More

Doctors Warn Of U.S. Cancer Drug Shortage

Cancer Drug Shortage

First Posted: 06/07/11 07:12 PM ET Updated: 08/07/11 06:12 AM ET

Cancer medicines desperately needed by sick children and adults are in short supply, undermining the ability of U.S. doctors to administer treatments, top oncologists warned this week.

Many drugs are scarce because there is no incentive for drugmakers to manufacture low-cost generics, which have slim profit margins for pharmaceutical companies. Doctors do not expect that equation to change any time soon, making them scramble to find acceptable alternatives, or to ration or delay treatment when they cannot.

Generic chemotherapy drugs are in particularly tight supply at the nation's hospitals, including mainstay cancer treatments such as cisplatin, doxorubicin, cytarabine and leucovorin.

"These are chestnuts. These are not old-fashioned drugs. They remain incredibly important drugs which serve as the backbone for treating many of the most common and treatable cancers," said Dr. Robert Mayer of the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston and a past president of American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) which held its annual meeting in Chicago this week.

Cisplatin is used to treat testicular, bladder and ovarian cancers that have spread. The drug, also used to treat lung cancers, is sold under multiple brand names, originally by Bristol-Myers Squibb. A generic form is sold by Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd, among others.

Doxorubicin, also available under multiple brands and as a generic from Teva and others, is used to treat non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, multiple myeloma, acute leukemias and other cancers.

Cytarabine, produced by Hospira Inc and others, is used to treat certain types of leukemia. Leucovorin, also sold by Teva, is used along with certain chemotherapy drugs to treat colorectal, head and neck and other cancers.

Dr. Michael Link, a pediatric oncologist at the Mayo Clinic and current ASCO president, called it a disheartening crisis.

"Here we have highly effective drugs, they've been shown they work and to think we don't have them available is almost unconscionable," Link said. "We don't see an end in sight."

In some cases, doctors can substitute another drug for one that is in short supply.

"It's still uncomfortable to say that this is ideally what we'd like to do, but unfortunately we don't have it," Link said. "You can imagine the conversation and I'm sure they're going on all over -- doctors have to tell their patients or their patients' parents that we can't give them the proven drug because we don't have it."

NO SUBSTITUTE

For some of these medicines in short supply, there may not be acceptable alternatives.

"One could say that substituting Pepsi for Coca-Cola doesn't make a difference. Maybe it does and maybe it doesn't," Mayer said. "But more often it might be substituting 7-UP for Coca-Cola, and that might make a difference."

Leucovorin, a form of folic acid that is used to enhance the effectiveness of other chemotherapy drugs, is one example.

"This is the one that I hear the most about from my colleagues. If you don't have it, you just have to omit it. It certainly isn't in the best interest of patients. It is a very inexpensive drug," Mayer said.

Sophia Parhas, a pharmacy manager at Children's Memorial Hospital in Chicago, said if there is a shortage of the generic, the hospital will often buy the branded product.

"We make some substitutions ... so doctors will go back and forth between daunorubicin and doxorubicin, depending upon which one is short," she said.

Another option is for doctors to flip the order that drugs are given depending on the supply situation. Allen Vaida, executive vice president of the Institute for Safe Medical Practices, which has been tracking the shortage, said doctors have also been forced to delay or ration treatments.

"Patients are started on a therapy and they may go through four or five or six cycles. When a drug becomes short, your cycle may be coming up a month later than planned," he said.

"Oncologists, especially in major cancer centers, are in a quandary. 'Do I start my patient on therapy? Do I save what I have for patients who started two cycles ago?'"

Dr. Richard Schilsky, cancer specialist at the University of Chicago and a past ASCO president, said the shortages have been going on for about nine months with no sign of abating.

"When you talk to the drug companies, they say there are manufacturing problems or they are taking plants offline and then it takes a while to get them back up," he said.

"They point the finger at the FDA (Food and Drug Administration), saying the FDA is under-resourced and they can't get plants inspected to allow resumption of drug production. The drug suppliers are in the middle of this as well," he said.

But underlying all of this, he said, is a dearth of financial incentive to make the lower-cost cancer drugs, especially when new cancer drugs command huge premium prices.

"The return on investment of manufacturing generic drugs is pretty low. If something goes wrong, it may be that some manufacturers decide to pull out rather than fix the problem."

Hospira spokesman Dan Rosenberg said shortages arise for many reasons -- capacity constraints, commodity shortfalls, or when a competitor withdraws its product for some reason or when competitors have shortfalls. It is not always possible for Hospira to ramp up production that quickly, Rosenberg said.

