More

Huntsman Signed Bill Requiring Utah To Study Mandate

Huntsman

First Posted: 06/01/11 11:09 AM ET Updated: 08/01/11 06:12 AM ET

WASHINGTON -- Ever since former Gov. Jon Huntsman Jr. began his public deliberations on whether he would seek the GOP nomination for president, he has had to refute claims that he not only considered an individual mandate as part of Utah's health care reform, but that he openly supported such an initiative.

In various statements to The Huffington Post in the last few weeks, Huntsman and his campaign have repeatedly batted down the idea of such support. They argued that the now politically toxic mandate was merely one of many health care reform ideas he examined.

Huntsman gave a lengthy denial during his first swing through New Hampshire.

"As governor, you've got to explore every approach, every policy option there is," he said in Hancock. "You'd be disingenuous as a leader if you didn't. So when you're doing something as important as health care reform -- and something as important as closing the gap on the uninsured -- you've got to live with the idea of what mandates will do, how people will respond, the benefits or burdens to small businesses. And after you argue it with all the experts, then you've got to come up with what you think is the best solution."

But Huntsman did more than just consider a mandate. On March 19, 2008, he signed into law health care reform legislation that included a requirement that the state study "the costs and benefits associated with (a) different forms of mandates for individual responsibility; and (b) potential enforcement mechanisms for individual responsibility."

Huntsman's spokesperson Tim Miller said in an email that this mandate legislation is perfectly in line with what the former governor has stated all along.

"This was a study bill which created a task force to review health care reform options," he wrote. "As Gov. Huntsman has said, he and the legislature considered a number of options -- good and bad -- as part of a comprehensive review process. In the end they decided on free-market legislation without mandates that has since become the model for conservative health care reform."

Judi Hilman, executive director of the Utah Health Policy Project, said "the bill is seen today as launching health care reform in Utah. It is not just a study bill." She added that an initial draft of the bill was reviewed by advocates and other stakeholders in November 2007.

The original legislation contained a mandate. But the bill got watered down, and the mandate was demoted to a study item.

After Huntsman signed the reforms into law, the legislature created a health care reform task force. Judging from the minutes of the task force meetings, the legislature simply heard testimony on mandates. But the task force never produced an actual study on the issue.

The mandate is the heart of the conservative critique of President Barack Obama's health care reforms. It is also the essential underpinning for the various lawsuits filed by Virginia and other states in their effort to repeal Obama's landmark legislation.

But the mandate didn't use to be a Republican anathema.

The problem facing potential GOP candidates like Huntsman is that the mandate had been a bedrock conservative, Heritage Foundation-supported idea, and an essential piece of former Governor Mitt Romney's formerly-celebrated Massachusetts Connector plan. Long before Obama became president, a lot of conservatives liked the mandate -- including Huntsman.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- Ever since former Gov. Jon Huntsman Jr. began his public deliberations on whether he would seek the GOP nomination for president, he has had to refute claims that he not only considered ...
WASHINGTON -- Ever since former Gov. Jon Huntsman Jr. began his public deliberations on whether he would seek the GOP nomination for president, he has had to refute claims that he not only considered ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 204
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
01:16 AM on 06/02/2011
I'm a pretty conservative guy and I like Huntsman. Assuming he has a more conservative congress than he, he will have a great Presidency..
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Silence Dogoody
12:58 AM on 06/02/2011
Only the political chattering class pretends Huntsman will get traction this election.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
truly moderate
Reform Party, a third way
12:51 AM on 06/02/2011
Atleast Huntsman isn't out attacking the adminstration......atleast he actually believes in looking and exploring multiple options and the opinions of the people and other leaders.....which is more than I can say for conservative republicans.

Still, I am disappoint lately with Huntsman. I thought he was going to build on his centrist foundation....instead (though mildly and in a well manner fasion) he is distancing himself from his former healthcare positions.
05:40 PM on 06/01/2011
Another one bites the dust. He was for it before he was against it. LOL
photo
K August
Research alecexposed
04:07 PM on 06/01/2011
"The problem facing potential GOP candidates like Huntsman is that the mandate had been a bedrock conservative, Heritage Foundation-supported idea, and an essential piece of former Governor Mitt Romney's formerly-celebrated Massachusetts Connector plan. Long before Obama became president, a lot of conservatives liked the mandate -- including Huntsman."

Funny how the all do a flip flop when a Democrat President pushed and passed what they already liked.
04:27 PM on 06/01/2011
Mandate, schmandate! If the economy is sucking for air next year, so will be Obama!
photo
CharlesDevell
Hellhounds on My Trail
09:51 PM on 06/01/2011
If the economy is exatcly where it is today Obama will be reelected. Numbers don't lie the country moving in the right direction positive job growth 14 straight months.

Also, Obama is a better choice than the group that GOP has to offer.

But, the economy will be better than it is right now. I don't know how much better, but it will be better.

And by you logic Obama wins right?

But, I suspect your statement was more wishful thinking than analysis.
03:57 PM on 06/01/2011
"...included a requirement that the state study "the costs and benefits associated with (a) different forms of mandates for individual responsibility; and (b) potential enforcement mechanisms for individual responsibility."

