More

How Failed Obama Foreclosure Relief Plan Contributes To Jobs Crisis [UPDATE]

Obama

First Posted: 06/03/11 02:02 PM ET Updated: 08/03/11 06:12 AM ET

WASHINGTON -- The Obama administration's inability to stem the foreclosure crisis ricocheted dramatically on Friday, as the Labor Department released unexpectedly low job-growth numbers that pushed the unemployment rate back over 9 percent. The jobs report comes on the heels of both a devastating report that found housing prices hit new lows in March and warnings from economists that the tumbling real estate market threatens to drag the economy back into recession.

"The jobs numbers, they ain't pretty, man," economist Jared Bernstein told HuffPost. Bernstein left the Obama administration last month to join the Center on Budget Policy and Priorities, a highly respected left-of-center Washington think tank. "You don't wanna make too much out of one month, but when that month reflects other trends in the economy, you want to take note."

"The bottom line is that the job market simply isn't meeting the basic employment and income needs of working families," he said.

"This is an emergency," said Preeti Vissa, community reinvestment director of the Greenlining Institute, a foreclosure relief advocacy group. "The ongoing foreclosure crisis is well on the way to dragging the whole economy into a double-dip recession if strong action isn't taken immediately."

The connection between the foreclosure crisis and rampant unemployment is well known by economists and the administration. Diving home values and heavy debt burdens force cutbacks in both consumer spending and tax revenue for local governments. These reduced spending levels and lower government revenues force layoffs in both the public and private sector. And those layoffs, in turn, spur more foreclosures. A July 2010 report from the International Monetary Fund suggested that foreclosure problems added 1.25 points to the unemployment rate -- or more than 10 percent.

On Thursday, President Barack Obama warned House Democrats in a private meeting that the housing situation could drag down the entire economy. His stated concern about foreclosures, however, doesn't match up with the administration's public response.

One House Democrat who was in the meeting complained that the president "said housing was the main thing dragging down the economy, with Geithner nodding solemnly like they'd done everything humanly possible for the last 27 months to fix the housing market."

Rep. Dennis Cardoza (D-Calif.) said Obama’s approach to the foreclosure crisis has been "an absolute failure" and predicted it will continue to drag down the economy unless he changes tack.

"For the life of me, I can't figure out why a community organizer who says he cares about families, who says he cares about communities, has just turned his back on one of the biggest problems in America,” said Cardoza, who co-chairs the Democratic Caucus Housing Stabilization Task Force. "The way they get defensive when you point out it's been a failure just underscores to me they don't have a clue about what to do."

Cardoza's central California district has been hit hard by foreclosures. The three cities he represents -- Modesto, Stockton and Merced -- all rank in the top 10 cities with the highest foreclosure rates in the country. Three out of five homeowners in his district are "underwater," owing more on their home loans than their houses are worth.

"I don’t blame [the administration] for causing the housing crisis," Cardoza said. "But at two-and-a-half years in office, if they can't figure out something to do soon that turns us around, I guarantee you they will pay for this at the ballot box.”

Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.) said Tuesday that he plans to renew his push on the administration in the coming weeks to put housing issues on the front burner. Specifically, he called for a better mortgage modification system and foreclosure intervention that includes third-party mediation.

"Our economy cannot recover until our housing market recovers,” Merkley said in a statement.

Republicans took shots at Obama for botching both the economic policy and the messaging.

"There's an old axiom in politics: under-promise, but over-deliver," said a Senate GOP leadership aide. "He did the opposite."

For nearly a year, the Obama administration has been boasting to voters of economic improvement. The White House embarked on a PR blitz dubbed "Recovery Summer" last year and toured the country to spread the good news that jobs were finally coming back.

Political strategists say that message is not convincing businesses, consumers or voters. The heavy losses sustained by congressional Democrats in the November 2010 elections were largely the result of the sagging economy.

"They've gotta show that they're gonna be on the side of the middle class in these hard times," said Mike Lux, CEO of Progressive Strategies, a Democratic political consulting firm. "The only way an administration wins when they're governing during hard times is by convincing people you're still working for them in the middle of a very tough moment. I just don't think there's any way to convince people that the economy is good, because it ain't."

That call for a new economic narrative from Obama reflects consistent polling results from Democratic pollster Stan Greenberg, who urged Democrats on Thursday to alter their message to reflect "a real economy" outside Washington "that's not changing."

