More

Philadelphia Foreclosure Relief Program Finds Success As Homeowners Meet Lenders

Philadelphia Foreclosure

First Posted: 06/14/11 01:00 PM ET Updated: 08/14/11 06:12 AM ET

With the nation in the grips of a punishing foreclosure crisis, one local program has found success in allowing struggling borrowers to stay in their homes.

A Philadelphia initiative started in 2008 requires the two parties in a foreclosure case to meet face-to-face and attempt to reach an agreement. That tactic, it turns out, can work. Of the homeowners who made deals through the program, nearly 85 percent are still in their homes 18 months later, according to an independent analysis released Tuesday.

The results offer a glimmer of hope in a bleak national situation. Of the eligible homeowners contending with foreclosure in Philadelphia, 70 percent went through the Residential Mortgage Foreclosure Diversion Program, and a third of those borrowers reached agreements with their mortgage companies to allow them to stay in their homes, according to the study from the Reinvestment Fund, a Philadelphia-based community investment group.

One-and-a-half years later, most of those agreements have stuck.

"The success is we set the table. And we require the guests to come to the table," said Judge Annette Rizzo, who set up the program with the president judge of the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas. "Once you get that one-on-one, where the case's facts come to light, that's when individual deals come."

Nationwide, the volume of distressed properties appears to be growing. In 2009, more than 2.8 million homes received a foreclosure filing, and last year that number rose to nearly 2.9 million, according to data-provider RealtyTrac.

Amid this crisis, the Obama administration's signature foreclosure-prevention effort is widely considered to be a failure. More homeowners have been kicked out of the program than are receiving assistance, according to data from the Treasury Department. The program will fall short of achieving President Barack Obama's promise of helping up to 4 million homeowners avoid foreclosure, auditors have determined.

Troubled borrowers who attempt to contact their lenders often describe a nightmarish process where they become lost in a maze of recorded phone messages, failing to speak to a real person. Banks claim to lose paperwork, as trial mortgage modifications can in some cases lead to foreclosure. Nearly 60 percent of housing counselors said borrowers have contacted them because a mortgage company had claimed to have lost documentation, according to a recent Government Accountability Office survey.

"There are all these robotic processes and nobody to make any intelligent business decisions," said attorney Margery Golant, a principal at the law firm Golant & Golant. "There's just nobody home."

Which is where Philadelphia's program comes in. That system, which has been publicized throughout the city, requires representatives of the mortgage company and the borrower to meet in person before a foreclosure moves forward to discuss possible alternatives to a sale at auction. These options could include a mortgage modification or a forbearance plan. If the two sides fail to reach an agreement at the first meeting, they go before a judge for a conference and again attempt to find a workable solution.

That approach has met success, as the portion of homes sold at sherriff's auctions for distressed properties in Philadelphia has fallen. Of foreclosures going through the diversion program, less than 6 percent of foreclosures filed in the second half of 2009 ended in sales at sheriff's auctions, down from over 27 percent of foreclosures filed before the program began, the Reinvestment Fund's study found.

"Once in, it looks like people are getting a reasonable shot at being able to achieve an agreement," said Ira Goldstein, Director of Policy Solutions at the Reinvestment Fund, "and those agreements seem to be lasting."

A "shadow inventory" of foreclosed properties yet to hit the market threatens to keep prices from rising, as the supply of homes outpaces demand. In some regions, banks are repossessing more homes than they sell, suggesting that lenders are ill equipped to deal with the sheer size of the crisis. Banks now hold more than 872,000 homes, nearly twice as many as in 2007, according to RealtyTrac.

As the pace of the home-price decline accelerates, Americans are losing their grip on their most valuable asset. The number of homeowners who owe more on their home than it's worth reached a new high in the first quarter of this year, at 28.4 percent of all single-family homes with mortgages, according to data-provider Zillow. Americans' home equity has hit a two-year low, new data from the Federal Reserve show.

While Philadelphia's program seems to have helped that city avert some repossessions of homes, it hasn't solved the fundamental problems: The broader economy is still weak, and the unemployment rate is hovering around 9 percent.

