iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Some Chicken May Contain Arsenic, FDA Says

MARY CLARE JALONICK   06/08/11 06:11 PM ET  AP

WASHINGTON — The Food and Drug Administration said Wednesday that some chicken meat may contain small amounts of arsenic, though the agency is stressing that the amount is too tiny to be dangerous to people who eat it.

The FDA said Wednesday that a new study developed by the agency shows that an ingredient in chicken feed that contains arsenic, called Roxarsone, may make its way into parts of the bird that are eaten. Previous studies have indicated that the arsenic was eliminated with chicken waste.

Pfizer Inc., which makes the feed ingredient, said Wednesday that it will pull it off the market in the United States. Had the company not stopped sales, the FDA could have eventually banned the product since it contains a known carcinogen.

Many poultry producers have already stopped feeding their birds the ingredient, which has been used since the 1940s to kill parasites and promote growth.

The FDA said that people should not stop eating chicken that may have been fed the drug. Michael Taylor, FDA's deputy commissioner for foods, said the study raised "concerns of a very low but completely avoidable exposure to a carcinogen."

Pfizer said in a statement that a subsidiary, Alpharma LLC, is suspending sales next month in response to the FDA findings. The company said it is waiting a month so producers have time to transition their birds off the drug. The ingredient will also be pulled off the market for swine and turkeys, though the FDA only studied chickens.

Scott Brown, of Pfizer Animal Health's Veterinary Medicine Research and Development division, said the company also sells the ingredient in about a dozen other countries. He said Pfizer is reaching out to regulatory authorities in those countries and will decide whether to sell it on an individual basis.

In the study of 100 chickens, the FDA found that chickens that had eaten the Roxarsone had higher levels of inorganic arsenic – as opposed to organic arsenic, which is naturally occurring – in their livers than chickens which had not eaten the Roxarsone. Inorganic arsenic is more toxic than the naturally occurring form.

The agency attempted to study levels of arsenic found in chicken muscle – breasts and legs, for example – in addition to the livers but that test ran into complications. An agency official said Wednesday that they would expect about 40 times less arsenic to be found in the muscle than in the liver.

Roxarsone has long been a concern for environmental and consumer groups worried about its presence in chicken waste and the resulting effects on human health in areas with high chicken production. Maryland state lawmakers have attempted to force a ban in that state, saying the arsenic ends up in the Chesapeake Bay.

"Arsenic in chicken production poses a risk not only to human health, but to the environment," said Michael Hansen, a senior scientist with Consumers Union, which publishes Consumer Reports. "We need to get arsenic out of food production altogether."

Consumers Union and other groups praised the FDA's move but asked the agency to go further and encourage bans of other animal drugs that contain arsenic. The FDA said it is looking at another drug made by Pfizer, Nitarsone, which contains arsenic and is fed to chickens and turkeys but is used much less frequently than Roxarsone. Officials said they are in talks with the company about that drug but do not have any data specific to it.

The National Chicken Council, which represents companies that produce and process chickens, said in a statement that the ingredient has been used to maintain good health in chickens for many years, and that it is used in "many, but not all" flocks.

"Chicken is safe to eat," the group said.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST FOOD

Filed by Joe Satran  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 136
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
April22
Some experiences in life are ineffable
11:24 PM on 06/11/2011
A Chevron ad trying to win our loyalty as to having their heart in the right place!

The same Chevron Ecuador is suing for contaminating the Amazon rain forest and who appealed a court ruling ordering Chevron to pay over $9 billion in damages, because more money would be needed to clean up the mess? That Chevron!

The same Chevron who was a member of the US-Libya Business Assoc., until the tide turned and their wesite went dark. Apparently Gaddadi was an okay kind a guy then. That Chevron?

The same Chevron whose first-quarter profit was up 36% this year as suppy disruptions drove crude above $100 a barrel. That Chevron?

