iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Louisiana Republican Aims To Overturn Roe v. Wade

Abortion

First Posted: 06/06/11 07:42 PM ET Updated: 08/06/11 06:12 AM ET

The Louisiana state legislature is considering a bill that would make performing an abortion a criminal offense, including in cases of rape and incest, and that would force a woman to pay out of pocket for an abortion that is necessary to save her life.

State Rep. John LaBruzzo (R), who introduced the bill, told lawmakers in a committee hearing last month that he fully intends for the bill to make its way up through the federal courts and challenge Roe v. Wade -- the 1973 Supreme Court decision that barred states from outlawing abortion in the first trimester of pregnancy.

"I think we're going at it piecemeal, trying to get two yards at a time, but we haven't gotten one first down," LaBruzzo said. "And I think this bill basically shoots for the end zone."

The Louisiana chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union, which would likely bring a lawsuit against the abortion ban if it passes, called the legislation "a frontal attack" on women's health and the medical profession.

"It turns doctors into felons," Marjorie Esman, the executive director of ACLU Louisiana, said in an interview. "It's an insult to anybody who wants to exercise their right to make their own medical decision, and we're not going to let the woman of Louisiana be insulted in this way."

Esman also sharply criticized LaBruzzo's stated desire to challenge the Supreme Court precedent.

"It's sort of astonishing that a legislator would take a position that is so hostile to the highest court in the land," she said. "It's a very arrogant, hostile statement."

In addition to banning abortions, the proposed bill would violate the federal Hyde Amendment, which states that while federal money cannot be used to pay for abortions except in the cases of rape, incest, and life endangerment, in those cases Medicaid and other government funds must be provided. LaBruzzo's abortion ban would not include such exemptions.

"This would mean a low-income woman whose life was in danger would have no options," said Ted Miller, a spokesman for NARAL Pro-Choice America. "She'd have to pay out of pocket."

The abortion ban has already passed in the Louisiana House. Miller said he expects it to pass in the state senate and to be signed by Gov. Bobby Jindal (R).

Louisiana already has a "trigger ban" in place that would make it one of the first states to outlaw abortion if Roe v. Wade were ever overturned. It is also one of 15 states with both legislative and executive branches sharply opposed to abortion rights, Miller said.

"This bill is consistent with other extreme elements we've seen come out of this state, and it's very disturbing," he said.

Mississippi and Alabama are also currently considering legislation that would directly or indirectly ban abortions in those states. Alabama lawmakers may take up a bill on Thursday that would amend the state's criminal code to redefine the word "person," and Mississippi will include a personhood amendment as a ballot initiative this November.

Alexa Kolbi-Molinas, a staff attorney for ACLU's Reproductive Freedom Project, said the organization has already challenged the Mississippi ballot initiative in court and plans to challenge any abortion ban that passes in the states.

"We'll regroup after the chips fall in Louisiana and Alabama, but all options are on the table," she said, "and that definitely means litigation."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
The Louisiana state legislature is considering a bill that would make performing an abortion a criminal offense, including in cases of rape and incest, and that would force a woman to pay out of pocke...
The Louisiana state legislature is considering a bill that would make performing an abortion a criminal offense, including in cases of rape and incest, and that would force a woman to pay out of pocke...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 3,511
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (64 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Channa
Everyone is entitled to my opinion.
04:03 PM on 07/08/2011
Christian conservatives think God is still worried about "replenishing the earth".
04:20 PM on 06/11/2011
The premises of this law are twofold: Sanctify children before they are born, but ignore them afterwards; and, blame the victim (in case of a crime). My stepdaughter was a rape victim a number of years ago. Walking down a college campus sidewalk and ambushed. The perpetrator was caught but got off with a suspended sentence (his father had money and connections). She became pregnant and had an abortion followed by a mental hospital stay (the abortion was a deeply painful decision). Under this law crime victims face one more deadly trial. I don't endorse abortion - but there are cases it is less bad than alternatives. The hypocrisy of many proponents of this type of law is sickening. They are of the ilk of the wealthy parents who helped the rapist I described, walk - but the girl seeking an abortion is EVIL! EVIL! "Let he who is without sin, throw the first stone..."
01:51 PM on 06/11/2011
'bout damn time. No legal scholar alive today, not even Ruth Bader-Ginsburg, defends the Roe decision. Justice Blackmun used shoddy history and shoddy constitutional interpretations to arrive at his decision that the Constitution protects a fundamental right to abortion. Bollocks; Every state has had anti-abortion laws on the books at one time or another since 1865, and all but 4 states criminalized abortion except in cases of rape, incest, or danger to the mothers' health. These have always gone unchallenged until Roe.