OH NO! He actually wanted people to study this to see whether or not it was a good idea. How dare he? Aren't politicians supposed to reach positions by the received the word of their party, unencumbered by any facts or research?
photo
CharlesDevell
Hellhounds on My Trail
photo
CharlesDevell
Hellhounds on My Trail
09:57 PM on 06/01/2011
JULIE ROSE (KCPW): One of the recommendations in that proposal is that all Utahns be required to have health insurance of some sort, and those who are not able to afford it would be paid for by the state through one of the state's health programs. It's a mandate of health insurance. Are you comfortable with that, with requiring every Utahn to get health insurance?
GOV. HUNTSMAN: I'm comfortable with a requirement. You can call it whatever you want, but at some point we're going to have to get serious about how we deal with this issue and that means there will have to be a multitude of different policies that are available in the marketplace. It means that it will be more incumbent on citizens to look at responsibility, there own responsibility in terms of health, and the choices that are made. It likely will mean that we'll be in an environment with better prices, more options, more access and availability.

There is a mandate today, let us not forget, and it's called the emergency room. You show up in the emergency room, and you get covered. Who pays the bills? Taxpayers pay the bills. Companies pay the bills. So we're living in an environment today where there already is a mandate in place.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cadawa
03:44 PM on 06/01/2011
Huntsman's a carpet bagger. He's from Palo Alto. He's a shock doctrine baby. Watch out Utah.
Huntsman should watch out also. There are plenty of people in that State that won't tolerate what he has in mind. They are aren't too particular about how that make that known.
He probably said he supported health care reform to get elected...kinda' like our President.
03:43 PM on 06/01/2011
Try as they might to make it happen, none of this will ultimately hurt either Huntsman or Romney. Both of these Republicans will be seen next year as rational and acceptable alternatives to Obama. It'll be the economy and how the President fared with it that will determine who wins in 2012. If the economy is bad, and the possibility of any serious recovery looks pretty sparse right now, the nation will not be frightened by the prospect of either Huntsman or Romney as President.
photo
K August
Research alecexposed
04:04 PM on 06/01/2011
And that's why the GOP has made it their job to not let the POTUS get re-elected....even at the expense of the people and jobs.

S.3816: Creating American Jobs and Ending Offshoring Act
Republicans block bill to prevent jobs from moving overseas

Senate Democrats attempted to pass one more jobs-related bill on Tuesday that would make it more difficult for U.S. companies to ship jobs overseas, but Senate Republicans successfully filibustered the bill.

This latest filibuster is another sign the Republicans truly do not care about the American people and are more worried about corporate interests.

http://politics.nytimes.com/congress/bills/111/s3816
04:25 PM on 06/01/2011
Do you really think Democrats aren't just as interested in corporate interests as Republicans? When Dems are on the upswing they get more corporate money that Repupblicans. And when Republicans are seen as more electable, they end up with the most corporate funds. Both Parties stay in bed with, end up all night with, and are more than willing to fully satisfy corporate interests. Who breathing doesn't know that?!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bioShell
03:41 PM on 06/01/2011
A law that required republicans to study, doomed to fail.
Clevelandinwi
Progressive is good; regressive, not so much.
02:17 PM on 06/01/2011
When an election draws near, Regressives begin to show why they are ALL considered hypocrites.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Maezeppa
Happy-Happy Joy-Joy
02:17 PM on 06/01/2011
Most all conservatives embraced the individual mandate until President Obama incorporated it - then it instantly became "unconstitutional" and "socialist" and probably "terrrrrrsticaltotaalitarianmarxism"
02:10 PM on 06/01/2011
the GOP works harder going against the grain than just being adult enough to recognize that THIS is what the people want...seriously if you're still voting for these cl0wns you should been driven OFF the island...really, it's okay to like yourself...
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
goodog
Honk if you believe in a public editor.
02:09 PM on 06/01/2011
This is a somewhat better smokingun than the previous 2nd-hand account of his support for a mandate, but it still gives him wiggle-room. I'm willing to bet there are some recorded statements in support of the mandate itself (in excess of support for studying the mandate). Any reasonable person would conclude that this bill indicates his support for the mandate, but we're dealing with people heavily invested in erasing his support for the mandate, so I'd like to see an even less ambiguous statement of his support. It's almost surely out there, and revelation of this signed bill does indicate that the media is moving beyond its uncritical narrative of Huntsman, and his easy ride may not be a done deal. Another question is whether the Romney campaign or someone like Gingrich or Bachmann are motivated to level the playing field by finding and tying a less ambiguous albatross around this guys neck. Why, from a progressive perspective, should we be wary of an apparently reasonable guy like Huntsman? Because there's something the press isn't telling you about him, and it's this: his open-armed embrace of the false narrative, the totally fabricated bio of "she whose name automatically throws our comments into moderation" when he introduced and officially nominated her at the 2008 GOP convention: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jAc1I--I8Os This IS the judgement of a man that ought to be questioned, not given an easy pass.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wizedollars
"Those who like Neil Diamond, and those who don't.
02:07 PM on 06/01/2011
Look around, the establishment candidates on BOTH sides supported health care mandates. Cuz that healthcare lobby sure owns both sides....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wizedollars
"Those who like Neil Diamond, and those who don't.
02:04 PM on 06/01/2011
Is he a Log Cabin boy? Just curious ...