iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Tackling Climate Change: New Reports Underscore Role Of Local Leaders

Michael Bloomberg

First Posted: 05/31/11 09:02 PM ET Updated: 07/31/11 06:12 AM ET

WASHINGTON -- More than 40 of the world's largest cities have reported their greenhouse gas emissions along with a comprehensive analysis of any climate change-related reforms in studies released Tuesday night.

Gathered from areas representing 300 million people and ten percent of global CO2 emissions, the reports show the impact participating cities have on climate change and outline the role local leaders could play in reducing their cities’ carbon emissions.

“I firmly believe that if you can’t measure it, you can’t manage it,” said New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg in a statement on Tuesday. “That is true in business and it is true in government. Only by regularly and rigorously measuring and analysing our efforts can we learn what works, what doesn’t and why, and take effective action."

Frustrated by partisan bickering and stalemate in Congress, local leaders at the fourth biennial Conference of Mayors, a three-day retreat held this year in Sao Paulo, Brazil, gathered to discuss how to make significant environmental reforms at the city level.

Bloomberg, chair of the C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group, an organization committed to implementing sustainable climate-related actions in cities around the world, was not the only official to stress the importance of fighting climate change at the local level.

"The best scientific data tells us that it is long past time to address this challenge, and the best demographic data tells us that cities must lead the way," said Rohit Aggarwala, special advisor to the C40 chair. "The CDP Cities 2011 and Climate Action in Megacities reports provide solid data that demonstrate that the C40 Cities are leading the way -- in reporting emissions, developing climate action plans, and, most importantly, in taking action. These reports will inform the strategic direction of C40 programs and initiatives; help build networks of cities with similar profiles and agendas; and help C40 City officials make decisions about what actions they should prioritize."

The C40 developed two separate studies: one in partnership with independent nonprofit Carbon Disclosure Project and another with consulting firm Arup. The first study asked cities to publicly disclose their greenhouse gas emissions and climate risk data using a single reporting platform, while the second study measured what actions have been taken and must be taken across cities to mitigate the effects of a changing environment.

Co-developed by CDC, the first analysis covered four core areas: adaptation, governance, greenhouse gas emissions and strategy. More than 70 percent of C40 Cities (42 of 58) participated in the study, and the majority agreed to make their data publicly available.

"Cities are beginning to seize the opportunities from combating climate change and creating a low-carbon economy," said Conor Riffle, Head of CDP Cities. "The insight and transparency that the measurement and reporting process provides is crucial to understanding how city governments can best act to reduce emissions and environmental risk as well as bolster economic growth."

Among the report’s key findings:

Of the 42 Cities in the report, 57% are adopting City-wide GHG reduction targets and 62% have established action plans to address climate change;
  • Two out of every three C40 Cities are measuring and disclosing their GHG emissions to the public, which means that City governments are keeping pace with the largest 500 companies in the world as transparent reporters of climate impacts;
  • Over 90% of C40 Cities participating in the study identified themselves as being at-risk due to climate change. A further 43% of Cities reported that they are already dealing with the effects of climate change in their areas.

A second analysis provided detailed record of the climate-related actions the roughly 297 million residents in C40 Cities had taken. The report also lists ways cities could implement carbon emission-reducing policies across key areas -- including energy, transportation and infrastructure -- and suggests local leaders play a pivotal role in furthering climate action.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

