iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

U.S. Only Added 54,000 Workers In May As Jobless Rate Rises

Jobs Report May

First Posted: 06/03/11 09:52 AM ET Updated: 08/03/11 06:12 AM ET

WASHINGTON (Lucia Mutikani) - Employment rose far less than expected in May to record its weakest reading since September, while the jobless rate rose to 9.1 percent as high energy prices and the effects of Japan's earthquake bogged down the economy.

Nonfarm payrolls increased 54,000 last month, the Labor Department said on Friday, with private employment rising 83,000, the least amount since June. Government payrolls dropped 29,000.

Economists polled by Reuters had expected payrolls to rise 150,000 and private hiring to increase 175,000 in May. The government revised employment figures for March and April to show 39,000 fewer jobs created than previously estimated.

The job creation slowdown confirmed the economic weakness already flagged by other data from consumer spending to manufacturing. It could stoke fears about the depth and duration of a slowdown that started early in the year.

The Labor Department said severe weather last month, including tornadoes and flooding, in the Midwest and the South did not materially affect data collection.

It also said that while some workers in those regions may have been temporarily displaced from their jobs, it found "no clear impact of the disasters on the national employment and unemployment data for May."

Economists still believe the lull in activity will be temporary. They cite high gasoline prices, bad weather and disruptions to motor vehicle production because of a shortage of parts from Japan as factors weighing on growth.

"It is clear we have temporarily entered a soft patch," said Christopher Probyn, chief economist at State Street Global Advisors in Boston, before the report.

"Nobody knows how soft and how long, but the best case view is that the fundamentals of the recovery remain intact and the economy will re-accelerate in the second half of the year."

The report provides one of the best early reads on the health of the U.S. economy and it regularly sets the tone for global financial markets. Worries about the pace of the U.S. economic recovery weighed on stocks on Thursday.

While the recent string of weak data has sparked talk about the need for the Federal Reserve to extend its asset purchasing program when it expires this month, analysts believe policymakers will take a soft payrolls report in stride.

Officials at the U.S. central bank regard the current downshift in the economy as temporary.

The Fed has been mapping out a strategy on how to start removing some of the massive stimulus it has lent the economy, and officials have made clear the bar for a further easing in monetary policy is high.

TEMPORARY FACTORS AT PLAY

"We should keep in mind that we have seen a lot of factors weighing on the U.S. economy in April and May, and should take this report with a pinch of salt," said Harm Bandolz, chief U.S. economist at UniCredit Research in New York.

"We may see some positive surprises in the second half of the year once the impact fades."

High gasoline prices hurt consumer spending in the first quarter, restricting economic growth to a 1.8 percent annual pace after expanding at a 3.1 percent rate in the October-December period.

The economy has regained only a fraction of the more than 8 million jobs lost during the recession. Economists say payrolls growth above 300,000 a month is needed to make significant progress in shrinking the pool of 13.9 million unemployed Americans.

The unemployment rate rose to 9.1 percent last month from 9.0 percent in April as some discouraged workers who had been inspired by the pick-up in hiring in April re-entered the labor market.

"There is so much slack in the labor market it's going to take a long time to get the unemployment rate down to between 6 and 7 percent. That's going to take years," said Stephen Bronars, a senior economist at Welch Consulting in Washington.

That could be bad news for President Barack Obama, whose chances of re-election next year could hinge on the health of the economy, particularly the labor market.

The employment report showed weakness across the board, with the private services sector adding 80,000 jobs last month after increasing payrolls by 213,000 in April.

Within the private services sector, leisure and hospitality fell, showing no boost from McDonald's recruitment of about 50,000 new staff in April, which was after the survey period for that month's payrolls. Spring is traditionally a strong hiring period for McDonald's.

Retail employment, which recorded its largest increase in 10 years in April, fell 8,500 last month. Manufacturing payrolls growth contracted 5,000 last month, while construction employment rose 2,000.

The report showed the average work week steady at 34.4 hours and few signs of wage inflation, with average hourly earnings rising 6 cents.

