iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Pentagon Considers Cyber Attacks To Be Acts Of War: WSJ

Cyber Attack Act Of War

The Huffington Post   First Posted: 05/31/11 11:34 AM ET Updated: 07/31/11 06:12 AM ET

Cyber attacks that originate abroad can qualify as acts of war that could merit a military response by the U.S., the Pentagon has determined, according to the Wall Street Journal.

Citing a Pentagon report on cybersecurity strategy, part of which will be de-classified soon, the Wall Street Journal reported that the Pentagon has, for the first time, developed a cyber strategy that seeks to outline how the U.S. might react to cyber attacks targeted at the government, as well as critical infrastructure such as power plants, public transportation systems, financial institutions, and more.

"If you shut down our power grid, maybe we will put a missile down one of your smokestacks," an unnamed military official told the Journal.

At the core of the Pentagon's plan is the idea of there being an "equivalence" between an electronic attack and a physical one. "If a cyber attack produces the death, damage, destruction or high-level disruption that a traditional military attack would cause, then it would be a candidate for a 'use of force' consideration, which could merit retaliation," writes the Journal.

The report's recommendations are likely to be controversial, sparking questions about how the government will be able to quickly and correctly track attacks back to their perpetrators, a notoriously difficult process. In addition, it remains to be seen how the policy would affect other countries' response to covert cyber attacks or cyber sleuthing spearheaded by the U.S. For example, many have suggested that the U.S. was, in part, responsible for the Stuxnet worm that infiltrated Iran's nuclear defense systems.

A recommendation for a global cybersecurity strategy outlined by the Obama administration earlier this month also suggested cyber attacks could be treated as military threats. The government noted that it would consider using military force to respond to electronic attacks.

"We reserve the right to use all necessary means – diplomatic, informational, military and economic – as appropriate," the report read.

The Pentagon's report comes amid a slew of significant and large-scale hacking attacks have been reported over the past several months. Hackers cracked the defenses of Epsilon, an online marketing company that works with giants like Citigroup, Walgreens, and Capital One, to compromise millions of users' data, Sony's PlayStation Network was shut down following a breach that put 100 million users' personal information at risk, and defense contractor Lockheed Martin suffered a "significant and tenacious" attack that threatened to expose sensitive information.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST TECH

Cyber attacks that originate abroad can qualify as acts of war that could merit a military response by the U.S., the Pentagon has determined, according to the Wall Street Journal. Citing a Pentagon...
Cyber attacks that originate abroad can qualify as acts of war that could merit a military response by the U.S., the Pentagon has determined, according to the Wall Street Journal. Citing a Pentagon...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2,841
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (68 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:14 PM on 06/11/2011
Yep,this is exactly right.Someone's getting their Ass Kicked,by the Pentagon and Donna J.Marn,Real Soon!
12:32 PM on 06/01/2011
Hey.you shut down our electric grids and we drop a bomb down your chimney.Sounds like a plan to me.
09:01 AM on 06/01/2011
Any excues to murder people in an effort to showcase their new weapons to sell...
When will the HAgue start looking to this contry as teh largest purveyor of death and demand heads of state ( oops doing that allready - Gaddafi etc) to be arrested and prosecuted for war crimes?
The USA manufactures more hate and death than anyone else and yet they seem to kkep their feet out of the sh%t!
Be real interesting over the next decadde to see how USA reacts to a massive CHINESE build up of arms...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
fastronaut
Something witty
06:43 AM on 06/01/2011
Soon, the question 'Why are you bombing me for no reason?" will be an act of war.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sol76
06:42 AM on 06/01/2011
Sounds like a warning to China and Russia. Perhaps cyber attacks are a bigger issue than we all realise, with those nations and others actively trying to breach everyone else's networks. That's not to say that blunt force could not create more problems than it solves. In the online world, can anyone be certain that they know where an attack actually came from?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Vlad Roudenko
10:16 PM on 06/02/2011
On the surface that's exactly what it appears to be. There is a big flaw in this position taken by US. It's entirely untenable. You will not see a bomber or a missile flying towards Moscow or Beijing. China may very well be carrying out cyber attacks against US on a government level. Russia is occupied with matters of bigger importance. Still, Russia has an abundance of talented young hackers who enjoy hacking various US sites and stealing credit card numbers. Even if one of these young people or a group of them manages to shut down, say, a government website, Washington wouldn't bomb their house. It would be an act of war it would never recover from and it knows that.