"We are doing everything we can to ensure access to these products for clinicians and patients," he said. "Often, we continue manufacturing products at a loss because we realize there is a critical medical need and we are the only company that provides the medication."

A Teva spokesman said its California plant that makes injectable drugs, which was closed last year due to quality issues, is now back up. But the plant will not reach full capacity until the end of this year.

To address the shortages, U.S. senators Amy Klobuchar, a Democrat from Minnesota, and Robert Casey, a Democrat from Pennsylvania, introduced a bill in February that would make drug companies inform the FDA about supply problems or plans to stop making a drug. The FDA would then have time to work with other suppliers to make the drugs or arrange for imports.

"That is a canary in the coal mine," Schilsky said. "It doesn't really resolve the fundamental problem."

Copyright 2011 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST HEALTHY LIVING

Cancer medicines desperately needed by sick children and adults are in short supply, undermining the ability of U.S. doctors to administer treatments, top oncologists warned this week. Many dru...
Cancer medicines desperately needed by sick children and adults are in short supply, undermining the ability of U.S. doctors to administer treatments, top oncologists warned this week. Many dru...
Filed by Amanda L. Chan  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 143
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
04:36 PM on 07/28/2011
Nationalize the drug and insurance companies. Come on, capitalism is a failure when it comes to people's health.
NancyY
carpe diem!
11:14 PM on 06/08/2011
My late husband had metastasized pancreatic cancer, and went through two complete remissions before finally succumbing to the disease. His doctor had him on gemcitabine and cisplatin after the first and second diagnosis, then tried different chemo treatments the third time around. At least we were able to have a few more years together.
08:29 PM on 06/08/2011
That is absurd that just because the profit isn't there, that the drug companies don't make enough of them. How much is a persons life actually worth. I bet you if the people making these decisions ever needed them, they would make sure that they increase the amount to of these drugs tremendously.
photo
vaygollybum
just wondering
09:24 PM on 06/08/2011
No. They would take thiers off the top and to heck with everyone else.
08:05 PM on 06/08/2011
Doctors have learned a lesson with the elimination of POLIO - and are therefore laxidasical about pushing for any drug that has the potential for completely healing anyone, and thereby putting the medical profession out of busienss !!!

Lawyers do NOT seek justice, ( on both sides ) and Doctors do NOT seek a healthy society - for if either profession were TRUE to it's calling; we would be a very healthy & balanced society on both fronts, but those "professions" would go out of business; and as long as "Baby Needs Shoes" the preying of mankind on it's own kind shall continue.
07:58 PM on 06/08/2011
I have an idea, how about you make the medicine because people need it, instead of trying to always make a profit, that's wth is wrong with the world, money money money money.... One day money wont be worth the paper its written on, then what?
NancyY
carpe diem!
11:16 PM on 06/08/2011
You don't understand the R&D (research and development) that goes into these drugs, plus the risk involved. This is what puts the cost up front. Then add on the FDA testing. Add to that the fact that if a company/corporation isn't making a profit it might as well not exist, and you see the problem.
11:37 PM on 06/08/2011
I guess I'm more for people living than making a dollar, I do understand what goes into it but I also understand those meds are helping people and to take that away because of "no incentive" for the manufactures seems a little bit greedy and ridiculous to me. These treatments are already passed the R&D and testing, they are using them, so spending money on that is over with, now its time to make the meds and help the people you initially made the meds for to begin with. Regardless I find the excuse ridiculous, but that's just my opinion.
11:40 PM on 06/08/2011
Except there is no R&D to be done on these drugs. They are well understood. Companies aren't making them because the financial incentive is low. However, these drugs can be sold as a profit, so I would hope that a company would at least devote some resources to making them.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
susanherna121377
07:50 PM on 06/08/2011
It is not just the chemo drugs that are in short supply.My husband is going through treatment with Taxol. There is no problem with it, but other drugs are given with it to combat side effects. One of them is the steroid Decadron IV. Today, they gave it to him in pill form because of a shortage of it in IV form.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lizsobelcolumbus
07:38 PM on 06/08/2011
no incentive to produce lower costing drugs ? how about saving lives ? these pharmaceutical drug companies are lower than drug cartels . atleast with drug cartels they are up front about what they do . the only thing these pharmaceutical companies are missing are the guns .
photo
yorktown1979
I don't get no respect!
07:34 PM on 06/08/2011
"Many drugs are scarce because there is no incentive for drugmakers to manufacture low-cost generics, which have slim profit margins for pharmaceutical companies."