WASHINGTON -- More than 40 of the world's largest cities have reported their greenhouse gas emissions along with a comprehensive analysis of any climate change-related reforms in studies released Tues...
WASHINGTON -- More than 40 of the world's largest cities have reported their greenhouse gas emissions along with a comprehensive analysis of any climate change-related reforms in studies released Tues...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 400
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
eaarth2
“An era ends when its illusions are exhausted
05:04 PM on 06/12/2011
Bloomberg's ideas are certainly reasonable. However Stopping the rise of C02 as a greenhouse gas, and other pollutants needs a national effort.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
brokerallen
The Middle Class Needs To Take Back America
02:00 AM on 06/03/2011
Replace Mayor Bloomberg.
ubrew12
that crazy uncle from Amarcord
12:23 AM on 06/03/2011
What the GOP is telling their flock is that a potent greenhouse gas, so potent that were it removed from our atmosphere this planet would be covered in ice, nevertheless loses its potency at concentrations 50% higher than is natural. Honestly, you don't have to be a scientist to find the flaw in that logic, you just have to be a sentient being.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
givemtheirwish
Science is the belief in ignorance of "experts"
12:17 AM on 06/03/2011
DON'T THEY KNOW?
THE SCIENCE IS SETTLED. AGW IS A FRAUD FOISTED ON G8.
ONTO THE NEXT SPOOKY DUDE HOAX.
05:29 AM on 06/02/2011
That's what the climate does.......it changes! Go drive a smart car and believe you are actually contributing to saving the planet.
photo
qwert1234
haha, charade you are
01:48 PM on 06/02/2011
holy crap! are you telling me climate scientists aren't aware that the climate changes? bloggers on huffpost are the only ones who figured this out? the arrogance of you people is astounding.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chrisd3
01:57 PM on 06/02/2011
"That's what the climate does......­.it changes"

Handwaving of the first order.

Climate doesn't change for no reason. What specific physical factors are causing the strong warming we've observed over the last 35 years or so?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
fireofenergy
Promote freedom AND science
01:26 AM on 06/02/2011
It is impossible to dispute the fact that CO2 is, indeed accelerating, like almost as fast as our debt.
The solution is what any industrial nation would do...
Build molten salt reactors (because they are like a million times less dangerous than the LWR) and...
Build all kinds of robotic solar, wind and lifepo4 battery factories (installations are where the jobs would be). There is simply NO excuse other than the normalcy factor and greed as to why we don't already have such urgently needed robotic factories (needed to make RE parts and batteries like ten times less expensive) and EV's.
Sadly, though, our leaders want to destroy the dollar (because they want to drive away industrialism) and so the debt will make it IMPOSSIBLE for US to continue on with a non carbon future unless such automation is utilized...

Worst yet, they want to tax carbon! (good for nations back in black to make good on RE tech, but utterly insane for US)!
02:24 PM on 06/01/2011
"Of the 42 Cities in the report, 57% are adopting City-wide GHG reduction targets and 62% have established action plans to address climate change;" Well Bravo and Amen.
photo
abbienormal
What hump?
03:42 PM on 06/01/2011
#1 fan.
02:11 PM on 06/01/2011
A survey completed last year by Dr. Murray Mitchell of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration reveals a drop of half a degree in average ground temperatures in the Northern Hemisphere between 1945 and 1968. According to George Kukla of Columbia University, satellite photos indicated a sudden, large increase in Northern Hemisphere snow cover in the winter of 1971-72. And a study released last month by two NOAA scientists notes that the amount of sunshine reaching the ground in the continental U.S. diminished by 1.3% between 1964 and 1972.
To the layman, the relatively small changes in temperature and sunshine can be highly misleading. Reid Bryson of the University of Wisconsin points out that the Earth’s average temperature during the great Ice Ages was only about seven degrees lower than during its warmest eras – and that the present decline has taken the planet about a sixth of the way toward the Ice Age average. Others regard the cooling as a reversion to the “little ice age” conditions that brought bitter winters to much of Europe and northern America between 1600 and 1900 – years when the Thames used to freeze so solidly that Londoners roasted oxen on the ice and when iceboats sailed the Hudson River almost as far south as New York City.

Newsweek, April 28, 1975
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chrisd3
02:20 PM on 06/01/2011
Please re-read that article, then come back and post any predictions you find from scientists.

We'll wait here.

