More

Obama Libya Report Not Ending Anger From Lawmakers

DONNA CASSATA   06/16/11 10:26 PM ET   AP

Obama Libya Report

WASHINGTON — Republicans and Democrats on Thursday derided President Barack Obama's claim that U.S. air attacks against Libya do not constitute hostilities and demanded that the commander in chief seek congressional approval for the 3-month-old military operation.

In an escalating constitutional fight, House Speaker John Boehner threatened to withhold money for the mission, pitting a Congress eager to exercise its power of the purse against a dug-in White House. The Ohio Republican signaled that the House could take action as early as next week.

"The accumulated consequence of all this delay, confusion and obfuscation has been a wholesale revolt in Congress against the administration's policy," said Sen. John McCain, the top Republican on the Armed Services Committee who has backed Obama's actions against Libya.

The administration, in a report it reluctantly gave to Congress on Wednesday, said that because the United States is in a supporting role in the NATO-led mission, American forces are not facing the hostilities that would require the president to seek such congressional consent under the War Powers Resolution.

The 1973 law prohibits the military from being involved in actions for more than 60 days without congressional authorization, plus a 30-day extension. The 60-day deadline passed last month with the White House saying it is in compliance with the law. The 90-day mark is Sunday.

In the meantime, Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi has maintained his grip on power, and the White House says if the mission continues until September, it will cost $1.1 billion.

Instead of calming lawmakers, the White House report and its claims about no hostilities further inflamed the fierce balance-of-power fight.

"We have got drone attacks under way, we're spending $10 million a day," Boehner told reporters. "We're part of an effort to drop bombs on Gadhafi's compound. It doesn't pass the straight-face test, in my view, that we're not in the midst of hostilities."

Sen. Jim Webb, D-Va., a combat veteran and member of the Armed Services Committee, scoffed at the notion.

"Spending a billion dollars and dropping bombs on people sounds like hostilities to me," Webb said in an interview.

Sen. Bob Corker, R-Tenn., called the claims "really totally bizarre." Rep. Tom Rooney, R-Fla., said telling Congress and Americans "that this is not a war insults our intelligence. I won't stand for it and neither will my constituents."

The White House pushed back, singling out Boehner and saying he has not always demanded that presidents abide by the War Powers Resolution.

White House spokesman Jay Carney said Boehner's views "stand in contrast to the views he expressed in 1999 when he called the War Powers Act `constitutionally suspect' and warned Congress to `resist the temptation to take any action that would do further damage to the institution of the presidency."

Boehner's spokesman, Brendan Buck, dismissed Carney's reference to a "decade-old statement."

"As speaker, it is Boehner's responsibility to see that the law is followed, whether or not he agrees with it," Buck said.

The White House response has complicated efforts for several Democrats and Republicans urging their colleagues to hold off on any action that could encourage Gadhafi. In a Senate speech, McCain said it would be a mistake for the United States to cut and run from its allies and the mission.

Speaking directly to Republicans, McCain asked, "Is this the time to ride to the rescue of the man who President Reagan called the mad dog of the Middle East?"

McCain said later that he and Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman John Kerry, D-Mass., would push ahead with a resolution authorizing the U.S. mission in Libya with conditions. The committee twice postponed meetings to finalize the resolution. Sen. Dick Durbin of Illinois, the No. 2 Democrat in the Senate, said he is working on a joint resolution authorizing force, barring ground troops and setting an end date.

"The convoluted definition of hostilities backs us into a corner," said Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C.

Rep. Mike Rogers, R-Mich., chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, complained that the Obama policy has created confusion, with the military and intelligence at cross-purposes.

"I saw a very dangerous policy drift, a real lack of a unity of effort across the administration," Rogers said after a closed-door briefing with intelligence officials.

In a letter to Obama this week. Boehner said the commander in chief will clearly be in violation of the War Powers Resolution on Sunday, and he pressed the administration to state the legal grounds for Obama's actions. The House speaker said Thursday that the White House report failed to answer his questions and that he expects a response by his Friday deadline.

Previous presidents, Republicans and Democrats, have largely ignored the Vietnam-era law, which was created as a check on their power to authorize military force.

Countering the criticism, House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi of California said Obama did not need congressional authorization, but she acknowledged the congressional frustration.

"It's like a marriage," Pelosi said. "You may think you're communicating, but if the other party doesn't think you're communicating, you're not communicating enough."

The White House sent Congress the 32-page report in response to a nonbinding House resolution passed this month that chastised Obama for failing to provide a "compelling rationale" for U.S. involvement in Libya.

The administration report estimated the cost of U.S. military operations at about $715 million as of June 3, with the total increasing to $1.1 billion by early September.