"The indicators are all speaking together that something more needs to be done," Bernstein told HuffPost. "I'm not sure there's any magic to such a pivot other than to stand up and say something needs to be done."

Bernstein recently defended the administration's inaction on housing, saying that it had been very difficult politically to provide relief to borrowers.

In an early May interview with HuffPost, White House economic adviser Austan Goolsbee cheered what appeared to be three consecutive months of stronger job growth.

"It's clearly a trend," Goolsbee said. "We've had, in the last three months, an average gain of a quarter of a million private-sector jobs a month. That could not be more different than the three-quarters of a million jobs we were losing when the president took office."

But today's numbers undermine confidence in the trend. The Labor Department revised prior months' job gains so that the past three months -- March, April and May -- showed an average climb of just 160,000 jobs per month, only marginally better than the 152,000 increase seen in the prior three-month period.

The administration's claims of job market improvement have frequently been coupled with caveats. Even the triumphant Goolsbee warned last month that "we've got a long way to go" on the economy. But the administration has been unwavering in its claims that its signature foreclosure relief effort, the Home Affordable Modification Program, has been a success.

Anti-foreclosure advocates have long bemoaned the program as overly reliant on the very Wall Street banks whose reckless lending helped spark the housing and financial mess.

HAMP was also thoroughly criticized in several reports from the Congressional Oversight Panel for the bank bailout, and a new report from the Government Accountability Office indicated that over 75 percent of housing counselors have a negative view of HAMP.

The program has only helped a small fraction of the 3 million to 4 million borrowers that President Obama claimed it would aid when the initiative was announced in February. Some homeowners have reported being stuck in limbo for more than a year.

Advocates say several other plans could provide relief without creating "moral hazard" -- a term economists use to describe a policy that could inadvertently encourage economically destructive behavior. By revising bankruptcy law to allow judges to write-off mortgage debt in bankruptcy, struggling homeowners could receive aid, provided they were willing to subject themselves to the financial hardships of filing for bankruptcy.

Alternatively, economist Dean Baker, co-director of the progressive Center for Economic and Policy Research, has promoted a "right-to-rent" policy, in which borrowers on the brink of foreclosure would be given the right to rent their homes for up to five years. Since banks are reluctant to operate as landlords, Baker says the policy would encourage banks to offer meaningful loan modifications.

Still, Bernstein added, the administration needs to resist the "cut spending craze," which "threatens to make an already tough situation worse."

While congressional Republicans are unlikely to let up in their political assault on government spending, he noted that a bipartisan commission led by former Federal Reserve Vice Chairwoman Alice Rivlin and ex-Sen. Pete Dominici (R-N.M.) in Nov. 2010 proposed a payroll tax cut that could create jobs by putting more money in workers' pockets. The Rivilin-Dominici plan recommended that the government lift all payroll taxes for both companies and employees for one year.

This report has been updated to include comment from Cardoza, Merkley and the Senate GOP aide.

Ryan Grim contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- The Obama administration's inability to stem the foreclosure crisis ricocheted dramatically on Friday, as the Labor Department released unexpectedly low job-growth numbers that pushed th...
WASHINGTON -- The Obama administration's inability to stem the foreclosure crisis ricocheted dramatically on Friday, as the Labor Department released unexpectedly low job-growth numbers that pushed th...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 10,598
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (187 total)
  1 of 9  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
photo
UnknownSolider 03:58 PM on 06/03/2011
Why is it that ELECTED OFFICIALS from the President's own party feel the need to demean him unfairly. Never in my life have I seen a President so disrespected by members of his own party the way Obama is by the Democrats. REALLY what is Obama to do about the housing crisis? Should Obama bail out the homeowners? ............Which is what Bush should have done but he elected to go with TARP instead, aka the  Read More...
11:11 AM on 06/20/2011
This fool thought he would be Reagan. Not the real Reagan, even, but Reagan as misremembered by the University of Chicago.
12:22 PM on 06/18/2011
Face it Barrack Obama is a complete failure as President of the United States. No if's ands or butts.
12:13 PM on 06/09/2011
Nowadays,Foreclosures have become in a big problem in this country.So you must have an expert advising you FCI offers a full Foreclosure Service for lenders and brokers by partnering with the experienced staff at Fci.www.trustfci.com/ForeclosureService.html
08:39 PM on 06/06/2011
I agree it's hard to understand why a homeowner would continue to pay into a depreciated asset. However, if every homeowner with a mortgage that is underwater defaults, we'll have more ghost towns than we already do. And where will the homeowners, their families & pets go?