Oh, you're back. That was quick. Did you find any? No? That's right, there weren't any. The article was about observed cooling, not predicted cooling. Not really the same thing, is it?
02:42 PM on 06/01/2011
There is a list of 3100 Scientists, here are the first few, Earl M. Aagaard, PhD, Charles W. Aami, Roger L. Aamodt, PhD, Wilbur A. Aanes, M. Robert Aaron, Ralph F. Abate, Hamed K. Abbas, PhD, Paul Abbett, Wyatt E. Abbitt III, Ursula K. Abbott, PhD, Bernaard J. Abbott, PhD, David M. Abbott Jr., Frank D. Abbott, Paul Abbott, Donald W. Abbott, Douglas R. Abbott, David J. Abbott, Eugene Abbott, Refaat A. Abdel-Malek, PhD, Riaz F. Abdulla, PhD, Albert S. Abdullah, DVM, Alan E. Abel, Jason Abel, Janis I. Abele, Joseph M. Abell, Robert E. Abell, Gene H. Abels, MD, Philip H. Abelson, PhD*, Wayne Aben, Jerrold Abernathy, Marshall W. Abernathy, Grady L. Ables, Earl Arthur Abrahamson, PhD, Robert C. Abrams, Carl M. Abrams, Alan V. Abrams, MD, Paul B. Abramson, PhD, Jose L. Abreu Jr., Joe L. Abriola Jr., Ahmed E. Aburahmah, PhD, Austin R. Ace, David A. Acerni, John W. Achee Sr., Billy R. Achmbaugh, Paul Achmidt, Daniel T. Achord, PhD, Ernest R. Achterberg, Ava V. Ackerman, DVM, William L. Ackerman, John R. Ackerman, Gene L. Ackerman, Richard E. Ackermann, Terry D. Ackman, Donald O. Acrey, Lee Actor, Humberto M. Acuna Jr., Robert K. Adair, PhD, William G. Adair Jr., Daniel Otis Adam, PhD, Brian D. Adam, PhD, Chris Adam, Anthony F. Adamo, George Baker Adams, PhD, Neil Adams, PhD, Leonard Caldwell Adams, PhD, Phillip Adams, PhD, Harold Elwood Adams, PhD,
02:45 PM on 06/01/2011
It has 31,000 on it not 3100.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
B Wood
05:27 PM on 06/01/2011
A study done on research papers regarding climate change between 1965 and 1979 found that 44 predicted the climate would warm while only 7 predicted it would cool.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chrisd3
05:36 PM on 06/01/2011
"only 7 predicted it would cool"

And the theme of most of those was "Pollution reflects sunlight back into space. If we emit enough of it, it would likely cause cooling, which could get serious if we do it long enough."

But since we DID do something about pollution, even these weren't actually wrong. There wasn't much in them that sceintists today would disagree with.
01:14 PM on 06/01/2011
Increasing the number of trains would reduce the number of cars and trucks spewing pollutants into the air. These trains can be powered by clean renewable energy.
photo
dumpdemliars2
One goal...One and done!
01:22 PM on 06/01/2011
Right!
01:13 PM on 06/01/2011
Cities can finance the placement of solar panels and wind turbines on the roof of every building. Coastal and river cities can finance the construction of tidal and hydroelectric turbines.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jimboy71
Hen Diapheron Heautoi
01:17 PM on 06/01/2011
And reap the rewards, and lower taxes, and give business incentives based on cheaper, or even free energy, and any number of wonderful things that could happen when people get together and own their power production.

I used to live in Westmount, which is one of Canada's wealthiest enclaves. Our power bills were nothing. Why? We had our own hydro company that bought from the Province at wholesale prices, and some generation capacity ourselves, which offset some of that cost further.

