More

Antimatter 'Trapped' For Over 15 Minutes By CERN Scientists

Antimatter

First Posted: 06/05/11 05:30 PM ET Updated: 08/05/11 06:12 AM ET

(AP/THE HUFFINGTON POST) GENEVA -- Nuclear scientists announced Sunday they have found a way to "trap" for more than 15 minutes elusive antimatter atoms that used to disappear after a fraction of a second.

That will give scientists at the European Organization for Nuclear Research time to study the atoms properly, in the hope of understanding what happened during the first moments of the universe.

The achievement is a significant improvement on earlier attempts to trap antihydrogen, which like all antimatter has a tendency to disappear before scientists have time to examine it.

"We went from two-tenths of a second to 1,000 seconds," said American scientist Jeffrey Hangst, a spokesman for the ALPHA research team working at the world's biggest particle physics lab – known by its French acronym CERN – on the Swiss-French border.

The team improved the efficiency of the antimatter trap by cooling antihydrogen atoms down to less than 0.5 degrees above absolute zero. Their research was published online in the journal Nature Physics.

Hangst said extending the lifetime of antihydrogen means scientists can be sure it has enough time to settle so it can be probed and compared with hydrogen atoms. The team will begin firing microwaves and then lasers at trapped antihydrogen later this year.

Phillip F. Schewe, a spokesman for the American Institute of Physics, said refining the antimatter trap was a great feat of physics engineering.

"But in a sense it does represent an incremental improvement rather than the achievement of something new," said Schewe, who wasn't involved with the work. "Now they'll have to trap greater number of atoms."

Hangst said the ALPHA team has already trapped about 300 antihydrogen atoms. The more they trap, the easier it is to conduct experiments on antihydrogen.

"This is a big step in demonstrating what we can do and where we can go," he said.

Understanding antihydrogen will help solve one of the biggest riddles of physics. Theorists say both matter and antimatter must have been created in equal amounts in the Big Bang, but antimatter has since disappeared from the natural universe while matter abounds in the stars, planets and galaxies.

Or as Hangst puts it: "Half the universe has gone missing and we don't know why."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST TECH

Filed by Catharine Smith  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 233
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Supernatoir
Heard GOP does not believe in science now math too
05:10 PM on 06/14/2011
its mind blowing that there are like 232 comments on here
02:24 PM on 06/09/2011
I am not a physicist but I do have a Masters in EE and for most of my life have kept up with scientific journals on the topics of theoretical physics and cosmology out of personal interest. I suspect that the big bang actually produced 2 universes. Whatever mechanism initiated the event did so in such a way that most of the matter went one way and most of the antimatter went the other way, somewhat reminiscent of how some supernovas hurl matter in 2 different directions creating an hour-glass shaped nebula. This nicely conserves energy due to the sum of the energy of the 2 universes being 0. It is even possible that the 2 universes continue to interact in some indirect way, possibly explaining some of the "weird" observations like the acceleration of universal expansion, dark matter/energy effects, and the relative weakness of gravity, to name but a few of the remaining mysteries.
10:49 PM on 06/07/2011
I'm no doctorate in physics but I have to admit, I've pondered this. Could matter and antimatter have collided in the early stages of the universe to have formed the so called "big bang"? That would explain the apparently small amounts of antimatter that remains, along with the colossal energy release that's propelling entire galaxies away from each other (and incredibly, accelerating them even after all these millions of years). Just a thought to consider. Congratulations to the scientists at CERN on the major breakthrough they've made.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PavoReal
"¡El Gusto Es Mio!"
02:30 PM on 06/09/2011
You need to state why there would be less antimatter after the collision, explosion or not, the same amount of matter/antimatter should still be here.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RedDogBear
08:28 PM on 06/07/2011
Here is an article about this from the Richard Dawkins site: http://richarddawkins.net/articles/634959-scientists-trap-antimatter-long-enough-to-study-how-it-works
photo
TYRANNASAURUS
UGH!....people don't taste good.
03:32 PM on 06/07/2011
Antimatter 'Trapped' For Over 15 Minutes By CERN Scientists ..........FABULOUS!

Can't wait to see what they discover.....Personally I've always had this Sci/Fi fantasy that the 71% of the universe that's known as dark energy is actually the hidden antimatter in the universe that we call space which is theoretically a void....but is it?
photo
TYRANNASAURUS
UGH!....people don't taste good.
03:41 PM on 06/07/2011
What is it they say......... for every action there's a reaction, for up there's down etc, etc so the antimatter has to be here somewhere...I can't see a positive without an equal negative....every coin has two sides and an edge they tell me..
notreallyabadguy
Help ever, Hurt never.
09:52 AM on 06/07/2011
Alright guys, you've got the antimatter, so lets get some starships online! Where the Dilithium Chrystals at?
Beam me up MuthaFukkkah!!
8-)
photo
Stageman
My micro-bio remains empty
12:12 AM on 06/07/2011
Why don't we just ask the aliens in the big ships orbiting the sun?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
marignymitch
E pluribus unum percent
10:16 PM on 06/06/2011
Antimatter doesn't simply 'disappear'; it's obliterated when it encounters ordinary matter. Ordinary matter also is obliterated in the process. (See gamma rays.)
photo
DXM
A sane moderate living during insane extreme times
05:48 PM on 06/06/2011
"...antihydrogen, which like all antimatter has a tendency to disappear before scientists have time to examine it."

