More

Netroots Panel Demands Action From Obama On Foreclosures

Obama

First Posted: 06/17/11 08:36 PM ET Updated: 08/17/11 06:12 AM ET

MINNEAPOLIS -- Neither Congress nor the Obama administration have shown much initiative to fix the nation's deepening foreclosure problem of late, but the issue remains a dominant subject of activist attention and a major source of middle class anxiety.

That's the takeaway from a packed Friday panel on bank regulation and foreclosures at the annual Netroots Nation conference, an annual meeting of internet-savvy progressives.

"It is a continuation of the insane Wall Street behavior of the 2000s," said financial blogger Mike Konczal, comparing the recent practice of pushing through foreclosures with shoddy documentation to the frenzy to push out subprime mortgages at the height of the housing bubble.

There were one million foreclosures in 2010. That pace has slowed somewhat in 2011, as banks are challenged in court, often on the validity of the paperwork deployed to evict borrowers.

When an audience member asked the panel whether greed or incompetence was behind the myriad ongoing abuses in the financial system, Rep. Brad Miller (D-N.C.) answered, "Yes."

Multiple panelists highlighted the disconnect between the political attention given to public worker pay and the budget deficit, and the fallout from the financial crisis, which blew a giant hole in federal finances.

"People seem to have forgotten, two and a half years ago, we had some unpleasantness," Miller told the audience, which responded with laughter.

"I don't know any teachers in Wisconsin who were taking out derivatives or gambling with credit default swaps," said Wisconsin-based activist Mary Bottari. "I don’t know any snow plow drivers who know what a CDO squared is."

The panel lambasted congressional Republicans for working to undo many of the reforms required by last year's Wall Street overhaul legislation, but also reserved pointed criticism for President Barack Obama for not stepping in to protect troubled homeowners from fraud.

"There is this schizophrenia on the right, where they’re complaining about community groups bullying Lehman Brothers," Konczal said, before adding: "A lot of people are talking about what President Obama can and cannot do right now. There are things we can do right now with the government that require no 60th senator. There are things that can be done that would radically increase the quality of life for people who are suffering."

Among those steps, Konczal said after the panel, include a serious investigation of the foreclosure fraud mess, which he said regulators have yet to undertake.

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac could aggressively lower the interest rates on underwater mortgages, Konczal said. But he said he would rather see the Obama administration use the authority it received under the Wall Street bailout legislation to adopt a widespread principal reduction program to keep people in their homes. Obama's current foreclosure relief effort, the Home Affordable Modification Program, is widely viewed as a failure. The plan is administered by the very banks currently embroiled in legal trouble for improperly processing foreclosures and loan modifications. Even for homeowners who receive help under HAMP, the vast majority only see their monthly payments lowered and not their overall debt burden, often leaving them owing much more on their mortgage than their home is worth.

"The biggest single policy failure of the Obama administration has been foreclosures," Miller said. "This is an area where the market simply is not working."

During a question and answer session, several members of the audience asked why there had been no criminal prosecutions of major financial miscreants involved in the Wall Street crash. Miller said that while he does not support "mob" justice where financiers are arbitrarily punished for the meltdown, he does believe there is a significant amount of potentially criminal conduct that is not being investigated by the executive branch. Where people broke the law, Miller said, they should be held accountable.

"There is specific conduct that appears to violate the criminal laws," Miller said.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
MINNEAPOLIS -- Neither Congress nor the Obama administration have shown much initiative to fix the nation's deepening foreclosure problem of late, but the issue remains a dominant subject of activist ...
MINNEAPOLIS -- Neither Congress nor the Obama administration have shown much initiative to fix the nation's deepening foreclosure problem of late, but the issue remains a dominant subject of activist ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,151
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (20 total)
  1 of 2  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
photo
Mafdet 09:04 AM on 06/19/2011
The fraud of the 2000s is continuing. Congress' attempt last year to speed through the Notaries Bill (the only piece of legislation to be fast-tracked last year) was an attempt to give blanket legitimacy to the paperwork on which millions of foreclosures have been based and millions more will be. Congress and the President wanted the foreclosure process to be expedited because once foreclosed upon, the  Read More...
12:06 PM on 08/12/2011
Two things; First, no bailouts. Too late on that one. No bailouts and no FEDERAL regulation of financial institutions. If people find value in the institutions they will succeed if they fail the are liquidated. Second, no mortgage adjustments. People signed contracts they either fulfill them as signed or default.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MrUniteUs
02:13 PM on 06/20/2011
Where you when ACORN started protested against subprime loans 10 years.
See
http://www.amazon.com/Seeds-Change-Controversial-Antipoverty-Organizing/dp/0826517064