Some of the points of this policy were really absurd. For example, it cites financial institutions as critical infrastructure in the same sentence as government. One could arrive at the conclusion that financial institutions are either part or property of the US government. Perhaps by bailing them out they became government property. At this point it all sounds just like any other absurdity thought up in some bunker and has no real world application. It's doubtful that US will go to war with anyone over a cyber attack, especially against larger countries.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
canpete
05:36 AM on 06/01/2011
seems everything is an act of war to america..........
photo
flossophy
the unfamous anti-establishment classical liberal
12:36 PM on 06/01/2011
Why are China and Russia trying to ha.ck into our networks?
04:23 AM on 06/01/2011
Of course! They want every possible justification for waging wars. It's their raison d'etre. The troubling part for the rest of the world is, they'll most likely end up firing live arsenals instead of virtual ones.
03:57 AM on 06/01/2011
I just have to agree with sentiment of so many here. Bizarre that the Pentagon say this after the Stuxnet issue. Do you them presume that no one reads the news? Or are they just 'one rule for them and another rule for others'?

Mark at http://www.idgconnect.com/blog
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:16 AM on 06/01/2011
I gather this is the official start of a cyber weopons race, the real start of course being the US' s own cyber attack on Iran. This is going to be a good deal more problematic than the "missile gap" of course, and no doubt no less expensive. A couple points:

1) The US undoubtedly has the lead in every category of the key technologies involved, including spying on others' program developments.

2) Everyone else knows it. So all players at the State level are already attempting to devise defences. And of course, these legitimate defensive moves are wide open to being interpreted as offensive in nature - so expect all manner of finger-pointing accusations, denials, and counter-accustions, some legit, and some not - with the public, of course, in no position to know which is which. A big, noisy $$ maker.

3) No government is going to run the risk of launching an isolated attack that only takes down a piece of an opponent's operations - it did not require a semi-official statement to already know the US response once the guilty party was identified. So any real threat is sub-national, i.e., "terrorist", though I would expect that the source will be from inside developed countries by their own citizens rather than as an extension of the current Islamocentric "war on terror".
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
harrymudd
06:06 AM on 06/01/2011
The cyber attack on Iran was by Israel not USA. I am Iranian and much preferred this to a physical bombing. I oppose bombing of Iran; this was a far more targeted "attack". It did not start and all out war. It did not kill any Iranian or American people.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:20 PM on 06/01/2011
1) If Israel was the direct agent, it was with US approval. But I rather suspect it was a joint operation from start to finish.

2) In my view, Iran has every right to seek the means to defend itself, given what the US has unleashed in the region over several decades. If Israel is allowed hundreds of warheads, I have no problem with Iran possessing a handful.
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
03:03 AM on 06/01/2011
Act of war? That's funny, we did not think so when we did it to Iran.... or did we?
photo
European1919
I am the PigmⒶn
03:16 AM on 06/01/2011
Not the same when the USA do it. Same with terrosism. Or sending armed combatants into a foreign country to assassinate someone.
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
05:13 PM on 06/01/2011
Yup, we are exceptional, and when it comes to morals, that seem to mean deficient..
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
harrymudd
06:07 AM on 06/01/2011
Would you have preferred a bombing? Israel/USA were going to do something. This was much less damaging to the Iranian people and killed no one.
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
05:12 PM on 06/01/2011
So when did congress declare war on Iran? Or do you care?
12:57 AM on 06/01/2011
If cyber attacks are considered acts of war then maybe they can use virtual missiles instead of real ones?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Michael Lindley
American in Paris
02:54 AM on 06/01/2011
Who would that kill? This is America-overkill is our hallmark!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mattjoe3
Once snowmobiled over open water
12:17 AM on 06/01/2011
Bulls%^# pretext for Internet kill switch.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Joe Meeker
Nos sunt legio.
12:06 AM on 06/01/2011
This is just another excuse to have perpetual war. More worrisome though is that this could be seen as a threat to China.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:30 PM on 05/31/2011
pretty strange comment considering pentagon and israel put STUXNET into play........
11:23 PM on 05/31/2011
Those of you against this, what should we do in retaliation if we are attacked like this?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lon Calhoun
Obama whats with the gas prices
12:01 AM on 06/01/2011
I hear crickets.
12:03 AM on 06/01/2011
A lot of people don't do the whole thinking thing around here...