While the U.S. led the initial airstrikes on Libya, NATO forces have since taken over the mission. The U.S still plays a significant support role that includes aerial refueling of warplanes and intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance work. Obama has ruled out sending U.S. ground forces to Libya.

___

Associated Press writers Julie Pace and Kimberly Dozier contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON — Republicans and Democrats on Thursday derided President Barack Obama's claim that U.S. air attacks against Libya do not constitute hostilities and demanded that the commander in chi...
WASHINGTON — Republicans and Democrats on Thursday derided President Barack Obama's claim that U.S. air attacks against Libya do not constitute hostilities and demanded that the commander in chi...
Filed by Elyse Siegel  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,502
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (22 total)
11:13 AM on 06/21/2011
Barack is playing war games with his new found power. He is out of control and by the way where is the money coming from??
photo
ZANDALEE
always remember where you came from
10:05 AM on 06/19/2011
If congress didn't approve the funding is the President dipping into his Black budjet?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lash LaRue
08:03 PM on 06/16/2011
GOP insiders are saying this is the weakest field they have seen since 1940.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:48 AM on 06/17/2011
Really, keep thinking that, you wont be dreaming when you wake up, someday..
07:16 PM on 06/16/2011
HST,

It's real sad that you have to report abuse when others have something constructive to say. I'm sure you practice the LBJ syndrome to a tee.

Here's a few good qoute's you had deleted. So WMD liar's.

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of
mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the
region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."

Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998.

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of
mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."
Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999.

"There is no doubt that . Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his
weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and
nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War
status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems
and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to
develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States
and our allies."
Letter to President Bush, Signed by Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL,) and
others, Dec, 5, 2001.

.

"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and
chemical weapons throughout his country."
Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:56 AM on 06/17/2011
Madeline Halfbright was the poorest in the grey matter, when it came to Sec of State...but fun to watch... Gore was a shining example of a poster boy mottled with the "Weiner Sydrome". but his was the biggest fraud perpetrated on the US and probably the world....you knew he was lying when his fragmented mouth was moving.. then he lost prominence to Obama, who could wound you with a lie at 70 feet and you wouldnt feel a thing.. The progressives will never admit to anything and always have a fall guy to take the complete blow of any of their wrongdoings. 2012
11:13 AM on 06/19/2011
The official name for what the Democrat's practine is called the "LBJ Syndrome". Better known from a question once asked of Nixon during an interview which was "When do you know that LBJ Lied?". The reply was "When he opens his mouth.' Obama has proven once againthe practice lives on.
06:28 PM on 06/16/2011
If Congress hasn't approved funding, where is all this money coming from? Can't we dip into this same fund to cover any shortfalls in Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security?
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Debbie McPherson
06:57 PM on 06/16/2011
Mike....they stole money out of SS to cover the interest on the last 8 years of wars...Obama has but one plan for America ---more war and more austerity....he is a nightmare...
11:10 AM on 06/21/2011
Glad you mentioned it. They have been stealing from the SS fund for many long years and have gotten away with it. Obama is the one who has cut off the col raises and caused hardship with his policies. It really is time to stop blaming Bush since this guy is quite a piece of work on his own
06:03 PM on 06/16/2011
Of course he refuses to obey the law. He beleaves he is above it and now he is again not doing his job as preident, but campaigning across the country which is all he is good at. And as for the resto of congress they need to look at promises they make to the people they were elected to serve. Take Allyson Schwartz of PA. She promised a disabled person she was going to write a bill to fix ERISA, a law that allows big insurance companies to legally deny coverage after a period of time as the law has no rules or guideling in regard to long term disability polices. Once reelected in 2008, she would even answer a phone call as to where she was in fixing it. But she was the first person to condem Weiner for photos, and when you look at it lying is worse that the photos.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:02 PM on 06/16/2011
One picture is worth a 1000 words
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
HST
Conservatism = selfishness
05:58 PM on 06/16/2011
"Sen. Bob Corker, R-Tenn., said he was amazed that the administration did not believe U.S. forces were facing "hostilities" in Libya, saying generals have told lawmakers otherwise in classified briefings."

Is Corker leaking classified information for political purposes?

Somebody needs to investigate.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Phil Waste
Angry Middle Class American Citizen
06:07 PM on 06/16/2011
Speaking as a Liberal Sen. Bob Corker has been a real surprise. I lived in Ten. when he got elected and thought he's just another southern Republican but if you check the time he has been in Washington you will find he is a lot more than just another southern Republican. He is a man to watch, I now expect him to do some real good things for Americans.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Phil Waste
Angry Middle Class American Citizen
06:08 PM on 06/16/2011
I might remind you that I was wrong about President Obama. :(
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kerry keane
Proud Libertarian - but here I'm a "Bagger"
06:12 PM on 06/16/2011
Well this really isn't a shocker, having spend years in the military I can say without doubt that we are, of course, facing hostilities and we have, of course, had casualties ...

