More

Apple's iCloud, iTunes Match: How Apple's Music Services Measure Up

Apple Icloud Itunes Match Wwdc 2011 Streaming Musi

The Huffington Post   First Posted: 06/06/11 05:01 PM ET Updated: 08/06/11 06:12 AM ET

Now that Apple has at last revealed the details of its music service on the iCloud, we can finally get a sense of how it measures up to the existing competition.

Apple's iCloud and related iTunes Match are gunning straight for Amazon's Cloud Player and Google Music Beta, and based on the details revealed during Steve Jobs' speech today, Amazon and Google should be worried. When it comes to user ease, price point, and functionality, Apple's new service has a leg up.

It's important to note that the iCloud encompasses not only music, but contacts, email, calendar, photos, apps, ebooks as well. All of these components will be synced across devices and available for free. Only music purchased in iTunes will be synced for free, while music from other sources can be synced through its $24.99 a year iTunes Match service.

At $24.99 a year, Apple far undercuts Amazon, which offers 5 gigabytes (or about 1,000 songs) for free before switching to a pricing tier. For users with about 20,000 songs or 100 GB of music, Amazon charges $100 a year (each gigabyte per year is another dollar). Jobs noted that Apple will let users store an unlimited number of songs--still for $24.99. Google Music Beta, which is invite-only at the moment, is free.

But both Google and Amazon lag drastically behind Apple in one key capacity: Upload speed. While uploading full libraries of music to Amazon and Google’s service could take weeks, Apple’s will take mere minutes. Apple’s able to pull off this trick because of the music licenses Apple was reported to have signed. Basically, Apple doesn’t actually have to upload your music, just to scan your collection and then match it to their preexisting catalogue in the cloud. What can’t be matched is uploaded.

"We have 18 million songs in the music store. Our software will scan what you have, the stuff you've ripped, and figure out if there's a match,” Jobs said. “If you have to upload your whole library, that could take weeks. If we're scanning and matching, we don't have to upload them. They're in the cloud. It takes just minutes. Not weeks."

And, though purchased music is synced free to the iCloud, while iTunes Match is a paid service, songs from iTunes Match will receive quality upgrades to 256 kpbs AAC. All of the songs in the cloud will be available to push to any iOS device. Amazon’s Cloud Player works on the web, and on Android, or by accessing the site through an iPhone’s mobile browser. Google Music Beta also works on Android and on web.

When it comes to music purchased from iTunes, Apple’s also offering the same iCloud sync and push features as it is for other kinds of media. Users can set their preferences so that any song downloaded to any Apple device is automatically downloaded to their other devices. What’s more, users will be able to see a purchase history on any device and choose to download past purchases with a click.

But the biggest advantage in Apple's music service might be unrelated to music. By offering music as one feature of the far more comprehensive iCloud, Apple has made a logical, and powerful, move. While Google itself uses cloud storage for its Gmail and documents, Google Music Beta was launched as a separate, and less fully formed appendage of the Google machine. Amazon offers a Dropbox-like way to store files that also touts an ancillary player for music. Apple, however, has presented what seems to be an integrated bid to capture the cloud from multiple angles under one overarching philosophy.

"About 10 years ago, we had one of our most important insights. We thought the PC would be the hub for your digital life where you put your photos, your video, your music. You were going to acquire it, and sync it to the Mac, and everything would work fine. And it did... but it's broken down in the last few years," said Jobs. "We're going to demote the PC and the Mac to just be a device. We're going to move your hub, the center of your digital life, into the cloud."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST TECH

Now that Apple has at last revealed the details of its music service on the iCloud, we can finally get a sense of how it measures up to the existing competition. Apple's iCloud and related iTunes ...
Now that Apple has at last revealed the details of its music service on the iCloud, we can finally get a sense of how it measures up to the existing competition. Apple's iCloud and related iTunes ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 26
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
09:34 AM on 06/09/2011
I'm so intrigued.... how does it know what the music you have is? It can't be a checksum because everyone will rip music with different codecs, so it must be the ID3 tags, so what will stop me from making blank mp3 files and creating the id3 tags I want??
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
glockman
07:53 AM on 06/08/2011
"Only music purchased in iTunes will be synced for free, while music from other sources can be synced through its $24.99 a year iTunes Match service."