Blackmun would have us believe that abortion laws were actually meant to protect the woman, not the fetus. BS. States and religious institutions changed their laws as soon as the "quickening" theory was disproved. States had those laws to protect the unborn, not to further some paternalistic interest in the woman's health.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bigfun
07:47 PM on 06/07/2011
i think mandatory pregnancy would be a good enhancement to the freedoms our troops are working so hard in the middle east to protect.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Seven Teenatheart
Tolerance, peace, and sanity. Be your own person.
10:46 PM on 06/07/2011
Has it occurred to you that "mandatory pregnancy" would mean rape?
If you're suggesting that you're one disgusting individual.
07:42 PM on 06/11/2011
I'm hoping the poster was being sarcastic.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Cleverboots
05:42 PM on 06/07/2011
What does Mrs. LeBruzzo think?
05:13 PM on 06/07/2011
The difference between a liberal and a conservative is that liberals don't care if conservatives live conservatively. But conservatives want everyone to live conservatively and will legislate to make it so. Then they talk about freedom.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Cleverboots
05:44 PM on 06/07/2011
Well said. F&F
06:49 PM on 06/07/2011
Well someone needs to stand up for the fetus's right to life.
07:44 PM on 06/07/2011
What bunk! You stand in silence when your party votes to cut health care and food assistance programs for low income women. You complain if you have to pay more taxes to increase welfare assistance to them. You support the killing of millions in war and think the death penalty is justice. Never mind that your beliefs probably help to create far more criminals then you prevent.

You are a bloody hypocrite. You love the embryo and hate the results. You whine that you shouldn't have to pay for "someone else's mistake" or "why didn't she keep her legs closed". Sure, tell that to an 11 year old who's been raped and impregnated by her father. I'm sure you think it's a swell idea to force her to go through the trauma of rape and then birth. You ignore the thousands of children lingering in foster care who are in desperate need of adoption. But hey, it's only the cute little healthy babies that count in your book. If it comes down to the life of the woman and the "life" of the fetus, then the woman's life gets my vote. And how is her choice going to impact your life other than your creepy need to interfere in someone else's privacy.

Hello 1929! Apparently the Republicans idea of jobs is creating a greater need for foster care and low wage child care workers. Boy, that will get the economy back up and charging along.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Okiemama
09:17 AM on 06/08/2011
The are 500,000 children available for adoption in this country. How many have you adopted? How many pregnant unwed mothers are you supporting (tax money does not count)? Forty percent of all preganancies end in miscarriages. How is the divine one doing with that "right to life" thing? Want to make miscarriages illegal also like Bobby Franklin in Georgia tried to do? And just how many pregnancies have you had?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Hysterian68
bureaucrat/historian/ranter
05:00 PM on 06/07/2011
LaBruzzo may be right in once sense. This of all Supreme Courts is just the one to reverse Rov v Wade. LaBruzzo may be onto something.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
floresfamily9
Term limits for ALL elected offices
04:23 PM on 06/07/2011
OMG!!! I got it!!!! Hook a guys "unit" to his bank account. Every time he uses "it", costs him 1,000. That $ is put into a pot and divided out over all the women who have children, but no support. That way, all men pay for the ones who are deadbeats, just like all women will have to pay for those who are just careless. No $, no sex. This way, women are not the only ones who are losing.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
floresfamily9
Term limits for ALL elected offices
04:14 PM on 06/07/2011
I am so tired of men trying to decide what I am allowed to do and not allowed to do. If men carried babies, it would be a whole different story. But until I make decisions for your body, stay out of mine. I would probably never be able to make the decision to have an abortion, but I would never tell someone else what they must do.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KaraC
Trans lesbian, atheist and humanist
04:31 PM on 06/07/2011
Well put. And of course, even if they ban abortion, it will still be available elsehwere, or in state via some back street butcher. All this will do is end up killing women, as will some pregnancies since they will be forced to carry the baby irrespective of the mother's health. This is yet another attack on women, and on the ability of women to form their own intellectual and moral judgements.
photo
john1513
Ora et Labora
05:04 PM on 06/07/2011
What are the reasons one would never have an abortion?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
traceymarie
the President is black, deal with it
05:37 PM on 06/07/2011
she does not need a reason, that is her choice.
06:15 PM on 06/07/2011
NONE OF YOUR BUSINESS A WOMAN CAN DO WHATEVER SHE WANTS GOT IT YET???????????????????????????????
04:11 PM on 06/07/2011
Are they at least going to spend some money on catching and prosecuting the rapist, or is this going to be de-criminalized?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Seven Teenatheart
Tolerance, peace, and sanity. Be your own person.
06:15 PM on 06/07/2011
Are they going to protect women from the child visitation demands after they are forced to bear their rapist's child?
Or will the rapist have continual access to mentally bully the woman for life?

