iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Osama Bin Laden Raid Avenged Deaths Of CIA Members Tom Shah And Molly Huckaby Hardy

Bin Laden Cia

MATT APUZZO and ADAM GOLDMAN   05/29/11 07:40 AM ET   AP

WASHINGTON — For a small cadre of CIA veterans, the death of Osama bin Laden was more than just a national moment of relief and closure. It was also a measure of payback, a settling of a score for a pair of deaths, the details of which have remained a secret for 13 years.

Tom Shah and Molly Huckaby Hardy were among the 44 U.S. Embassy employees killed when a truck bomb exploded outside the embassy compound in Kenya in 1998.

Though it has never been publicly acknowledged, the two were working undercover for the CIA. In al-Qaida's war on the United States, they are believed to be the first CIA casualties.

Their names probably will not be among those read at Memorial Day memorials around the country this weekend. Like many CIA officers, their service remained a secret in both life and death, marked only by anonymous stars on the wall at CIA headquarters and blank entries in its book of honor.

Their CIA ties were described to The Associated Press by a half-dozen current and former U.S. officials who spoke on condition of anonymity because Shah's and Hardy's jobs are still secret, even now.

The deaths weighed heavily on many at the CIA, particularly the two senior officers who were running operations in Africa during the attack. Over the past decade, as the CIA waged war against al-Qaida, those officers have taken on central roles in counterterrorism. Both were deeply involved in hunting down bin Laden and planning the raid on the terrorist who killed their colleagues.

"History has shown that tyrants who threaten global peace and freedom must eventually face their natural enemies: America's war fighters, and the silent warriors of our Intelligence Community," CIA Director Leon Panetta wrote in a Memorial Day message to agency employees.

These silent warriors took very different paths to Nairobi.

Hardy was a divorced mom from Valdosta, Ga., who raised a daughter as she travelled to Asia, South America and Africa over a lengthy career. At the CIA station in Kenya, she handled the office finances, including the CIA's stash of money used to pay sources and carry out spying operations. She was a new grandmother and was eager to get back home when al-Qaida struck.

Shah took an unpredictable route to the nation's clandestine service. He was not a solider or a Marine, a linguist or an Ivy Leaguer. He was a musician from the Midwest. But his story, and the secret mission that brought him to Africa, was straight out of a Hollywood spy movie.

"He was a vivacious, upbeat guy who had a very poignant, self-deprecating sense of humor," said Dan McDevitt, a classmate and close friend from St. Xavier High School in Cincinnati, where Shah was a standout trumpet player.

Shah – his given name was Uttamlal – was the only child of an Indian immigrant father and an American mother, McDevitt said. He had a fascination with international affairs. He participated in the school's model United Nations and, in the midst of the Cold War, was one of the school's first students to learn Russian. From time to time, he went to India with his father, giving him a rare world perspective.

"At the time, that was unheard of. You might as well have gone to Mars," said McDevitt, who lost touch with his high school friend long before he joined the agency.

Shah graduated from Berklee College of Music in Boston and Ball State University's music school. He taught music classes and occasionally played in backup bands for entertainers Red Skelton, Perry Como and Jim Nabors. His doctoral thesis at Indiana's Ball State offered no hints about the career he would pursue: "The Solo Songs of Edward MacDowell: An Examination of Style and Literary Influence."

"He was one of our outstanding people," said Kirby Koriath, the graduate student adviser at Ball State.

Shah and his wife, Linda, were married in 1983, the year he received his master's degree. In 1987, after earning his doctorate, Shah joined the U.S. government. On paper, he had become a diplomat. In reality, he was shipped to the Farm, the CIA's spy school in Virginia.

He received the usual battery of training in surveillance, counterespionage and the art of building sources. The latter is particularly hard to teach, but it came naturally to Shah, former officials said. Shah was regarded as one of the top members of his class and was assigned to the Near East Division, which covers the Middle East.

He spoke fluent Hindi and decent Russian when he arrived and quickly showed a knack for languages by learning Arabic. He worked in Cairo and Damascus and, though he was young, former colleagues said he was quickly proving himself one of the agency's most promising stars.

