iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Bank Drops Legal Pressure On Foreclosure Fraud Expert's Family

Foreclosure

First Posted: 06/13/2011 11:12 am Updated: 08/13/2011 5:12 am

Deutsche Bank has dropped the son of high-profile foreclosure fraud investigator Lynn Szymoniak from the foreclosure case against her, according to new court documents.

The bank had added Szymoniak's son, Mark Cullen, to the foreclosure suit this May, a move that many experts saw as an act of retaliation against Szymoniak, who has publicized banks' widespread use of forged signatures in the foreclosure process to improperly give borrowers the boot. On June 8, lawyers filed a "Notice of Dropping Party" with the Florida court dismissing its previous claims against Cullen.

The bank's decision to back down marks a minor victory for Szymoniak in her own fight to preserve her home. When Deutsche Bank hiked the interest rate on Lynn Szymoniak's mortgage in 2008, she challenged them in court, alleging the move was a violation of the original contract.

Szymoniak has challenged her bank outside the court as well" She has taken them to task in the halls of Congress, with state and federal law enforcement agencies and over the airwaves. A white-collar crime expert who specializes in documentation fraud, Szymoniak has detailed scores of commonplace foreclosure documentation improprieties as the foreclosure epidemic has deepened and shared her findings with state and federal officials.

Szymoniak also appeared on CBS New's 60 Minutes" in April to detail the rampant forgery of signatures at the heart of the foreclosure system implemented by most major national banks.

These forged signatures help banks cover up their own mistakes, some which have pushed borrowers into foreclosure through no fault of their own. In Lynn's case, she says she decided to stop paying her mortgage after the bank improperly raised her interest rate. But her investigations then uncovered that her bank's had relied on forged signatures to prove that they owned her loan in the first place.

A Flordia court agreed with Szymoniak, and shortly after her "60 Minutes" appearance, a judge threw out the bank's case. The bank was given a few weeks to refile the case if it could get its ownership records in order.

When the bank refiled, her son, Mark Cullen, had been named a party to the lawsuit, creating a blight on his legal record and a major hassle for the family. Independent foreclosure attorneys accused the bank of attempting to intimidate Szymoniak's family and retaliating against Szymoniak for her public activism.

Szymoniak's case provides a window into several different bank improprieties in the foreclosure process and is one of many cases that could pose major liabilities for Wall Street -- liabilities that could dwarf the existing capital of some major firms.

Deutsche Bank serves as the trustee for numerous mortgage-backed securities, bundles of mortgages packed into securities then sold to investors, including a security that included Szymoniak's loan. Trustees are responsible for ensuring that all of the loan documents for mortgage bonds are appropriately collected and accounted for. The attorneys general of both New York and Delaware are investigating trustees for fraud.

Szymoniak's basic case is straightforward: Deutsche Bank cannot prove that the trust owns her mortgage because her mortgage was never properly sold to Deutsche Bank, she alleges. If many mortgages in the Deutsche Bank trust are found not to have been transferred appropriately, that could make Deutsche Bank liable for huge investor losses.

When asked to comment, Deutsche Bank insisted that it had nothing to do with the decision to include Szymoniak's son in the foreclosure case. While the lawsuit is being brought in its name, the bank farms out almost all of the actual work on its securitized mortgages to other parties, called mortgage servicers. And trusts, including Deutsche Bank's, have very tight contracts that limit banks' liability for actually doing anything in foreclosure cases, making them almost immune from losses associated with what mortgage servicers do in their name.

"The trustees on MBS are pretty close to brain dead entities," said Thomas Adams, an attorney who has worked in mortgage securitization for decades. "They do not have true oversight functions and typically negotiated their transactions so that they had minimal responsibilities."

Just as Deutsche Bank is having trouble proving that it owns Szymoniak's mortgage, American Home Mortgage Servicing, the servicer for Szymoniak's loan, has had trouble figuring out who actually lives in her house. American Home declined to comment after the new court documents were filed, but a spokesperson told HuffPost earlier that the decision to include Szymoniak's son in the refiled lawsuit was not an act of retaliation. Instead, they said at the time they believed him to be a tenant who could have a secondary claim to the home. He was named in the foreclosure suit, American Home said, to make sure that he couldn't come back and press legal claims against American Home if his mother is later evicted.