Please?!

http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/business/companies/chevron_corporation/index.html
April22
Some experiences in life are ineffable
11:02 PM on 06/11/2011
Our government has our best interest at heart and our tax dollars are being used in that venue, right?

Earlier this week Pfizer announced it would "voluntarily" stop selling a widely used arsenic-laced poultry feed additive.

"As far back as 1999, concern about arsenic in roxarsone going inorganic spurred the European Union to ban its use; and the US poultry giant Tyson, no doubt fearing liability issues, stopped using it in 2004. But the broader industry kept right on dosing its birds with the arsenic-laced stuff, and the FDA and USDA did nothing to rein them in."

Many farms have for years spread chicken manure containing roxarsone on their fields or used chicken manure converted into pellet fertilizer, where it then went into water tables.

"Most likely, Pfizer's move will spur the poultry industry to wean itself completely from the dodgy additive ... eventually. At this point, what's the rush? Twelve years after the European Union banned roxarsone, five years after it emerged as an obvious public-health menace in the scientific literature, US farmers were still applying 2 million pounds of it to chicken feed each year at the time of Pfizer's decision, Food and Water Watch estimates. And whether they liked it or not, millions of consumers were—in fact, still are—getting a nice dash of arsenic with their nuggets."

The FDA your pals at work for you!
April22
Some experiences in life are ineffable
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
seehowtheyrun
Without music, life would be a mistake
01:50 PM on 06/10/2011
I had a pasture raised chicken the other day. I have never tasted anything like it. If I had never had chicken before, but I had had eggs, I would have known from eating this chicken where eggs came from. It had a slightly eggy taste, and the fat on it was a deep golden color (like the yolk of eggs from pasture raised chicken). It tasted nothing like chicken raised on commercial organic feed or like the cardboard-like mass produced chicken living on Pfizer's t0xic feed.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Austintatious
03:22 PM on 06/09/2011
The agencies of the government of the United States charged with the responsibility of protecting the American people from the dangerous practices of the food industry are thoroughly corrupted, to the point of being subsidiaries of that industry and a total failing of the people. The same is true of the President, the Congress and the Supreme Court. When it comes to the safety of our food or just about any other matter, our government represents the big corporations. We, the people, are on our own.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:14 PM on 06/09/2011
"Pfizer Inc., which makes the feed ingredient, said Wednesday that it will pull it off the market in the United States. Had the company not stopped sales, the FDA could have eventually banned the product since it contains a known carcinogen."