I'm willing to venture that most homeowners, whether they're in default or still making mortgage payments, just want to remain in their homes & maintain a stable lifestyle for their families. That's how I feel. I've wanted a home all my life having moved nine times by the time I was 11 years old & the home we have is perfect for us.

Also, currently there aren't enough would-be homeowners available to buy the homes that are now empty due to foreclosure.

The most reasonable solution is to work with homeowners, even the unemployed who don't have enough income to make payments. By providing them the stability of knowing they will remain in their homes & allowing them to make what payments they can, the majority will get back on their feet & they'll do this much faster living in stable home environments than they will homeless because they're unable to pay rent.

The pooling & servicing agreements (PSAs) for some of the trusts that bought the mortgages specifically state that home values may go down & investors should expect a loss if that happens. Well, it's happened. The investors/servicers need to write down the principal & help the economy back on track.
06:31 AM on 06/07/2011
I sadly had several colleagues, (none poor) defaulting on their homes. and moving elsewhere for the better home values.



One of my executive's was actually giving lessons to subordinate's, on how to work the system. It cost me a great deal of difficulty and hardship, but they're no longer employed by me.


They swear lawsuit's, I maintain, that's not the corporate image I want representing my companies. I was completely stunned how easy they defaulted on one loan, and qualified for another so quickly, under their spouse's name.


We are talking eight million dollars in home sales, and millions minimum in taxpayer loses.



As we speak I'm closing an entire office. It's absolutely 100% legal, and one could argue it's in the best interest of the clients. It sadly is also legalized fraud and in my opinion borderline collusion.



What makes matters worse is 65% of all persons that qualified under Obama's two billion mortgage protection plan, defaulted again in eighteen month or less on their new mortgages.



This in NOW beyond politics, it's a plan for absolute failure. We sadly need to cut the life ropes, take the pain, and let this economy reach natural level so we can rebuild.



The middle class is being wiped out via lost property values. It's the only investment they have. We are without question expanding and creating a Great Depression like FDR did.



Nothing in life is free; Only questions now are who paying these bills, when they become due remain.
04:06 PM on 06/07/2011
The problems with the pooling & service agreement that you speak off is a massive group of my colleagues, created this defense to make them rich.

They are without exception excellent at their jobs, and brilliant scholars of law.

They also know the the main holders of these certificates are Foreign Governments, the States, teachers unions, state workers, and business conglomerates.

I agree it's going to be done eventually, but you have no idea how great that cost will be.

You will not be punishing Wall Street alone.


Allowing people to stay in their home with reduced payments helps no one. The interest keep accruing and makes matters worse. They can Never catch up unless home prices rises more aggressively than their interest payments. They usually need to get out from under to satisfy their debts anyway, and they also have tax liabilities from home ownership thus falling deeper and deeper within the pit.

This has happened so many times in past history, all evidence proves evictions and quick home sales at reduced prices ultimately proves most effective. you lose big in short sales, but gain massive tax revenues and fee's long sales

Their are never easy fixes, but prolonging the agony and crisis always effectively kills more long term. Giving away for free, what others spend a lifetime struggling to achieve, never favors well with consumer confidence, or market economies.

Both persons and corporations mandate sitting back, awaiting their entitlements before progressing forward.
03:52 PM on 06/06/2011
HAMP sucks! After submitting the paperwork and receiving info about how it works, I declined it. You are better off if you refinance.
10:12 AM on 06/11/2011
Figures. Oh, good luck getting re-financed. Will depend on whether the bank thinks it will be able to sell your house later and double their money. Sad.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
Hoe Toe
" If there was no God, there would be no athiests.
11:50 AM on 06/06/2011
I want a job first so I can afford a house one day and some Obamacare for my family.
10:12 AM on 06/11/2011
Keep on dreaming.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
Hoe Toe
" If there was no God, there would be no athiests.
photo
RedRat
Ignorance is fixable, stupidty is forever
12:58 AM on 06/06/2011
I cannot for the life me figure out why these elite economists can't see the obvious in this housing collapse. Look, we are now a service sector economy, service sector wages really do not qualify for home mortgages of 25 or 30 years. Way back when, when we were a manufacturing nation, you could reliably give a loan to a worker because they were going to be employed for a long time. Today, workers come and workers go, we have a revolving door jobs situation. Further, service sector employees are not paid at high wages but as very low multiples of minimum wage. Even foreclosed homes are not affordable to the average service sector worker, IF he/she could even get a loan!

