More

David Coleman Headley's Credibility Questioned: Top Witness In Mumbai Terror Trial Faces Defense

Headley

SOPHIA TAREEN   05/31/11 10:18 PM ET   AP

CHICAGO — An admitted American terrorist who is the government's top witness in the trial of a Chicago businessman accused in the deadly 2008 Mumbai attacks repeatedly lied to the FBI, a judge and even his wife as he cooperated in a plea deal to save his own life, defense attorneys said Tuesday.

David Coleman Headley, who has pleaded guilty to laying the groundwork for the three-day rampage in India's largest city, spent five days on the witness stand detailing how he received orders from a Pakistani terrorist group and the country's main intelligence agency to conduct video surveillance in Mumbai.

But defense attorneys for the Chicago businessman, Tahawwur Rana, told jurors that Headley's account is unreliable even though he is the government's key witness. They claim he implicated Rana, his longtime school friend, in the plot because he was motivated by the possibility of making a deal with prosecutors – a technique he learned in his time as an informant for the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration.

"To get something good, you have to give them something good?" Rana defense attorney Patrick Blegen asked.

"Yes," Headley said.

"You knew if you don't get someone else arrested, all the weight of the case would rest on you alone?" Blegen said.

"Yes," Headley answered.

Headley, who pleaded guilty to avoid the death penalty and extradition, wrapped up testimony Tuesday with prosecutors saying they expect to call up to eight more witnesses starting Wednesday.

None has been as anticipated as Headley, whose testimony has been scrutinized for what it has revealed about the global fight against terrorism. The trial comes on the heels of the May 2 killing of Osama bin Laden by U.S. forces in Pakistan and amid suspicions that the country's government may have known or helped hide the former al-Qaida leader. Pakistan has denied the allegations.

Headley testified Tuesday that a militant leader with ties to al-Qaida – who is also charged in Rana's case – had plotted to attack U.S. defense contractor Lockheed Martin. Headley told jurors that in August 2009, he used one of Rana's computers at his Chicago-based immigration services business to begin researching details about Lockheed Martin for Ilyas Kashmiri, a Pakistani terrorist leader.

"He had people who had conducted surveillance," Headley said of Kashmiri.

Headley said Kashmiri was angry over the U.S. drone attacks inside Pakistan and wanted to target the defense contractor. Kashmiri leads the militant group Harakat-ul-Jihad al-Islami, which has launched attacks in India and Pakistan, including a 2006 suicide bombing against the U.S. consulate in Karachi that killed four people, according to the State Department.

Headley didn't provide details about the plot, which wasn't carried out. He also said Rana did not know about it.

Rana, a Pakistani-born Canadian, has pleaded not guilty to accusations that he provided Headley cover as a representative of his immigration business while Headley conducted surveillance for the attacks that killed more than 160 people. Rana has also pleaded not guilty to assisting Headley as he took surveillance for another planned attack on a Danish newspaper that in 2005 printed cartoons of Prophet Muhammad that offended many Muslims.

Headley has detailed through emails, recorded conversations and transcripts how he took orders from both the Pakistani intelligence agency known as the ISI and the Pakistani militant group, Lashkar-e-Taiba, that took credit for the Mumbai attacks.

In their final moments to question Headley before jurors on Tuesday, prosecutors reiterated that all of Headley's work in plotting and planning were communicated with Headley's Lashkar handler, Sajid Mir, and an ISI officer known only as "Major Iqbal" and Rana. Kashmiri, Mir and Iqbal, along with three others, are also listed on the Rana indictment, but their whereabouts are unknown.

The defense's main focus has been to portray Headley as a liar who lived multiple lives and used his friend over the years. Rana and Headley, who are both 50, met as teenagers at a Pakistani military boarding school.

"He is a guy with a very troubled past and a very troubled history with the truth," Blegen told reporters.

Under defense questioning, Headley admitted he lied in his initial statements to law enforcement when he said Rana had no knowledge of his plans. On Tuesday, he said he had sought a psychiatrist for a "mixed personality disorder" diagnosis, but did not disclose that treatment when asked by the judge in the case. He also acknowledged that he omitted details about his second wife when he spoke to his first wife.

Defense attorneys showed clips of Headley's initial statement to investigators, which showed a stark contrast to the man who has been speaking in a soft and nearly monotonous voice while appearing unaffected by days of questioning. In the video, a visibly agitated and fast-talking Headley keeps asking prosecutors if they had made any other arrests yet in the case.

On more than one occasion, Headley relied on Rana to help him commit crimes, even without his knowledge, he testified. Headley – who has two heroin smuggling convictions and later worked with the DEA as an informant – said he took Rana with on a car trip to smuggle heroin in Pakistan because Rana's government identification would help them get through check points easily. Rana, who attended medical school in Pakistan, served in the country's military. However, Headley testified that Rana had no idea there was heroin in the car and it was a huge risk.

Still, experts have said that undermining Headley's credibility is a challenge for the defense. His testimony has involved numerous emails and transcripts of phone calls with others listed in the indictment. Government witnesses are also expected to include FBI agents.

"He's certainly an imperfect individual, but the fact that the U.S. government put him up there and put him up there first, seems to suggest a reasonable level of confidence in what he has to say," said Stephen Tankel, a visiting scholar at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace who has written a book on Lashkar.

Blegen said defense attorneys were still deciding if they would put on a case.

