iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Arne Duncan May Use No Child Left Behind To Give Schools Relief From Mandates

Arne Duncan

By DORIE TURNER   06/12/11 12:25 AM ET   AP

-- Frustrated by what he called a "slow motion train wreck" for U.S. schools, Education Secretary Arne Duncan said he will give schools relief from federal mandates under the No Child Left Behind law if Congress drags its feet on the law's long-awaited overhaul and reauthorization.

That could mean everything from granting waivers on test score requirements to flexibility on how schools spend federal funding, though Duncan offered few details because he said the department is just beginning to work on its plan.

The Obama administration has called for an overhaul of the 9-year-old federal education law by the fall, but lawmakers have indicated that won't be possible. Duncan told reporters Friday that his first goal is for Congress to rewrite the law but he wants to put other plans in place in case that doesn't happen this year.

"This is absolutely plan B," Duncan said. "The prospect of doing nothing is what I'm fighting against."

Duncan has warned that 82 percent of U.S. schools could be labeled failures next year if No Child Left Behind isn't changed. Education experts have questioned that estimate.

Still, no one thinks states will meet the law's goal of having 100 percent of students proficient in math and reading by 2014. A school that fails to meet targets for several consecutive years faces sanctions that can include firing teachers or closing the school entirely.

And Duncan hasn't been shy about granting waivers. In 2009, he granted more than 300, significantly higher than the number given out a year earlier by his predecessor.

Federal lawmakers – even Democrats – aren't thrilled about Duncan's new plan after months of closed-door, bipartisan meetings hashing out changes to the law, which is four years overdue for reauthorization.

"It seems premature at this point to take steps outside the legislative process that would address NCLB's problems in a temporary and piecemeal way," said Senate education committee Chairman Tom Harkin, a Democrat from Iowa.

House education committee Chairman John Kline, a Republican from Minnesota, said he's slowed down the reauthorization process because Democrats on his committee "have really started to engage."

Kline plans to introduce a bill that would give local school districts more flexibility in how they spend federal money. For example, he would like to allow them to move money for teacher training to underfunded special education programs.

Republicans and Democrats agree the law is broken. The Bush-era legislation has led to schools being labeled failures even though they are making improvements, and has discouraged states from adopting higher standards.

Duncan said he's encouraged by talks with federal lawmakers in recent weeks indicating the law might see revisions this year. But he said he wants a backup plan in case that doesn't happen.

"We can't afford to do nothing," he said.

Duncan said the department is talking to state officials, teachers, principals and parents about how to help schools if the law isn't rewritten. He said any actions taken by the department would not prevent Congress from continuing to negotiate reauthorization.

The news comes as relief for governors, who say their schools should not be punished because of an outdated law. In Georgia, for example, the state Department of Education is creating a "performance index" that measures growth in academic achievement rather than just year-to-year test scores and looks at more subjects than just reading and math, the only two required under the federal law.

"I would like the flexibility to use this performance index as it focuses on what makes a school successful and academic growth in each area," said Gov. Nathan Deal.

But some observers say Duncan's plan might backfire with Congress because waivers aren't popular with lawmakers who want more accountability for schools.

"I don't get all the drama. It almost has the feel of a threat to Congress," said Sandy Kress, who served as an education adviser to President George W. Bush in the passage of No Child Left Behind in 2001. "One has to worry that what they're really saying is, `We're going to open up the candy store and let people in and they can have as much as they like.'"

___

Associated Press writer Chris Williams in Minneapolis, Minn., contributed to this report.

___

Array

FOLLOW HUFFPOST EDUCATION

-- Frustrated by what he called a "slow motion train wreck" for U.S. schools, Education Secretary Arne Duncan said he will give schools relief from federal mandates under the No Child Left Behind law...
-- Frustrated by what he called a "slow motion train wreck" for U.S. schools, Education Secretary Arne Duncan said he will give schools relief from federal mandates under the No Child Left Behind law...
Filed by Joanna Zelman  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,533
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (24 total)
05:12 PM on 06/17/2011
Ed IS BROKE
IT AINT NO JOKE

LOOK TO
MAROK V OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY

http://www.cco.state.oh.us/scripts/ccoc.wsc/ws_civilcasesearch_2007.r?mode=5&CaseNo=200606736
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sean Taylor Teacher
Literacy is a right of all people
12:28 AM on 06/16/2011
Arne Duncan and privatization will ruin Title I public schools if he pushes through all the reforms that he sees as beneficial­. Arne Duncan is leasing the Department of Education to corporate America, giving them the keys, agenda, and the bully pulpit! WHY? MONEY? INFLUENCE! What qualifies Arne to dismantle/­reform public education? He plays baskets ball! WOW! Arne Duncan must see value in the corporate side of education and business sees quick profits until they need to be bailed out. This dynamic duo may do irrevocabl­e damage to a generation of poor Americans. The danger is not in affluent public schools, it will be the millions served in the poorest Title I schools that Corporate America and Arne's reforms will harm.

