iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Afghanistan Civilian Casualties Hit High In May

Afghanistan Civilian Casualties

PATRICK QUINN   06/11/11 03:53 PM ET   AP

KABUL, Afghanistan — May was the deadliest month for Afghan civilians since the United Nations started tracking deaths in 2007, according to a report released Saturday. The carnage continued, with bombs killing 21 people nationwide – including a family on a religious pilgrimage and a child lured by a suicide attacker pushing an ice cream cart.

Violence has been on the rise as the Taliban and other insurgents try to regain territory lost in the fall and winter to the U.S.-led coalition in southern Afghanistan. The insurgents have stepped up suicide attacks and bombings that are more likely to affect civilians.

Fighting always picks up in the spring after the opium poppy crop is harvested in the south and the snow melts elsewhere in the mountainous country, allowing insurgents to move more freely. But attacks have intensified as militants try to undermine confidence in the Afghan government, which wants to show it is ready to take over security as the U.S. begins to withdraw some forces.

"We are very concerned that civilian suffering will increase even more over the summer fighting season, which historically brings the highest numbers of civilian casualties. Parties to the conflict must increase their efforts to protect civilians now," said Georgette Gagnon, director of human rights for the U.N. mission in Afghanistan.

The U.N. said insurgents were responsible for 82 percent of the 368 civilians killed last month, with homemade bombs the leading cause of death. The international alliance and Afghan security forces were to blame for 12 percent of the deaths while it was not clear who was responsible for the remainder, according to the report. It also said 593 civilians were wounded last month.

NATO airstrikes, a frequent cause of tension between the Afghan government and the alliance, were behind 3 percent of civilian deaths, the report found.

Despite those findings, much of the public anger over civilian casualties has focused on the international force.

Last month, President Hamid Karzai ordered the alliance to stop bombing homes after an airstrike that accidentally killed a group of children and women in southern Helmand province. Coalition commanders apologized, saying the airstrike was launched after a gunbattle broke out following an insurgent attack on a patrol in the district that killed a U.S. Marine.

But the incident and Karzai's reaction has severely strained relations with the coalition and further complicated an already difficult relationship with the United States as President Barack Obama prepares a July troop drawdown in the increasingly unpopular war. Obama expressed his sorrow over recent civilian casualties in Afghanistan caused by coalition airstrikes in a videoconference with Karzai on Wednesday.

The death toll for international troops rose only slightly in May, with 56 killed compared with 51 the same month last year, according to an Associated Press tally.

The insurgency generally focuses its attacks on international and Afghan armed forces, but one of Saturday's attacks seemed designed to target children.

A suicide bomber pushing a red ice cream cart in the provincial capital of central Ghazni detonated his explosives, killing one and wounding three others, according to provincial police chief Mohammad Hussain.

"The suicide attacker was a young man with a thin beard and mustache wearing a scarf," said a witness who identified himself as Asadullah and said he was standing about 20 yards (meters) away when the blast occurred. "He was pushing an ice cream cart ... and then he exploded."

A roadside bomb also hit a minibus carrying a family to a shrine for a religious pilgrimage in the Khakrez district of Kandahar province in southern Afghanistan. The attack killed members of the family, including eight children and five women, according to provincial police chief Abdul Raziq. He said the bomb was planted by the Taliban and was intended for NATO or Afghan forces.

In the eastern province of Khost, a suicide bomber blew himself up outside the local police headquarters in the Shai Kali area, killing three policemen and a child, according to provincial police chief Sadar Mohammad Zazai.

Among the dead was a local police chief, Zazai said. It was not immediately clear whether he was specifically targeted. Provincial health director Hedayatullah Hamidi said 25 people were wounded in that attack.

The Taliban began its yearly spring offensive on April 30. The month that followed saw the most civilian deaths of any month since the U.N. started closely tracking casualties in 2007. Previously, the deadliest month was August 2008, with 341 deaths.

While the U.N. figures only go back to 2007, the monthly toll is likely the highest of the war because civilian casualties were not a major problem in its early years.

The international coalition has around 133,000 troops fighting in Afghanistan, including about 100,000 from the United States. On Saturday, NATO said a service member was killed in an insurgent attack in the south, bringing the total coalition deaths this month to 23. Since the start of the year, 229 have died.

Casualty figures blamed on the coalition and Afghan forces have been steadily declining over the past four years – despite an increase in allied and government forces. A recent U.N. report found that insurgents were responsible for 2,080 deaths in 2010 compared with 440 for the coalition and Afghan troops. That report found that deaths due to airstrikes declined by 52 percent last year compared with 2009.

The U.N., which is preparing a midyear civilian casualty report, said it decided to release the interim numbers Saturday because they were so high.

Karzai, meanwhile, was in Pakistan meeting with the country's political and military leadership in an effort to jump-start a faltering peace process with the Taliban, part of a reconciliation effort that he began last year. Many of the Taliban's key leaders are thought to be sheltering in Pakistan, and insurgents retain safe havens in the country's lawless tribal regions bordering Afghanistan.

