iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Jon Tester Faces Opposition From Montana Voters On Swipe Fees

Jon Tester

First Posted: 06/08/11 01:23 PM ET Updated: 08/08/11 06:12 AM ET

WASHINGTON -- As the Senate prepares to vote Wednesday on Jon Tester's amendment to delay swipe fee reforms, the junior senator from Montana faces division among his colleagues and opposition from his home state, where voters overwhelmingly support swipe fee reform.

Tester is sponsoring an amendment to delay the implementation of regulations on the fees banks can charge merchants for swiping debit and credit cards. These swipe fees are a multi-billion dollar industry -- at a major cost to merchants, including mom-and-pop shops and other small businesses.

But Tester took the banks' side in the lobbyist-driven battle with merchants, against fellow Democratic Sen. Richard Durbin (D-Ill.). Populist voters in Montana are not pleased.

Three-quarters of Montana voters support the swipe fee reform that Tester is trying to delay, according to a retailer-commissioned poll that was released Monday. Within that 75 percent are some major supporters of reform: 54 percent said they would fight to protect it, while 38 percent said they may vote against Tester over his support for the delay. (He's up for reelection in 2012.)

When HuffPost asked Tester's office for a comment on the polling, spokesman Aaron Murphy said he would not comment on a poll "funded and shopped" by a special interest. Murphy said he is not aware of any independent polls in the state -- or polls funded by groups that support Tester's position.

Retailers and Wall Street have been advertising heavily in Montana, prompting criticism from Republican operative Karl Rove when he appeared on a local radio show in the state in April.

Rove dinged the station he was on for running a bank-sponsored ad in support of Tester. The show, "Voices of Montana," was guest-hosted that day by political consultant to Montana Republican Rep. Denny Rehberg, who is Tester's opponent in the 2012 Senate contest. Tester announced Friday he had raised $1.16 million in the first quarter of 2011 -- more than a dollar for every man, woman and child in the Big Sky State. Rehberg pulled in a measly $580,000.

On the show, Rove interrupted his own routine political analysis with some off-the-cuff griping about the ad he'd heard while he was on hold. Tester didn’t deserve the praise from Wall Street, Rove said, because he was a Johnny-come-lately on the issue. But a few seconds later, Rove and the host took a curious turn and blasted Tester for being in the pocket of Wall Street.

The host noted that Tester is "literally doing the bidding for the 1 percent, the biggest banks in the world" and said, "We'll see how perhaps handsomely rewarded [Tester] may have been by Wall Street, by the big banks, for backing this measure."

Rove, who knows more about how corporate rewards are distributed, corrected the host: "Well look, he's already been rewarded; they're underwriting these radio ads," said Rove.

Local newspapers have pointed out Tester's Wall Street ties in articles about his support for the reform delay amendment, with headlines like "Tester Sticks With Banks on Debit Card Swipe-Fee Issue" in the Missoulian.

Tester has been backpedaling all year on the move to delay swipe fee reform, which he originally hoped to push back by two years. He later switched his amendment to a 15-month delay, and then reduced the time period once again. The Senate will vote at 2 p.m. on Wednesday on an amendment that would delay reforms by only one year.

Tester also made a risky choice in the legislative vehicle for the measure, which is being tied a bill that is unlikely to pass the House of Representatives -- even if Tester is able to get 60 votes for his amendment.

"Well, we haven't had a lot of luck passing bills in both chambers," Durbin said with a smile on Tuesday.

Correction: An earlier version of this report stated the interview with Rove on "Voices of Montana" was hosted by a consultant to state Rep. Danny Rehberg. The show is hosted by Aaron Flint, who is not a consultant to Rehberg, but was guest-hosted that day by Rehberg campaign manager Erik Iverson.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- As the Senate prepares to vote Wednesday on Jon Tester's amendment to delay swipe fee reforms, the junior senator from Montana faces division among his colleagues and opposition from his...
WASHINGTON -- As the Senate prepares to vote Wednesday on Jon Tester's amendment to delay swipe fee reforms, the junior senator from Montana faces division among his colleagues and opposition from his...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 191
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (7 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Joe Padilla
Ever hear of a credit union crisis?
02:07 AM on 06/20/2011
Here are the crooks in congress that screwed their constituents and voted to make them pay more to wall street and take away money from their own home state business.

These are the Senators who voted yes to you paying more in swipe fees.

NAYs ---33
Akaka (D-HI)
Alexander (R-TN)
Baucus (D-MT)
Bayh (D-IN)
Bennett (R-UT)
Bond (R-MO)
Brownback (R-KS)
Bunning (R-KY)
Carper (D-DE)
Coburn (R-OK)
Cochran (R-MS)
Corker (R-TN)
Cornyn (R-TX)
DeMint (R-SC)
Gregg (R-NH)
Hatch (R-UT)
Inhofe (R-OK)
Johanns (R-NE)
Johnson (D-SD)
Kaufman (D-DE)
Kyl (R-AZ)
Lieberman (ID-CT)
McCain (R-AZ)
McCaskill (D-MO)
McConnell (R-KY)
Murkowski (R-AK)
Roberts (R-KS)
Sessions (R-AL)
Shelby (R-AL)
Tester (D-MT)
Thune (R-SD)
Voinovich (R-OH)
Warner (D-VA)
01:16 AM on 06/09/2011
Their is always ways around anything in office.who ever pads their pockets with the most money wins.And as usuall the people lose.Sold out again.
01:14 AM on 06/09/2011
Montana is a state of drunks.Every other buisness is a bar.Must have been drunks who put him in office.I use to live in that wonderful state.lol
01:12 AM on 06/09/2011
Who is paying this so call official,to keep this thing going.As long as it goes on the banks are making millions.Everything these days are going to plastic.even goverment checks such as social security and almost everything else.Their is no break for the poor.Everyone is getting ritcher while taking everything a poor man has.But our congressmen and senators can't pass bills to help us.When the time comes we wont need them either.Look out for the people who put you in office or you wont be their next time.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:58 PM on 06/08/2011
The Banksters are paying him a lot. The voters pay him nothing. What do you expect him to do? TERM LIMITS NOW.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
katylab
cops have the best dope
08:26 PM on 06/08/2011
Time to get rid of the blue dogs - by any means necessary.
photo
tector
My own opinion is enough for me...c. hitchens
06:09 PM on 06/08/2011
hope there is a viable progressive candidate available in montana to run against tester in the primary.