The future of public schools:

Segregated public charter schools that deny access to all but the academic elite.
Title I schools with unqualified teachers that serve the highest risk students.
Special education students concentrated in low performing school with little or no services.

Sean Taylor M.Ed.
http://reading-sage.blogspot.com
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Alexander Russo
I talk trash about school reform.
01:39 PM on 06/15/2011
here's a just-published huffpost update on how congressional leaders and teacher union leaders have reacted to duncan's proposal (badly) and my take on why the idea has failed to win support OR generate movement on the hill (lack of confidence in race to the top, mainly).

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/alexander-russo/why-duncan-waiver-proposa_b_877483.html
photo
VoiceofV
There's no certainty – only opportunity
10:43 AM on 06/15/2011
The Washington bureaucrats are destroying American education so they can sell off what's left to their Wallstreet trader business partners through privatization.

While the rest of the world is moving away from the NCLB style non-sense of rote learning, including China, Mr. Duncan offers to throw a few bones to the schools if they will do as he says without question.

What else could they be doing to more certainly assure that the U.S. will become a Third-World Nation?

The train wreck is coming from Washington Mr. Duncan, and you are among the drivers.
08:18 AM on 06/14/2011
What's wrong with American education? Too many politicians spoil . . .
01:28 AM on 06/14/2011
“Arne Duncan was a hack as the Chicago Public Schools CEO. Look at his qualificat­­ions. He's a University of Chicago professor'­­s kid who has a B.A. in sociology from Harvard. Big deal. He did however play profession­­al basketball in Australia. That has to qualify him for the head of our nations schools. His only interactio­­ns with students had to do with playing hoops with the kids in his mother's after-scho­­ol reading program. In his first foray into education he was appointed to a board that was to help a troubled public school by his investment banker buddy. Instead of improving the school, they closed and reopened it as a selective enrollment charter school.

Duncan has worked very hard to destroy the Chicago teachers Union and enrich his corporate cronies through the advancemen­­t of charter schools. I lost a lot of respect for Obama when he named this corporate tool to head our education system. His new initiative is nothing more than a boondoggle for corporatio­­ns looking to take over the field of education. Now that that he and Christie see eye to eye I can't understand how anyone in education would vote for the eliminatio­n of their job and way of life. It seems to me that things still have to get worse before they get better. We are constantly pitted against one another. While ALL of our pride and livelihood­s are being sold to the highest bidder. I'm sick of it!”
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:19 PM on 06/14/2011
Well said. It is a shame. Look at schools like Imagine Charters - they have a real estate subsidiary and rent school buildings from themselves. Let educators run schools!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Hugh Briggs
Bass-Fu Master
04:24 PM on 06/13/2011
Slow motion my eye.. Texas schools , and people like Michelle Bachmann and Sarah Palin show the schools are in very sad shape. ...
03:33 PM on 06/13/2011
Duncan has done some good, but what bothers me here is that this is yet another story in which the executive branch threatens to act if the legislature doesn't. That is not the way our system is supposed to work - the executive implements the wishes of the legislature, not the reverse, nor does it act alone.
photo
Ayla87
Don't Delete Me Bro!
03:18 PM on 06/13/2011
lol why is everyone so up in arms about the education system? It's working just fine considering it's original purpose. The compulsory school system of the US today is a throwback from 19h century Prussia. It was designed to create compliant workers, obedient soldiers and a general populace who thought the same on all major issues. People were educated just enough to do their job but not enough to question authority.

And when you think about it, it's not that much different today in America. Recent NCES statistics indicate that barely 5% of all high school graduates in this country are literate enough to engage in critical thought and interpretation. Nearly 50% are in the basic or below basic category, which means they're functionally illiterate, and the rest are somewhere in the middle, just smart enough do their jobs and nothing more.

Even democrats and republicans are pretty much the same. Both parties want control you, they just can't decide which parts of your life is most important to control; Your wallet or your morality. The only thing they do agree on is they want you to sit down shut up and do as your told.

We're not that much different from 19th Century Prussia. And we never will be unless we all wake up and realize that the system is failing not because of money or tests or teacher evaluations. It's failing because it was never designed to create the type of citizens that we're expecting of it.
01:45 PM on 06/13/2011
Mr. Duncan calls this a "a slow motion train wreck". Are you kidding? This is a fully engulfed derailment, and he's trying to put out the fire by spitting on it. All the discussions about NCLB and problems with the educational system center around policy, money, and the battle between the parties. It is not now, nor has it ever been, about how to help children. If you notice , the article never mentions anything about what is best for children. As a matter of fact the word child only appears twice in the written out version of NCLB. These politicians need to be reminded of the saying "a stitch in time saves nine". They are letting things get unraveled to the point of no return. They don't get that if you fix education you start to fix the economy and society in general.
11:29 AM on 06/13/2011
This law isn't "outdated." It isn't "broken." Both of those imply that there was a time and place that this law was a good thing, but that it's failed to change with the times.

This law was a bad idea in 2001, and it's a bad idea now. Everybody who knew what they were talking about ten years ago said that it was a horrible idea, but the politicians went ahead with it anyway.

