More

Albert Woodfox, Herman Wallace Given "Cruel And Inhumane" Prison Sentences: Amnesty International (POLL)

The Huffington Post   First Posted: 06/08/11 02:07 PM ET Updated: 08/08/11 06:12 AM ET

Isolation
A solitary confinement cell in Alcatraz's D Block - San Francisco, CA. Credit: Derek Key

Picture a box measuring roughly 6.5 by 9 feet. Imagine sitting in that box, 23 hours a day, for 40 years. For most, that describes a claustrophobic nightmare. For Albert Woodfox, 64, and Herman Wallace, 69, it describes their everyday lives. The two have been held in solitary confinement, with limited outside communication, at the Louisiana State Penitentiary since 1972. Their crime? Murdering a prison guard nearly four decades ago.

Woodfox and Wallace aren't the only ones outraged by the prolonged isolation. As AFP reports, the cases are ruffling some international feathers. Amnesty International has called for the immediate termination of the prisoners' isolation.

According to Guadalupe Marengo, Amnesty's Americas deputy director, the organization believes the treatment to be "cruel and inhumane and a violation of the US's obligations under international law."

As the organization's investigation into the cases shows, both men have been denied any "meaningful review of the reasons for their isolation." Four hours a week they are allowed to leave their cells to shower, or take a walk along the corridor. The men’s lawyers told the human rights organization that both are suffering from serious health problems caused, or aggravated, by their years of solitary confinement. They also claim that the two men may not have been guilty in the first place:

"No physical evidence linking the men to the guard’s murder has ever been found; potentially exculpatory DNA evidence has been lost; and the convictions were based on questionable inmate testimony. Over the years of litigation on the cases, documents have emerged suggesting that the main eyewitness was bribed by prison officials into giving statements against the men and that the state withheld evidence about the perjured testimony of another inmate witness. A further witness later retracted his testimony."

In April of 2010, National Geographic aired a documentary which explored the psychological effects of prolonged solitary confinement. They found that the brain processes loneliness in the same location as physical pain, and that being cut off from others can be so painful that prisoners are prone to extreme actions (such as self-mutilation and extreme violence) in order to connect with those outside their cells. Moreover, they found that it doesn't simply cause temporary impulsivity, but actually changes how their brains function entirely.

(Scroll down for poll.)

In 1913, solitary confinement was ruled in the US as ineffective and cruel and was abandoned by the Eastern State Penitentiary as well as most of the world. However, in reaction to increased prisoner violence at a federal prison in Marion IL, it quickly made a comeback in the 1970's. Currently more than 80,000 Americans are in solitary confinement, which usually includes a 15 minute computer-controlled shower, and an hour exercising alone as their only release from their cells.

After 40 years of their similar routines, both Woodfox and Wallace have entered lawsuits against the penitentiary, claiming that their treatment qualifies as "cruel and unusual punishment" and therefore violates the US constitution.

Until the cases are reviewed, Amnesty International urges authorities to make sure the treatment of the prisoners complies with international standards.

Quick Poll

Is Solitary Confinement A Form Of Torture?

Yes

No

Undecided

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

Picture a box measuring roughly 6.5 by 9 feet. Imagine sitting in that box, 23 hours a day, for 40 years. For most, that describes a claustrophobic nightmare. For Albert Woodfox, 64, and Herman Wall...
Picture a box measuring roughly 6.5 by 9 feet. Imagine sitting in that box, 23 hours a day, for 40 years. For most, that describes a claustrophobic nightmare. For Albert Woodfox, 64, and Herman Wall...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 219
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
patchinr3
02:27 PM on 07/06/2011
they all ought to be in solitary confinement, maybe they wouldnt be in asuch a hurry to get back in once there out women to especialy the women
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tuigim
The perils of benefactors...
01:04 PM on 06/09/2011
We have failed you Woodfox and Wallace.
We were made ignorant by those who stole journalism and deprived us of news
as they deprived you of your freedom.

Set my people free: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GHx7JftWVFw
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rooster Coburn
Less Gov't + More Responsibility = A Better World
04:44 PM on 06/09/2011
If they had been introduced to "ole sparky" this would never have happened to them. What a shame that they weren't!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
patchinr3
02:28 PM on 07/06/2011
let the kkk judge them not some naacp doogooder outfit
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tuigim
The perils of benefactors...
12:40 PM on 06/09/2011
The U.S. had no credibilty on human rights issues because of its own record.
The U.S. government has long been negligent is meeting the needs for survival of its people:
Clean water,
health care,
a fair justice system that works to solve the causes of violence and reform offenders, education...
The duty to provide these basic rights should NEVER be handed over to profit makers.
They form the core of a government's basic responsibility.

These men who were tortured and many others should sue the pants of the offenders
who were abusive at the lower levels and neglecful at the highest levels.
More importantly, this needs to change NOW.

No more letting the media dictate who we elect.
No more bought elections.
No more wars.