i have given up donating to the dnc, dncc and other such orgs for democratic candidates. much better to use act blue and other like groups to send money to candidates who reflect my political views rather than letting dnc etal take my money and give it to blue dogs and other demos i despise.
photo
OnMySoapbox
Would the GOP even pull the plug on Jesus?
05:55 PM on 06/08/2011
crook
05:00 PM on 06/08/2011
This article mentions Tester's $1.16 million raised, and also mentions now he's voting for an unpopular bill to help out banks. I think the likely connection writes itself here.
Just look www.trustfci.com/SecInv.html
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
grovestand12
E Pluribus Unum...O, 2012!
04:13 PM on 06/08/2011
how much did they pay you, tester????
03:43 PM on 06/08/2011
We all complain about it when we read of politicians doing favors for corporate America and we should. But what most people fail to understand is that this is inevitable in a system that requires it in order to be elected in the first place and then keep the office. The real issue is campaign finance reform. Until we get real reform, nothing changes.

We all complain that we need campaign finance reform as well we should. But until we begin paying attention to who we are voting for in the White House and what kind of people they are likely to appoint to SCOTUS, NOTHING WILL CHANGE.

I remember harping on it in 04 talking about how it was inevitable that there would be retirements on the Court and that was reason enough to vote for Kerry. (Even though there were plenty others). People looked at me as if I had 2 heads and sure enough, O'Connor retired and Renquist died. If Kerry had made those appointments, in addition to all the other pro-corporate wingnut decisions, there would have been no Citizens United. Not to mention there would have probably been no financial meltdown, better response to Katrina, etc. etc.

People need to take responsibility for their own democracy or they will find that they have lost it!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:03 PM on 06/08/2011
There is always a way around campaign finance reform. We have to get away from the Professional Politician form of government. Congress can't be a JOB, it must be a service if we are going to have a strong government responsive to everyone, not just the Special Interest that put them into and keep them in THE JOB. TERM LIMITS NOW.
09:15 AM on 06/09/2011
Term limits do nothing but restrict our democracy and make sure that the level of expertise acquired by several years in office never happens. Term limits are not in the Constitution-(but funny how you so called textualists want them) and they help explain the insanity of the current state legislatures. The Framers obviously didn't agree with you.

The connection you make between campaign finance and term limits is so silly one cannot only wish that people actually bothered to think about the consequences of their suggestions.
01:53 AM on 06/10/2011
If you stop the career politician it still won't stop the corruption. Big corporations and banks would just offer to take care of them post term if they do what they need them to do. "Hey, get this law passed and there will be a nice cushy place on our board of directors when you get out of office." Regulation rarely stops corruption. Usually it's used as a vehicle to become more corrupt. Term limits won't do anything. The only thing that will do anything is if the people get mad, pick up their torches and pitch forks, and let everyone know that we aren't going to stand for this any more. We need to turn off American Idol and get serious about this instead of asking the corrupt to police themselves. The people are supposed to control the government, not the other way around.
03:06 PM on 06/08/2011
One thing for sure we do know. We know who loses.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Pammy2
I'd rather laugh with sinners than cry with saints
02:52 PM on 06/08/2011
So another tool of the banking industry spits on his constituents. This is news?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
artsymermaid
02:51 PM on 06/08/2011
It's a tough when you have to side with WalMart or banksters. Meh.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:08 PM on 06/08/2011
AND the government won't let Wal Mart be a bank too. Remember what happened when evryone was bad mouthing Wal-Mart about their lack of real Health Insurance for their employees. What is it $4 bucks for 30 days worth of meds now? Let Wal-Mart into banking and watch the costs drop like a rock.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tjconkster
Occupy the Voting Booth 2014
02:46 PM on 06/08/2011
Tester's not worried...if he gets voted out...the Banksters will reward him with a plum lobbyist job..
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cobra7
Fact checking every Lie they tell
06:54 PM on 06/08/2011
But isn't there a time period before he can accept a lobbyist job?....at best he will be a lobbyist-in-waiting.....nuff said
09:03 PM on 06/08/2011
Not for John Ensign it isn't. I will vote for Tester again, Rehberg is trying to please the tea party but I'll bet he would've voted for Ryan's bill if he wasn't afraid it would be used against him in the upcoming election. He's just another rich career Republican. Tester probably would want to become a lobbyist, he owns a farm in Big Sandy and will probably go back to running it. Keep up the good work, Jon.
09:05 PM on 06/08/2011
Sorry, I meant to say he wouldn't want to become a lobbyist.