking themselves why God is punishing them.

(Here's a hint, the country to the North of the US has healthcare that follows God's command to look after the less fortunate, and we are open to EVERYONE (LGBT included) having equal rights. After all, Jesus tell us to love each other and leave judging others to God, nd we are only receiving normal weather conditions.)
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
BrettnCalgary
07:28 PM on 05/29/2011
Oh come on, we get tornadoes too, a few years ago a killer tornado hit Pine Lake here in Alberta, and a few years before that another one hit Sherwood Park by Edmonton, did those places fail the holier than thou test or something? Or maybe Slave Lake?
chinchilla
They say I need to write something here.
07:40 PM on 05/29/2011
I know Brett.

The difference is we here in Canada don't scream about how Jesus wants us Christians to control the country.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:52 AM on 05/30/2011
I'm sure Jesus enjoyed how you judged those"red-neck Southern Baptists". We all know that everyone in Joplin, MO is a red-neck SB.
04:46 PM on 05/29/2011
MY HEART GOES OUT TO THEM ALL!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Steve Rockett
09:00 PM on 05/29/2011
Too bad the republicans don't feel the same way.
05:02 PM on 05/30/2011
Well as a friend of a friend with family in that area, they have spray painted on many homes that they don't want help especially from obama. The news seems to be ignoring those homes.
04:14 PM on 05/29/2011
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

“Outgoing Longwave Radiation (OLR) is the energy leaving the earth as infrared radiation at low energy. Earth's radiation balance is very closely achieved since the OLR very nearly equals the Shortwave Absorbed Radiation received at high energy from the sun. Thus, the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) is satisfied and the Earth's average temperature is very nearly stable. The OLR is affected by clouds and dust in the atmosphere, which tend to reduce it below clear sky values. Greenhouse gases, such as methane, nitrous oxide, water vapor and carbon dioxide, absorb certain wavelengths of OLR adding heat to the atmosphere, which in turn causes the atmosphere to emit more radiation. Some of this radiation is directed back towards the Earth, increasing the average temperature of the Earth's surface. Therefore, an increase in the concentration of a greenhouse gas would contribute to global warming by increasing the amount of radiation that is absorbed and emitted by these atmospheric constituents.
The OLR is dependent on the temperature of the radiating body.”

“The Stefan-Boltzmann T^4 law for blackbody radiation show tendency also for earth.
In equatorial area, where temperature is bigger, radiation is also bigger.”
"The temperature falls with height precisely because most of the atmosphere is convecting, which leads to a fall of temperature with height because of pdV work.”

All these statements are correct and their correctness create huge misunderstanding what is real reason for climate change.
04:19 PM on 05/29/2011
Main mistakes are mixing all greenhouse gases together and make all of them equally responsible for climate change.
It is especially wrong for water vapor, which together with others properties of water actually cooling earth atmosphere.
Water evaporated from all surfaces of oceans, seas, lakes, rivers,
Water evaporated from leaves of any plants.
Water evaporated from any wet surfaces.
In atmosphere we always see dynamic processes of evaporation and condensation of water, as in drops of rain, as in tail after jet, as in clouds, fog, etc.
Evaporations of water need energy. To evaporate 1 kg of water we need 539 kcal of energy.
Every condensation of water released energy in the same amount.
Evaporation of water is cooling surfaces, from which evaporation occur and air close to those surfaces.
It is reasons, why in summer time is always cooler close to oceans, seas, lakes and rivers.

We must pay attention, that only methane (CH4) is lighter than water vapor.
Nitrous oxide (N2O), carbon dioxide (CO2), nitrogen (N2), oxygen (O2), are heavier than water vapor.
It property of water vapor helps convection forces to mix air with height.
Here it will be helpful to repeat, what offer to us Wikipedia:
"The temperature falls with height precisely because most of the atmosphere is convecting, which leads to a fall of temperature with height because of pdV work.”
Fall of temperature with height helps condense some water vapor and create water droplets.
04:21 PM on 05/29/2011
This process released heat, which increase temperature of surrounded gases.
Hotter air recreate convection forces, which bring some of air higher, where again some of water vapor will condensed and released additional heat.
It dynamic process of partially condensation with height will repeat many times till upper troposphere (around ten kilometers high), where so cold that 99% of water vapor will condensed to water droplets.
It process helps all gases in air bring energy 10 km close to space, where energy will go to space easy, than from oceans level.

Mankind activity not only reduces evaporation of water from continents by deforestation, tilling land, growing the same crop on huge area.
Mankind activity decreased reflection of direct sun radiation, by soot, roads, homes, cities, etc.
Mankind activity correlate with energy, which we use. Most of energy, used by mankind increased carbon dioxide, which is ease use as coefficient in climate models.
In reality carbon dioxide is playing not so significant role in climate change, as reduction of evaporation on continents and decreasing reflection of direct sun radiation.
03:22 PM on 05/29/2011
funny how everyone is talking science but not one person on this page of comments said anything about that poor child who was sucked out of the window of the truck he was riding in. I could care less about who is right in global warming. The human story is far more compelling and sad.
03:27 PM on 05/29/2011
Every tragedy has two sides-mourning and what to do to prevent future mourning?
If we will insist that carbon dioxide is main player in nature, tragedy like this will nonstoppable forever.
03:34 PM on 05/29/2011
How did 'insistence' create this tragedy?
03:31 PM on 05/29/2011
My heart and thoughts go out to those families who have suffered such horrific losses. Hopefully all of us that use these forums to express our views will remember the people in Joplin and other disaster areas with donations and good will.