That lenders are squeamish about giving loans is not terribly surprising, I would be too if I were in their shoes. Remember, they just got burned in 2008 with loans gone sour. Hey, after you have been burned once, you tend to be very touchy about flying to that flame again. Basically, now with the Freddy and Fannie perhaps going out of business, who is left to guarantee loans, especially to service sector workers? You have Repubs threatening to shut down the budget, you have a high deficit, and jobs may or may not be there. Who wants to take on the burden of a home to buy or to lend money on?
10:15 AM on 06/11/2011
REMEMBER: THEY are the one's who kew what they were getting into. If not, they shouldn't be in the business. Oh, by the way, the FEDERAL GOVT. MADE the banks provide these loans, simply to make their numbers look good.
photo
RedRat
Ignorance is fixable, stupidty is forever
02:29 PM on 06/11/2011
My view is that many of the loans that contributed to the housing bubble collapse were encouraged by Congressional pushing for housing for everyone. Basically, they wanted housing for low income and poor people. Perhaps a noble intention, sounds good and is politically correct. Unfortunately, the road to hell is always paved with good intentions.

The fact of the matter is that owning a house is an expensive matter. It requires a very long term commitment which means holding on to that house pretty much for the term of the mortgage, e.g., 20 or 30 years. This requires that the owner of the home have long term employment, i.e., the length of the loan. We no longer have that in our economy. You are indeed lucky nowadays to hold on in a job for 5-10 years. There are substantial costs that you must come up with that cannot be put off, i.e., property taxes, heat and light and water bills, maintenance, etc. You put these off at your peril.

Sadly, politicians in office and running for office held up a perverted American Dream that everyone ought to own a home. Sounds good, but that is just not wise. Some people can own homes, but many cannot and should not. Here is where Political Correctness and the idealism of the 60s and beyond, got in the way of reality.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
truly moderate
Reform Party, a third way
11:47 PM on 06/05/2011
While I do agree that president Obama and the democrats can certainly take some of the blame for not doing enough, the Republicans (especially the freshmen) can sure as hell eat a huge slice of it for NOT DOING ANYTHING. Actually I take that back, there were very active, trying to repeal healthcare as their first priority INSTEAD of focusing on bills that would create incentives for job creation.

While its true that its not the government's job to "create jobs", the government is responsible for creating a suitable environment for business leaders to create jobs, as well as to properly dispense federal jobs as needed.

Ofcourse the GOP at the state level didn't help things trying to reduce union rights and make workers pay MORE in a time when our economy has just started recovering. Union downsizing wasn't just limited to WI and ofcourse similiar bills were presented in other states as we all know tea party ideology spreads like a mindless fire.

Looking back a few years, the housing boom was due to economic prosperity achieved near the end of Clinton's term, but this was an age when though the GOP and DEMs had differences, they ended up working together to pass policies that allowed for a condusive jobs environment. Unfortunately, Bush allowed overseas outsourcing and overseas tax loopholes used by large companies to go unanswered. Unfortunately the GOP is allowing these same companies to take a free ride, while placing American citizens in second place.
photo
RedRat
Ignorance is fixable, stupidty is forever
01:04 AM on 06/06/2011
In general I agree with your comments. Except that the Clinton administration also went along with that outsourcing of American Jobs, Clinton bought into the World Free Market Place ideas of Reagan/Friedman. The thing is that we had a booming economy when Clinton took office and the outsourcing was at an extremely low level, it was the Repubs that allowed the tax breaks for outsourcing and the Dems and Clinton did nothing to stop that. A very disastrous idea.
10:17 AM on 06/11/2011
Very good. YOU do see the truth of it all. It's sad THEY have used the Unions as the problem, simply to deflect attention away from the real problem creators: THEM!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
truly moderate
Reform Party, a third way
12:53 AM on 06/12/2011
Well at first I didn't see things this way, but watching the way Walker went against unions during a desparate time kind of changed my ideals on unions and why they are in fact needed. At first, I saw unions as an "issue" because I bought into the half truth that unions threaten competition (much less of a concern was tax money paying for union workers, which tended to be more of the TPs issue whereas traditional republicanism was more concerned about competition issues). While unions in a sense reduce competition, they also bring about more benefits then they take away, which is why I call the competition issue a half truth. At will employment isn't inherently a bad thing, but in geographical areas that rely on employment from major industries, non union workers can face big issues during a layoff season, which in turn can really hurt a town's economy.