Did you come to ACORN'S defense when the edited videos where shown?. .
Where you when Senator Obama proposed legislation against subprime loans.
Why are you letting Republicans get away with blocking Elizabeth Warren from heading
up the consumer protection agencies.
Where is the list the banks that are most egregious agregeous in denying loan modifications,.
Where is the list of banks that are more likely to give loan modifications.
Where is the call to ban negative amortizations?
Yet another lazy blame the President article, devoid of research or recommendations.
02:35 PM on 06/20/2011
Excellent New York Times piece on Fannie Mae head essentially influencing ACORN and many others to support the loose credit agenda that crashed us and made him money. Says the scandal is overlooked, business as usual in Washington.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/17/opinion/17brooks.html
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MrUniteUs
04:48 PM on 06/20/2011
Shadow,
I am so glad you shared that false and misleading article. .
Brooks is about 10 years out of sync.
#
ACORN Foresaw the Foreclosure Crisis in 2001 | Politics ...
Sep 29, 2009 ... In 2001, ACORN officials already recognized that the driving force behind the subprime lending was the ability of brokers to chop up risky ...
www.eastbayexpress.com › News › Full Disclosure - Cached
#
ACORN and the Community Reinvestment Act : The Questionable Authority
Nov 18, 2008 ... On August 4, 2000, American Banker reported on ACORN protests at nationwide offices ... ACORN argued that large numbers of subprime loans were ..... Mutual promised $375 billion for CRA when it bought Dime Bank in 2001. ...
scienceblogs.com/.../acorn_and_the_community_reinve.php - Cached - Similar
#
Acorn Led Financial Sector With Warnings on Lending (October 27 ...
Oct 27, 2008 ... On August 4, 2000, American Banker reported on ACORN protests at nationwide ... was due to subprime loans, which may be cause for alarm, said ACORN ... In 2001, Speliotis recalls, representatives from ACORN and the state ...
https://www.citylimits.org/news/article_print.cfm?article_id=3641

The article fails to mention the massive real estate crisis that occurred during the Reagan-Bush years due to deregulation. See Silverado Bank and Neil Bush.

I going to write the NY Times, and make the corrections.
11:19 AM on 06/20/2011
Remember when he broke his promise on publicly financing his election? Why, then, are we surprised by or disappointed in this dbag?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
AZreb
equal-opportunity Independent heathen
10:29 AM on 06/20/2011
You can "demand" all you want, but if the Department of Justice and the Secretary of the Treasury do not want to take action, you might as well save your breath. Let's not forget that this is campaign season and banks and other financial institutions are major donors. Can't bite the hand that feeds the money into the campaigns of BOTH parties.
iam99
To know what you prefer...
04:38 AM on 06/20/2011
If you believe the statement that we must look forward and never back, then you have met the mark. It is you!
iam99
To know what you prefer...
04:34 AM on 06/20/2011
Oh, you want some real action do you?
OK, OK! Well, here is a smoothly-spoken, savvy...
speech!
11:29 PM on 06/19/2011
I am intimately familiar with both the MHA legislation and the mortgage servicing industry and I have to disagree with many of the posts here. The MHA program was indeed intended to help the people. If the President is guilty of anything-it is of naivete. He actually believed that by making it law, lenders follow thorough, thereby helping the people. In the bid for re-election, no amount of money supporters would equal the power of being able to say that his legislation prevented millions of foreclosures.

Lenders/servicers (aka banks) hate this law and many have been dragging their feet. Servicers, in particular, make more money in fees by foreclosing than by modifying. Further, the banks that are legitimately trying face unprecedented volumes of requests, constantly changing guidelines, and managing operational logistics of huge complex organizations making the effort difficult and expensive. By no means is the President a favorite of any of the bank executives, to say that he is defies logic.

