More

Keith Olbermann: Current TV Will Be All News In Prime Time

Keith Olbermann

FRAZIER MOORE   06/ 9/11 05:55 PM ET   AP

NEW YORK — Keith Olbermann is showing off his office to a visitor.

His office is in the cozy production and editorial headquarters from where, starting June 20, he will originate "Countdown With Keith Olbermann" on Current TV every weeknight. He and his team had taken residence just days earlier at the still-under-renovation building, which, situated on Manhattan's West 33rd Street, Olbermann has dubbed Studio 33.

The set for his show hasn't been delivered yet. But he has just finished taping his first "Worst Persons" Web video (today's winner – ta-da! – Sarah Palin) in the newsroom.

His office is bare. Its lone amenity so far is a desk chair he used to have at MSNBC, a chair he says once belonged to Brian Williams that he somehow kept after exiting in January. But on the newly refinished hardwood floor, a dotted outline of Post-its clearly indicates where his desk will go.

Olbermann has similarly vivid outlines in mind for how "Countdown" will fit into his new Current TV home. As he is quick to point out, "Countdown" is only the opening act.

"The idea that it's just me coming over and putting a show on in the middle of this network is correct," he says, "but temporary."

As a more enduring plan, Olbermann, 52, has empire-building in mind. He's got Current's prime-time landscape, not just a nightly hour, in his sights.

Hobbling with the aid of a retractable cane (he is nursing a stress fracture in his left foot), he leads the way to another office already equipped with two chairs, and lowers his 6-foot-3-inch frame into one of them.

He explains that "Countdown" will be much the same show it became at MSNBC during its eight-year evolution.

"Countdown" was a smart, progressive refuge and a reliable rebuke to rival Fox News Channel pundits where Olbermann would chronicle the day's events, interview guests, deliver blistering commentaries in filigreed prose, needle hand-picked scoundrels (as in his Worst Persons fixture), and wrap the whole package with literate trappings and pop-culture wit (his readings from James Thurber short stories were a regular feature).

It was the most popular show on MSNBC, averaging more than a million viewers, and it served as the prime-time template for a left-leaning lineup at a network that, until "Countdown," had been plagued by an identity crisis.

Then, on the night of Jan. 21, Olbermann told his viewers he was leaving. He said, a bit cryptically, that "there were many occasions, particularly in the last two and a half years, where all that surrounded the show – but never the show itself – was just too much for me."

Five months later, he wants to assure his fans that the new "Countdown," back in its customary 8 p.m. Eastern time slot, will pick up where the old one left off, but "without all those limitations on me," to which he furnishes his own wry comeback: "You WEREN'T free to say whatever you wanted to, back then?!'"

Suffice it to say there was ongoing friction between the brash Olbermann and his NBC bosses – just as there had been at earlier jobs as far back as Olbermann's star-making, often stormy turn as a "SportsCenter" anchor at ESPN in the 1990s.

The problem for a TV journalist, as he sees it, is systemic with ever-growing media consolidation by conglomerates whose myriad other business interests can potentially clash with editorial independence. Just this past January, Comcast Corp., the giant cable operator, acquired a controlling stake in Olbermann's already huge former employer, NBCUniversal. But he sees the dilemma as spanning the media landscape.

"It became evident to me," he says, "that at some point there would be a critical mass reached when I would not be able to continue to work anywhere in that structure. They just would not be in the position to have someone as risky to their other business interests as I am."

Last fall, he began mulling options for a berth outside such media colossuses as NBCUniversal, Walt Disney Co., News Corp. and Time Warner. And going further, he figured, "There had to be at least one television network looking to identify or reidentify itself that had a news and public affairs base" – a network that would be game to take a successful cable-TV host and build itself around him.

Among possible destinations, Olbermann says he thought of Current, the privately held network co-founded in 2005 by former Vice President Al Gore and Joel Hyatt. Although available in 60 million homes after just five years, it has struggled to redefine itself after ditching its original concept as the go-to site for viewer-generated short videos, a great idea explosively pre-empted with the advent of YouTube.

