'The Big Lie': 9/11 Truther Comic Book To Be Released (VIDEO)

Image Comics, one of the largest comic book publishers in the United States, is known for series like Spawn, The Walking Dead, and Savage Dragon. Now they are adding a controversial new title to their pantheon: a 9/11 Truther comic called The Big Lie.

Written by Rick Veitch and Gary Erskine, The Big Lie revolves around a particle physicist who travels back in time to warn her husband, who died on September 11.

USA Today describes the plot:

She rushes to his office at a risk-management consulting agency, but since she has aged 10 years, Carl can't quite accept that it's her. And even though she brings evidence on her iPad, neither her spouse nor his co-workers believe her warnings.

"The meat of the story is her trying to convince these 'experts' that the terrorist attack is about to happen," Veitch says. "So it's essentially a taut emotional drama with the facts and questions surrounding 9/11 sewed into it."

Veitch tells USA Today that he didn't consider himself a Truther, but says that he's skeptical of any “official” version of events provided by the government.

"Reading the 9/11 Commission Report, it's pretty clear that a lot of important evidence about the lead-up to the attacks and the collapse of the towers was ignored or glossed over," Veitch says. "And I'm pretty angry about the aftermath: how Iraq was invaded based on false intelligence and the occupation mismanaged resulting in over 100,000 civilian deaths."

"If one scratches the surface of the commission report, one finds huge holes in the official story. There's also a lot of disinformation out there and oddball conspiracy theories that need to be debunked. People who are paying attention are asking for a real in-depth investigation into all these nagging questions. That's what our book is all about."

The series was originally conceived of by Brian Romanoff, who set up Truth Be Told Comics in order to help raise funds to pay for the comic. He also runs the 9/11 Truther site NorCalTruth.org.

“It is in the name of truth and justice for the victims of 9/11 and their family members, that we are committed to sharing the truth about what occurred on September 11th. Truth Be Told Comics (TBT) was formed to facilitate the project of getting critical 9/11 information before the huge number of comic readers across America and the world,” Romanoff writes on the Truth Be Told site.

“Our goal is to present the most obvious elements of the 9/11 crimes and cover-up: the multiple advanced warnings, the multiple war-games on the day of, our missing air defense system, the demolitions of the WTC towers, 9/11 Commission Report and more.”

Visit USA Today to see some of the first pages of the comic, which will be released September 7.

Comments

[Joseph Vala]

11:30 AM on 08/08/2011

I love conspiracy theorists. I think everyone should have one. They are great fun at parties!!!

Don't tell a CT that there was an exhaustive examination of all the data run by the field leading educators and engineering department at Purdue. Don't tell them that every possible theory that was introduced by CTs, such as explosives or imaginary new types of thermite, were categorically disproven. Don't tell them that the crush damage that was introduced by the millions of tons of falling debris created the collateral damage that destroyed several building next to the Towers. Don't tell them that the strength of the steel within the Towers had been compromised up to 90% of it's original strength because of the fires inside the building. Science is a lie to them.

Lastly, don't tell them that if there was credible evidence connecting the Bush administration to 9/11, liberals in the media would've jumped on it like rabbits during mating season. Don't tell them that Mike Wallace actually lost his job because of his blood lust to discredit Bush and even ran a fabricated story about his military record that ended his journalistic career. That's too easy.

Let them dream their dreamy little dreams. They need attention, this is how they try to it.

So Keep On Keepin' On, Freaky Folks! We need a good belly laugh every now and then, and you all provide it for those of us who choose not to live in WhackyLand on a daily basis.

[Camron Wiltshire]

01:08 AM on 08/15/2011

Ae911Truth.org Don't let sophists like "Joseph" lull you back to sleep. Do your own research and trust your own eyes and the laws of physics. Also keep in mind that over 1,500 Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth find the government's version of events to be frankly impossible and have gone above and beyond to present the evidence which demands an immediate and independent investigation of 9/11. It's been 10 years and no one can stop the Truth from coming out now. Ae911truth.org Watch Blueprint for Truth and decide for yourself if you have been given the full story. Ae911Truth.org

[Joseph Vala]

10:23 AM on 08/15/2011

Like i said, in the face of overwhelming evidence, people will still believe what they want. I don't engage in debate with CTs. Why talk to a wall?