So in other words, becuse of greed by the drug companies people are going to die. This is where socialized medicine comes in and just says "Make some generics" to the drug companies and many lives are saved or is that not important anymore?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
paulthamec
Proud to have served this great nation ..
06:56 PM on 06/08/2011
Also dont forget about the frivolous lawsuits that also take away from there profits.
photo
yorktown1979
I don't get no respect!
07:48 PM on 06/08/2011
3 weeks after starting to take Darvocett I had a massive heart attack and found out that former Gov. Engler (R) was in the insurance business and got a $250,000 cap on "frivolous" lawsuits. If I was to sue the drug company, all of the money would go to the lawyers and I would get nothing except my medical records made public record. I wouldn't dream of suing. Why would I? My heart won't take the grief to make money for someone else. So the drug company wins! They got to sell their product, make their profits and I lose my life. Sounds fair doesn't it Republicans who want to kill Medicare and Social Security?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
paulthamec
Proud to have served this great nation ..
08:01 AM on 06/10/2011
This is what i am talking about,lawyers have created this mess with these lawsuits and most of these pin head judges allowing them ! it truly hurts the people who really need the care after some drug company and doctors malpratice. this has driven the cost through the ceiling for all i too am a victim of malpratice, i had a procedure done with removel of a tumor (acoustic neuroma) where the anesthesiologist made a error in my weight leaving me partially paralyzed in my left side.i too have a cap on what i can sue for i have a family i have to take care of and can no longer do my job to support them.i am 50yrs old and have no other choice but to go on disabilty (1950.47) a month that comes to 23.405 a year and of course i had to hire another lawyer to fight for my disability which used up most of my settelment mony this is crazy.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rrfotobus
06:29 PM on 06/08/2011
The opening paragraph of this article says it all... "Many drugs are scarce because there is no incentive for drugmakers to manufacture low-cost generics, which have slim profit margins for pharmaceutical companies." The fact that there are still profit margins, and by producing these drugs they could save live, makes the drug companies appear as ignorant, self-serving, selfish businessmen. No, wait, not only do they seem that way, but they are that way.. Welcome to the new America where profits supercede humanity. Guess they learned from the oil companies.. Go GOP, you are changing America one step at a time with your undeniable support for these sadly misguided drug lords..
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
paulthamec
Proud to have served this great nation ..
06:45 PM on 06/08/2011
Agree 100 %
05:41 PM on 06/08/2011
we give away billions of dollars to countrys, like our goverment who squander it away, when have the sick with cancer become 2nd class. stop giving away the money, bring that money home where it belongs.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Leon Engelun
05:39 PM on 06/08/2011
"there is no incentive for drugmakers to manufacture low-cost generics, which have slim profit margins for pharmaceutical companies."
That is pretty sick when a small profit is not considered good enough. With that attitude the drug makers show their true colors.
07:00 PM on 06/08/2011
There are so many things wrong with this article that it's hard to know where to start. It costs the original company billions and billions of dollars to get a drug onto the market. Without a profit they can't recoup that R and D expenditure OR have the funds to carry on with research. If the generics aren't there, that is not the fault of the original company and generic companies don't have the high overheads, Since cancer drugs are not cheap, the article does not make sense when it states "there is no incentive for drugmakers to manufacture low-cost generics, which have slim profit margins for pharmaceutical companies."
And to the person that questioned why we can't kill cancer cells without harming the host - the cancer cell is a human cell!
photo
yorktown1979
I don't get no respect!
08:00 PM on 06/08/2011
Well, we gave GE $3 Billion for R&D last year, do they manufacture any drugs that save lives? No, I don't think so. Oil companies just got another round of subsidies for R & D in spite of a 38% increase in profits over last year. If the GOP is going to give subsidies to companies for R&D then why not to the drug companies who could actually "bring good things to life"?
05:28 PM on 06/08/2011
sadly cisplatin and its relative platinum based drugs are harder and harder to get in some areas. every time we had to buy a dose for my dog a year ago we had to find a new specialty pharmacy to order it for us its just not out there.
05:06 PM on 06/08/2011
"They point the finger at the FDA (Food and Drug Administration), saying the FDA is under-resourced and they can't get plants inspected to allow resumption of drug production. The drug suppliers are in the middle of this as well"
The government and Big Pharma together screwing the American people...wow, there's a new one, huh?
04:56 PM on 06/08/2011
what do we have a government for all they have to do is say you make the drug or you don't get to sell anything in this country again