(Reporting by Lucia Mutikani, Editing by Andrea Ricci)

Copyright 2011 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
WASHINGTON (Lucia Mutikani) - Employment rose far less than expected in May to record its weakest reading since September, while the jobless rate rose to 9.1 percent as high energy prices and the ...
WASHINGTON (Lucia Mutikani) - Employment rose far less than expected in May to record its weakest reading since September, while the jobless rate rose to 9.1 percent as high energy prices and the ...
Filed by Maxwell Strachan  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 11,975
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (202 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sam Salinitis
read 1984.
08:24 PM on 06/06/2011
obama said life was good.....economy is awesome.....yeah were laying off teachers and making more soldiers for kinetic wars !!!
photo
bridge to somewhere
That's impossible, even for a computer!
12:14 PM on 06/06/2011
Really makes you long for those good-old Bush days when we were shedding a few hundred thousand a month.
10:06 AM on 06/05/2011
And most of the new jobs last month were due to the hiring of McDonald's fast food. Maybe we need the government to take over that business as well. Many of you on this blog still do not know how "real" jobs are created based on your belief that it is the government's job to create jobs, and that is socialism and does not work. The jobs that drive the economy of this country are created in the private sector, like it or not. Most of the other jobs live off of these industries. All of the government jobs live off of the income from private industry, for example. So, wake up and learn how things work and figure out who best knows this and will commit to doing what is needed to stimulate job growth in this country, and it is not the current administration in Washington.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:29 AM on 06/05/2011
Capitalism leads to outsourcing, outsourcing leads to unemployment. Unemployment leads to impoverishment when a government chooses to protect the rich only. May impoverishment lead to...
A government that realizes it is there for "We the people" and not only for their own sponsors the rich, will begin to take care of its civilians.. When the government ignores the things that now happen to "Us the people" it is no longer representing the people and asks the people to protect themself against governement and the sponsors they works for now. Will cost a lot of blood
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PatrickforO
America needs a Labor Party
05:14 PM on 06/04/2011
Kudos to Mikeee below for his citation. Here's the actual quote. It is worth everybody here reading it:

Toward the end of the Civil War, U.S. President Abraham Lincoln wrote, in a letter to Col. William F. Elkins on November 21, 1864, "I see in the near future a crisis approaching that unnerves me and causes me to tremble for the safety of my country. As a result of the (Civil) war, corporations have been enthroned, and an era of corruption in high places will follow, and the money power of the country will endeavor to prolong its reign by working upon the prejudices of the people until all the wealth is aggregated in a few hands and the republic is destroyed. I feel, at this moment, more anxiety for the safety of my country than ever before, even in the midst of war. God grant that my suspicions may prove groundless."

Geez, does that sound familiar, or what? Congrats Mikeee!
04:21 PM on 06/04/2011
As States and Cities cut programs to balance their budgets continued unemployment will rise.

Conservative leadership wants to balance the budget big time off the backs of the middle class and poor and this will lead to millions of lost jobs which will harm almost all business.

It is now a question of how we want to reduce the deficit and if any Democrat or Republican politicians get to ambitions we will have another meltdown but i believe it will be corrected fast because the people will rise up and have their voices heard including business that will suffer.

This is NO surprise and myself and many here knew we would have higher unemployment in America because of the cuts in government related jobs across America.

We are very lucky it is not worse.

Republicans more reduced taxes for the rich while we are already paying less in federal taxes then we have in over 4 decades.

What is going on here is we must have higher taxes the the wealthy, less loopholes for big companies because without revenues we will have the entire middle class pick up the tab.

We must have a different approach to medicare and those that are very wealthy will not get the same as those who do not have.

Raise the age for SS we have no choice.

Have big corporations bring back the money they have overseas by giving them a one time big discount to do so on taxes.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:22 AM on 06/05/2011
Just how will raising the age for "SS" bring jobs back from China. Seems it will only add to the jobless roles.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TedEjr
How can they be Right when they are wrong so much
03:24 PM on 06/04/2011
Isn't this also the time of the year when the teens and college grads enter the job market? These figures haven't been seasonally adjusted yet, have they?

In addition, the speculator fueled (no pun) oil price has artificially impacted the numbers.

I would not yet be ready to claim that the sky is falling.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tundra599
01:49 AM on 06/05/2011
Oh, this administration would have used that as an excuse if they could have. They are the king of excuses and pointing the finger to someone or something else.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
billw8017
History looks like this
02:47 PM on 06/04/2011
This is grim stuff. We have to hope that the recovery though much too slow will be robust and pick up everybody anxious to work before it is complete.