Logic also dictates that the lack action against financial execs can be traced directly to the budget deficit. Tough choices have to be made. On which do they focus resources first? Fixing the problem or investigating/punishing those who caused it?

The media has failed to acknowledge that the Obama Administration through the Treasury Dept. & OCC is no longer accepting excuses. The're now withholding incentive payments for completed HAMP mods and levying heavy fines for lack of performance to help more people now.
02:44 PM on 06/20/2011
So we elected a president who is "naive" to fix this mess!? He could compensate for what he doesn't know by consulting the right advisors, not the yes men, the lost, the manipulators for their own advantage. Tough choices, yes, but the spectrum of choices was truncated. Common folk who live inside the economic graph would be inspired and positive if the too-big-to-fail did go to jail so we stopped acting like a third world or post-Communist country. Behaviorist psych says reward what you want more of. What did we reward? We made those big banks bigger.
11:20 PM on 06/19/2011
I have one question, except for those that lost employment or had an ermergency, why should anyone want to take care of someone who signed a loan on a house that is now in foreclosure?

Those people signed up for a loan at a known payment schedule and now that their house may be upside down and they want someone else or the taxpayer to pick up the tab. They signed up for it, they lived with the payment and now they are hoping to get a 'freebie'.
12:26 AM on 06/20/2011
@ VoteThemAllOut
In many cases, you are right; there are those who can afford the payment but just want a handout. There are also many, possibly millions of cases where borrowers were lead by their Realtor and Mortgage professional into subprime mortgages when they qualified for a prime rate. Why? The agents make more money on those mortgage products than on prime mortgages.Realtors and Mortgage Brokers have a fiduciary responsibility to their clients, yet in many cases they were focused on their own bottom line. Its easy to say that borrowers should have known, but the truth is that buyers rely on the guidance of their Realtor and Mortgage Professional in the same way and for the same reasons that we all go to the doctor for medical guidance or a lawyer for legal guidance- these individuals are supposed to use their expertise to guide their clients..

Add to all of this all of the questionable practices of the lenders, originators, appraisers, inspectors, etc. and it only seems fair to make the lenders clean up the mess that they played a large role in creating. I've heard of originators who rejected appraisals as too low then proceeded to tell the appraiser what figures they needed to see to push the loan through- and they got what they asked for. Is that all the fault of the buyer? Responsible lending practices would have prevented much of what we see now.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GetRealSoon
Finding Fraudster
01:55 AM on 06/20/2011
Thank you for asking an honest question and not creating an assumption.
This has gone on since 1996 until 2006. Is this the governments fault or Obama's fault?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ivmL-lXNy64

The Community Redevelopment Act asked for an easement on lending and ask the banks not to discriminate against low income areas. If they didn't make an effort they were penalized $10,000. That's it. No one granted stated income no doc.loans. They were asked to lower credit, not fraud the income. Dateline did an excellent investigation.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sa28ktYQ9_Y Sorry, I can't link part one.

When the loan adjusted to a higher rate did the borrower know? Yes, but they were told they qualified for the loan. They thought they were getting a deal to settle in first with lower payments and then adjust. It was the POWER of the OPTION ARM.

Move to 2008, well in 2007 New York lenders already had their crisis. Stocks crashed. You just didn't know about it unless you were looking. And after filing bankruptcy they sold the servicing rights to another buyer to collect payment.

Now the new buyer says I don't know what your talking about. In court, foreclosure laws do not allow the mortgage origination, financing, or approval. Only the Note and the assignment (Deed of Trust) can be challenged in court. Your screwed.
I hope this next video clears the air and you enjoy it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ljHjZpC7bnc
01:38 PM on 06/19/2011
Sady, we thought we were voting for a President who would actually go back to representing the People instead of the big $ special interests that have taken over our government. This President immediately got in bed with Corporate America and the Wall Street Thieves and can't cave in enough to Republican demands. We the People were told we expect too much.