Don't believe the Politicians, look in the Pentagon papers ...
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
behindEnemyLines
Put down the talking point pamphlet.
05:32 PM on 06/16/2011
"I'm sure Sen. Barack Obama would have disagreed if he were serving at this time," said Rep. Brad Sherman, D-Calif., a member of the House Foreign Affairs Committee.

President Obama has no idea who Senator Obama is. Senator who?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mamapower
OBAMA*BIDEN*2012
05:53 PM on 06/16/2011
You don't have any idea of what you speak.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Spank05
06:10 PM on 06/16/2011
Uhhh, he's factually quoting someone. I'm on your side, but if you want to disagree with him do so with facts or move on.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:07 AM on 06/17/2011
159 days of senator training, made this senator the most brilliant AH, ever elected to the highest office in the land. His brilliance, is outshined by Jimmy Carter, who was a one termer....and Obama is almost there....
Dealerdeb1
Conservative Libertarian truth
10:21 AM on 06/19/2011
I think you are being mean OBAMA IS there. he is the very finest example of the AH's the Liberalsvote for to get free stuff. He's the Best Worst Preident ever silly boy
05:26 PM on 06/16/2011
Funny how Dems understand the Constitution and Executive powers when Obama is in office...but had a hard time with it.....with Bush. Funny how Bush was a war monger...yet Obama has sent additional troops into the two wars started under Bush, started bombing Libya and started bombing Yemen. Yet...he's held to a totally different standard. My guess is...the civilians and troops dying under Obama....probably don't see it any different. Such hypocrisy...it's comical. Isn't it about time for him to win the Nobel Peace Prize again?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WowJones
Trolls are like mosquitoes on acid.
05:35 PM on 06/16/2011
If you ever read some real news, the Senate is drafting a Libya resolution as we speak.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Phil Waste
Angry Middle Class American Citizen
06:00 PM on 06/16/2011
Got a link?
06:03 PM on 06/16/2011
Your just now is old news, it was last March and it died on the vine. The reason, until the President addresses both Houses of Congress on the issue it isn't going anywhere.

He didn't want to justify it,so he invaded before the UN started their operation hoping for a quick win. Well it turned out just like Kenndey's Vietnam, darn it's hard to be a hero.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
HST
Conservatism = selfishness
06:04 PM on 06/16/2011
"Such hypocrisy.­..it's comical.'"

If you like comical hypocrisy, then must really enjoy the fact that republicans led this country into a war over imaginary WMDs that cost trillions of dollars and thousands of American lives, but are truly outraged about limited support for NATO with no ground troops, no casualities that has just reached a cost of a billion dollars.

Now that's what I call comical hypocrisy!
07:01 PM on 06/16/2011
The Intell came from the Democrats, Bush trusted them, what a big mistake:

"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity
to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver
them. That is our bottom line."
President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998.

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is
clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's
weapons of mass destruction program."
President Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998.

"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a
great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state
will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our
allies is the greatest security threat we face."
Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998.

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten
times since 1983."
Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998

"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with
the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions
(including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi
sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal
to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."
Letter to President Clinton, signed by Sens. Carl Levin, Tom
Daschle, John Kerry, and others Oct. 9, 1998.
07:04 PM on 06/16/2011
Here's a few more qoute's, by the way snopes verified them all as correct.

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of
mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the
region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."

Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998.

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of
mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."
Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999.

"There is no doubt that . Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his
weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and
nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War
status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems
and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to
develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States
and our allies."
Letter to President Bush, Signed by Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL,) and
others, Dec, 5, 2001.

"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and
a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored
the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass
destruction and the means of delivering them."
Sen. Carl Levin (d, MI), Sept. 19, 2002.

"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and
chemical weapons throughout his country."
Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JABBER2
05:22 PM on 06/16/2011
CHECK OUT THE PICTURE OF OBAMA ON THIS PAGE, LIKE I SAID, WHEN THINGS DON'T GO HIS WAY, HE MAKES HIS 'LIPS REAL TIGHT' ALMOST LIKE HE IS READY TO EXPLOAD!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WowJones
Trolls are like mosquitoes on acid.
05:24 PM on 06/16/2011
LOL. What a load of BULLSHEET. You guys project and make up all kinds a crap.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mamapower
OBAMA*BIDEN*2012
05:54 PM on 06/16/2011
Are you really that naive and ignorant?

