iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

John Boehner Warns Obama On Violating War Powers Act With Libya Mission

John Boehner Obama Libya

DONNA CASSATA   06/14/11 09:18 PM ET   AP

WASHINGTON — House Speaker John Boehner urged President Barack Obama on Tuesday to explain the legal grounds for the continued U.S. military involvement in Libya and set a Friday deadline for the commander in chief's response.

The White House said late Tuesday it was nearing completion of an "extensive" response to congressional inquiries.

Ratcheting up the pressure, the Ohio Republican said in a letter to the White House that the administration clearly will be in violation of the 1973 War Powers Act this weekend. Obama did not seek congressional consent for the operation within 60 days of the March 19 U.S. airstrikes against Moammar Gadhafi's forces.

"Either you have concluded the War Powers Resolution does not apply to the mission in Libya or you have determined the War Powers Resolution is contrary to the Constitution," Boehner wrote. "The House and the American people whom we represent deserve to know the determination you have made."

Boehner complained that the administration has provided briefings for lawmakers but has not sought formal authorization. Seeking an explanation, he asked Obama for answers to constitutional and statutory questions by Friday.

Earlier this month, the House voted to rebuke Obama for failing to pursue congressional approval and accused the president of not providing a "compelling rationale" for the Libyan operation. The House measure also required a report from the administration, due by Friday, on the scope of the Libyan operation, its costs and its impact on the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

"The ongoing, deeply divisive debate originated with a lack of genuine consultation prior to commencement of operations and has been further exacerbated by the lack of visibility and leadership from you and your administration," Boehner wrote.

The White House maintains that it has been in compliance with the War Powers Act and has called the resolutions unhelpful and unnecessary.

Initially the White House brushed off the nonbinding House measure, saying it had provided answers at various briefings. But last week it said it will respond to detailed questions on the U.S. mission in Libya within the deadline.

Responding to Boehner's letter Tuesday, White House national security spokesman Tommy Vietor said, "We are in the final stages of preparing extensive information for the House and Senate that will address a whole host of issues about our ongoing efforts in Libya, including those raised in the House resolution as well as our legal analysis with regard to the War Powers Resolution."

Vietor didn't say exactly what form the White House response would take and whether it would be the type of report sought by the House.

NATO commands the Libya operation, but the United States still plays a significant support role that includes aerial refueling of warplanes and intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance work.

In the Senate, the fate of a resolution signaling support for the operation was in limbo.

Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee, said plans for the panel to meet Thursday and write a resolution would be delayed to allow lawmakers to review the White House report. He left open the possibility of action on a resolution next week.

"We just want everybody to see the information and see how it impacts their thinking," Kerry said.

Among the backers of the resolution is Sen. John McCain of Arizona, a leading proponent of military action against Gadhafi, the top Republican on the Armed Services Committee and Obama's presidential rival in the 2008 election. McCain warned his GOP colleagues against any steps that would send a positive signal to Gadhafi.

"I caution my friends, both here in the Senate and in the House of Representatives, that we don't want to do anything or pass legislation which would encourage Gadhafi to remain in power," McCain told reporters.

Sens. Jim Webb, D-Va., and Bob Corker, R-Tenn., introduced a separate resolution last week that presses Obama to seek congressional consent for continued U.S. military involvement in Libya and requires the administration to provide a detailed justification for the decision to go to war.

McCain said there are continued signs of deterioration for Gadhafi's hold on power, including high-level defections from his regime.

"I would say to my Republican friends: If this were a Republican president, would you be trying to impose these same conditions?" McCain asked.

On Monday, the House essentially voted to prohibit money for the Libya operation, backing an amendment barring the use of any funds in contravention of the War Powers Act. The vote was 248-163 on a spending bill that still must be reconciled with the Senate.

One of the most vocal critics of Obama, anti-war Rep. Dennis Kucinich, D-Ohio, said he and Rep. Walter Jones, R-N.C., will file a complaint in federal court Wednesday over the Libyan war.

____

Associated Press writer Alan Fram contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON — House Speaker John Boehner urged President Barack Obama on Tuesday to explain the legal grounds for the continued U.S. military involvement in Libya and set a Friday deadline for th...
WASHINGTON — House Speaker John Boehner urged President Barack Obama on Tuesday to explain the legal grounds for the continued U.S. military involvement in Libya and set a Friday deadline for th...
Filed by Elyse Siegel  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 8,023
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (113 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
treadway123
treadway123
03:15 PM on 06/17/2011
What BOEHNER/SOME DEM's are doing is Publically embolding Gadoffi! They know NO WAR was ever declaired in Lybia! We have NO boots on the Ground/no military in harms way! This is something they needed to do behind Closed doors! It emboldens our enemies when our Congress Publically tries to throw our president under the Bus on Security of our Military, Terrorist fights like in Yemen takeing place! They would NEVER have DONE THIS IN BUSH"S YEARS/Cause Chaney would have cut them off at the foot, an pointed out this was a talk for Behind closed doors, not to allow our enemies to see/hear our countries WEAKNESS's!
04:57 PM on 06/21/2011
So when Liberals and Democrats were slamming Bush ("The war is lost!" Harry Reid) - were they guilty of emboldening our enemies? Did you miss all the protests by many liberals, Democrat pols, and even some on the right? They didn't just throw Bush under the bus, the backed up and drove over him many times. Did you just start reading this year?
11:30 AM on 06/22/2011
That was Bush's war, there were no WMD's there was no reason to let 4,000 of our soldier be killed for no good reason. This is not the same at all. We should have impeached Bush for lying to us, the entire country, to congress and the world, but he still walks free. Tell me what good the war in Iraq did? It ruined our military, the economy and our standing in the world but the Faux Cowboy got away with it.

