More

Budget Battle Pits Atheist Ayn Rand vs. Jesus

Ayn Rand Jesus

First Posted: 06/02/11 07:53 PM ET Updated: 08/02/11 06:12 AM ET

By Daniel Burke
Religion News Service

WASHINGTON (RNS) The atheist philosopher and novelist Ayn Rand published more than a dozen books before she died in 1982. Now, liberal Christians say another work belongs in Rand's controversial canon: the 2012 Republican budget.

House Republicans passed their budget along party lines in April, saying its drastic cuts to federal programs are necessary to prevent a deficit crisis.

But in a petition drive, video, ads and websites, liberal Christians counter that Rand's dog-eat-dog philosophy is the real inspiration for the GOP budget and its author, House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan, R-Wis.

"You've got a guy who is a rising Republican star, and who wrote the budget, saying he's read her books and Washington needs more of her values," said Eric Sapp, executive director of the American Values Network, which produced the video. "If you're a Christian, you've got to ask some serious questions about what's going on here."

In other words, Sapp argues, you can follow Ayn Rand or Jesus, but not both.

In novels such as "Atlas Shrugged," the Russian-born Rand portrays American capitalists as heroes battling an encroaching government bent on milking their success. In nonfiction writings, Rand is more explicit about her Objectivist philosophy, which views religion as a "primitive" sop to the feeble-minded masses.

Tea Party Republicans have embraced Rand's writings, particularly "Atlas Shrugged," which some argue foretells the Great Recession and Washington's extraordinary efforts to end it. Rush Limbaugh, former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan and Supreme Court Justice
Clarence Thomas all call themselves Rand fans.

Biographer Anne C. Heller says Rand was raised a secular Jew in Russia at a time when Jews were persecuted by the Russian Orthodox Church. Early on, Rand decided that the existence of God and the Christian ideal of self-sacrifice were untenable ideas, Heller said.

"It must be either reason or faith," Rand said in a 1979 interview. "I am against God for the reason that I don't want to destroy reason." Rand saw her materialist philosophy and Christianity as incompatible and hoped to undermine Judeo-Christian ethics.

Rand's anti-religious views, however, are not as well known as her novels. By highlighting them, Sapp and liberal Christians hope to discredit the GOP budget, and drive a wedge between the conservative Christian and Tea Party wings of the Republican Party.

To that end, Sapp, who has directed faith outreach for a number of Democratic campaigns, is promoting a video in which evangelical leader Chuck Colson warns Christians to beware of Rand's "idolatry of self and selfishness."

"I am no fan of big government, but there are far better ways to critique it than Rand's godless nonsense, especially for Christians," Colson says in the video.

More than 6,000 people have signed a petition asking Ryan to put down Rand and pick up a Bible, according to Kristin Ford of Faithful America, a left-leaning online group.

"Ayn Rand's philosophy of radical selfishness and disdain for the poor and struggling is antithetical to our faith values of justice, compassion and the common good," the petition reads.

The American Values Network video, which Sapp said will be emailed to 1.2 million Christians in Wisconsin, opens with anti-religious remarks from Rand and segues into Republican leaders, including Ryan and Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., offering high praise of the Russian novelist.

"Rand, more than anyone else, did a fantastic job of explaining the morality of capitalism, the morality of individualism," Ryan says in a 2009 Facebook video excerpted in the ad. "It's that kind of thinking, that kind of writing that is sorely needed right now."

Ryan's spokesman, Kevin Seifert, said the congressman "does not find his Catholic faith to be incompatible with his feelings for Ayn Rand's literary works. ... Rand is one of many figures and authors that Congressman Ryan has cited as influencing his thinking during his formative years."

Seifert said that Ryan has not seen the ads, and so would not comment on them. Nor would Ryan offer an opinion on Rand's anti-religious statements. "It's not appropriate for him to speculate on an individual's personal religious views," Seifert said.

In a recent letter, Ryan sought to assure New York Archbishop Timothy Dolan, president of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, that the GOP budget aligns with Catholicism.

"Those who represent the people, including myself, have a moral obligation, implicit in the church's social teaching, to address difficult basic problems before they explode into social crisis," Ryan wrote in the April 29 letter.

Ryan argues that his budget is informed by the Catholic principal of subsidiarity, which holds that large bureaucracies should not assume tasks best left to individuals.

The GOP congressman also quotes the late Pope John Paul II's warning that government welfare programs can lead to inertia, overweening public agencies, and ballooning budgets.

Jay W. Richards, a Catholic and author of "Money, Greed and God: Why Capitalism is the Solution and Not the Problem," calls Ryan, like many Rand admirers, a "cafeteria Randian."