As a physicist and free lance science writer I find this to be a really poorly written statement. The problem is not that the antihydrogen "disappears", it leaks out of the "trap" (composed of electric and magnetic fields) and annihilates into gamma rays when it comes in contact with normal matter in the environment. The innovation described here cools the antihydrogen enough that the leakage rate out of the trap has been decreased significantly making it practical to collect enough antihydrogen to investigate its properties in more detail.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RedDogBear
07:29 PM on 06/06/2011
Thanks for the explanation. I don't even know why I bother reading the comments some times, so many of them are pointless. Jabs at science, stupid jokes, etc. Yours was one of the few that gave some useful info.

Having said that I do want to stick up for the person who wrote this a bit. I don't know much about physics but I do know a good deal about computer science and software engineering and I've written a few articles where I tried to present technical issues for a business audience. I know the pressure from editors can be enormous to keep things overly simple so while I sincerely appreciate your more accurate description I don't think saying "disappear" was all that inaccurate for this kind of an article.
photo
TYRANNASAURUS
UGH!....people don't taste good.
03:35 PM on 06/07/2011
It wasn't well written right.......but they know whom they're speaking to..... of course you're not included...thanks for the explain.
04:45 PM on 06/06/2011
In this type of research, 15 minutes is a lifetime.
04:07 PM on 06/06/2011
Wow...Incredible.
Way to go CERN!
Hard to believe this milestone has been achieved...
Wow.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Micki Pacific
02:07 PM on 06/06/2011
So maybe I am my consciousness and my anti-consciousness, working through the process of integrating myself into nothingness? Ha, VISA, you've reached the anti-Micki, and you are late on your payment!

Lemme know when they get an anti-fat molecule (a spray-on would be great,) or an anti-stupid molecule..a spray to dissolve the ignorant outta people would be pretty sweet...
01:13 PM on 06/06/2011
So what does this really mean , will the war stop , people get employment...or just some facts...im glad the scientists are employed!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RedDogBear
01:22 PM on 06/06/2011
Oh just that maybe we would have a better understanding of mundane stuff like the beginning of the universe. For some of that, that is worth a little investment. And keep in mind compared to what we are still spending on Iraq and Afghanistan, the money we give as tax breaks to oil companies to drill for oil (because they would never have any incentive to drill for oil otherwise) this is just a drop in the bucket.

I sincerely don't understand how anyone can be so unimaginative as to not see the value of a better understanding of the fundamental way the universe began and works. But if you can't keep in mind that one of the things about basic research is you never know what you may find. Einsteins wasn't trying to create nuclear power, just to understand how light works. People at Bell Labs doing basic research in physics ended up inventing the transistor which is what makes all modern computers possible.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
deweydecimal
@DeweyMai on Twitter
07:26 PM on 06/06/2011
Keeping scientists employed is in the best interest of our national and economic security. Other nations recognize this and the US seems intent on forgetting it.

http://www.economist.com/sciencetechnology/displaystory.cfm?story_id=17460678
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RedDogBear
08:31 PM on 06/07/2011
The idea that projects like this just "keep scientists employed" is total rubbish. The people that do this work are the best in their field. The competition for these positions is intense. If these people just cared about making money they could all easily leave the research world and make much more money working in industry. Even in the worst economies there is always work for minds like this.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Random User
12:23 PM on 06/06/2011
You know, at any given moment, the Earth is producing more antimatter in the atmosphere than these guys could make in a year.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-12158718
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RedDogBear
12:37 PM on 06/06/2011
And your point is? The goal here isn't just creating antimatter its doing so in a way that can be studied. That was what made this interesting that they can trap the antimatter for several minutes where as normally (e.g. in the atmosphere) it vanishes in a fraction of a second.
02:40 PM on 06/06/2011
But they cannot trap it and study it so your point is?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Random User
02:44 PM on 06/06/2011
My point was that there's nothing to be afraid of.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RedDogBear
12:22 PM on 06/06/2011
"Or as Hangst puts it: "Half the universe has gone missing and we don't know why."

Is this really accurate? It makes it sound as if the anti-matter somehow disappeared and we don't know where it went. As I understood it (and I'm not anywhere close to a physicist just an interested amateur so I could easily be wrong) its not so much that we don't know where to look for the anti-matter its that by its very nature with our technology its been virtually impossible to find or study these particles in the past. I guess that's a subtle distinction but I think an important one.
02:35 PM on 06/06/2011
You're thinking of "dark matter" which is theorized but not proven due to our inability to locate it.

Current theory says that equal amounts of matter and antimatter were created in the Big Bang, since they are equally likely to be generated. This is a Big Problem though, since matter and antimatter annihilate each other into energy--there wouldn't be galaxies planets, etc. So in order for all this to exist, their equivalent amounts of antimatter must have been destroyed, disappeared, or otherwise "unraveled" into energy....somehow. "Half the universe has gone missing" is fairly accurate in that context.

OR, the antimatter was never generated in the first place--which would require a significant reworking of the theory.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RedDogBear
02:37 PM on 06/06/2011
Makes sense. thanks!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Saijanai
Micro bio? We don't need no stinkin' micro bio...
01:22 PM on 06/07/2011
Is there any way to tell something is anti-matter, just by looking at it? If not, and if the universe clumped into regions of anti-matter and "regular" matter from the beginning, then you would likely have entire galaxies and groups of galaxies composed of one or the other with no likelihood for interaction. And you would never know unless some exceedingly large chunk of one variety of matter crossed the boundaries of intergalactic-cluster space to enter the realm of the other.