But Szymoniak's son, Mark Cullen, has not lived there for seven years, Szymoniak said. He is a graduate student in poetry at the New School in New York, a fact that any cursory inquiry by American Home's lawyers could have detected.

Like many mortgage servicers, American Home outsources most of its legal work on foreclosures to " foreclosure mills " -- law firms that process thousands of foreclosure documents a day, packing austere warehouses full of recent law school graduates to robo-sign key documents. Several foreclosure mills in Florida have received sanctions from state government, with the Law Offices of David J. Stern shutting down following an investigative report by Andy Kroll at Mother Jones.

But other foreclosure mills, like The Law Offices of Marshall C. Watson, which first handled American Home's case against Szymoniak, have survived the fines.

When Szymoniak challenged the foreclosure, the bank brought in Florida corporate law behemoth Akerman Senterfit & Eidson. It wasn't the notoriously sloppy foreclosure mill adding Szymoniak's son to the case -- it was an expensive team of corporate law experts. That fact reinforced the impression among Florida foreclosure attorneys that the decision to add Szymoniak's son to the mortgage was an act of intimidation. Akerman did not respond to phone calls for comment but conferred with American Home prior to the mortgage servicer's interactions with HuffPost.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS

Deutsche Bank has dropped the son of high-profile foreclosure fraud investigator Lynn Szymoniak from the foreclosure case against her, according to new court documents. The bank had added Szymoniak...
Deutsche Bank has dropped the son of high-profile foreclosure fraud investigator Lynn Szymoniak from the foreclosure case against her, according to new court documents. The bank had added Szymoniak...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 130
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
John Bays
ASSERTIONS ARE NOT FACTS
11:14 PM on 06/28/2011
Good deal for bankers and bank trustees. Borrow money from the fed at 0% - lend it out at 7 or 8 % - rake in the profits - give the CEO's and Trustees big bucks to play golf at their bank sponsored country clubs {Initiation and annual dues are just one of many tax-free perks - throw in your bar bill too} - then - when things go south and the homes you hold mortgages on are not worth the loan balances - bundle and sell those mortgages while inflating their value. Then get a government bailout and pay your CEO's another bonus for the wonderful geniuses they are. Who is the FOOL here - possibly......us?
11:09 AM on 06/17/2011
Such a poor situation... too bad

Regards
Tony
http://www.foreclosurerepos.com/
08:18 AM on 06/15/2011
If an individual submitted forged documents in court, they would go to jail.
If a bank submits forged documents in court, they are asked to get them right, and come back.
Something is wrong when banks are free to forge documents and forge signature, and no one goes to jail. Unless the bank wants to accept responsibility for forging documents, and pay a serious fine, the individual responsible for forging the documents should be prosecuted, and a jury should decide their fate. Foreclosure fraud is a crime and should be punished.
The system is not going to fix itself, especially if no one is polciing their actions.
06:31 PM on 06/14/2011
I hope that Szymoniak and her son sue Duetsche Bank for intimidation. If they are suppose to be the lender, then they should already know whom has interest in the property whether they
out souce the servicing or not that's no excuse to pull someone up in court who's name is not even on the Deed.
01:12 PM on 06/14/2011
The Florida f.c. lawyer David Stern was first investigated in press reports by Janice Martin of St. Petersburg Times. I respect the work Mother Jones has done in this regard but I believe that this crusading Florida reporter was first on the case.
11:19 AM on 06/14/2011
This bank was involved in the subprime crisis. They have moral standards?
11:17 AM on 06/14/2011
I just heard about this cool site smokandmers.com
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ejcop77
the country that I know is disappearing
02:16 AM on 06/14/2011
crooks! every last one of these banks are run by ga*ng*st*ers
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
McKeaton
01:42 AM on 06/14/2011
Deutsche Bank, has a german name, but in fact is a subsidiary of Goldman Sachs, the real boss there is a former , till 2005 GS alumni...
spokanelaw
Spokane attorney
12:29 AM on 06/14/2011
Not an isolated incident of incompetence, but a pattern of willful ignorance?
08:59 PM on 06/13/2011
The second wave is about to hit. www.johnmschwarzlaw.com
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GetRealSoon
Finding Fraudster
10:14 PM on 06/13/2011
Second wave was 2010 and getting to be a little late to defend foreclosures. They pretty much got away with the fraud and predatory lending.
photo
RedRat
Ignorance is fixable, stupidty is forever
07:26 PM on 06/13/2011
In Sunday's NYTimes, they had an interesting article about the difference between "flippers" and "flappers". Apparently, if you or I buy a property at a low price and then resell the property, then we are flippers. We are still flippers if we end up selling the house even at loss due to market conditions. We are expected to do "due diligence". However, if you are get a property from a bank out of foreclosure or a short sale, resell the property for more money, then you are a flopper. You have apparently broken the law. Hmm. Who in these situations is better capable of doing due diligence?? I would say the bank. If the bank agrees to sell the property for a sum of money without doing a simple comparison to comps in the area, they are absolved and have the law on their side. Hmm. Do you think the cards are stacked against you, the lowly citizen. Hmm.
photo
BeautifulOnDaOutside
I ♥ Huffington Post
03:03 PM on 06/14/2011
You are talking about people who conspire with others, such as real estate agents and appraisers, to mislead the bank. This is fraud, and it is and should be illegal.
photo
RedRat
Ignorance is fixable, stupidty is forever
06:44 PM on 06/14/2011
Whoa there a minute. Appraisers and real estate agents conspire to lead us lowly home buyers also. Who do you think sets prices on homes put for sale? It's real estate agents and appraisers. If you paid too much for that house because of flipping, then everyone will tell you to do due diligence, look at the comps in the neighborhood, look at the prices in your area and what they are doing, are homes selling, etc, etc. No one is going to go to bat for you the private citizen, it is your responsibility to make sure that the house price is fair.