Repeal the thing.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tultican
Thomas Ultican, MEd. BS Mecahnical Engineering
12:45 PM on 06/13/2011
You are right! It was bad in 2001 and it is worse today!
photo
Blacksheep1
Keeping the Left honest, 7 days a week!
09:44 PM on 06/13/2011
Somday, we'll be saying the same exact thing about Obamacare.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:45 AM on 06/14/2011
Right. So much better to let people suffer and die "and decrease the surplus population" (see Dickens' "Scrooge").

Ryan's "Vouchercare" is a much better plan: if you run out of money for healthcare, just die so we don't have to bother about you and we can give the wealthy more tax breaks.
10:13 AM on 06/13/2011
Having a secretary of education who's never taught (Duncan) is like having an attorney general who's never practiced law.

Both are equally ridiculous.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tultican
Thomas Ultican, MEd. BS Mecahnical Engineering
12:46 PM on 06/13/2011
I'll give an Amen to that.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DMDAY44
01:50 PM on 06/13/2011
Why not, we have a chief executive who has never been an executive.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:46 AM on 06/14/2011
Bush was an "executive", so I think that torpedoes the point you were trying to make.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
P Alan Greene
09:37 AM on 06/13/2011
The slow motion train wreck is not American schools.

The train wreck is the large pockets (mostly urban) of poverty and joblessness. The schools in those communities reflect the problems of those communities.

Imagine a man has been attacked and his throat has been sliced open, blood pouring from the wound. When the emergency personnel arrive, they exclaim, "Goodness! This man's shirt looks just terrible! How the heck will we fix him up so he's properly dressed?" That's how much sense addressing schools as the problem of the US makes.
10:00 AM on 06/13/2011
Exactly. Many American schools are doing quite well.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gravit8
my micro-bio is empty, eh heh
12:36 PM on 06/13/2011
Not really...They're 'doing well' given the current state of education budgets.

However, if you look at how well they could be doing with adequate funding (and all the staff/resources that funding provides) they could be 'doing well' compared to international standards - which puts 'doing well' at a much higher standard than we're achieving now.
08:27 AM on 06/13/2011
well, in the state I live in, the bumbling of the so-called "leaders" has caused a major shortage in school funding, and then the falling home values(affects tax revenue) plus the rising costs of benifits plus the new state education guy being an IDIOT has cost thousands of teachers their jobs statewide. More than 500 in the county where I live alone. This equates to larger classes and less funding for other programs that enrich the schools and keep lots of those at-risk kids interested long enough to finish school. These larger classes are difficult even for the best teachers to manage and if you are't getting the material the first time, thats too bad. Because of NCLB the teachers have to move at a frightening pace and these kids never reach the mastery level for any skill. Those that dont "get it" dont get a second shot because the teachers have such huge classes they cant stop to help the ten kids that need the help. They have a mandated schedule to keep so they can cover all the material on those mandated tests.
And the fun part is these tests are also given to the kids in special education that cant read or preform work on grade level. And a kid with a 50 IQ has to take a test that may determine if that teacher gets to keep his/her job.
Bigger classes = less one on one time with the students = poor achievement
08:57 AM on 06/13/2011
What you must understand is that this effect you are seeing is not an accident.

The CAUSES that you mention are not accidental and coincidental. This is a slow-motion nuclear bomb going off in our public schools, and it's quite on purpose.

Every competent non-ideological education expert in the country was against NCLB. It was stated at the time, that "this would effectively dismantle much of the public school system."

It was stealth though...death from a thousand tiny cuts.

But at the time, it was the only way to get ANY money for education.
12:20 PM on 06/13/2011
Thank you for adding. You may find, The Big Test, by Nicholas Lemann of interest. All of the reforms are top down. I'm sure there are examples, maybe, but where was the voice of teachers in all these reforms? More mandates for teachers, more 'accountability', but less support and funds to do so.
07:28 AM on 06/13/2011
First step to stopping the "slow motion train wreck," Arne:

Hand control of the railroad switch over to somebody who knows how it works and is qualified to run it.
08:59 AM on 06/13/2011
You must mean, let's all realize that NCLB was a completely flawed concept, that would only result in the incremental destruction of the public school system, so we need someone who will shove NCLB off to the side and get on with the business of educating our kids?

is that what you mean?
11:25 AM on 06/13/2011
That's all true, but it's not what I said.

What I said was, basically, "Arne Duncan should step down and let an educator serve as Secretary of Education."
12:25 PM on 06/13/2011
THANK. YOU. Duncan loves the Charter School Movement and no classroom experience. I read his bio. What makes this man qualified to run the DOE?????? Or Arne, if you are on, respond please.
03:58 PM on 06/13/2011
It's worse than you think. Arne Duncan is in charge of the American public school system, but he's got no experience in public school classrooms EVEN AS A STUDENT. The guy is the product of private school, with no educational background whatsoever.

The only thing wrong with your post is where you ask what makes him qualified for his job. There's no question to ask there. He's clearly unqualified.