I don't see why carcinogenic substance has to be in use to be banned. If the FDA does not ban the substance, it will probably be used, quietly, again in the future. Sometimes these stories seem to be written solely with the shareholder's mindset.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
baileywick
03:05 PM on 06/09/2011
Pfizer serves us "arsenic chicken", Monsanto gives us "cancer corn", ADM gives us the willies and certain people want more deregulation.
This is NOT Kansas anymore.
11:04 AM on 06/09/2011
About 90% of the animals raised for food each year in our country are chickens, raised in conditions that would absolutely sicken a good 99% percent of us and send us looking for other options. There are grain-based alternatives to chicken that are actually healthy, humane, and very tasty and affordable, like those offered from Gardein. For more on this see http://freefromharm.org/take-action/.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Mensch99
03:55 AM on 06/09/2011
I find that organic meat costs about twice as much as the meat containing hormones and antibiotics. I compensate for this by eating only half as much meat, or less.
The American habit of gobbling huge quantities of meat is a contributing factor to the epidemic of obesity and diabetes.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
1Truthseeker
Explore,Discover,Create
12:18 AM on 06/09/2011
It does not matter how low the dose they claim that one ingests, it is cumulative in the body! The criminal part is that this raxorazone is excreted in the poultry and swine feces and that in turn is used as fertilizer on our fields for growing grains, corn and other crops. This just spreads the organic arsenic into more of our food. The use of organic arsenic is primarily used by the giant Farm corporations. Thus a lot of this organic arsenic is polluting our ground water. There is a reason why more and more people are coming down with cancer. Our land, water and air is being poisoned by massive amount of chemicals used by the Corporate Farming industry. Independent Scientific investigations have finally established a connection between the neuro- toxins in the Herbicides we use to be a leading cause of Prostate cancer in men; yet the Corporate Farmers are spending millions to deny this, taking up the time of our elected officials just to avoid doing the right thing! Eat organic and support your local family farmer. Get on board with the sustainable farm movement. If you have a Roundup weed killer dispose of it at a hazardous waste site. Monsanto is finally admitting that it does cause birth defects and that they have known this for the past 20 years.
12:53 PM on 06/09/2011
If you read the article, you might have noticed that the concerns were over "inorganic arsenic", and not "organic arsenic". Perhaps you just made three identical typos?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
1Truthseeker
Explore,Discover,Create
12:18 AM on 06/09/2011
They have been feeding the organic arsenic to chicken and pork for a number of years. I learned of this several years ago when I noticed that the Golden Plump chicken that used to be labeled hormone and antibiotic free suddenly had the 'antibiotic free" missing. I cannot eat meat that has been treated with antibiotics so I wound up doing a lot of research with the Food Safety division in the Department of Agriculture in my State. I finally learned that the reason these companies had to remove the "antibiotic free" labeling is that they were continuing to feed their animals the organic arsenic that functions like an antibiotic. I researched the organic arsenic and learned that is a known and powerful carcinogen and that the chickens that consume this suffer with deformities and tumors. I only buy meat that is labeled hormone and antibiotic free.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Chester Erickson
(R) moderate
12:40 AM on 06/09/2011
I'm a little confused when you say that you can't eat meat that has been treated with antibiotics.

Do you mean that you can't eat meat that has EVER been treated with antibiotics, or you can't eat meat that hasn't gone through the proper withdrawal period?

Antibiotics don't stay in the meat forever, just like the penicillin we take doesn't stay in us forever. There are well-established withdrawal periods to make sure that the meat doesn't contain any traces of antibiotics.

It would almost be easier if antibiotics did hang around forever, you could treat an animal (or person for that matter) ONCE and be done with it.
photo
MagicalPossibilities
Question everything...
01:07 AM on 06/09/2011
The problem is giving antibiotics to animals a a matter of course to keep them alive in the extremely unhealthy conditions found in factory farms. This has a domino effect, rendering antibiotics less and less effective while the bacteria slowly become immune to the drugs.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
1Truthseeker
Explore,Discover,Create
09:50 AM on 06/09/2011
Being allergic to a large spectrum of antibiotics, I avoid poultry that is regularly treated with them.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
CR46
spay/neuter and adopt
12:08 AM on 06/09/2011
So glad I raise my own chickens for eggs and an occasional meal.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Chester Erickson
(R) moderate
10:52 PM on 06/08/2011
This is news? Here is a publication from 2006:

http://www.iatp.org/iatp/publications.cfm?accountID=421&refID=80529
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
1Truthseeker
Explore,Discover,Create
12:24 AM on 06/09/2011
Very informative link! Again the use of arsenic in agriculture is banned in Europe.
09:56 PM on 06/08/2011
everybody knows the food industry is a gong show but we don't care enough to do anything about it.

could try general election vote reform....
removal of corp money from politics.....

sadly our performance on simpler problems doesn't inspire confidence.
photo
North2011
"He who knows best, knows how little he knows"
09:49 PM on 06/08/2011
"Michael Taylor, FDA's deputy commissioner for foods"

Was also a former Monsanto Vice President, former USDA "food safety inspector" & agrees it's alright to inject cows with genetically engineered bovine growth hormone (rbGH/rbST)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Finnegans Wake
riverrun, past Eve and Adam's, from swerve of shor
02:32 PM on 06/09/2011
Obama's continued the policy of letting the fox guard the henhouse, unfortunately...
09:44 PM on 06/08/2011
"I'll have the sesame arsenic chicken and she'll have the lemon pepper mercury salmon."