But I do have it on good evidence from over 600 credible scientists that the brains of CTs are controlled by aliens! I have proof! It's irrefutable!! In fact, many of the highly accredited scientists I have info from they are the same aliens that are hiding the Yeti!!! This is absolutely the truth, we say so!!!!

[tominnyc]

02:11 PM on 07/03/2011

How is questioning 9/11 government investigations for ALL that went down that day =
"theory"
when patriots are questioning and not even "hypothesizing" -- without a new investigation?
It is dismissive to stomp and say conspiracy theorists oh my because people are afraid of what the stand down meant in terms of the depth of our evil regime was capable of. It clearly was allowed to happen and the bin Laden allowed to fly out while all citizens were grounded. Let's start from there and work our way out to inconsistencies, lies, and using this event to invade Iraq.Then a little Pat Tillman and more delightful history of the draftdodgin' psycho who saw the 1st plane hit WTC b4 he entered the classroom hmmm

[David F Kyte]

02:27 PM on 07/06/2011

Well the first lie is that there was a stand down order, Norm Mineta said himself, the order was to "shoot down". You really need to get YOUR facts straight before asking to waste tax money to engage in a witch hunt. Remember questions mean absolutely nothing, let see some hard facts, if you have them?

[BlaneReigns]

09:43 AM on 07/08/2011

The 2.25 seconds of simultaneous free-fall acceleration of ALL FOUR of building 7's upper corners, as outlined in NIST's NCSTAR 1A report, is a HARD FACT that mathematically proves the structural supports must have been removed in a very precise sequence across the entire cross sectional area of the building. The unfortunate reality that your simple mind cannot or will not comprehend this does not render this very peculiar fact a mere "question."

[tominnyc]

11:59 AM on 07/09/2011

"Now thanks to recent research by "jimd3100" we know that a one Douglas F. Cochrane was the naval aide Mineta was referring to. When 9/11 activist Jeff Hill followed up and phoned Cochrane, asking him what the orders were, Cohrane replied that he was "really not prepared to talk about this subject at all." Jeff then pleaded with Cohrane to ease his mind about whether the orders were stand-down orders, to which Cohrane replied that he had "nothing further to add" to the information already publicly available. Hill then asked Cohrane if he thought answering his questions would get Cheney in trouble, Cohrane paused, and then stated that "The 9/11 Commission Report is the authoritative narrative on the events surrounding 9/11."
As it turns out, it is against the law for Cohrane to say anything else because his interview with the 9/11 Commission has been classified.
We need to be allowed to view Cohrane's testimony, but even if he says the orders were shoot-down orders, the fact remains that after seeing the second tower struck at 9:03 AM the National Military Command Center realized there was "a coordinated terrorist attack on the United States," but yet shoot-down orders were not relayed to the military until 10:31.
As 911myths.com says regarding the Norman Mineta issue, "Get out there, read the contrary views, see if they can deal with the points we raise, or have compelling new arguments of their own."

[Valerie Finnigan]

05:10 PM on 07/09/2011

Because there comes a point at which you're not questioning anything, but simply rejecting legitimate answers in favor of ones that fit your agenda.

[Bill le chard]

03:24 PM on 06/27/2011

Vino wrote:
"19 Hijackers trained in caves carried this out and put the laws of physics on hold for a day...soun­ds like a conspiracy theory to me"

Fairly simple Vino, show us 1 source that any of these hijackers were "trained in caves" or even in caves leading up to 9/11, then we can move on to your dismal understanding of physics.

[David F Kyte]

01:55 PM on 06/27/2011

Niels H. Harrit's paper is just a rehash of Jones' thermite theory that has been completely debunked already. And there are NO papers supporting a controlled demolition published in a legitimate science journal. "Peer Review" for truthers means they write a paper, other truthers (peers) read it and they call it Peer Reviewed. OR they pay Bentham. No real structural engineers, chemist or scientist see it because it is only published online in conspiracy theorist sites. Creationist do the same thing.

But if you have any REAL peer reviewed papers, let see them.

You do know not all Arabs live in caves, some even have pilot licenses, Hanjour had a federal pilot's license and a log book cataloging 600 hours flight time.

