More

Sprint Files To Block AT&T Purchase Of T-Mobile

Sprint Att Tmobile

First Posted: 05/31/11 07:14 PM ET Updated: 07/31/11 06:12 AM ET

By Sinead Carew and Diane Bartz
NEW YORK/WASHINGTON D.C. | Tue May 31, 2011 5:08pm EDT
(Reuters) - Sprint Nextel has formally asked U.S. regulators to block AT&T Inc's proposed $39 billion purchase of T-Mobile USA, saying the deal "has no public interest benefit" and would harm competition even if it comes with conditions.
Sprint -- the most vocal opponent of the deal, which would create a new leader in the U.S. wireless market -- said that even if the Federal Communications Commission forced AT&T to divest assets as a condition, that would not be enough.

"The proposed transaction would produce no tangible public interest benefits and would impose serious anti-competitive harms that cannot be remedied through divestitures or conditions," Sprint said on Tuesday, the deadline for initial responses to AT&T's application to the FCC.

Smaller rival Leap Wireless and advocacy groups like Free Press have spoken out against the deal, as have many individual consumers in FCC filings.

On the flip side, AT&T said in a statement on Tuesday that it had support from groups including "community, civic and minority organizations," as well as 13 governors. The deal requires FCC and Justice Department approval.

AT&T argues that it needs T-Mobile USA's spectrum to expand high-speed services faster and improve its network performance, which has been criticized by consumers.

But Sprint, the No. 3 U.S. mobile operator, took issue with that argument, saying that AT&T has no lack of spectrum.

Instead Sprint said AT&T's problem is that it has "simply failed to upgrade or invest sufficiently in its network." It said AT&T already has enough spectrum to cover 97 percent of Americans with high-speed mobile services.

But Sprint argues that it may be come more difficult for consumers to pay for such services as smaller companies like itself would have less power to moderate service pricing after the deal as the two top carriers, AT&T and Verizon Wireless, would then control about 80 percent of the market.

Like Sprint, T-Mobile USA -- a unit of Deutsche Telekom -- tends to appeal to more cost conscious consumers than AT&T so the worry is that the cheaper prices would end up being phased out over time.

Sprint also argued in its lengthy filing with the FCC that AT&T's control of wireline assets such as connections to mobile broadcast towers would "exacerbate the anti-competitive effects of the takeover."

A merger of AT&T and T-Mobile USA would increase AT&T's share of the market to 44 percent from 32 percent, with Verizon continuing to hold 35 percent, according to Sprint, which estimated its own market share at 15 percent.

As a result, manufacturers would have less incentive to build mobile devices for Sprint after the deal because of its smaller scale, the company said in its filing.

Verizon Wireless is a venture of Verizon Communications and Vodafone Group Plc.

(Editing by Matthew Lewis and Steve Orlofsky)

Copyright 2011 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST TECH

Filed by Bianca Bosker  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 84
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
12:36 AM on 06/03/2011
ATT got rid of its 500 text messaging plan. Just noticed it today on my online bill and they AUTOMATICALLY UPGRADED my plan with a $10 extra charge without telling me to the 1000text plan. WTF!

Check your "features" youll be next!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:43 AM on 06/02/2011
Good. AT
11:59 PM on 06/01/2011
I'm a long time T-Mobile customer and this merger will be more harmful than good. Leave choice in the market! Tell AT
photo
thinkb4uleapII
My micro-bio is no longer empty.
07:30 PM on 06/01/2011
Antitrust statutes are passe and no longer needed. While they currently do little to hinder the consolidated power and stifling control of large corporations over key industry sectors, they may pose some future danger to these federally-protected megalopolies should some "do-good" statesperson(s) miraculously get control of the levers of power. To avoid such a remote possibility -- BAN ANTITRUST LAWS NOW!!!
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
J0E1
Phil Hill 2012
03:52 PM on 06/01/2011
"On the flip side, ATT said in a statement on Tuesday that it had support from groups including "community, civic and minority organizations," as well as 13 governors" Wow, what stake do these organizations and governors have in the success of a telecom? I'm guessing a loss of large contributions... This should be blatantly obvious to the FCC.
photo
JWerner
Beware Macduff; beware the thane of Fife!
04:02 PM on 06/01/2011
Nah. The government is apparently quite happy to overlook obvious signs of corruption and favoritism, both from within and without, unless it has some specific reason of it's own to pursue it.
photo
thinkb4uleapII
My micro-bio is no longer empty.
07:33 PM on 06/01/2011
On what basis are the cited organizations backing this merger?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
anastasiabeaverhousen
Time wounds all heels
01:58 PM on 06/01/2011
AT
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
anastasiabeaverhousen
Time wounds all heels
02:00 PM on 06/01/2011
I didn't believe General Public below........he's right. The ampersand must be the HP hotkey for deleting comments!
photo
JWerner
Beware Macduff; beware the thane of Fife!
04:03 PM on 06/01/2011
. . .