In 1997, he was dispatched to headquarters as part of the Iraq Operations Group, the CIA team that ran spying campaigns against Saddam Hussein's regime. Around that time, the CIA became convinced that a senior Iraqi official was willing to provide intelligence in exchange for a new life in America. Before the U.S. could make that deal, it had to be sure the information was credible and the would-be defector wasn't really a double agent. But even talking to him was a risky move. If a meeting with the CIA was discovered, the Iraqi would be killed for sure.

Somebody had to meet with the informant, somebody who knew the Middle East and could be trusted with such a sensitive mission. A senior officer recommended Shah.

The meetings were set up in Kenya, former officials said, because it was considered relatively safe from Middle East intelligence services. It was perhaps the most important operation being run under the Africa Division at the time, current and former officials said. Among the agency managers overseeing it was John Bennett, the deputy chief of the division. He and his operations chief, who remains undercover, were seasoned Africa hands and veterans of countless spying operations.

Because of the mission's sensitivity, Shah bottled up his normally outgoing and friendly personality while at the embassy.

"This is the glory and the tragedy of discreet work," said Prudence Bushnell, the former ambassador to Kenya. "You keep a very low profile and you don't do things that make you memorable."

Officials say Shah was among those who went to the window when shooting began outside the embassy gates. Most who did were killed when the massive bomb exploded. He was 38. Hardy was also killed in the blast. She was 51.

The U.S. government said both victims were State Department employees. But like all fallen officers, they received private memorial services at CIA headquarters. Every year, their names are among those read at a ceremony for family members and colleagues.

Hardy's daughter, Brandi Plants, said she did not want to discuss her mother's employment. Shah's widow, Linda, sent word through a neighbor that the topic was still too painful to discuss.

Shah's death did not stall his mission. The Africa Division pressed on and confirmed that the Iraqi source was legitimate, his information extremely valuable. He defected and was re-located to the United States with a new identity.

Bennett later went on to be the station chief in Islamabad, where he ran the agency's effort to kill al-Qaida members by using unmanned aircraft. He now sits in one of the most important seats in the agency, overseeing clandestine operations worldwide. His former Africa operations chief now runs the agency's counterterrorism center. Both have been hunting for bin Laden for years. Both were directly involved in the raid.

Shah and Hardy are among the names etched into stone at a memorial at the embassy in Nairobi, with no mention of their CIA service. Shah is also commemorated with a plaque in a CIA conference room at its headquarters. Both were among those whose names Panetta read last week at the annual ceremony for fallen officers.

"Throughout the effort to disrupt, dismantle and defeat al-Qaida, our fallen colleagues have been with us in memory and in spirit," Panetta said. "With their strength and determination as our guide, we achieved a great victory three weeks ago."

Bin Laden said the embassy in Nairobi was targeted because it was a major CIA station. He died never knowing that he had killed two CIA officers there.

___

Follow Matt Apuzzo and Adam Goldman at and

Links:


___

Associated Press writers Greg Bluestein in Atlanta and Michelle Price in Phoenix contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

WASHINGTON — For a small cadre of CIA veterans, the death of Osama bin Laden was more than just a national moment of relief and closure. It was also a measure of payback, a settling of a score f...
WASHINGTON — For a small cadre of CIA veterans, the death of Osama bin Laden was more than just a national moment of relief and closure. It was also a measure of payback, a settling of a score f...
Filed by Joanna Zelman  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,795
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (33 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dbrett480
08:51 PM on 06/11/2011
I'm surprised at all the people who are not happy with Bin Laden's death. I guess they would have us ask "how high" whenever terrorists tell us to jump.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
A ScottMiller
02:20 PM on 05/31/2011
"Their CIA ties were described to The Associated Press by a half-dozen current and former U.S. officials who spoke on condition of anonymity because Shah's and Hardy's jobs are still secret, even now."