"We both want stability in Afghanistan and in Pakistan," said Pakistani Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani in a press conference held with Karzai following the first meeting of the joint peace commission. "Our only aim is to support the peace process, which is Afghan-led."

___

Associated Press writers Solomon Moore and Ahmad Massieh Neshat contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

KABUL, Afghanistan — May was the deadliest month for Afghan civilians since the United Nations started tracking deaths in 2007, according to a report released Saturday. The carnage continued, wi...
KABUL, Afghanistan — May was the deadliest month for Afghan civilians since the United Nations started tracking deaths in 2007, according to a report released Saturday. The carnage continued, wi...
Filed by Cara Parks  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,333
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (24 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
booker52
avid reader
08:23 AM on 06/13/2011
This goes beyond mission creep, just call us what we really are, occupiers.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
intellifran
insert clever line here...
10:05 AM on 06/13/2011
So? An attack was launched on us from there. That is how we respond. That is how we responded to Japan. The difference is we have no nationalism today. What a shame.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
fapescia
07:21 AM on 06/13/2011
The most outrageous lie Petreaus told was when he said that Afghan parents were deliberately burning their children to discredit the US. According to the US all reports of civilian casualties are lies. He says the Taliban stores bodies on donkey carts and rushes them to the site of a US artillery or missle strike. In 2004 in Iraq Rumsfeld was so incensed about an AlJazeera report showing civilian casualties that he ordered the bombing of AlJazeera headquarters. I love my country but I see it for what it is. Exit strategy and Vietnam all over again. Who from the Taliban will be the new Le Duc Tho?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
structurequity
structurequity not oppression
02:36 AM on 06/13/2011
Patreus speaks on one side of the elevated killing numbers of the Taliban and upon further reading one comes to find that 4 of 5 are not Taliban, now this article of civilian casualties. Why aren't the two joined so we can see the war for what it is, a lie of such huge proportions by our military/industrial/congressional leadership.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
intellifran
insert clever line here...
10:09 AM on 06/13/2011
Detaining is sometimes like fishing with a net. You throw back the ones you don't want. People make reports on insurgents because they don't like theigh neighbors, we detain them, realize they aren't bad and then release them. They're not kept for years, it's generally two weeks at the most (which sucks but they're fed, clothed, and live in AC).
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JoeBlough
The Horror. . .The Horror. . .
01:42 AM on 06/13/2011
I don't think America was ever meant to purposefully invade foreign countries and kill their citizens for pleasure or money. How exactly did Bush\Cheney pull this off?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
godsonecooldude
06:08 AM on 06/13/2011
when you are president and a republican you can do any thing you want. and try to get away with it.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:20 AM on 06/13/2011
Well, afghan civilians, the best advice for you is keep away from invaders and quislings and you may live another day.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dancenownzen
09:52 PM on 06/12/2011
If we ( the world) would have been working on ways to STOP using oil, we would not need ANY arab countries. Then, we ( the world) could COMPLETELY cut them off. No $$$ No help No support no recognition that ANY arab country even exists on the planet. Let them kill eachother. Let them live under Sharia law. Let them live in 200 BC WHO CARES???

we ( the world) could care less about the PEOPLE in these countries, we only care about what we ( the world) get from them = OIL ... so we have to play these stupid games of trying not to step on toes and treat them all as if they are legitimate, sophisticated countries....while waring against some of them in the name of revenge ( AFG) and nation building efforts and "support" of thise seeking freedom ( libya, yemin, etc) They don't want FREEDOM the way we define it
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
intellifran
insert clever line here...
10:11 AM on 06/13/2011
Isolationsim has been proven false. It won't work. We need to have a relationship with other countries.
08:42 PM on 06/12/2011
How many Afghan casualties at the hand of their own? And when they kill their own, they intend it.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dancenownzen
09:40 PM on 06/12/2011
this is a valid question .....HOWEVER it does not change a thing that WE are doing there = KILLING people
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
intellifran
insert clever line here...
10:12 AM on 06/13/2011
Yes, that is what war is...killing. Live with it. If those horrible people didn't hide behind their wives and children there would be no "innocent" casualties. Look at UBL's wife, she was shot while he was hiding behind her. This is what they do.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Blackorpheus
the decisive blows are always struck left-handed
08:11 PM on 06/12/2011
The calculation is this: 300 Afghan civilians almost equal one American soldier. With that math, we haven't killed many Afghan civilians at all in our fruitless ten-year war.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tulka2
Solidarity. Courage. Humor.
07:54 PM on 06/12/2011
U.S. hopes for peace go into the grave with these innocents.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AndyWright68
Freedom is inevitable!
07:42 PM on 06/12/2011
I wonder how Americans would act if some other country kiIIed a terrorist hiding here while also kiIIing hundreds of innocent people. Think about it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tulka2
Solidarity. Courage. Humor.
07:57 PM on 06/12/2011
The U.S. is divided between people who can imagine that and those who cannot.  Of course your question assumes that Afghanistan has real living, feeling, proud human citizens, which of course it does.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AndyWright68
Freedom is inevitable!
09:10 PM on 06/12/2011
I wish the other side could see the violence over there. But of course it will never be allowed to be televised. Can't get the support they need if they allow the truth to be seen.

