More

Tree of Life: How Terrence Malick Made His Family

Tree Of Life

First Posted: 06/11/11 11:17 AM ET Updated: 08/10/11 06:12 AM ET

While a great deal of attention has been paid to the asteroids, opera, dinosaurs, and lava-spewing volcanoes that pepper long stretches of Terrence Malick's epic "Tree of Life," it's the deeply felt, hyper-realistic portrait of boyhood that anchors the film, as well as the performances of three young Texans. Tye Sheridan, Laramie Eppler, and Hunter McCracken effortlessly portray the sons to Brad Pitt's strict father and Jessica Chastain's angelic mother.

To mold his family in true authenticity, Malick and the production team spent over a year scouring schools across Texas, seeing over 10,000 students, looking for three young, non-actors to take on the roles. In the end, close to 95 percent of the entire cast for "Tree" was made up of people who hadn't acted before.

Though McCracken was unavailable for interviews, Sheridan and Eppler both spoke (very politely, in thick southern accents) to HuffPost about their unique experience working with the elusive auteur, Malick, back in 2008.

Sheridan, 14, who played the youngest brother, Steve, in "Tree," was the first boy that the filmmakers cast. He hails from Elkhart, Texas -- a small town of about 2,000 people just east of Waco. Though Sheridan performed in "a couple plays back in second grade," he never imagined he'd be in a major motion picture.

"My teacher said I'd be on Broadway one day. She thought I was great," he said.

Sheridan read for the production team at least ten or eleven times over the course of the audition process. "They just had me play with a bunch of other kids," he said. "To see how we reacted to each other."

Co-producer Nicholas Gonda complimented Sheridan's appealingly recognizable, old-fashioned American quality, and said the producers knew, almost immediately, that they wanted him in the film.

Laramie Eppler, 13, who plays R.L, the middle brother, had never acted in school plays or taken a drama class before jumping into his pivotal role in the film. Three years ago, the Iowa Park, Texas native merely accompanied a friend of his to an audition for "Tree" and randomly caught Malick's eye.

"Terry came out into the [waiting] room and saw me and asked if I wanted to read for it," Eppler said. "I read some lines, went to three other auditions, and then I got the part."

As Gonda said: "We didn't find Laramie -- he found us."

Neither Sheridan nor Eppler were given full scripts of the film before their auditions -- they were told only that they'd be playing young boys growing up in the 1950s. According to production notes, they were intentionally kept in the dark; Malick insisted that each of the boys play as close to themselves as possible, rather than "performing" as a character.

"[In auditions], he would tell you a situation," Eppler said, "and ask how would you really react to it. Like, what would you do if you just saw your mom and dad get into an argument?"

Before they began the four-month shooting process in Smithville, Texas, all three boys bonded intensely with their movie-mother, Jessica Chastain. For close to three weeks, the four of them essentially lived together; they went bowling, rode go-karts, ate ice cream, watched movies, and swam in the pool in Chastain's Smithville backyard.

"The first week was kind of awkward," Eppler admitted. "But after that we were all really tight. [McCracken and Sheridan] are like real brothers to me now."

"Yeah, Jessica's basically like a second mother," Sheridan added. "We still talk a lot."

That intimacy carried over the production days, as well. Every morning, the boys would wake up on location in their Smithville, Texas homes, and pick out clothes from the 1950s to wear in the film.

Though Chastain was unavailable to comment for this story, she says in production notes that she had trouble letting the kids go by the end of the process. "My heart broke as I realized these were not really my boys,” she said.

Both Eppler and Sheridan said they'd like to act again in the future, with Sheridan especially hoping to venture out to L.A. to give it a real try. He's not sure when he'd go, but he has an aunt who lives out west, and he said he could probably stay with her.

Still, Malick had some choice words of advice. "He told me to make very smart choices in my life and just be really good," Sheridan remembers.

Eppler said he has no plans to move out of Texas -- he's busy playing baseball and basketball at his middle school and showing market goats as part of the Junior Future Farmers of America. Eppler also does rodeo, and just earned a slot at the Texas Junior State Finals for team roping, his favorite event.

"I catch the head of the steer and another guy catches the feet," Eppler said.

The kids, for their part, have watched the lengthy, complex film that they star in, and both claim they liked it "a lot."