___

Sophia Tareen can be reached at http://twitter.com/sophiatareen

FOLLOW HUFFPOST CHICAGO

CHICAGO — An admitted American terrorist who is the government's top witness in the trial of a Chicago businessman accused in the deadly 2008 Mumbai attacks repeatedly lied to the FBI, a judge a...
CHICAGO — An admitted American terrorist who is the government's top witness in the trial of a Chicago businessman accused in the deadly 2008 Mumbai attacks repeatedly lied to the FBI, a judge a...
Filed by Jen Sabella  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 38
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
naschkatze
A free man creates himself.
05:28 PM on 05/31/2011
I get queasy when people turn state's witness. It seems like an easy way to convict someone else, yet it spares the more guilty party perhaps. I've seen this in murder trials where the actual perpetrator gets off with a lighter sentence while the accessory gets hit up hard. Is it worth it? Is it justice?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
raffa657
04:33 PM on 05/31/2011
How credible is an admitted terrorist? I would think more credible than someone who's been tortured, water boarded, electrically shocked, or humiliated by being blindfolded, stripped naked and have one making fun of ones private parts. After treatment like that, I'd tell you anything you want to hear.
photo
FZliveson
Beating the Conundrum
04:21 PM on 05/31/2011
How credible is a politician? A lawyer? A judge? A car salesman? There is no real truth anymore in many places; just situational integrity. Unfortunately today it is almost a liability and not a virtue to be truthful. People say what others want to hear and people hear what they want to hear. The media terrorizes more than the terrorists do.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
naschkatze
A free man creates himself.
05:30 PM on 05/31/2011
Excellent, friend.
03:56 PM on 05/31/2011
It is Pakistan's position in this World that is actually being questioned.
03:33 PM on 05/31/2011
What the witness has fessed up to only collaborates already knows facts about the Pakistani ISI.
03:33 PM on 05/31/2011
I mean corroborates.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
naschkatze
A free man creates himself.
05:31 PM on 05/31/2011
Then why make a deal with him?
03:29 PM on 05/31/2011
Even today, the ISI m_urdered a famous Pakistani journalist.

http://www.atimes.com/atimes/South_Asia/MF01Df03.html
03:31 PM on 05/31/2011
Prime Minister Syed Yusuf Raza Gilani expressed his "deep grief and sorrow" over Shahzad's death and ordered an immediate inquiry into his kidnapping and murder, according to Associated Press of Pakistan.

Shahzad, 40, had on several occasions been warned by officials of the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) over articles they deemed to be detrimental to Pakistan's national interests or image. He leaves a wife, two sons aged 14 and seven, and a daughter aged 12.

Human Rights Watch researcher Ali Dayan Hasan earlier said he suspected ISI officials abducted Shahzad, possibly because of a recent story he wrote on al-Qaeda infiltration in the Pakistani navy. Authorities haven't commented. (Al-Qaeda had warned of Pakistan strike.)
03:28 PM on 05/31/2011
Considering the history of the ISI, what he says is nothing earth shattering. The ISI is a terr0rist organization.
photo
TurnSeiki
Staunch Conservative
02:49 PM on 05/31/2011
This is unbelievable. Liberals are actively trying to destroy the credibility of an admitted terrorist. This is ridiculous. By that logic, why was Scott Petersen's mistress seen as credible? If the person is a bad person, you can't take their word for it when they 'fess up?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AdamWest1313
Hardcore Agnostic
03:48 PM on 05/31/2011
Ah yes, you read an article online, so that means all liberals must be in on it....Wow.
Alonzo
Discount anything I say about myself.
02:33 PM on 05/31/2011
How credible is anyone?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MrTJB
Optimistic Pessimist
04:05 PM on 05/31/2011
Exactly. And who gets to decide? Who's above reproach? Who sits on the throne and is free from sin or guilt that deserves the position to pass judgment? I doubt very much that ANYONE could ever be that someone. It's only a matter of degrees. I'm more credible because I'm LESS guilty? I told FEWER lies? LOL. Pls.
02:25 PM on 05/31/2011
Well since the CIA owns and works in tandem with the ISI, I'm amazed they didn't know about it in advance.
photo
75thRanger
Though I Be The Lone Survivor
02:18 PM on 05/31/2011
Ask President Obama.......he probably can shed some light on the credibility of his friend Bill Ayers.

RLTW
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AdamWest1313
Hardcore Agnostic
03:48 PM on 05/31/2011
That's the best you've got? Bringing up Bill Ayers?
photo
75thRanger
Though I Be The Lone Survivor
03:56 PM on 05/31/2011
Is he or is he not a terr*rist?
photo
75thRanger
Though I Be The Lone Survivor
07:36 PM on 05/31/2011
That's what I thought.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MrTJB
Optimistic Pessimist
03:59 PM on 05/31/2011
Or ask the Bush/Cheney monster. I'm sure they can shed some light on the credibility of intel surrounding WMA's, yellow-cake uranium from Africa, FEMA Director Mike Brown, standing down the agents at Tora Bora...or any other number of lies and cover-ups perpetrated by THAT administration....
photo
75thRanger
Though I Be The Lone Survivor
04:12 PM on 05/31/2011
Feel better? All I know is that President Obama has a terr*rist as a friend and I don't so he has more insight in the matter than I do.

Sua Sponte
02:18 PM on 05/31/2011
It depends. A lot of them count on getting killed in the attack, not spending their lives in prison or having to sit in a chair while gas seeps through their tiny animal brain. Sometimes they are not told it is a suicide mission and that can make them turn on their bosses when they find out.