Personally, I have a more favorable attitude towards small business and unions, as they tend to retain their employees and ofcourse the employees (as a general rule) are better taken care of.
10:45 PM on 06/05/2011
Yes,those poor souls on wall st, the govt. made them do it,and the govt made the CEO's send our jobs overseas,and give the oil companies subsidies,and ruin the world economy.They did all this because they believe in american exceptionalism.Try not to delude yourself,don't listen to the talking points,and do the research,read the books available on the crash,then make up your OWN mind.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
godsonecooldude
10:10 PM on 06/05/2011
Obama could do somthing rite everyday and someone would find some sort of fault with it. I in my intire life have never seen such a bunch of suck tit ball babys. If you dont like this country then go find one you mite be happy in.like rush dimbaugh was going to. the econmy is not the greatest it was even worse then this.and it dont look like it maybe the best next year. but at least it is growing not at the speed all would like it. read about the great depression it was bad no money no jobs no nothing. for a long time government started work programs. oh guess that wont happen we would have to spend some money. we didnt get this way in 2008 it all took place before obama. yeah some lost money I did also shit happens pick self up and keep going.
10:19 AM on 06/11/2011
Please let us know when that happens, will you??
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
godsonecooldude
12:34 PM on 06/11/2011
even the repubs say the ecomny is growing. I heard them talk about how its turned around. during the last elections we had.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Paul Sta
08:01 PM on 06/05/2011
Ignoring the foreclosure problem will continue to devastate existing homeowners as foreclosures go unchecked home values will plummet easily another 30%. What happens when 50% of all homeowners are underwater on their homes.?? Borrowers should have no more integrity than the banks that lend them the money. A strategic default is nothing more than a self imposed bailout.

Just like any other bank or corporation, why continue paying into a depreciating asset.
08:16 PM on 06/05/2011
Reports of home fire have increased significantly since the downturn started.As a result I'm betting home insurance rates are going to skyrocket pretty soon.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
godsonecooldude
10:12 PM on 06/05/2011
housing hasnt hit bottom yet but it will.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:19 PM on 06/05/2011
On the one hand the GOP left the US in such bad shape that they didn't even want to win 2008. I respect the incredible problems Obama has tried to tackle.

But as a former strong supporter I have to wonder
if Hillary, Dr. Dean, etc. might do better next year.
Obama has been an easy target for the right, yes,
even easier than Bill Clinton was, and maybe should
let someone less wounded try it. He can always
try again years later, after maybe people appreciate
how tough these times have been.

Why he hasn't done better with housing, or even
tried to put 1-200 Wall St. Crooks in jail, for
10-30 years, is beyond me? We knew the
GOP would not hurt WS, we hoped Obama
was not as beholding to....?
08:19 PM on 06/05/2011
Not only did they leave us in bad shape,they worked hard at making sure it was horrible.This wasn't happenstance,it was purposeful.
photo
dollbaby
Spice...."The Toughest Fighter."
10:47 PM on 06/05/2011
AND still is....that is why they agree to nothing and demand more cuts. They want the economy to crater by Nov 2012. They will take the white house and that will be the end!
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
enigma2
Enigmas are enigmatic..
11:11 PM on 06/05/2011
Good post.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
godsonecooldude
10:14 PM on 06/05/2011
at least he has tryed.
photo
dollbaby
Spice...."The Toughest Fighter."
10:47 PM on 06/05/2011
and very very hard
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:38 AM on 06/06/2011
maybe he should have waited another 4-8 years, I think more experience in DC would have helped, although you'd think his staff would have filled that part........maybe most or all of the Dem leadership are just warmed over moderate Republicans, you have to wonder sometimes....which would leave us with only the illusion of democracy
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
ReedYoung
global mean land-ocean temperature 1880 to present
07:03 PM on 06/05/2011
No corporation bailed out by The People should have the legal right to foreclose on any of The People who became unable to pay their mortgages due to the collapse of the financial system that those same corporations caused.
photo
runswithscissors
I think, therefore I am not a conservative
02:43 PM on 06/05/2011
How about anyone who's underwater just burn the house down? The banks got their bailout and are paying record bonuses, so obviously they can afford to take the hit. Once all those homes are gone, construction will pick up as new ones will need to be built.

This has always been the logic of the war profiteers (burn the country and then rebuild it for profit). Why should the housing market be any different?
08:29 PM on 06/05/2011
I just commented on that,home and auto arson fires are trending up as the housing market trends downward.