I used to think that when articles included references to "[government] officials who spoke on condition of anonymity" it was the type of thing that was 100% sanctioned by higher-ups, they just didn't want people to think that they were supposed to know. Kind of like a wink at the public, saying, here's a little nugget for you, usually indicating something that will happen soon, but hasn't been officially announced yet.

In this case, we have a story, which the authors are admitting in its entirety should remain secret..yet here it is, and they've published it.

Which leads to my question: why are these authors not the target of the government, just the same as WikiLeaks? What's the difference? Has all of this information been leaked with the authority of higher-ups? Should that matter?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Howard53545
05:45 AM on 05/31/2011
They died in vain for the imperial policies of the empire, and more will follow them into oblivion.
photo
joebaggadonuts
Civilization: Evolutionary pathway of choice.
08:24 PM on 05/30/2011
It was revenge for 9-11. We have not grown past our roots. An eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth. Failure to evolve has brought alQuaida to its knees, finally, a desperate organization flailing about without a leader. If we cannot have justice, at least we got revenge.
07:48 PM on 05/30/2011
CIA is known to kidnap people in foreign countries, assassinate foreign leaders, bring down democratically elected governments and organize insurgencies. This agency has a lot of bloods on its hands and is a benchmark of state terrorism
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
xanxia
Dazed and Confused
09:58 AM on 05/30/2011
Impressive article!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
We Not Me
09:37 AM on 05/30/2011
The US has won the battles, Bin Laden won the war. He killed 9,000 American civilians and troops, helped bankrupt our treasury, and he made his cause relevant by putting America in a constant state of fear and paranoia.
So much for American exceptionalism.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
patches12
01:21 PM on 05/30/2011
read about the cold war ... there was way more "paranoia" back then....

the difference being the threat was one of annihilation vs. focused terrorism

they haven't won...but neither have we...

the inference from your assertion is that we should not take reasonable precautions..??
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
VirginiaJeff
Waiting for the "Jennifer Government" movie
02:59 PM on 05/30/2011
He's using hyperbole, perhaps. But not by very much. Bin Laden got our leaders to expend a disproportionately large amount of money and lives in response to his attack on 9/11. He also got us to compromise our values with regard to human rights, in particular our outlook toward the use of torture, which had condemned whenever other governments had resorted to it. And he got us to undermine the Constitution through our legislative endorsement of warrantless wiretaps during two presidential administrations -- releasing a genie that no president will want to return to the bottle.
09:27 AM on 05/30/2011
It's amazing people like this, that Eric Holder and the dems want to prosecute.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
patches12
01:25 PM on 05/30/2011
Yup... they cheer blowing bin laden's brains out, in front of his family with a "kill" order from the born abain war hawk president, but they wring their hands that the number 2 guy... the 9/11 master mind, KSM, got water boarded or had to listent to loud music.. they want the CIA agents who did that to go to jail.

irrational and stupid people leading this country...
05:09 PM on 05/30/2011
How is it irrational? We execute murderers every day. We do not string them up and torture them. That is the act of a barbaric people.

By the way, Holder is not prosecuting CIA agents. That is a right-wing media myth. Holder appointed an investigator to check out why information was destroyed (namely, CIA interrogation tapes). Destroying information like that is a violation of law. They allowed the deadline to pass and nobody was prosecuted for the destruction of the tapes.
photo
Olethea
Life may be sweeter for this- I don't know.
06:55 PM on 05/30/2011
Those irrational and stupid people did what bush couldn't. And without torture.

Now we truly can say "Mission Accomplished," and draw down the troops.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
VirginiaJeff
Waiting for the "Jennifer Government" movie
03:00 PM on 05/30/2011
No, we do not.
07:07 AM on 05/30/2011
It's a shame they pulled most of the troops out of Afghanistan and sent them to Iraq when we had Bin Laden and his boys on the run and didn't have enough troops to cut off his retreat into Pakistan. This war could have been over six years ago. I don't think the Iraq war was worth six more years in Afghanistan.
07:42 AM on 05/30/2011
Almost all of the progressives in Congress thought the war in Iraq was necessary.