Vote for those who stand for real justice, not for profit or vengeance.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
arkymorgan
Nobody knows the trouble I've been...
11:07 AM on 06/09/2011
From Logicnotfaith: 'Funny I'm sure the authors of the constituti­on would have an different interpreta­tion of "cruel and unsual" given the times (i.e. The Tower of London). The irony is that these two would have been hanged in 1789... '

It was always my impression that the Founding Fathers were trying to create something _better_ than what they had inherited from the Old World.

Silly me.
09:44 PM on 06/08/2011
If you are black, move North, the southern justice system is not fair
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
greysells2
grey cells matter
08:36 PM on 06/08/2011
America has a cruel streak. Sometimes cruelty is expressed through unsanctioned individual actions. Sometimes it is expressed through sanctioned institutional actions. All the same, it is cruelty.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tuigim
The perils of benefactors...
12:43 PM on 06/09/2011
X2
But what is America and who is running it?
Many good people had no say in this
and I they dare say that the majority when they hear about it are appalled by it.
So who has control and how do we get it back?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
patchinr3
02:36 PM on 07/06/2011
libberals
08:33 PM on 06/08/2011
It is unadvised to let people like that wander about. I'd rather keep them in the box than endanger the staff.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tuigim
The perils of benefactors...
12:44 PM on 06/09/2011
Well MMRDO,
your lack of heart is consistent.
I'll give you that.
Life is better with a pulse.
12:47 PM on 06/09/2011
So what would you do with them? They stab a staff member, they attack another inmate, where do we put them?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Veganie
Live food, live bodies
06:49 PM on 06/08/2011
Some prisoners are without any incidents or violations; they deserve parole, due to their remorse, changed attitudes and beliefs.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
patchinr3
02:40 PM on 07/06/2011
THEY NEED AN ATTITUDE ADJUSTMENT AND never be around libberals they WILL conform.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Daschenk
06:48 PM on 06/08/2011
Liberals aren't defending the rights of criminals, they are protecting the rights of all individuals simaltaniously so that nobody is innocently punished.

This includes giving everybody a fair trial, and protection from cruel and unusual punishment.
These guys got neither, and the result is an embarrassment to our tradition and Constitution.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
patchinr3
02:42 PM on 07/06/2011
what hogwash they been there for 30 years they had more hearings than j edjar hoover
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Daschenk
06:44 PM on 06/08/2011
The Constitution is clear on this, Solitary is considered cruel and unusual.

What their crime (allegedly) was, is completely irrelevant.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JavaWinters
random pieces of my mind
07:12 PM on 06/08/2011
Eliminating solitary completely removes a punishment option for the guards to maintain safety for all prisoners. If they can't put violent individuals somewhere away from the rest then everyone else is in danger of being attacked. Solitary is needed in prisons, but it must not be abused. This case is extreme, even if the men were guilty.

The Constitution is *not* clear on short term loss of privileges and solitary.
08:28 PM on 06/08/2011
It goes further than that. Not only is this a question of putting people in the hole for years on end, it's also a regime designed for sensory deprivation. It's not as if someone is being put into protective custody with the ability for the person to communicate with other people from their protective shell and to have diversions. The regime is clearly punitive and designed to enhance the damaging effects of solitary as much as possible.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Daschenk
12:21 AM on 06/09/2011
One can't use the slippery slope argument only when it suits. Execution would be more humane than 40 years of deprivation.
06:36 PM on 06/08/2011
Misleading photo. I do consider solitary for 40 years to be torture, but the photo is of a cell in Alcatraz where prisoners were kept in complete darkness, which is not something that happens today.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
babybuda
Tolling for the outcast....
06:34 PM on 06/08/2011
The sad truth is trying to reintroduce these two human-beings into general population will probably be very difficult if not impossible for them !
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
deepfreezevideo
Now with even MORE microbial micro-bio!
10:40 PM on 06/08/2011
impossible...
06:24 PM on 06/08/2011
Crying over these guys right, meanwhile 40 years ago, a wife and children lost a father. But please lets spill tears over thier rights?? What is wrong with the people in this country!
06:37 PM on 06/08/2011
Then again, if they are innocent and are kept in a box for 40 years. Is that justice? Is that how you treat other people?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Daschenk
06:45 PM on 06/08/2011
Punishing men who cannot be linked to the murder, does not bring a father or husband back to life magically.
08:34 PM on 06/08/2011
It keeps the CO's safe.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
uncc49er
Only the truth and nothing more
06:24 PM on 06/08/2011
It is like killing someone painfully over 40 years. I would prefer to be executed right away.
06:18 PM on 06/08/2011
Oh hell no! So there's no evidence linking these guys to crime, and yet they're serving time. I would recommend "Innocence Project," but they need some kind of DNA test to vindicate the inmates. Plus, the only evidence the state has is inmates testifying on behalf of the state. Of course the inmates testifying are given a reduced sentence, and that there is motivation for false testimonies.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
patchinr3
02:54 PM on 07/06/2011
put people in jail every day on testimony of snitches dept of justice and eric holder would be out of business if they couldnt use snitches