Or, it's a glitch in the system, as General Public said.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
becky bradshaw
"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth
12:15 PM on 06/01/2011
"A merger of ATT and T-Mobile USA would increase ATT's share of the market to 44 percent from 32 percent, with Verizon continuing to hold 35 percent, according to Sprint, which estimated its own market share at 15 percent."

Since ATT (formerly Southwestern Bell) and Verizon (formerly Bell Atlantic) coordinate their marketing and pricing, once the T-Mobile acquisition is approved, the Baby Bell Cabal would control about 80% of the U.S. market (http://attcritic.blogspot.com/2011/03/collusion-between-at-and-verizon-on.html).
photo
thinkb4uleapII
My micro-bio is no longer empty.
07:12 PM on 06/01/2011
Kinda reminds me of the Terminator sequel where the Terminator bot reconstitutes itself after being blasted into tiny pieces. Similarly, the telecoms and media conglomerates continue to solidify their grip on their respective industries by acquiring, merging and consolidating disparate and valuable assets.
12:01 AM on 06/02/2011
Verizon also took out MCI once and for all long ago.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
General Public
liberal, progressive, atheist, Democrat, SubGenius
11:57 AM on 06/01/2011
Hey, everyone commenting on this, if you use the ampersand sign when you type AT and T, the ampersand and everything after that will not show up in your post. Seems like a bug in the commenting system. So just type "AT and T" or "ATT", and don't use the ampersand sign.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
drumz
Those little red panties they pass the test
12:53 PM on 06/01/2011
This has been happening for days.
photo
JWerner
Beware Macduff; beware the thane of Fife!
01:11 PM on 06/01/2011
Indeed. Wonder when it'll get fixed. . .
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
General Public
liberal, progressive, atheist, Democrat, SubGenius
11:51 AM on 06/01/2011
AT
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
General Public
liberal, progressive, atheist, Democrat, SubGenius
11:55 AM on 06/01/2011
OK it seems that if anyone types in AT ampersand T, the ampersand and everything after that gets cut off. Really Huffington Post you need to fix that bug.

Anyway, this merger is a really bad idea and would mean higher costs, less innovation, less choices for consumers, and would only benefit the phone companies at the expense of everyone else.
photo
thinkb4uleapII
My micro-bio is no longer empty.
07:15 PM on 06/01/2011
The "bug" you refer to is likely a result of HP "cleansing" submitted input prior to storing it in their database.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MrVee
11:41 AM on 06/01/2011
Why people only consider this to be purely a money thing is beyond comprehension. This deal is going to be really bad for consumers. The next time you fill up your car, try to remember what it was like when there was true competition for gas. Back when there was more than 12 companies producing gas, you had choice and lower prices. When Exxon took over Mobile Oil, their combined power forced smaller hardworking businesses to shut down. Now we got 4 -5 dollar a gallon gas. If you are too young to remember, ask somebody.

In fact, try to remember what competition was like before Super Wal-Mart entered your town and effectively killed every mom and pop store in site. Mom and pop kept the money in the community because that is where they lived. Wal-mart sends it to China by way of Wall street. Same would be the result if AT
photo
JWerner
Beware Macduff; beware the thane of Fife!
01:13 PM on 06/01/2011
In all honesty, before the superstore in my town moved in, there still weren't that many mom-and-pop stores. They would've had to compete with Target, the wide variety of commonplace department stores, and other larger businesses.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
J0E1
Phil Hill 2012
11:37 AM on 06/01/2011
Next up on HP news "Why homeless people want food and shelter" plus, a HP exclusive story "why your male neighbor wants a super model gf and an italian supercar"
photo
Zork4
You can have your own opinion, not your own facts.
05:46 PM on 06/01/2011
There is something beyond self-interest here. Sprint's interests align with the public interest in this case.
11:35 AM on 06/01/2011
The FCC is taking public comments about the merger. If you'd like to comment, the Proceeding Number is 11-65:

http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs/hotdocket/list
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
drumz
Those little red panties they pass the test
12:56 PM on 06/01/2011
Thank-you!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
becky bradshaw
"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth
11:26 AM on 06/01/2011
"A merger of AT
photo
time1910
time is on my side
11:24 AM on 06/01/2011
T-Mobile USA is for sale. Don't just block AT
photo
time1910
time is on my side
11:29 AM on 06/01/2011
T-Mobile USA is for sale. Don't just block ATTs purchase Sprint, buy it!
12:18 PM on 06/01/2011
Why would sprint a CDMA format buy T-Mobile a GSM format?
11:23 AM on 06/01/2011
Wow, they could only round up 13 GOP governors who would take money for their approval? I would have guessed all of them would be for sale.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
drumz
Those little red panties they pass the test
12:57 PM on 06/01/2011
13 out of 50 is 26% hardly a majority!
photo
JWerner
Beware Macduff; beware the thane of Fife!
01:21 PM on 06/01/2011
Indeed. Not to mention that they, conveniently, don't mention how many governors would be AGAINST this move. They also don't mention which states these governors are in. . .I personally consider the opinions of the governors of flyover states (Nebraska, the Dakotas, etc) to be of less import than the opinions of, say, the governor of California or New York or Texas, or some other state with PEOPLE in it.