"I suspect the progressive Christians are confusing that point," he said. "You can agree with Rand's critique of collectivism as enervating and soul-destroying without adhering to her overarching philosophy."

But Heller, the biographer, isn't so sure.

"Certainly you can believe that the state can't do everything for everybody, but if you are a practicing Christian, you also believe that it is our duty to take care of the least among us," she said. "And we know perfectly well from history that churches and individuals can't do that job alone."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST RELIGION

By Daniel Burke Religion News Service WASHINGTON (RNS) The atheist philosopher and novelist Ayn Rand published more than a dozen books before she died in 1982. Now, liberal Christians say another wor...
By Daniel Burke Religion News Service WASHINGTON (RNS) The atheist philosopher and novelist Ayn Rand published more than a dozen books before she died in 1982. Now, liberal Christians say another wor...
Filed by Josh Fleet  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 221
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (6 total)
02:57 PM on 06/18/2011
Yet fanatic Evangelicals seem to think that Ayn Rand's objectivism is compatible with Christianity. If you read the Bible, there are nation-states who get punished over and over again for NOT providing for their poor, for NOT treating the disadvantaged with compassion, and for NOT being nice to foreigners.

There are some who believe that taking a religious construct's teachings and inverting them constitutes a form of Satanism.

Extremist individualism might be said to be Satanic in this light.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cylixdemas
03:49 AM on 06/14/2011
No really... Who is John Galt?
04:20 PM on 06/08/2011
I find equating the Republican budget with Atheism to be appalling and intellectually stupid. The implication that compassion can only be exercised if you are a god fearing Christian is insulting to billions of people throughout the world.
I find Ryan’s budget to lack any sense of compassion or generosity. I agree that it parallels some of Rand’s political and social beliefs. Her Atheism, however, is incidental as is the GOP’s Christianity.
This line of logic by the Democrats is very misguided.
sanddc
Man may think he rules -God is still in charge..
09:50 PM on 06/07/2011
One read the Bible and believes in the God,Son and the Holy Spirit, Those that read Ayn Rand beleives in non of the three. They believes like the person they praise no matter what status they are in life . They are atheists like their idol. Can you believe a man that set on the Supreme Court follows and is a fan of this woman.
04:33 PM on 06/07/2011
Unfortunately Heller hasn't looked at historical christianity. Expecting the government to take care of the poor among us is a fairly recent idea. Prior to the depression era, individual christians and churches stepped up to the responsibility to help those around them. If we are looking to the government to provide for everyone, then we SHOULD be reading Ayn Rand. Otherwise, where are the christians who are sacrificially following Christ's commands to care for others??
sanddc
Man may think he rules -God is still in charge..
10:00 PM on 06/07/2011
All people don't go to churches and pay the church their taxes every years and for the rest of their lives,but the government take the people taxes whether they go or not.
The government does not save souls but they collects every soul money that goes to church. The church saves soul but the church can't collect taxes from everyone like the government.Why shouldn;t the governments return to people like socail security or medicare,people have worked hard and put $$$ it in the kitty all their lives, Why should the government keep and enrich their friends and foes what other people have put in to the system.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
ExpatinCanada
04:06 PM on 06/07/2011
“An interview recently surfaced that was conducted in 1998 by the Ayn Rand Institute with a social worker who says she helped Rand and her husband, Frank O’Connor, sign up for Social Security and Medicare in 1974.

Federal records obtained through a Freedom of Informatio­n act request confirm the Social Security benefits. A similar FOI request was unable to either prove or disprove the Medicare claim.

Between December 1974 and her death in March 1982, Rand collected a total of $11,002 in monthly Social Security payments. O’Connor received $2,943 between December 1974 and his death in November 1979.

http://www­.patiastep­hens.com/2­010/12/05/­ayn-rand-r­eceived-so­cial-secur­ity-medica­re/comment­-page-2/â€
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Patricia Russell
We are sorry, your micro-bio did not meet our guid
03:11 PM on 06/07/2011
"I have also read that there was a six foot floral wreath in the shape of a dollar sign."
The GOP can get behind that!

http://www.examiner.com/la-in-los-angeles/ayn-rand-s-funeral
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Connor Alexander
Stop playing the 2 party game!
02:25 PM on 06/07/2011
No one should take either the Bible or Rand's books literally. Really, any books for that matter. Anyone that points at a book and says 'this is all we need' hasn't even really begun thinking. Thinking starts when you put those books down and say to yourself, 'what have I learned and how can I use from this information'.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stuoverit
"What year did Jesus think it was?"-GC
05:46 PM on 06/07/2011
Maybe not one book, but the Harry Potter series as a whole...
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Connor Alexander
Stop playing the 2 party game!
06:28 PM on 06/07/2011
Fine. Fine. I'll concede that.
DrSnuggles
You label me and I'll label you
09:30 AM on 06/07/2011
I had such high hopes for this article based on the title, but alas this seems to be "Christians should be against Ayn Rand because she was an atheist." Which, you know, is fine since anything that takes support away from the Randian (re: draconic) budget is good with me.