Current has persevered nonetheless and been honored for the investigative newsmagazine "Vanguard," now beginning its fifth season. Even so, the network operates on the margins with a minuscule audience. It clearly needs an attention-getter – someone to goad viewers into finding Current on their dial, and, if it's not there (roughly one-third of the nation's TV homes still can't get it), demanding it from their cable provider.

"What Current has lacked is some sort of centerpiece," says Olbermann. "Both my experience and my ego tell me I can be that centerpiece."

Al Gore must have thought so, too. The day after Olbermann left MSNBC, he heard from Gore. The offer included not just salary but also equity in the company.

"And then," says Olbermann, "we made up this crazy title of Chief News Officer," which, despite its tinge of ironic grandiosity, represented a blend of trust and responsibility that appealed to Olbermann.

His deal with Current was unveiled Feb. 8.

"We're independent, and that's what Keith prizes," Gore told the AP at the time. "We are not part of a conglomerate. We don't answer to anyone but ourselves."

And with Olbermann's arrival, he added, "We are poised for a real breakout."

The breakout, according to Olbermann, will extend far beyond "Countdown."

"We're starting with this show, but we will be expanding," he says. "More than likely, we will have a second prime-time show within a year, maybe sooner than that."

Maybe Olbermann will find himself another Rachel Maddow, the liberal host who clicked with viewers on MSNBC after Olbermann brought her aboard for a companion show to his at that network.

Sure, nods Olbermann. "Or conceivably," he says suggestively, "I might just find the SAME Rachel Maddow. You never know."

He also looks to place the scrappy "Vanguard" correspondents at the heart of the network's new emphasis on newsgathering.

The new "Vanguard" season will premiere July 20 at 9 p.m. EDT, riding on the coattails of Olbermann's debut, with a follow-up to Mariana van Zeller's 2009 Peabody Award-winning report on black-market sale of prescription pain killers, which now is fueling a surge in heroin addiction.

"Keith Olbermann's hire is going to bring a whole new bunch of viewers to the channel," van Zeller predicts, "and a lot of people are going to be introduced to the long-form kind of journalism that we do."

"I think we'll become a very important home base for independent, progressive thinking on television," says Current CEO Mark Rosenthal. "Our goal is to get every last one of the viewers who watched Keith before – and then some. And I think we can do it."

Olbermann says plans already are afoot for the 2012 presidential race, including coverage of the primaries, debates and election night.

"Eventually, the network is going to be all news, information and analysis – certainly in prime time," he says. "Initially, we hope to sneak up on people. But the ultimate goal is, to be the provider of news analysis for more people than any other cable outlet.

"The goal," he declares with a confident smile, "is world domination."

___

EDITOR'S NOTE – Frazier Moore is a national television columnist for The Associated Press. He can be reached at fmoore(at)ap.org and at http://www.twitter.com/tvfrazier

FOLLOW HUFFPOST MEDIA

NEW YORK — Keith Olbermann is showing off his office to a visitor. His office is in the cozy production and editorial headquarters from where, starting June 20, he will originate "Countdown Wit...
NEW YORK — Keith Olbermann is showing off his office to a visitor. His office is in the cozy production and editorial headquarters from where, starting June 20, he will originate "Countdown Wit...
Filed by Jack Mirkinson  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2,431
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (35 total)
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
mairs
01:20 PM on 06/15/2011
Love seeing Countdown on Current advertised on MSNBC during their weeknight shows. Sort of a shock.
03:17 PM on 06/14/2011
Another screaming lib that no one watches with MSNBCs rating they will be a shopping channels soon
11:51 AM on 06/14/2011
Stephanie Miller!!!
10:59 PM on 06/14/2011
Are you a fan of her?
10:44 AM on 06/14/2011
"The goal," he declares with a confident smile, "is world domination."
Well Keith to my simple mind world domination would be *easier* if Current started advertising itself as the worlds first *broadband* channel, and gave up on ¨just another cable channel¨ you would increase your possible user base at least 10 times ....for *free* well you might need a bigger server farm but Al could buy that and by making it *pay* broadband. You could more than recoup your losses...

