iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

AFL-CIO Threatens To Primary Tim Johnson Over CEO Pay

Tim Johnson

First Posted: 06/10/11 06:17 PM ET Updated: 08/10/11 06:12 AM ET

WASHINGTON -- The nation's largest labor union federation on Friday threatened to challenge the powerful chairman of the Senate Banking Committee in the 2014 elections, if he allows a key set of new executive pay regulations be weakened.

The surprising remark occurred during a panel discussion moderated by The Huffington Post at the Social Investment Forum Conference. The summit was attended by hundreds of socially conscious investors ranging from religious groups like the Unitarian Church to high-profile investment houses like Mesirow Financial.

During the panel, a top technocrat on the Banking Committee, General Counsel Dean Shahinian warned that investors may have to accept a weaker-than-anticipated version of new disclosures on CEO pay mandated by last year's Wall Street reform bill. Shahinian also acknowledged that his boss, committee chairman Sen. Tim Johnson (D-S.D.), would be willing to re-open last year's landmark legislation and rewrite some aspects of the law if bipartisan political consensus about some measures could be established.

AFL-CIO Special Policy Counsel Damon Silvers immediately interrupted Shahinian: "I think Senator Johnson needs to think about his political future," he said. The audience of potential campaign contributors let out an audible gasp.

Shahinian responded that Silvers' comment was "inappropriate" for the panel, but the union lawyer did not apologize.

Instead, he instructed Shahinian to consider "the recent personal history of Blanche Lincoln." The AFL-CIO is widely credited with ruining any chance the former Democratic senator from Arkansas had of winning reelection in 2010. Walmart, the world's largest retailer. is headquartered in Lincoln's state, and the labor union had repeatedly objected to her positions on key workers' rights issues.

Unable to win over Lincoln, the AFL-CIO spent millions of dollars supporting progressive Democratic challenger Bill Halter in the 2010 primaries. Halter lost the primary, but the divided Democratic base caused Lincoln to suffer a landslide loss in the general election.

At the Friday panel, Silvers vowed to provide the same treatment to Johnson -- one of the most Wall Street-friendly Democrats in the Senate -- if he does not make sure that Dodd-Frank remains intact.

Johnson is not well-loved by consumer advocacy groups in Washington, who worry that his close ties to the banking industry would make it difficult for Democrats to back financial protections for households. About one-fifth of all Johnson's campaign cash from 2003 to 2008 came from the financial, insurance and real estate industries, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. And Johnson's state is home to the "South Dakota loophole," which lets credit cards and other lenders evade state regulations. Eight of the 12 major pay-day lenders, according to a letter Johnson wrote to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, are also headquartered there.

"I like Dean, but what he said was just stupid," Silvers told HuffPost after the event.

Before his position on Johnson's committee, Shahinian worked under former Banking Committee Chair Chris Dodd (D-Conn.) during last year's financial reform debate. Earlier in the panel, Silvers made a special point of acknowledging Shahinian's work on the Dodd-Frank bill, noting that many Washington insiders frequently refer to the bill as "Dodd-Frank-Shahinian."

The heated exchange between the two was prompted by a discussion of the ratio of executive pay to that of other workers. As a result of the law, companies will have to directly compare the compensation of top officers with the median salary of its employees in reports to shareholders.

But executives are now pressuring the Securities and Exchange Commission to exclude various classes of workers from the required calculation, in an effort to make the ratio between CEO pay and rank-and-file laborer wages appear lower. Shahinian suggested that some categories of workers, including part-time workers, may not reflect a fair reading of the bill.

Silvers rejected that view, noting that investors can't select which of a company's operations to buy into, but must invest in "the whole company." He further stated that the AFL-CIO will not accept any move to re-legislate the issues signed into law by Dodd-Frank for any reason. Other financial reform advocates have previously expressed concern that Wall Street interests will pressure lawmakers to reopen the bill over relatively minor issues, and use that as a wedge to defang critical reforms.

Shahinian later hedged his previous phrasing, saying that Johnson does not personally support altering Dodd-Frank.

Silvers' open threat to back a primary challenger against Johnson comes on the heels of a May speech by AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka, who cautioned that Democrats could not take the support of organized labor for granted in the 2012 elections.

"We will spend the summer holding elected leaders in Congress as well as the states accountable on one measure: Are they improving or degrading life for working families?” Trumka said. "Our role is not to build the power of a political party or a candidate. It is to improve the lives of working families and strengthen our country."