It's a no brainer.
photo
fineartist1
The average person thinks he isn't
03:00 AM on 06/02/2011
Jimboy, just a question about your icon picture. What are you doing playing the violin or is that a slab of raw meat on your arm under a pillow and a tape measure under your chin?
01:12 PM on 06/01/2011
One of the best things cities can do to reduce their emissions is to finance the construction of an electric car charging infrastructure. Most people don't buy electric cars because they don't have anywhere to charge them. Adding outlets to parking lots and garages will help a lot. Adding charging meters next to parking meters would also help. Battery charging stations for cars that can swap batteries would reduce charging time significantly.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jimboy71
Hen Diapheron Heautoi
01:18 PM on 06/01/2011
Hydrogen fuel stations for the hydrogen combustion engine developed by BMW would be great too. It produces water vapour as exhaust.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
alteredstory
Hold on to the center
01:35 PM on 06/01/2011
We already have an electrical grid though - it's an easier retrofit.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chrisd3
01:52 PM on 06/01/2011
I thought the big problem with hydrogen was that it takes more energy to produce the hydrogen (not really "produce," but you know what i mean) than you get from burning it. Have there been advances in this that I hadn't heard about?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jkanon
A pragmatic progressive
11:30 AM on 06/01/2011
This approach will work as long as Republcians are kept out of local governments. The anti-science, anti-climate change stance of the GOP has made it the party of destruction as far as amelerating climate change is concerned.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
alteredstory
Hold on to the center
11:33 AM on 06/01/2011
Just to offer a glimmer of hope - Governor Chris Christie of New Jersey, while he pulled out of RGGI, is now publicly acknowledging climate change as a dangerous problem, and he's apparently taking action on it.

Among a couple things of questionable benefit, he's banned new coal plants, and is pushing wind.
MGhamma
Reality is 100% biased!
01:19 AM on 06/02/2011
Well, he does have a lot of wind to spare.
photo
fineartist1
The average person thinks he isn't
03:01 AM on 06/02/2011
The fool just lost my vote.
photo
abbienormal
What hump?
10:51 AM on 06/01/2011
Really folks. If you are going to toss in the Al Gore/big house/jet set lifestyle argument into the mix, please be considerate of others and do it in the evening.

I really cannot start any drinking games in the morning.

Please. Think of the rest of us.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jimboy71
Hen Diapheron Heautoi
01:19 PM on 06/01/2011
George Soros...

Oops.

Beer's on me.
photo
abbienormal
What hump?
01:28 PM on 06/01/2011
Oh, boy. Forgot about that one.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chrisd3
01:19 PM on 06/01/2011
"I really cannot start any drinking games in the morning."

For heaven's sake, why not?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jimboy71
Hen Diapheron Heautoi
01:32 PM on 06/01/2011
It interferes with my work more than this place does.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
alteredstory
Hold on to the center
10:50 AM on 06/01/2011
http://skepticalscience.com/argument.php

EVERY claim made here has a source linked on the page. ALL of them.

How here's what I want you to do, since you claim to be "skeptics" - find one paper - just one, and read it. Then look at its bibliography (the sources used in that paper) and pick another source. Read that paper, and get another source. Read that paper, and get another source.

Keep going.

This will take you back to 1850 and probably farther, and you will have read less than 1% of the available research on climate change.

When you claim that "there is no evidence" it is depressingly clear that you are taking that claim on faith, as you have clearly never tried to look at the evidence presented.

Go ahead - we'll wait. Do that little exercise. Do a little book work to prove that you're not just a credulous pawn, parroting what you're told.

And hey, if you BELIEVE in global warming, and haven't looked at the evidence, you're just as bad, so YOU go do it too.

We don't need to take this on faith. We need to NOT take this on faith, and if you do, you're leaving yourself open to the next persuasive person who comes along and makes a better argument. Go look at the data.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jimboy71
Hen Diapheron Heautoi
01:20 PM on 06/01/2011
But it's much easier just to say that the site has an agenda, is part of a conspiracy, and dismiss it. That way, you don't have to do any actual work.

Not one of the deniers here has ever taken that challenge, in part because they don't have the intelligence or the patience, but also because they know the truth that they seek to hide with their baseless allegations.
10:14 AM on 06/01/2011
Climate change is a lie...just like the world being round is a lie.....I know the world is flat because of Pirates of the Caribbean.....they went to worlds' end......I know that atoms are a lie because I can't see them......I know that oil being harmful in a number of ways is a lie because I feel fine.......I know that DNA is a lie because OJ was innocent......I know that fox news is the truth because they said it was.
03:57 PM on 06/01/2011
A fair and balanced assessment.