Goldman Sachs has created a commodity index for speculators and while it seems bubble prone (prices swing rather than merely rise and may fall almost to the minimum soon), the speculator money it draws seems now to have pushed gas prices 40% above what supply/demand figures call for. I wish G/S had been allowed to go bankrupt! Its shenanagans are a sharp tax on the ordinary people whose consumption is needed to bring back the American economy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ThomasPaineWeNeedYou
Know history or repeat it.
02:28 PM on 06/04/2011
But the Bush Tax cuts are still in place. Credit given to that when jobs where going up so what happened. Maybe they do not work. Yep that is what I believe. You cannot employ people when the guts of the factories they were in are now somewhere other than the USA.
02:40 PM on 06/04/2011
Are you old enough to remember the utter destruction of the factories in Europe during WW II? What destruction created the base on which to rebuild better and more advanced technology for mfg. Does noone have that kind of vision for America? Please nominate those who are most in need of a good, swift, kick in the pants with a pointy-toe shoe?

News flash: University to knock down two historic research buildings to provide space for new, more expansive research center. University of Chicago is tearing down nuclear-research and Fermi research buildings to build new state-of-the art acility. Note: The football field of the first chain reaction has been gone many years, and the library which occupied the space is also gone! Progress!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ThomasPaineWeNeedYou
Know history or repeat it.
02:44 PM on 06/04/2011
58 yrs how about you.
Good post.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ThomasPaineWeNeedYou
Know history or repeat it.
02:48 PM on 06/04/2011
Cannot post on the other anymore. Speaking of words I was looking for a word that rhymes with a word that HP frowns on f a $ ! s t. Guess what it rhymes with baptist now is that a hoot or what.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ftkl1234
12:29 PM on 06/04/2011
If we look at employment as part of an equation that includes consumer demand that impinges manufacturers supplying that demand, I think we can understand that consumers aren't demanding enough to get manufacturers to rev up production, no?

Unless consumers start spiking up our confidence and spending sufficiently, we're caught in neutral for the while.

Loosen up the purse strings, folks!
photo
PS Nymn
LIVE! ... from Mom's basement!!
12:36 PM on 06/04/2011
I will need a better pep talk than that before I start spending more.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bwestleyj
Not a Zero-Sum Gamer..
05:36 AM on 06/05/2011
You have just stated in simple terms "why" the poster is correct.

Why wouldn't you spend? Because there is NO DEMAND TO SPEND.

But, there are MILLIONS of unemployed people in America ready and willing to spend on the basic necessities of life, IF they had CASH. But, businesses (from large to small) are unwilling to hire because the consumer market is weak on DEMAND from these same millions of people.

If you can create a large enough shift and increase DEMAND, it will cause a "domino effect" to the economy. Demand on supply will increase, which in term, forces business to react to higher demand by producing more - how do they produce more? Through hiring more resources - the currently unemployed.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lynettema
Little old lady
11:56 AM on 06/04/2011
GW's administration was losing jobs at the rate of hundreds of thousands and hardly a blip from the MSM. They postponed the news until Obama became prez so they could blame him. If we had a Congress (House) that was focused on jobs instead of social manufacturing - if we had a Congress (House) that was more concerned with the average American having a job than protecting the wealthy - if we had a Congress (House) that put the people before defeating President Obama - the job report would most certainly look better.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
aresponse2dotcom
Let truth prevail over "stuff"
12:20 PM on 06/04/2011
What economics class did you get your profuse education from? Feeding and expanding bureaucracy (operational COST) does not help when income is decreasing. Spending money to create more income only works when the money is spent on things that generate income (PRODUCTION OR PRODUCT). You do not increase workforce when confronted by rules, regulations that create unexpected higher cost to your operation. You do not increase job opportunities by putting the brakes on production as in the gulf shutdown. Etc.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lynettema
Little old lady
12:39 PM on 06/04/2011
None are so blind as those who will not see.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PatrickforO
America needs a Labor Party
05:10 PM on 06/04/2011
I am afraid it is a bit less simplistic than that, A-response. First, bureaucracy is a natural development of all firms that grow beyond a certain point. Bureaucracy grows because it is more efficient than 'seat of the pants' management. I know, you refer to government when you speak of bureaucracy, and you use the word pejoratively. So, let me ask you a few questions. When you took a shower this morning, did water come out of the tap? When you turned on the lights, did they go on? Last time you got in your car, did you rip out an axel on a pothole no one has been willing to repair? And, hey, when you pumped your gas, do you feel confident the pump was calibrated honestly? When you had a green light, did you proceed, confident that the people on the cross street would actually stop at their red light? If someone broke into your office building would you want them caught before they stole anything? If your house was on fire, would you want people to show up to put it out? That's government. But, without such an infrastructure, how do you suppose your firm and all the rest of the businesses would even be able to function? So...without this cost, how can we even have production?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
fireart
I got mine the hard way.
10:17 PM on 06/04/2011
You dont have a clue do you. Ha Ha Ha Ha
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:26 AM on 06/05/2011
Not a clue but the answer.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Mikeeee
Private corps can't do it better!!!
09:35 AM on 06/04/2011
This has reached the point of fiasco, that we even still talk about this. read your history about financial institutions during the late 1920's - mid 1930's, it's the same scenario unfolding again. Banks won't lend to small businesses which produce most of the jobs (while of course making record profits for themselves).
It actually goes back much further, you can read more here:
http://shorttext.com/c3czb25mec9