Yet I pay nothing on Google Music to store every song in my iTunes files, including those I purchased from iTunes, and all those I ripped from my 1500+ CD collection. I'm storing over 8000 songs in Google music for no yearly fee. How is that not better than paying $24.99 a year?

So I can't store documents and pics, so what? I want it for music.
06:46 AM on 06/07/2011
We Ubuntu users call it UbuntuOne and we've had it around for a while now.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lordcron
Get on my Left if you know you ain't Right!
11:39 PM on 06/06/2011
I know I just posted but another though just came to me. What happens to your data if you all of a sudden find yourself out of work and can't afford to pay for them to keep your data? Do they just wipe it out of the cloud and poof your information is gone?

Scary stuff.
11:47 PM on 06/06/2011
Well, you get 5 GB free, and the $24.99 mainly for music, so you probably already have the music anyway. Just not everywhere you go.
DrReve
It's in the details.
11:55 PM on 06/06/2011
as per Apple:
"When you sign up for iCloud, you automatically get 5GB of free storage. And that%u2019s plenty of room, because of the way iCloud stores your content. Your purchased music, apps, and books, as well as your Photo Stream, don%u2019t count against your free storage. That leaves your mail, documents, Camera Roll, account information, settings, and other app data. And since those things don%u2019t use as much space, you%u2019ll find that 5GB goes a long way."
photo
Mister Grumpy
An Angry American
11:50 PM on 06/07/2011
Isn't that what a MP3 player is for?
01:26 AM on 06/07/2011
The music is copied to your devices and you have it locally.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lordcron
Get on my Left if you know you ain't Right!
11:36 PM on 06/06/2011
People need to read the fine print on Apples icloud service. Some companies like these sale information on what you like based on what they see in you files and worse, based on what gets uploaded, You can land in jail.

It's not to say you have something to hide but why make it easy for people to pry into what you are interested in any more the looking at your cookie information and your browsing habits. Store you information on a external hard drive or burn it to a DVD and store it. Don't make it easy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
theveggiedude
my body is a temple, not a living graveyard
10:32 PM on 06/06/2011
My music collection is almost 5000 songs and 120GB. $25/yr is reasonable if only for the storage alone. If I wanted to back it up with DropBox, it would cost $199 for up to 100GB.
08:28 PM on 06/06/2011
Actually, Google Music Beta does not require any uploading and like iCloud, will match the existing library via its Music Manager app. Also, in the following sentence, you probably meant that Google should be worried, not Apple:

"Apple's iCloud and related iTunes Match are gunning straight for Amazon's Cloud Player and Google Music Beta, and based on the details revealed during Steve Job's speech today, Amazon and Apple should be worried"
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wilray
50,000 Screaming Fans (Ignore that other number)
09:07 PM on 06/06/2011
I just got on Google Music beta today. If it is ultimately priced the same as Apple's service, I see absolutely no reason to switch.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
theveggiedude
my body is a temple, not a living graveyard
10:33 PM on 06/06/2011
I have a reason. Apple will match your entire collection at the higher 256-Kbps AAC format. Google does no conversion.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Onutz
11:14 PM on 06/06/2011
((I just got on Google Music beta today. If it is ultimately priced the same as Apple's service, I see absolutely no reason to switch.))

How long do you think it will take to upload your music library?
11:49 PM on 06/06/2011
Even if that is the cast, Google doesn't have the licenses Apple does. Nearly every song most people have Apple has,yes, there are some indy artists or specific versions of songs, but overall Apple has it. Plus iCloud does more than music.
12:17 AM on 06/07/2011
...and Google clouds apps have been doing so much more for so much longer than anything Apple announced its iCloud will do. That notwithstanding, how does your reply excuse factual errors in the article?