"People are still in the unemployment cycle. That hasn't broken," Judge Rizzo said. "As much as we can get a good deal crafted, if you still have no capacity to maintain it at whatever level, that's going to be a problem."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
With the nation in the grips of a punishing foreclosure crisis, one local program has found success in allowing struggling borrowers to stay in their homes. A Philadelphia initiative started in 200...
With the nation in the grips of a punishing foreclosure crisis, one local program has found success in allowing struggling borrowers to stay in their homes. A Philadelphia initiative started in 200...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 190
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
08:45 AM on 06/16/2011
Sign the Stop Foreclosures Now Petition
http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/smokeandmers911/
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
demilieu
Texas liberal...with reservations
06:26 PM on 06/15/2011
To the bank, it's a house. To the people who live there, it's a home. That's the reaon we should see more active government particiption in helping the two parties come to an agreement that's fair but allows a family to stay put in their home if they wish to do so.
08:47 AM on 06/16/2011
These are sad times we are living in...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Pinmason
Occupy Democracy
04:43 PM on 06/15/2011
Part 2 The last thing anyone wants to see is the banking and mortgage companies go down the tubes. It would have a devastating effect on the economy of major proportions; however, the effect their scandalous actions have incurred on the American Economy and the Housing Market, must be corrected. In order to do this, banks must be forced to reduce mortgage amounts owed. If a family's home has lost close to fifty percent of it value according to recent reports then banks must refinance that home at fifty percent of it's original value owed at a fixed rate of four percent (two percent if they want to fight it) for the number of months remaining on the original mortgage. This is still not fair to homeowners that by all rights more than likely now own their homes outright but has not been made aware of the current situation. It is time for the GREAT AMERICAN HOME OWNER BAILOUT BY THE BANKS AND MORTGAGE COMPANIES for the homeowner. The benefits to the economy would be immediate and long lasting and it would give the housing market a new starting point that everyone can survive with.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Pinmason
Occupy Democracy
04:08 PM on 06/15/2011
Part 1 Here is a plan that will boost the economy and the housing market not the one mentioned above as it does not go far enough for the homeowner.
The banking rope a dope. As investigators and the OCC have established and new investigations continue to demonstrate the magnitude of the mishandling of mortgages by BofA and Mers and many others, it becomes obvious that they have little or no legal recourse to claim a mortgage or even to initiate a foreclosure process. Mers has already sent up a white flag with the resignation of its CEO earlier this year and Mers announcing that they can no longer go after foreclosures; however, BofA and the banking coalition continues to fight in legislatures to limit homeowners ability to fight these illegal foreclosures. Why are they fighting this so hard...because the courts are increasingly favoring the homeowners based on the documents provided in court that lack the credentials of a proper mortgage. In all cases I have read to date, not one lawyer for the banks has been able to produce a legitimate mortgage in court. I praise those states that have stood up and made the banks and mortgage companies accountable and sent them packing instead of the homeowner. Don't fall for the banks rope a dope...there is a better way.
Call a cease fire and set terms. Part 2 on following post.
05:11 AM on 06/15/2011
When Your current mortgage has a prepayment penalty you should not refinance your loan, do not make costly mistakes, use tools like "123 Refinance" they make it easy to refinance
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:56 PM on 06/14/2011
i am wondering who is coming to the table? the bank sends an attoney -who does the homeowner have to help them? if the documents are forged, robosigned, etc what "deal" can be made with illegal paperwork?
09:33 PM on 06/14/2011
It's good business to keep homeowners paying their mortgages. Banks lose money on Sheriff's sales and having to keep non income producing property. If lowering the interest rate and extending the term keeps the money flowing in its a win for both sides.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Pinmason
Occupy Democracy
03:43 PM on 06/15/2011
Is a good idea? I don't think so. The representatives from the banks and mortgage companies when they show up should first and foremost be required to provide a mortgage that can be traced from the mortgage to the deed. NO ROBOSIGNING OR ELECTRONIC MORTGAGE ALLOWED AS EVIDENCE OF A COMPANY SAYING THEY HOLD THE MORTGAGE. In the case of mers mortgages, sixty-five million of them at last count, not one lawyer from the banks in courts has been able to show the chain from the mortgage to the deed. BofA continues to use Robosigning as a means of correcting a mortgages peidgree. I think this is a form of injustice to homeowners. The homeowners mortgage payment is nothing more that a bailout of the banks and mortgage companies. I suppose it's better than nothing...but it comes far short of correcting the problem of providing long term recovery in the housing market. Until we go after the banks and mortgage companies that created the problem of sinking home values with foreclosures and in most cases have lost the mortgage due to poor at best banking practices and accounting measures according to the OCC, this action becomes a cave in to those institutions that continue to wrong American Homeowners; however, if someone may lose there home then this measure becomes the only life raft available and that's sad all things considered.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
USNDC
Smartest President ever ? ... not even close.
08:07 PM on 06/14/2011
Worse than the great depression !

It's official: The housing crisis that began in 2006 and has recently entered a double dip is now worse than the Great Depression.

Prices have fallen some 33 percent since the market began its collapse, greater than the 31 percent fall that began in the late 1920s and culminated in the early 1930s, according to Case-Shiller data.

Candidate Obama campaigned on this issue.

President Obama abandoned this issue.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:40 AM on 06/15/2011
the Federal Government needs to guarantee the price of every home in the US for the purchase price paid by the current owner. that would stop home prices from falling and end foreclosures immediately. cn't make your payments? sell your home. If you sell it for less than you paid for it, the government sends you a check and you pay off your mortgage and keep the rest.
photo
intellectualTradition
corruptisima re publica plurimae leges
07:56 PM on 06/14/2011
that photo is r*cist. where are the anglo's ????
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sean Laney
03:11 AM on 06/15/2011
I don't agree. At least the folks in the picture had the guts to stand up for what is right instead of laying down and taking it.
Freedom Lives
Do you wonder, watch, or make it happen?
07:36 PM on 06/14/2011
Community Reinvestment Act-the source of billions in defaults today.