This is far from over and unless you dismantle the FED and all forms of it, you are condemning your children to a repeat of history. It really is that simple.
photo
Archangel 2020
Progressive independent realist
01:57 PM on 06/04/2011
I totally agree!!! fanned and faved
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PatrickforO
America needs a Labor Party
05:15 PM on 06/04/2011
F
07:10 AM on 06/04/2011
Cities and States across America are cutting programs to balance their budgets and that is causing unemployment to rise.

The majority of cities across America are making major adjustments and people have been and will in the future will loose their jobs.

Less people working less purchases that support our economy.

We already are feeling the effects and this should be NO surprise i and many others seen this coming including most people here. We all know the cutting of programs to balance budgets no surprise correct?

Conservatives want to reduce government my a big margin which could mean millions of jobs lost and many businesses effected.

There are different approaches to deficit reductions and i personally believe that conservatives will place the entire burden on the middle class thus destroying the fabric of America or causing extreme unemployment that will harm most business.

All of my very good friends are conservative businessman agree in what is written above and believe the approach Conservative politicians want to take is destructive and will cause a big meltdown
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:30 AM on 06/04/2011
Obama has not created jobs. What part of we went from 8.1% to 8.8% now where back to 9.1% do you all not get?
photo
PS Nymn
LIVE! ... from Mom's basement!!
11:54 AM on 06/04/2011
I don't think you get the part about the number of new entrants to the job market exceeding the number of jobs being created.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
kraki
Member of Vast Right Wing Conspiracy
01:08 AM on 06/04/2011
Heres part of the problem. You folks defend Obama at all cost (including personal integrity), flying in the face of reason. He is all you have, next to Biden, *giggle*.

The dems/left controlled the WHOLE government for his first TWO years. The DEMS could have gotten votes to fund/change ANYTHING during those first two years. Gitmo, Civil trials for detainees, Iraq, Afghanistan, Bush Tax cuts, etc. Anything and everything - He didn't! He DID add a 3rd war.

So, In 2012, you will use "fear the republicans" to TRY and regain power. Some will even still be try'n to blame Bush/Republicans in lieu of any of responsibility on the left.

Heres the BIG problem :
#1 Obama can campaign on the same promises he did the first time. It worked on you all before, made you feel good about him and he hasn't done most of them anyway.
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promises/obameter/rulings/promise-broken/

#2 The right will ask a very simple question, "Why should Joe Public vote ALL you guys BACK IN AGAIN, when you didn't get anything done those first two years. What will be different NOW? You continued all the stuff a 'bad' republican worked out."

Cheers,
Kraki
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
aresponse2dotcom
Let truth prevail over "stuff"
11:55 AM on 06/04/2011
F
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lynettema
Little old lady
12:01 PM on 06/04/2011
The thing is, those of us who have paid attention realize that it is the Senate with their 60 vote majority that held up the progress we so needed. Hopefully more will be paying attention as we vote this year than in '10.