"Now that I’ve watched it several times I think I get it," Eppler said. "I think the movie is about like letting stuff go and to not hold on to your grievances."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST ARTS

While a great deal of attention has been paid to the asteroids, opera, dinosaurs, and lava-spewing volcanoes that pepper long stretches of Terrence Malick's epic "Tree of Life," it's the deeply felt, ...
While a great deal of attention has been paid to the asteroids, opera, dinosaurs, and lava-spewing volcanoes that pepper long stretches of Terrence Malick's epic "Tree of Life," it's the deeply felt, ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 123
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
02:24 AM on 07/12/2011
One observation: the film is partly about how we try to find explanations for things which we are at a loss to understand. Love, loss, "God," the creation of the universe, or even why dinosaurs went extinct. This is why, in my opinion, the film is intentionally difficult to comprehend. I think Malick wants us to think about why we search for easy answers to life when there are none. I prefer films which challenge me--whether emotionally, visually or structurally. This did all three. I don't always like them, honestly, but I always enjoy the challenge. I happen to love The Tree of Life and will see it again. Beautiful.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DAE
12:58 PM on 07/01/2011
I grew up in a small town during the same period depicted in the film. There were so many scenes that resonated. It was an amazing recreation and evocation of my childhood in so many ways. It was like snippets of my memories, not my specific ones but my everyman ones, immortalized on screen. It was all about the sorrow of life and its exaltation. We all have dreams and for many of us they are dashed by the inexhaustible march of time and the vagaries of life, but we are all part of a greater whole and will be united in oblivion.
06:38 PM on 06/16/2011
Wow. What a bunch of mean posts. So you liked the movie (i loved it)-doesn't make you better than anyone else. So you hated the movie-doesn't mean those who did are effeminate snobs. Just agree to disagree, maybe let us know why you did or didn't like it, but jeez quit with the name-calling (yes, I am aware I am guilty of it, too. I feel badly about that. Sorry) Beautiful movie, though. Even the dinosaur bits
jdrourke
Snark is good for the soul...
02:58 PM on 06/13/2011
In my opinion, the family (and those playing them) are terrific! Brad Pitt was awesome, and I hope more people will go see this great movie.

http://jdrourke.wordpress.com/
photo
four dog mama
Ignorance is the currency of the right.
03:13 PM on 06/12/2011
Interesting headline since they never mentioned Mr. Pitt.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
quixoto
seeking lost squire
03:35 PM on 06/12/2011
They mentioned him:

"Tye Sheridan, Laramie Eppler, and Hunter McCracken effortlessly portray the sons to Brad Pitt's strict father and Jessica Chastain's angelic mother."

But yeah, you're right. This article is not really about him at all. Obviously his used here much like Hollywood movies always use big name stars: to attract attention.

I think it worked too.
:-)
photo
four dog mama
Ignorance is the currency of the right.
03:49 PM on 06/12/2011
Yes, but the children did not mention him, while praising Jessica Chastain. I just thought it odd.

Yes it surely worked. Thanks
06:37 AM on 06/13/2011
I know. They do that every time. I think most readers would have read the article without the hook of "brad pitt" surely? (I would have - just knowing it was about a terrence malick film would have been enough).
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WHTrout
Thou shalt keep thy religion to thyself!
01:13 PM on 06/12/2011
For me, "The Tree of Life" was two films -- one was poignantly acted, beautifully filmed, and very poetically realized (that would be the Texas family story); the other was the most incomprehensible, most pretentious piece of schlock I've ever suffered through in a theater. If Mallick had just told the Texas family story, this would be a great film -- the rest of the film unreeled like a badly thought-out National Geographic special.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
quixoto
seeking lost squire
03:40 PM on 06/12/2011
If I may be so bold, is it not possible that the juxtaposition of the two types of the two types of movies was there for a reason? Perhaps you can admit that seeing dinosaurs at some point early in the story put the the hardships this family faced in some sort of cosmic perspective. Perhaps, as you watched these kids be kids you couldn't help thinking in the back of your mind, "there were just dinosaurs here!" and this itself possibly directed your train of thought to the possibility that there are greater themes at work here then just a family trying to get by.