Even Attorney General Janet Reno threatened banks who's loans were not up to expected "participation rates"-with the Democrats expectations.

Yes-mortages underwritten to poor financial risks results in massive defaults.

Why are you surprised?

People who had NO business buying homes-acquired them anyway.

Poor social policy results in massive cost to taxpayers.

Again-

why are you surprised by this result?
10:02 PM on 06/14/2011
Why are you so anxious to blame the little guy ? What about the mortgage reps, the loan officers, and the banks who preyed on the little guy and walked away with big bucks ? What about the fact that the big banks BROKE THE LAW by not following documentation requirements but received stimulus money and are still rolling in dough ? As a former Mortgage Processor, I KNOW that it would have been impossible for non-qualifying folk to get loans without the approval and assistance of mortgage reps, loan officers, and bankers. But who do folk like YOU blame - the little guy because it's so easy. Geeez !
Freedom Lives
Do you wonder, watch, or make it happen?
10:15 PM on 06/14/2011
The "no money down" little guy?

That guy?

Or the "almost no money down" little guy?

That guy?

Or the "interest only" loan

little guy?

Banks didn't default on these mortgages.

PEOPLE did.

Nobody put a gun to their head to sign up for their mortgages-

did they?

No-

people defulated-

people who should have been renters instead.

And now?

Now we-the taxpayers (again)

are footing the bill.

That IS-

the ugly truth.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GetRealSoon
Finding Fraudster
10:33 PM on 06/14/2011
Thank you for telling the truth. We need the help.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GetRealSoon
Finding Fraudster
10:31 PM on 06/14/2011
People who had NO business misusing banking laws, altering loans, and placing people in loans designed to fail for personal gain.

Massive cost to taxpayers resulting from unscrupulous mortgage brokers and lenders
Freedom Lives
Do you wonder, watch, or make it happen?
11:26 PM on 06/14/2011
I agree there was fraud as well.

You also assume people were too stupid or ignorant to understand what is was that they were signing.

Stupid and ignorant people should also not be buying homes-or they should have their lawyer review their documents.
photo
Kyle Ransom
Former veteran mortgage broker and mortgage securi
07:21 PM on 06/14/2011
It is good that one city is trying to find a resolution to the foreclosure crisis. However, we must not forget that there are very serious issues with mortgage note transfers and what mortgage lender actually own the notes. Even if the homeowner and the current lender come to an agreement, the homeowner is still at risk as the true owner of the note can still collect on the debt.
07:20 PM on 06/14/2011
I had loss of income issues last year... tried to come to some agreement with BofA... no deal... they said my income was insufficient. New year... lot's of money. Now they denied me because I have too much money. EFF! THEM!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rda1911a1
God Bless John Browning
06:59 PM on 06/14/2011
Of the 85% who are still in their houses how many are making their payments or just squating like gophers untill the sheriff get's around to dragging them out.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
J T K
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
06:53 PM on 06/14/2011
Assuming these are all loans that the banks have a legal right to foreclose on and everything in order this strikes me as unfair duress by the government against the banks. If the banks have such a large inventory of unsold homes it's in their best interest to at least delay adding to it and make money in the meantime so that they don't end up paying more to deal with the properties than they would selling them or auctioning them off.

That being said the government shouldn't be involved in forcing one side in a private contract to take a disadvantageous position which is what it seems they're doing now. This doesn't apply of course to any banks that got government bailouts. Since I don't think it's realistic that they be forced to return every cent immediately, as I and most Americans would prefer, but they should be forced to use the money. Whether they should use the money on new loans or helping people with existing loans is debatable.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GetRealSoon
Finding Fraudster
07:10 PM on 06/14/2011
What your saying is the investor (the note holder)shouldn't be at a disadvantage. The problem with that is the lender took out a loan from a warehouse line of credit so they could make a loan to you. The lender was then to sell the loans to an investor. Lots of those loans never got sold to an investor and are still sitting. So who's at the disadvantage. The lender wrote the loan. Why didn't it sell?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
J T K
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
07:40 PM on 06/14/2011
As long as they hold a valid note then they are the holder of one end of a contract. As long as that end has been upheld by them or a previous owner what else matters? If the loan doesn't sell then the bank or whoever holds it is stuck with it and whatever losses they incur because of that. By that same logic I don't attach any moral weight to someone defaulting on their mortgage if it makes economic sense to do so.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
trespanieli
06:39 PM on 06/14/2011
Make lenders look in the faces of the people they are trying to defraud? I like it!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:58 PM on 06/14/2011
well if they send their high payed lawyers to the meeting it probably is very easy to continue the fraud?