Glad to help
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
VirginiaJeff
Waiting for the "Jennifer Government" movie
03:01 PM on 05/30/2011
To our everlasting shame.
photo
collettethehedgehog
My micro-bio is So running on empty
05:29 PM on 05/30/2011
If you had ever listened to Senator John Kerry's speech to Congress he specifically said he would give the president the benefit of the doubt, but if there were no WMD he withdrew his support. That was true for most Americans.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sexywhiteboy53
America First!!
09:01 AM on 05/30/2011
nobody pulled any troops from Afgan? it was a differant kind og War! no army to fight? only the taliban , which america defeated early on. the problem is they will just keep comeing back? haveing a 120,000 men in Afgan has only proven to be deadly for our troops? In Iraq we where fighting an army, which America defeated also very quickly!! al-Qaeda is who where are fighting in Iraq and Afgan same muslim extremists!! The CIA and our troops and Seal Teams, and Delta force have been looking for Bin-ladn way before Bush became President? read above 1998? WTC bombing 1993!!
12:46 AM on 05/31/2011
Another mission accomplished that was a little premature.Troop levels were cut in half, other wise Bin Laden and his boys would have been toast. We even had confirmed photos of Bin Laden from a drone camera. By the time Obama got in the White House the US forces had been loosing ground to the Taliban and Al Qaeda for two years and would have ended up being pushed out of Afghanistan if they hadn't been reenforced and we have just recently in the last year taken some but not all of the ground back that we lost. Does that sound like the Taiiban were defeated?
07:03 AM on 05/30/2011
sorry for the typos, but iTs a tough job trying to show rwingers who are raised hating folks of color, the true way of our nations ills. and how the disinformation of gw bush and dick cheney lies has this once great powerful nation on its knees. and our gop dominated congress will do any thing to regain power if it means taking us all down. just so obama can be a one termer .nd mitch mcconnel said so.no surpirzes there ,is masters the koch brothers ,ule dems drool.so they think all your rwing leaders will be unemployed come nov 2012 so help us god .amen .jesus /our nation depends on you to rid us of all theses evi;l people posing as christians fasc
istas
06:18 AM on 05/30/2011
Great artical . well written.
05:58 AM on 05/30/2011
Only a handful of Nuts including Osama Bin laden wanna fight against US. I don't understand why these nuts don't wanna do something good to benefit their own societies. When they'd begin to wage war against US, then they themselves would sign their death sentences.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Doug Sandlin
We See The World Not As It Is But As We Are
09:55 PM on 05/31/2011
In a nutshell: they have major issues with U.S. foreign policy, due to the presence of Western armies in Muslim countries, the hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians in their countries who have died because of those policies, and the unprecedented meddling in the affairs of Muslim-majority lands on the part of European powers (beginning with post WWI "map-making" which gave us the modern nations of Iran and Iraq, among others).

Basically, they (extremists, specifically), feel that the West, and in recent times, the U.S., has caused them a lot of trouble, and they want us out of their countries, in every way.

And we're not going.

Hence all the trouble.

They had the theory that terrorism would cause democratic societies such as the U.S. to put pressure on their leaders to withdraw their armies from Muslim lands.

As everyone has noticed: their theory was wrong.

http://cpost.uchicago.edu/
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
joydbrower
Absolute power corrupts absolutely.
05:46 AM on 05/30/2011
What a memorable story - and so very appopriate for this Memorial Weekend! Their IDs have had to be hidden for security purposes, but their work was NOT unnoticed nor unappreciated. They truly gave the last full measure of devotion, contributing to important counter-terrorism work that goes on today more intensely than ever - and will continue for the foreseeable future. May God bless their souls and their surviving family members!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
conservativecrim
02:40 AM on 05/30/2011
Why do they call CIA the Company???????
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gmartin997
06:01 AM on 05/30/2011
Why does the CIA call its special training facility the Farm? Who knows? Who really cares?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
conservativecrim
02:35 AM on 05/30/2011
It has nothing to do with revenge ...... YOU REAP WHAT YOU SOW ...... Sow Terror ...... Reap Terror ....... it's simple ........

CIA/Blowback