I hope I'm not assuming too much there...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WHTrout
Thou shalt keep thy religion to thyself!
08:47 PM on 06/12/2011
From what I've read in countless reviews after seeing the film, you are definitely on to something that Mallick ATTEMPTED -- but it was a very pretentious, muddled, and for me unsuccessful attempt. There are subtler, and more successful, ways of reaching for "cosmic" themes (watch any film by Rainer Werner Fassbinder, for instance, or by Bergman or Godard) without CGI dinosaurs and lava flows.
05:26 AM on 06/12/2011
This is what I assumed was the case. I was reminded of "To Kill a Mockingbird", which also involved a huge search - in Alabama, I believe it was - to find the ideal children to play Jem and Scout. In both cases they found non-actors, and in both cases the effort was a tremendous success. What I noticed immediately about the three boys in this film was their utter authenticity. The children used in most American films are so artificial and cookie-cutterish, both in the way they look and act. The three boys were perfect. I wouldn't be surprised if "The Tree of Life" begins and ends their film careers. The two who played Jem and Scout in "To Kill a Mockingbird" had one or two other roles, but did not stay in acting. They were ideal for the parts they were picked for, but not cut out for film stardom. Perhaps it will be the same for these three.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jlab
03:28 AM on 06/12/2011
The movie is amazing. Malick's camera doesn't seem to show us rehearsed scenes, it's like it accidentally captures real life in passing. The boys were nothing like the talented kid actors you see in mainstream Hollywood movies. Their emotions rang absolutely true. The oldest one was mesmerizing in his shock about the unsettling discovery that he was more like his father than he wanted to be. And the middle one looked exactly like a young, forlorn Brad Pitt. I can't wait for the DVD (I have to admit I'll fast forward through some of the planet, volcano, dinosaur stuff ...)
03:25 AM on 06/12/2011
Another pretentious melodrama...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jlab
03:36 AM on 06/12/2011
Go watch your Uwe Boll DVDs.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
frank day
Republican = FAIL
10:43 AM on 06/12/2011
lol
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Militant Leftist
American seditionist
09:07 AM on 06/12/2011
Obviously one who prefers empty eye-candy films.
11:00 AM on 06/12/2011
No. He just said he doesn't like the empty eye candy film.
12:02 AM on 06/12/2011
Just saw this movie. Loved it and hated it! Some of it was overwhelming kitsch and other parts of it stirred memories of my life long dormant. This movie is well worth seeing again but I think the next time I see it I will get stoned first! LOL
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Berkguy
12:53 AM on 06/12/2011
Fanned! Everyone did do a great job, especially these boys.
UVA1983
Left of left
11:46 PM on 06/11/2011
Malick films are dense. However, this was simply tedious. If you want to find beauty in it, good for you. Watching a family living in a toxic situation wandering forever around their background is not interesting. Watching sparkling lights flicker as representation of G_d is certainly a trite way to embody that idea --- but Malick felt we needed to see that repeatedly for 2.5 hours. But I guess it was just too darn dense for me to comprehend. I know, I"ll write my graduate film thesis on it.
01:07 AM on 06/12/2011
It was mix of Nova, Masterpiece Theatre and Startrek NG. You would think that Malick might avoid the cheesy Startrek standard "entity" image.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
UncleJimbo
BLANK!
11:30 PM on 06/11/2011
From the Raggedy and Snippy,Snotty Comments,I know why I don't often post on these Threads!
12:08 AM on 06/12/2011
Judgmental anyone?
photo
socalcde
My micro-bio is empty.
02:05 AM on 06/12/2011
How the heck do you have 2642 fans if you don't often post anything?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Militant Leftist
American seditionist
11:24 PM on 06/11/2011
I saw "Tree of Life" on Friday, as I'm a huge Malick fan. It was like no film I've ever seen before, blending magnificent, poetic imagery, with voice-overs of the characters deepest thoughts and yearnings. Expect significantly less dialogue than your average film, and a second viewing is definitely recommended. I'm going again myself tomorrow.
03:10 AM on 06/12/2011
Let me guess, you wear a beret and have been overheard using the words mise en scene and cahier du cinema.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jlab
03:24 AM on 06/12/2011
When I read your comment, I was overheard using the word "trou du cul".
06:05 AM on 06/12/2011
Maybe also the word, "auteur".
Let me guess, you are one of those anti-intellectuals who has a giant chip on your shoulder that other people have ideas and thoughts that are beyond your ken, so you lash out by firing off cliched parodies of them. Touché!
11:07 PM on 06/11/2011
Lucky kids to be involved in such a remarkable project. I was pretty much awestruck by it's visual beauty, and impressed by the breadth of Malick's vision. I will definitely see it again.
photo
Highball
In Blackest Night
05:16 PM on 06/11/2011
I'm so excited to see this.

This must have been quite the experience for these kids, from the sounds of it.