Maybe you should start reading. Where were those WMD's? If they existed (and by all accounts we supposedly sold them to Saddam) then why didn't Bush et al trot them out and prove we weren't being lied to?
08:26 PM on 06/16/2011
Thank you for your keen insight.
photo
Jett7
You're gonna need a bigger boat.
10:20 PM on 06/15/2011
I see once again Boehner is making up sh**.
photo
songoftherushes
I can think, I can wait, and I can fast
09:58 PM on 06/15/2011
US pays 75% of NATO's bills

"Ten years ago US defence investment represented almost half of all defence expenditure in the whole alliance. Today it is 75%," Rasmussen said.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/jun/15/nato-chief-warns-of-two-tier-force
photo
NHGranite
Killer Koala escapes diner, eats shoots & leaves
09:53 PM on 06/15/2011
Have they redefined war? based on the messages here today, I believe they are Palinesque regarding history and definitions. There's the Korean War, but it was called a police action, war was never declared. Millions killed. Technically, it is not over - it's just a cease fire. Viet Nam, Iraq, Grenada, the War on Terror, the War on Drugs. Not wars. Lots of guns, uniforms. boots on the ground. Not so in Libya.

The President's side says: Wednesday's report from the White House says that U.S. operations are limited to a supporting role in a coalition whose operations are authorized by the U.N. Security Council resolution. They "do not involve sustained fighting or active exchanges of fire with hostile forces, nor do they involve the presence of U.S. ground troops, U.S. casualties or a serious threat thereof, or any significant chance of escalation into a conflict characterized by those factors." it says. Read more: http://www.thebostonchannel.com/politics/28244881/detail.html#ixzz1POpr5Tmr
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vanwinkle
07:56 PM on 06/15/2011
John Boehner will say and do anything to undermine OUR President.
11:58 PM on 06/15/2011
Obama is a liar... Read the news just released today at ABC world news... Behind your back, he shook hands for top donors, gave them the political jobs for their special interests only... You are sooo doomed to vote for him again... Good luck..

http://abc­news.go.co­m/Politics­/report-ob­ama-admini­stration-r­ewards-big­-donors-jo­bs/story?i­d=13849435
photo
njdanie
old retired nerd
07:13 PM on 06/15/2011
So does this mean that Republicans are "peace mongers" now?
08:52 PM on 06/15/2011
Only if there is no viable threat from Grenada.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jimchap
02:54 PM on 06/21/2011
if thar's oil in them thar hills they are. It's all about oil.
mooncop1
Impeachment is a beginning, not an end.
07:10 PM on 06/15/2011
Forget the warning start the impeachment process.
photo
NHGranite
Killer Koala escapes diner, eats shoots & leaves
09:57 PM on 06/15/2011
Oh, good they're finally going after Bush - but he can't be impeached after his term, so just start to prosecute for torture and the false pretext for Iraq.
05:17 PM on 06/15/2011
Common trope "Obama bombing Libya" - is this what the American media report?
05:10 PM on 06/15/2011
partisan debate: Was Bush the better Obama? Is Obama worse than Bush? Blah, blah, blah.
The previous administration held the UN in disdain till they needed the UN to take over from the failed Bremer interim "solution" in Iraq - and then blithely continued to hold the UN in disdain.
The present administration adheres to international law, conducts foreign policy based on principle, lets diplomacy run its course, has broken with unilateralism, puts much of the onus of the implementation effort where it belongs - on the shoulders of Europeans.
08:53 PM on 06/15/2011
Hear, hear!
photo
NHGranite
Killer Koala escapes diner, eats shoots & leaves
10:00 PM on 06/15/2011
Ditto. F&F
05:05 PM on 06/15/2011
It's hilarious, but also sad, watching so many Obama supporters try to justify his actions in Libya. Some liberals are opposed and I commend them for their consistency. Others go to the default "Bush" "Racism" arguments. Some say it is not a war because NATO is involved, or that we are required to attack Libya by treaty. Here are the salient facts:

Bush is not President.
The NATO treaty does not require us to attack Libya. No NATO member was attacked.
The UN resolution does not require us to attack Libya. If so, where are Russia and China?
Six nations, including us, are participating in the attack.
Thirty eight nations participated in the war in Iraq.
We are attacking Iraq because our President chose to do so.
The war is legal, and will remain so if our President seeks and recieves the approval of Congress as required by the WPA.
If he asks, he will recieve approval.
Approval does not make the attack wise or right.
To my liberal friends "warheads on foreheads equals war".
05:13 PM on 06/15/2011
Attack?
You are sadly uninformed. The Gaddafi security apparatus launched a concerted premeditated armed attack on all manifestations of peaceful protest across Libya.
Recommended reading: The UN prosecutor`s report.
05:28 PM on 06/15/2011
Maybe you should broaden your reading.

Assad kills hundreds in Syria - why aren't we attacking?
Genocide in Sudan - why didn't we attack?
Genocide in Rwanda - why didn't we attack?
China is taking over Tibet - why don't we attack?
Iran is killing her citizens - why don't we attack?
North Korea starving millions of their citizens - why don't we attack?
Saddam slaughters 300,000 Shiites - why don't we attack? Oh, wait...
Saddam invades Iran - why don't we attack? Oh, wait...
Saddam invades Kuwait - why don't we attack? Oh, wait....
Sri Lanka ruthlessly eliminates Tamils - why don't we attack?
Turks slaughter Armenians - why don't we attack?
Need I go on? Recommended reading - World History 101
Here is an internet link - genocides since 1945. Only about 150 or so. http://www.wtnrradio.com/news/story.php?story=13
I'd say your logic/rationalization is a littlle spotty, but if you feel that strongly about it there is a recruiter near you. Be all that you can be.
photo
songoftherushes
I can think, I can wait, and I can fast
09:10 PM on 06/15/2011
There weren't any peaceful protests in Libya. They were violent from day one, probably as a concerted effort to foment a greater uprising.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nenitaB
Not the talk. What good result would it hav
07:59 AM on 06/16/2011
philips 0811. ... I do agree with your factual words ! Fanned and Faved !
05:03 PM on 06/15/2011
Why not run a test? Submit the Gaddifi letter to the house as draft without revealing Gaddafi penned it. It may well command a third of the votes in the House.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Brandon Baier
brandon_baier
04:57 PM on 06/15/2011
So while everyone is talking about this being a violation of he WPA, was there ever any doubt that this was going to turn into an actual occupation?
Let me jog everyones memory about what the NY Times said back in March:
On a day when two United States airmen bailed out over Libya and were rescued after the crash of their fighter jet, Mr. Obama and the leaders of Britain and France stepped up efforts to work out an accord on who would be in charge of military operations once the initial onslaught on Libya’s air defense systems was complete.

I cite the last three lines. From the get go we all knew this was going to happen. What will be interesting is who get control since according to Gates NATO is falling apart? Our troops taking orders from a foriegn command? Sounds like a world war when you take a step back, maybe just a little but then look at Pakistan. and Iran, and China, and Russia....
05:04 PM on 06/15/2011
There is no evidence of any of that happening other than your wild inferences.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
beGrown beSexy
06:20 PM on 06/15/2011
there is no evidence of WPA (war powers act)?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Brandon Baier
brandon_baier
07:26 PM on 06/15/2011
That a piece from the NY Times as I said in my post. And gtes has been saying for days that NATO is having issues... what rock are you living under you silly little troll.

And since they are all hinting that America is part of the Aliance but isnt going to command it... isnt that what is going to happen, Foreign officers will be in command of our troops, just like in WWII. If you want to take it further by all means follow it through. With Syria moving tanks on its protestors, yes thats right TANKS, who is next?
04:54 PM on 06/15/2011
The rationale behind resolution 1973 is the "responsibility to protect" civilians - which in the given case was expanded to responsibility to prevent harm being done to civilians.
Would Congress in its majority take issue with an administration abiding by that norm?
The tunnel vision of the people trying to throw a spanner into this administration`s work is that participation in the implementation effort is not in the United States` interest. Would standing by be in the interest of the United States as a world power adhering to international law?
Both parochial isolationists and anti-imperialists seem to feel that way.
05:30 PM on 06/15/2011
Well go to the Recruiter and put your corpus where your mouthus is if it so important to you to protect civilians.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lets Drink
04:02 PM on 06/15/2011
Ed Haskell,

I think you are trying to rewrite history because you hate George Bush. The Clinton Administration did in fact use much of the same intelligence to justify the continued sanctions against Iraq.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ed Haskell
Sometimes too much drink is barely enough...
08:33 PM on 06/15/2011
No. By the time of the Iraq war there was a lot more, and a lot more accurate, intelligence about what Saddam did and didn't have.

And Bush *did* indeed make up a lot of the junk that they fed the Congress to justify the war.

Don't try to rewrite history just because you love George Bush.