The more innocent people we kiII the more terrorists there are. The more terrorists there are the more money they need to kiII the terrorists. The more terrorists they kiII the more innocent people are kiIIed .. wash, rinse repeat.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Uncle Bill
ex-lawyer and teacher
11:38 PM on 06/12/2011
Don't discount the efforts of the Taliban and local warlords to insure that there are civilian casualties.  It is an old guerilla strategy to use civilians as shields.  It either protects the guerillas from attack or gives them a propaganda coup if they are attacked.   If we don't kill innocents when striking at them, the guerillas will provide the bodies.  It is a necessary part of their propaganda war.  The narrative is also key to Karzai to hiding his complete dependence on foreign troops and his condemnations makes a show of independence to distract his people from his ballot box and wallet stuffing.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AndyWright68
Freedom is inevitable!
12:27 AM on 06/13/2011
We shouldn't be there in the first place. And since the alleged death of OBL we really shouldn't be there. All the fighting tactics are irrelevant. What if 19 rednecks knocked down a couple of skyscrapers in China and China did to us what we are doing to Afghanistan?
photo
Shukr
There I was...
03:16 PM on 06/12/2011
Who cares just a bunch of mooslim shuria law abiding terrurists.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dancenownzen
09:44 PM on 06/12/2011
so them we should exterminate all of them? how "Hitlerish" of you. Perhaps you can start building the ovens
photo
Shukr
There I was...
01:02 AM on 06/13/2011
lol I was being sarcastic because this war has been going for a long time, almost a decade yet people don't become outraged at this and peacefully call for an end to this war. This is because they have bipolar nature towards this war. One day they feel sad for Muslims then the next day they see some white christian guy talking about Sharia and they're ready to blow the next Muslim country in to a crater.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
westcoastsc
Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhe
02:01 PM on 06/12/2011
Why are we there? They offered to hand over OBL, but Bush refused and invaded anyway.

The Taliban had all but eradicated drugs in Afghanistan. Since we have been there, they are growing more drugs than ever before. Before we got there, none of heroin can from there; now, it is 40 percent. During the Iran Contra drug smuggling, the government used C130s full of cocaine to bring it here. The U.N. says that it was only the drug money that kept the banks from completely collapsing in 2008. Why don't we catch anybody? Why are CIA planes still crashing in Mexico with tons of cocaine in them?
photo
Rational Thought Plz
Is the Micro Bio Half
02:26 PM on 06/12/2011
I guess we like drugs?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Uncle Bill
ex-lawyer and teacher
11:27 PM on 06/12/2011
The Taliban refused to hand over bin Ladin.  There has been poppy growing in Afghanistan and south Asia for centuries.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
westcoastsc
Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhe
08:28 AM on 06/15/2011
They offered to hand him over twice. The first time was on the condition that the U.S. show them the evidence. The second time was unconditionally, but we invaded anyway. I guess you don't know about Rumsfeld giving orders to let him get away. Where have you been getting your information? The CIA taught people how to grow poppies way back when they were resisting the Soviet Union. The Taliban had eradicated almost all drugs. Since we have been there, they are now growing more than they ever have in history an estimated 80 billion dollars worth a year. They are growing so many drugs, they are having a hard time feeding their people. Who is getting caught? Nobody.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AndyWright68
Freedom is inevitable!
01:31 PM on 06/12/2011
And 100 new terrorists...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Danny Dan
12:26 PM on 06/12/2011
With technology getting better and better for our military capabilities we really don't need troops over there,but the money being spent to support the troops is what keep some of these Business's supporting the wars profitable.
You have all heard that Corporations are NOT spending money cause they are keeping it for themselves.
Once you've made your money,why stay in America,you can go anywhere.Halliburton and
,Blackwater to name a few.
12:32 PM on 06/12/2011
So you're advocating just using drones or something--you are probably also very outraged about civilian deaths (which are much higher when you just bomb and drone places).
You might benefit from some actual knowledge about the things that boots on the ground do other than kill people as well.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Danny Dan
12:57 PM on 06/12/2011
I know about boots on the ground and have been following it closely.
They put themselves in harms way.It hasn't worked very well.
photo
fairwayhill
1948 Palestine belongs to the Palestinians
11:56 AM on 06/12/2011
So called "lsrael" is stolen Palestine.
12:32 PM on 06/12/2011
Flagged as stupid.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
REMEMBER2050
Bring on that War on Women, GOP! I'm game.
01:44 PM on 06/12/2011
To be fair, it wasn't the Israeli's idea at the get-go. It was the British, I believe. Other than that, no disagreement from me on every new territory they've appropriated since then.

Reember Vanessa Redgrave? An amazing actress. She was blackballed decades ago because she said she supported a Palestinian nation.