While the AFL-CIO has vocally backed many of the Obama administration's top legislative initiatives, including the health care reform bill and the Wall Street overhaul, the president has not fought aggressively for labor's top priority, the Employee Free Choice Act. That bill would make it easier for workers to organize into labor unions. After repeatedly pledging support for EFCA during the 2008 campaign, Obama has not gone to the mat for the bill since entering office, critics say. Indeed, the legislation has not yet received a congressional vote under the president's watch, despite having Democratic control of both chambers for his first two years in office.

Organized labor's influence within the Democratic Party has deteriorated significantly since the 1970s, but unions continue to provide an enormous amount of on-the-ground campaign support and get-out-the-vote help for the Party during elections, serving a role akin to that of conservative churches in the Republican Party. If labor chooses to sit out races or openly oppose votes on key candidates, the electoral prospects of those Democrats will be significantly diminished.

The labor movement has been strengthened of late by high-profile public opposition to the policies of Republican Gov. Scott Walker in Wisconsin. Protests to defending state workers have sparked a series of efforts to recall Republican members of the state legislature who backed anti-union bills.

This article has been updated to clarify that the AFL-CIO is a federation of labor unions, not a union itself.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- The nation's largest labor union federation on Friday threatened to challenge the powerful chairman of the Senate Banking Committee in the 2014 elections, if he allows a key set of new e...
WASHINGTON -- The nation's largest labor union federation on Friday threatened to challenge the powerful chairman of the Senate Banking Committee in the 2014 elections, if he allows a key set of new e...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 763
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (15 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ryan Magdangal
Pirate Satellite
01:23 PM on 06/13/2011
I'd say take em out! Walk the plank...
UkrainianPrince
history buff
12:47 PM on 06/13/2011
None of this makes any difference. The political elites, with few exceptions, with the wealthy 2% & Wall Street, bankers, CEO's, etc., don't care!!! They don't have to...whatever happens they do alright!! Congress is the College for Lobbyists. Virtually everyone of them has a nice pension, healthcare and the insider contacts to make a fortune off the bottom 98%.

Witness: Gregg Judd (R) & the DINO from Indiana went to Goldman Sacks and The Nat'l Chamber of Commerence, respectively... "public servants" who did corporate America's bidding for $$$ jobs after their "career" in government.

Pay attention, the fix is in. They don't really care about America (money is global now) or the middle class. That's why the "Great Recession" is over... it never affected them. That's why they (& Obama) don't care about the unemployed or underemployed, or people that have lost their homes... it doesn't affect them!! If they lose an election, corporate Amercian hires them, or some think tank or the Ivy league college or they just serve on a couple corprorate boards a few time a year for a few days and make $250,000.

Sadly we live in an America where the political class and the powerful have insulated themselves from the trials and tribulations of life that the bottom 95% have to deal with. Now with Citizens United, they can insulated themselves from the voting public, disenfrachise voters at will and buy elections wholesale by selling ignorance via the corporate media.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
clearasmud
Obama Is Nothing More Than A Moderate Republican
02:44 PM on 06/13/2011
Fanned
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
fisher65
11:07 AM on 06/13/2011
funny thing , tom brokaw said and i wonder if it was a slip of the tougue, he said corporations are sitting on tons of money, lol as if we did'nt know already!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JohnBryansFontaine
Liberal Democrat
08:16 AM on 06/13/2011
Labor's Revival Depends on Workplace Organizing, Not Electoral Politics
by Randy Shaw

http://www.beyondchron.org/articles/Labor_s_Revival_Depends_on_Workplace_Organizing_Not_Electoral_Politics_9253.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
clearasmud
Obama Is Nothing More Than A Moderate Republican
02:45 PM on 06/13/2011
But electorial politics are what is making it illegal, or very very difficult, to have or develop or be in a Union. Where the Republicans go, worker rights disappear.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tweed7t
wear sunscreen and dance
05:35 PM on 06/12/2011
Ben Nelson needs to go.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TrippLite
01:00 AM on 06/12/2011
Who's buying our elections? Big business. But so is Big Labor.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Christy Sargent Anderson
Sheeple, wake up!
09:24 AM on 06/12/2011
Big Labor has lost membership and continual power for the last 30 years as the power has been shifted to big corporations. Ask yourself, what is the state of the working American family in 2011? American families wages and benefits are in the pits incase you're out of touch. Strengthening American Middle class, strenghtens America.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dieter Zerressen
11:02 AM on 06/12/2011
If you have to choose between big business and big labor, and you do, why in the heck would you side with Wall Street? The unions have their problems but at least their efforts on mostly on behalf of the working people of America. The CEO's and Wall Streeters do not care about America; they're only concern is profits and it doesn't have to be in dollars either. Euros or Chinese currency is just fine with the racketeers.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Stewart Goss
Evil requires the sanction of the victim -Ayn Rand
11:35 PM on 06/11/2011
Trillions in new debt. Nothing to show for it except "oh the ditch must have been deeper than we thought" or "give it a few more years" or "get used to a lower standard of living".