Apply that principle to banks. Of all people they should be able, if not required, to do due diligence. They have whole divisions at their disposal to look at prices of homes in any given area. Mislead a bank??? Really? The bank better damn well know what that property is worth. When they sold the property, they accepted that the price they gave out was fair to them, and them alone. If they thought the price was too low, then don't sell it as such a low price.

If you are in the business of giving mortgages and holding title, you had better know exactly what that mortgage and property is worth and what you can resell it for. Sorry, I have absolutely no sympathy for the bank here, anymore than I would have for someone who bought too high, or someone who sold too low.
07:00 PM on 06/13/2011
Widespread use of forged signatures, fraudulent intent to cover their mistakes, shell entities to avoid liabilities, property seizure no fault of homeowner, use of crooked attorneys, and act of intimidation. It reads like the Mafia mob. How can we call the banks legitimate businesses when they behave outright like criminals. If you're fed up & want change, learn how Amyx can disrupt the financial services industry by shifting the power to the people: http://amyx.co/
photo
Kyle Ransom
Former veteran mortgage broker and mortgage securi
06:12 PM on 06/13/2011
Deutsche Bank is 100% aware that they knowingly foreclosed on homeowners wrongfully. That's what happens when you rush to make profits! Using foreclosure mills with clueless Robo signers to help them kill American Dreams. All many of these homeowners wanted was a better loan and possibly a grace period of 6 months or more to start making new payments they could afford. The value is not there anymore so why not give the homeowner a lower interest rate and reduced principal balance?!

To send a message to SCARE homeowners into not fighting back will not work. The PEOPLE are united! Going after the homeowner's son because he spoke out? What a joke! It makes me happy that I use the Go Fight Foreclosure System to educate people on improper securitization.

"Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere."
Martin Luther King Jr., Letter from Birmingham Jail, April 16, 1963

Kyle Ransom
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
J T K
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
07:04 PM on 06/13/2011
Pressuring this guy and the wrongful and fraudulent foreclosures are wrong and the banks should be made to correct that and compensate anyone hurt because they screwed up.

That being said the banks have every right and an obligation to their shareholders to uphold their end of the contract and foreclose on anyone who isn't making payments so that they can collect the collateral (the property) and attempt to resell it. Even if they have to sell it at a loss the bank gets more by taking the property than they do letting someone live there for free.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Grimway
07:43 PM on 06/13/2011
The crap that is going on now is INDEFENSIBLE! PERIOD!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
plaidsportcoat
04:34 AM on 06/14/2011
ugh. you sound like Obama courting wall st. for 2012
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
apathyman
Let them hate, so long as they fear
06:00 PM on 06/13/2011
I'd like to know why banks are allowed to refile when they are caught using forged documents? If it were the home owner they'd lose their house right away and possibly end up in jail. Why are banks not held to the same standard?