But, no mention that Jesus' teachings make it very clear that if He were here today He would clearly be a progressive. I would be happier if it were suggested that philosophies that ignore the basic precepts of love and compassion are more of a danger to Christianity than atheism is.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
proudtohaveserved
04:40 AM on 06/08/2011
DR jesus would not be a progressive, he would be a socialist. SELL EVERYTHING THAT UOU HAVE AND GIVE THE MONEY TO THE POOR, BECAUSE, AMEN I SAY TO YOU IT IS EASIER FOR A CAMEL TO PASS THRU THE EYE OF A NEEDLE THAN FOR A RICH MAN TO ENTER THE KINGDOM OF THE FATHER
02:45 AM on 06/07/2011
Is there a God? I don't think so, but it's possible. But even if there is, nobody, living or dead knlws anymore about his nature than any of us do, no matter what your priests, mullahs, rabbies and preachers might tell you.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
logicanada
Blogger, radio co-host, writer, editor, voice-over
01:36 AM on 06/07/2011
John Galt is a more realistic fictional character than Jesus.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cylixdemas
03:45 AM on 06/14/2011
Along with trickle down economics?
photo
Arbutus
Ramble on.
10:40 PM on 06/06/2011
"It must be either reason or faith," says Rand. Why can't the goal be both reason and self-sacrifice? Why doe reason to Rand mean selfishness?
07:57 AM on 06/07/2011
Reason is not a choice. Neuroscience tells us that the brain doesn't work that way. We do what we do because we feel like doing it. Yes self-sacrifice is part of the mechanism. We are a social species. It's not the only part.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:05 PM on 06/06/2011
Ayn Rand was a real person that actually lived. We actually know many of her thoughts and ideas.

Jesus is a mythological figure that never existed. Nothing more than bad fiction.
02:56 AM on 06/07/2011
I don't see any reason to doubt that Jesus existed. I'm certain that there were at least a few Judean carpenters named Joshua. Of course non-extraordinairy claims don't require overwhelming evidence to back them up. When you get to water walking, raising folks from the dead, turning water to wine you up the ante. I'd need overwhelming evidence to give credence to tales about Joshua the Judean carpenter doing these things 2,000 years ago, just like I'd require overwhelming evidence to give credence to some Joe the carpenter from Cleveland taking strolls across Lake Erie and magically turning it's water into Burning River ale today, and frankly, no such evidence exists.
07:14 AM on 06/07/2011
More people wrote about Jesus outside of the Biblical texts than wrote about Alexander the Great. They also wrote about Jesus within a few years of his life and death. The one source we have for Alexander the Great wrote 400 years after his death. Yet, I will bet that you believe that Alexander was real and not a myth.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stuoverit
"What year did Jesus think it was?"-GC
05:50 PM on 06/07/2011
To answer succinctly:

1) The dynasty of Ptolemy in Egypt (The Hellenistic Era)
2) Archeology
photo
Red Leaves
Well, well, what matters it? Believe that too.
10:13 AM on 06/08/2011
Yes, more people wrote about Jesus outside of the Biblical texts about Jesus...decades and centuries after when he was supposed to have died. Where are the contemporaneous accounts of Jesus's activities and miracle workings? Perhaps a diary entry from a Syrian merchant about seeing Jesus feed the multitudes? Maybe a letter home from a Roman Centurion who stood guard while watching the enigmatic Christ speak his Sermon on the Mount?

We have none of that. I do not necessarily believe that Jesus was a mythic figure. But the miracles he was supposed to have done? Yeah, you see, extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. We don't even have ordinary evidence for Jesus' existence, let alone the extraordinary evidence necessary to convince sensible people that he was able to walk on water.
04:44 PM on 06/06/2011
Next week: Economic Battle Pits Einstein Vs Mohhamed

How crass.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
harmonikasavingsbonds
Standard?Nonsense! I DEMAND an automatic poodle!
03:19 PM on 06/06/2011
Ayn Rand gives atheists a bad name.