From what I can tell, protecting women is out of scope for this proposed legislation....
03:50 PM on 06/07/2011
Louisianna Republicans - proudly leading the way into the 19th Century!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Okiemama
04:29 PM on 06/07/2011
I think they are going back farther than that. They want a theocracy.
03:47 PM on 06/07/2011
Progressives, let me see if I have this right:

The Constitution says, and I quote, "The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."

Yet you seem to argue that the people have no right to keep and bear arms.

On the other hand, neither abortion nor "privacy" are mentioned in the Constitution.

Yet you seem to argue that there is some sort of inalienable constitutional right to abortion.

Do I have that right?
04:08 PM on 06/07/2011
Actually nowhere in the Constitution does it say any such thing. I believe you are referring to the Bill Of Rights, which does contain oblique references to privacy, keeping religion out of state sponsored events, a free press and a host of other important items without which this might as well be Stalinist Russia.
06:19 PM on 06/07/2011
WHO PAYS ATTENTION TO THESE STUPID GOPERS THEY CAN ALL GO TO HELL. PEOPLE OF LA. VOTE THEM ALL OUT. OR DO YOU WANT TO BE TOLD WAHT TO DO I AM AM AMERICAN AND NOBODY TELLS ME WHAT TO DO.
photo
Wheelo
A man a plan a canal Panama
04:08 PM on 06/07/2011
...while omitting the part about the well regulated militia...

Is it not also a Conservative and Libertarian position that the Government has no business in one's private affairs? What part of putting the government in the doctor's office aligns with this?

There's nothing in the Constitution that says a corporation is a "person" either, but corporations have broad First Amendment free-speech rights. That funny Constitution...
03:46 PM on 06/07/2011
It's rather terrifying to think Louisiana is as close-minded and backward to be pushing this.
06:25 PM on 06/07/2011
HOW CAN YOU SAY THAT IT IS THE SOUTH LOOK WHAT THESE PRICKS DID TO THE BLACK PEOPLE OMG HOW CAN YOU SAY THAT THEY ARE CLOSE MINDED THE SOUTH IS DISGUSTING AND BY READING THIS CRAP THE PEOPLE IN THE SOUTH ARE IDIOTS, I CANNOT STAND THE SOUTH THEY STILL ARE BACKWARDS THEY BELONG IN THE MIDDLE EAST. THE LOVE THAT MORON PALIN AND THIS IDIOT IS A BIGGEST MORON I HAVE EVER SEEN THIS DOPE PALIN DOES NOT EVEN KNOW HER HISTORY AND SHE ONLY GOES ON FOX AND THOSE MORONS ON FOX DID NOT EVEN CORRECT THIS DOPE. PLEASE............... THE SOUTH IS DISGUSTING. PEOPLE WAKE UP TRY USING YOUR BRAINS I KNOW YOU HAVE SOME................
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sharon Hunt
Life, Liberty, LIBERAL
03:25 PM on 06/07/2011
the GOP doing what it usually does..inflict its will on women's personal issues. I thought they want smaller government? You could have fooled me
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Roman1
Not Liberal Or Conservative. Just A Real American.
02:55 PM on 06/07/2011
Priorities still on point. New Orleans is still being rebuilt, unemployment through the roof in the state, Dems worrying more about themselves and their pocket books than their people....but let's overturn RvW because it's settled law and to keep everyone's minds off of the horrible job Republicans consistently do.