Pathetic excuses.
janereally
My micro bio is empty.
08:45 AM on 06/13/2011
the "new debt" is the result of two Bush wars, and one Bush tax cut. the facts are everywhere if you choose to see the truth.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
clearasmud
Obama Is Nothing More Than A Moderate Republican
02:29 PM on 06/13/2011
In January 2001, with the budget balanced and clear sailing ahead, the Congressional Budget Office forecast ever-larger annual surpluses indefinitely.

Routine increases in defense and domestic spending account for only about 15 percent of the financial deterioration

Together, the economy and the tax bills enacted under former president George W. Bush, and to a lesser extent by President Obama, who was forced by Republicans to renew the Bush Tax Cuts, wiped out $6.3 trillion in anticipated revenue.

Federal tax collections now stand at their lowest level as a percentage of the economy in 60 years.

Big-ticket spending initiated by the Bush administration accounts for 12 percent of the shift.

The Iraq and Afghanistan wars have added $1.3 trillion in new borrowing, and were not added to the budget deficit until Obama took over.

The Bush prescription drug benefit for Medicare recipients contributed another $272 billion, unpaid for, and not on the budget deficit until Obama took over.

TARP may eventually cost nothing as financial institutions repay the Treasury, added just $16 billion

Obama’s 2009 economic stimulus, 6 percent of the total shift.

All told, Obama-era choices account for about $1.7 trillion in new debt, including renewal of Bush Tax Breaks, forced by the Republicans, and continuation of the wars he inherited.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Stewart Goss
Evil requires the sanction of the victim -Ayn Rand
11:32 PM on 06/11/2011
Since when should the govt. be involved in what people get paid?

If we are going that route why take half steps, let govt. determine all salaries.
12:20 AM on 06/12/2011
When we pay to keep your company that is really bankrupt from going under --to the tune of 700 billion dollars we surely can say what you get paid. That should have been part of the bailout from the beginning. When your company is wrecking the US economy while you take home millions we surely can have a say. When your company is paying no US taxes while you take home millions, again surely we have a say. ---want the next 20 or so reasons?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
psnyder325
Yep, I'm a Socialist. Deal.
12:31 AM on 06/12/2011
Read carefully before you comment. The law DOES NOT mandate what CEOs get paid. It simply lets the investors and stockholders KNOW what the CEOs get paid and then shows the ratio between what the average worker gets paid and the CEO and other top executives get paid. In other words, the law simply mandates that the OWNERS of the company....the stockholders and investors in a PUBLICLY TRADED COMPANY get to know how much their EMPLOYEES, the executive staff, get paid and what a discrepancy there is between the workers and the executives. Right now, the stockholders in a publicly traded company may or may not know what their EMPLOYEE, the CEO, gets paid, because executive pay is normally determined by the Board of Directors. This keeps the OWNERS of the company, the STOCKHOLDERS from making decisions at annual stockholders' meetings about whether that pay is justified. I don't see what problem Republicans have with OWNERS of the company....the stockholders,....KNOWING what their EMPLOYEES are paid. In every other country in the world, this is a no-brainer. Only in America is a major political joke...sorry....I mean "party," ... against the knowledge by stockholders of what their people are getting paid. No government mandates so far as WHAT people get paid. Just a protection of the minority stockholders. This is an appropriate role for government.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kerry keane
Proud Libertarian - but here I'm a "Bagger"
01:21 AM on 06/13/2011
Don't bold type son, it makes your post seem ridiculous, as if the content wasn't bad enough ....
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:15 PM on 06/11/2011
The AFL-CIO needs to back a 3rd party which focuses on workers rights, as a way of sending a message to both corporate-owned parties.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jimtodd
Unrepentant child of '60s
04:31 PM on 06/11/2011
There is some talk here about new progressive organizations, but I would hope to discourage that path. There is an organization that is perfectly positioned to lead a progressive movement, but it is unfortunately, leaderless, spineless, and totally ineffective. I am talking about the Congressional Progressive Caucus, which must be a book club or coffee klatch because they don't stand together as legislators.
We all need to challenge the CPC to stand up to Obama and the rest of the neoliberals. With the departure of Goolesby, there is no one in the administration that could remotely be considered a progressive. As long as Obama can ignore us without penalty, he will continue to do so.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jimtodd
Unrepentant child of '60s
04:02 PM on 06/11/2011
Your analysis of the Blanche Lincoln fiasco, which you present as fact and not opinion, is totally bogus. Lincoln never had a chance in the general election, and everybody in the world knew that except her and Obama. Progressive Democrats put forward another (non-progressive) candidate in the hope of saving the seat. The idiots at the White House and the party brain(dead)trust are what caused the party to lose the seat.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pecosdog
this sht writes itself
06:21 PM on 06/11/2011
Wrong, she was a spineless blue-dog who did not deserve votes from anyone left of moderate and that is why she lost.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
clearasmud
Obama Is Nothing More Than A Moderate Republican
02:42 PM on 06/13/2011
"Everybody" knew that except her and Obama? Wow! How were you so fortunate to be included with "Everybody"? "Her" and Obama had massive poll data to make judgements on. What data (please link) did the presient "Everybody" have?
03:05 PM on 06/11/2011
Voters in SD will decide if Johnson can take Wall Street money and still represent them, considering the financial services sector in the SD economy. Blanch Lincoln represented Walmart better than she represented her voters and got ousted. Mary Landreau represents oil because her state is tightly bound to oil income. Her voters will decide if she stays