Yes you are.
05:22 PM on 06/16/2011
“United States Contribution to Operation Unified Protector’’ published last week by the Financial Times.

Although it is working under NATO, the US is by far the largest contributor to operation Unified Protector. As of mid-May it was conducting 70 per cent of reconnaissance missions, over 75 per cent of refueling flights and 27 per cent of all air sorties.

The US has about 75 aircraft, including drones, involved in the operations and since the end of March has conducted about 2,600 aircraft sorties and about 600 combat sorties. In addition the US military can call on a number of naval assets in the Mediterranean.

As well as its contribution to the NATO operation, US spending on Libya includes its twelve day operation Odyssey Dawn that took place before Although it is working under NATO, the US is by far the largest contributor to operation Unified Protector. As of mid-May it was conducting 70 per cent of reconnaissance missions, over 75 per cent of refueling flights and 27 per cent of all air sorties.

The US has about 75 aircraft, including drones, involved in the operations and since the end of March has conducted about 2,600 aircraft sorties and about 600 combat sorties. In addition the US military can call on a number of naval assets in the Mediterranean.

As well as its contribution to the NATO operation, US spending on Libya includes its twelve day operation Odyssey Dawn that took place before NATO took over.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:04 PM on 06/16/2011
but, but it's not a war!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
HST
Conservatism = selfishness
06:27 PM on 06/16/2011
S-T-R-E-T-C-H & S-P-I-N

Rinse and repeat.

And a 1 and a 2...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
VoteLibertarian
Despite your politics, I like you anyway.
05:17 PM on 06/16/2011
it would be nice if we got to keep the land and natural resources of those we conquer...at least we'd get some benefit.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mjc
Avoid printing any..
11:20 AM on 06/18/2011
There is a reason why we build those huge air bases and, in Iraq, the largest embassy in the world. We may be "gone" in terms of troops, but there is always some of our 'DNA' left for future use.
05:17 PM on 06/16/2011
Ms Pace

"....White House spokesman Jay Carney said Wednesday that the president expects Congress to support the Libya campaign as it continues. With Gadhafi under pressure to leave power, he said now is not the time to send "mixed messages" about U.S. commitment to the campaign......"

My god, this administration has sent nothing but mixed messages on the war in Afghanistan, and they are criticizing Congress? Time for the Obama administration to quit playing games and consult Congress when they decide to go to war - whether in Libya or Yemen.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:15 AM on 06/17/2011
What is a Jay Carney...doesnt he sit on Bamas lap and mime, his very words....Obama missed the boat, he should have hired the Claire Shipman the man of the Carney house..
05:14 PM on 06/16/2011
Which Presidents ignored the War Powers Act is the question?

Not Bush 2, he went to Congress, presented the facts as they were known at the time and got approved both for Afghanistan and Iraqi. Yes, later it was learned that of the 5 points for going to Iraqi that one was incorrect data collected by the intelligence community during Clinton’s tenure.

Not Bush 1, Went to Congress, presented the facts as they were known at the time and got approval for both the Gulf War and Panama Conflict, he, also, acquired approval from Congress to support UN Resolution 794 (Operation Restore Hope) with both money and troops in 1992 - Somalia.

Not Reagan, Congress approved Grenada and the Bombing of Lybia

Not Nixon, he inherited the Vietnam War from Kennedy and Johnson, but then again that wasn’t called a war it was a Crisis.

So, what President besides Obama has ignored the War Powers Act? Being of age I remember well the going on at the time this was past and it included air operations and ground operations.

Is this how Obama resolves our budget problem by spending more money?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WowJones
Trolls are like mosquitoes on acid.
05:27 PM on 06/16/2011
Reagan did not get Congressional approval for Grenada

George H.W did not for Panama
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:16 AM on 06/17/2011
Rightttt...zzzzzzzzz
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
behindEnemyLines
Put down the talking point pamphlet.
05:33 PM on 06/16/2011
Reagan did not get approval for Grenada. Your other statements are true. Be consistent or your comments will be ridiculed.
06:39 PM on 06/16/2011
After the Oct 13th assassination Reagan became concerned for two reason’s the airstrip being constructed by Cuba and the American medical students enrolled at St. George's School of Medicine.

He addressed Congress on Oct 18th about the possibility of having to rescue the students. Although not a formal vote the Senate and House Arm Forces Committee’s gave their blessing with committee memorandums. All were convinced that the effort would last no more than a few days, it was actually a week later that the fighting stopped.

And yes some in the House tried to start Impeachment hearings, but, in committee hearings it was determined that he acted appropriately and Tip O’Neill ( a Democrat) put an end to the noise.

My point is this President seems to feel he is above the law and this is just the tip of the iceberg.