but it would require *nerve*
10:41 AM on 06/14/2011
Looking forward to the 20th. Can't wait to set my dvr.
02:45 AM on 06/14/2011
Another sign-up: Amy Goodman's "Democracy Now!"
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MrColdheart
can't resist urge to not label self
10:48 AM on 06/14/2011
I love her show but it tends to be dryer then listening to NPR during a traffic jam on your way home from work.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tom Sutpen
A for-real Socialist
05:26 PM on 06/14/2011
Too left wing. They'd never do it.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ugotabkidnme
11:00 PM on 06/13/2011
Also, sign up Thom Hartman.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
mairs
11:26 PM on 06/13/2011
x2
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ugotabkidnme
10:54 PM on 06/13/2011
Can you imagine also unleashing Lawrence O'Donnell on a news network with editorial independence? The combination of Keith and O'Donnell would be earth shaking.
08:04 AM on 06/14/2011
Earth shattering? That sure wasn't the case when they were both on msnbc. O'Donnell, being the more tempered of the two, doesn't have difficulty in explaining his positions in ways that avoid censure. Olbermann, on the other hand, wreaks havoc wherever he goes and will, as is his pattern, wear out his welcome at Current too. An unhinged pomposity is not easy to take.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Proud Progressive
Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness
11:30 AM on 06/14/2011
Rush and O'Really seem to disprove that last statement-at least for the simple-minded
08:18 PM on 06/13/2011
Woo - hoo! Can't wait. Ed Shultz just doesn't cut it as Keith's replacement.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tom Sutpen
A for-real Socialist
12:38 AM on 06/14/2011
He's not Keith Olbermann's replacement (that would be a disaster); Lawrence O'Donnell is.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
formerroadie
I am a liberal and proud of it!
06:05 PM on 06/13/2011
They have a new viewer in me. I can't wait till the 20th!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
scorpioleidy
I rant ... therefore, I am.
03:59 PM on 06/13/2011
I'm getting g00sebumps just thinking about the fact that I can watch Countdown with KO again, starting next Monday. I'm so excited!
04:53 PM on 06/13/2011
Better go to doctor ..you might need a shot of penicillan
06:06 PM on 06/13/2011
No one has ever received a shot of penicillan. "penicillan" doesn't exist.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
mairs
06:13 PM on 06/13/2011
Penicillin.
Dad of Marine
Army Vet and Latino Progressive - and proud of it
03:31 PM on 06/13/2011
Keith is correct about this process; criticl mass making it so that no real journalism people and thoughts can get through without these huge conglomera­tes, greedy corporatio­ns, putting a stop to progressiv­e news. Just a step further on this is the fact that this is not only happening to journalism news shows, programs, but also to anyone in any huge corporatio­n speaking their mind about progressiv­e values. I worked for a large corporatio­n through 2010 and know first hand that if you say anything that counters the strategy of said corporatio­ns in general, you are a marked person. In other words, your days are numbered there. Only thinking like the corporatio­n wants you to think is "the only way", according to them. A person should have the right to work there and be able to feel that their, board member, strategy is NOT the only way to think. We are supposedly in a democracy and in that, their are two sides to every stategy and a path forward.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
A1Tours
05:26 PM on 06/13/2011
Working with and through republican elected officials, corporations those who own them have methodically been weakening any power individual citizens have by eliminating our rights those rights have all been under corporate backed republican attack in an obvious effort to create an America where corporations RULE - not the people. They have had help from misguided people who were told that democrats have "taken away your rights" and without being able to enumerate even ONE right that had been lost, they convinced people to support republicans who indeed, then DID set about to "take away your rights"! Which rights? Well I CAN enumerate them (at least those that I am aware of) Your right to form or join a union, which is a group of like minded citizens, your right to collective bargaining, which is your right as an American worker to discuss and bargain with your employer, your right to privacy with your gynecologist and MANY laws have already passed where republican governors and legislatures have the majority, your right to vote - laws have been and are being passed in those same states that drastically reduce an individual's access to his or her ONE vote - making it law to have a photo ID, which many senior citizens no longer have and they refuse student ID, watch what republicans are doing and don't listen to what they SAY they are doing for there is a huge difference!
03:07 PM on 06/13/2011
More cable companies need to add Current channel to their listing before they move Maddow...or both shows might sink from lack of viewership. Come on Cox cable, get on board.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tom Sutpen
A for-real Socialist
05:14 PM on 06/13/2011
Maddow isn't going anywhere. She has an audience of some substance on a news network. Why would she give that up to be the lead-in for three year old episodes of 'SWAT: Playa del rey'?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
formerroadie
I am a liberal and proud of it!
06:07 PM on 06/13/2011
MSNBC is not a news network. It's a network with news on it. :)
06:11 PM on 06/13/2011
Olbermann's ratings will bring with them leverage, although Current already has a really sizable amount of homes it is available in. From the man himself:

"When we get the show on the air, we expect to have that show fully running and fully competitive in its field from the beginning," said Olbermann. "I didn't want to go into an environment in which I had to build every piece of equipment myself. What Current has done [in reaching 60 million households since its 2005 launch] is a record-setting pace for cable networks in this country. Current is an established television network with a very large footprint, and with any kind of continued growth, we will be in a position to be seen in as many homes as any other news broadcast in this country on cable. That was the reason the decision was so easy to make."
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tom Sutpen
A for-real Socialist
12:40 AM on 06/14/2011
What do you expect him to say?

(I know . . . 'piss off, stalker')
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nonpartay
♫Nonpartisan, liberal, ex-conservative♫
03:07 PM on 06/13/2011
Good luck with your new show, Keith! I've really missed you. I grew to look forward to and appreciate your nightly wrap-ups of the news and have set up my DVR to record the new Countdown. I would love to see you achieve great success for Current if only to prove all these sneering conservatives wrong about you and your ratings. I'm pretty sure you can build up a great news department there that will give us information we actually need to govern ourselves as opposed to the hype and propaganda they have on Faux "news." You were one of the biggest influences, besides President Obama, that got me really interested in knowing what is really going on in this country in government about 6 or 7 years ago. It's not pretty, but we still need to know about it if we're ever to make it better. Thanks for all you do.
10:09 AM on 06/14/2011
I applaud your assessment and will join in praising Keith. I hope that as time moves on that Curent will be able to establish themselves as a voice of facts and truths in reporting the news. Keith can certainly lead in clearly identifying opinions based on the facts. He is so good at that! Not many more days . . . .
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nonpartay
♫Nonpartisan, liberal, ex-conservative♫
12:00 PM on 06/14/2011
It's less than a week away! :)
11:09 PM on 06/14/2011
Not unless network news moves to 10 pm Live for an a hour with 0-2 breaks. But that will never happen. Too many people like CSI. I mostly watch news, talk shows and game shows. Current TV can make a name for themselves with Keith. Have you read the Rolling Stone interview yet?
02:42 PM on 06/13/2011
I understand why the right is so fearful of this man. Working on behalf of his father he showed those who would notice that end of life counselling has nothing to do with death panels. Working with medical professionals providing free clinics, he demonstrated to the Country the need for universal coverage. He put faces to the patients Gov Brewer stole life saving treatments from, in spite of promises to the contrary.

That was just the last 6 months or so of his reporting. I will be there on June 20th with bells on to welcome you back Mr. Olbermann. O'Donnell is ok, but you Sir, have been missed.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tom Sutpen
A for-real Socialist
03:10 PM on 06/13/2011
Keith Olbermann has never been in favor of a Single Payer Health Care system. He was all for the so-called Health Care Reform package signed into law last year . . . when any halfway sensate being knew that the very last thing you could call it was Health Care Reform.

Here's what real Health Care reform is: Single Payer. Anything less than that is not reform.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nonpartay
♫Nonpartisan, liberal, ex-conservative♫
03:22 PM on 06/13/2011
So apparently you think nothing should have been done if we couldn't get single payer? Weird.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
formerroadie
I am a liberal and proud of it!
06:08 PM on 06/13/2011
He IS for single payer. He's just not delusional enough to think we could have gotten it with the blue dogs in tow. Once it is time, he will be there in full force supporting single payer.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nonpartay
♫Nonpartisan, liberal, ex-conservative♫
03:21 PM on 06/13/2011
Excellent post. F&F Welcome to HuffPo!