Idaho's Senator Crapo also gets a huge hunk of change from big oil, but Idaho is not an oil state. H-m-m-m. Idaho's senator should be able to vote his conscience with regard to the oil cartel and balance Landreau's oil-slave votes, but he can't. Crapo has been bought. It is a sad reflection on the voters of Idaho that he is allowed to stay.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
MaryJane
Corruptio optimi pessima
02:36 PM on 06/11/2011
I love Richard Trumka. Very smart. Very dedicated.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Stewart Goss
Evil requires the sanction of the victim -Ayn Rand
11:32 PM on 06/11/2011
Lol, and a real weasel.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
MaryJane
Corruptio optimi pessima
03:02 AM on 06/12/2011
Care to explain?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:00 AM on 06/12/2011
yeah but he's our weasel.. sometimes you need a weasel to kill a snake.
02:16 PM on 06/11/2011
If you enjoy Democrats working against your interest, be a good team player and keep giving them a free ride. This is a guaranteed way to continue getting screwed.

Wake Up Dems!!!!!! Primary those sell-out Dems.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pecosdog
this sht writes itself
06:23 PM on 06/11/2011
In the short term, it may hurt a bit, but in the long run, our congressmen need to be taught that we will not tolerate "insubordination" to the causes that we elected them on.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:18 PM on 06/11/2011
yep---the dems keep screwing liberals because they know most liberals are going to vote for them anyway. and obama, with his war in libya and extended tax cuts for the rich needs to be sent a loud and clear message! I'll be voting for an independent or 3rd party candidate.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Vic22
"I write to make it right, don't like what I see"
02:16 PM on 06/11/2011
For all the people on here blaing everything on the unions, that is exactly how Faux News and the CEOs win. They divide and conquer the working class by saying "that public employee makes 5k more than you, theres no way they deserve it!" meanwhile, your private employer is driving down your wages, outsourcing your jobs, and keeping you from being prosperous, while filling their pockets.

Like the CEO with 10 cookies says to the working class man with 1 cookie, "watch out for that union guy, he'll try to take your cookie"
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:19 PM on 06/11/2011
yep. it's not union workers who make too much -- it's CEO, Entertainers, and those botn with a silver-spoon in teir mouths.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Vic22
"I write to make it right, don't like what I see"
07:30 PM on 06/11/2011
I can't agree about the entertainers. In the hiearchy of their professions, they too are the laborers. Its like the NFL lockout, people that say that NFL players make too much money, must then be arguing that owners and CEOs don't make enough. The entertainers and athletes don't set the ticket prices (The fact that they are over priced is something you need to take up with the owners), but for every 20 million dollar athlete or entertainer who actually does the job, there is an owner or studio head whose income dwarfs his employees