He has sat by and watched continued subsidies to Oil Companies making record profits and paying executives tens of millions of $ in compensation, bonus' and retirement packages. All while allowing cuts to the programs American citizens need.

He was given it all and absolutely refused to use the bully pulpit to stand up for the people. His weak performance lost the House and many state legislatures which in turn will be redistricting to make sure right wing conservatives are elected.

And of course NOW he wants our money and our votes again. I will probably vote Democratic, the lesser of two evils, but will definitely WRITE IN a true progressive for the Presidency.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Binks
12:43 AM on 06/29/2011
Brilliantly stated. I agree with everything you bring up, especially the point about "his weak performance losing the House and many state legislatures." I can't begin to describe the rage that rises up in me when I get money solicitations from Democrats right now who are belly aching about losing more seats. Where were they in 2009? Where was O'Bambi? He is SOLELY responsible for what occurred in the 2010 elections. Solely.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JoanMeijer
Author of Relentless: The Search For Typhoid Mary
01:24 PM on 06/19/2011
Do you think he'll care now that he's facing reelection? Probably not since the banks are his great hope for raising that Billion he needs to make the run. He hasn't cared about the people yet, why should he start now?... the only thing he has going for him is that the people running against him are so much worse.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GetRealSoon
Finding Fraudster
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
zmanusmc
Against all enemies, foreign and domestic
12:12 PM on 06/19/2011
The simple answer = get rid of the Federal Reserve banks which is bankrupting the country ... this whole foreclosure/banking crisis is simple to understand. Greed. The three culprits are greedy politicians (who took donations from bankng and financial institutions like Freddy and Fannie - Dodd, Frank, etc), greedy homeowners who bought houses that were beyond their means, and greedy bankers who fleeced the sheeple. Obama promised he would t
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GetRealSoon
Finding Fraudster
12:39 PM on 06/19/2011
Careful on the greedy homeowners comment. Yes there were some but there was a lot of bait and switch on the loan applications that never got investigated.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Great American
Seal The Borders ~ God Bless Sheriff Arpaio!
10:56 AM on 06/19/2011
Libs want Obama to implement a program for people that have not paid on their mortgages for six months, another six months not to pay their mortgage.

Until we foreclose and clear these bad mortgages from the books, we will never be able to get this country moving forward.
05:11 PM on 06/19/2011
It will be years or decades to clear up the "who owns the note and mortgage?" mess. In securitization frenzy, many (don't know how many) chains of title were broken, can't be fixed. State laws control this. Also don't know how many times notes and security (mortgages) were bifurcated/split contrary to Uniform Commercial Code rendering loans as unsecured debt. Don't know how many mortgages were not put into the mortgage back securities. Don't know how many times pooling and servicing agreements were violated. It may be so bad that nobody wants to know. But we have to acknowledge it to deal with it.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GetRealSoon
Finding Fraudster
11:00 PM on 06/19/2011
HA. HA. HA. That was so funny I forgot to laugh. Where did you get your degree. School for Profit? Try being the victim before you speak.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jabs Holt
10:21 AM on 06/19/2011
Its to late ........Something needed to be done 2 yrs ago as Obama promised !
12:31 AM on 06/20/2011
I'm sorry, did I miss something? Is President Obama the messiah? Or did I miss the magic wand in his back pocket? Get real! This mess was years in the making and will taken twice as long to get out of if the government does everything perfectly-which is impossible given that legislators are just like the rest of us- human and the only perfect person isn't currently walking the Earth.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Mafdet
09:04 AM on 06/19/2011
The fraud of the 2000s is continuing. Congress' attempt last year to speed through the Notaries Bill (the only piece of legislation to be fast-tracked last year) was an attempt to give blanket legitimacy to the paperwork on which millions of foreclosures have been based and millions more will be. Congress and the President wanted the foreclosure process to be expedited because once foreclosed upon, the houses could go back onto the market, the consumer banks could start ginning out loans again, and the investment banks could start using them to cook up more snake oil. And the fees that the banks collected from consumers in the 2000s would be nothing compared what they could collect this time around. Clearly, the reason why there have been no prosecutions is because Congress, the last president and the current one were and continue to be complicit in the fraud that devastated this country. But I state the obvious.