[PetrBuben]

05:23 AM on 06/29/2011

false. all false. good propaganda. .. have you seen the footage of 9// ? do you know what you saw? a cd.

[David F Kyte]

12:11 PM on 06/30/2011

Have you actually seen a REAL controlled demolition? I have and it is nothing like what happened on 9/11. Do you also think the Sun revolves around the Earth? It LOOKS that way to the uneducated too.

[EcnelisDoogod]

10:36 AM on 06/26/2011

I wonder if crital comments of HPs past are now allowed...

http://watchingthewatchers.org/news/2247/jesse-venturas-censored-911-commentary

[PerotVentuSheehCarte]

09:31 AM on 06/25/2011

Anthrax
Pentagon
Shanksville
Twin Towers
Building Seven

note how the criminal trolls fear the search for truth
they know exactly who and what they are protecting

[David F Kyte]

09:21 PM on 06/25/2011

The REAL Truth.

[Trojan505]

02:06 PM on 06/24/2011

I have a choice. I can either believe the scientists, chemists, architects and engineers who believe it is scientifically impossible for the official version of 9/11 as told by our beloved, honest members of government and media to be true.

Or I can believe those very honest members of government and media, who would never tell a lie, along with a bunch of group-thinkers who post to "conservative" and "progressive" blogs.

Um, yeah, I think I'll stick with the nerds on this one. It doesn't make one a "conspiracy theorist" to ask questions or demand accountablility regarding an event which took over 3,000 American lives and which was used to justify the War on Terror, perhaps the biggest mistake in American military history.

[Bill le chard]

03:20 PM on 06/27/2011

False dichotomy. The fact is that the following have established, supported, or confirmed the "official story":
NIST
FBI
National Science Foundation
Structural Engineers Association of New York
American Institute of Architects
Royal Institute of British Architects
National Transportation Safety Board
Purdue University
American Society of Civil Engineers
National Fire Protection Agency
Journal of Engineering Mechanics
International Symposium on Technology and Society
Welding Journal
Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention
Indian Concrete Journal
International Journal of Fracture

To name a few. The fact is 9/11 Truth is a cult whose "experts" represent a minuscule minority, and parade around that pathetic appeal to authority & popularity to distract from the fact that they fake peer review to appeal to an ignorant mass.

[tominnyc]

02:03 PM on 07/03/2011

to question the official Bush Crime Family report of 9/11 is a CULT? That is so childish.

Bush and Cheney refusing to testify except together as lover-draftdodgers behind closed doors with no transcript or media present.

Or is that OK for you too?

[Ekant Dilwalla]

03:35 PM on 08/11/2011

I give little credence to these govenment pawns, instead, I used my brains and my understanding of science (only high school science is required here, though I do have a masters of science degree), that I understand that thousands of tons of steel connected together acts as a massive heatsink... which means that before it can be raised up to a high temperature, all the heat is being conducted away... (try soldering long pipes and you will find out).... The heatsink effect is massive since the amount of steel is massive ... therefore I cannot believe the lies I am told that the steel got to temperature that would weaken it.

Not only this... if the steel weakened, the fall of the building would have taken many hours... not ten or so seconds... That is another smoking gun.

How can you completely eliminate the support of thousands of tons of steel, which has been supporting the weight for several decades,such that it acts as if the support was never there (The building fell with freefall ACCELERATION). It went against the laws that were set by Newton. The mass ACCELERATED through thousands of tons of steel. The only way it could have happened is if the steel that was below was blown out of the way AHEAD of when the debri fell on it and this is only possible as result of carefully planned and placed explosives which are controlled by a computer.

[Athelstane]

03:38 PM on 06/27/2011

You could believe the scientists, chemists, architechts and engineers in peer reviewed articles who debunk all the truther myths and demonstrate that the buildings came down as set out in the official report. Or you could believe and of the outlandish theories that require thousands of co-conspirators doing noncredible things. And wear your tin foil hat while to do it.

[PetrBuben]

05:25 AM on 06/29/2011

false. you should trust the facts. even your own eyes.

[Valerie Finnigan]

04:50 PM on 06/23/2011

Here are a few things that are being ignored. The planes didn't just strike the towers and knock them off center. They actually went into the towers. Secondly, the collapses weren't symmetrical, as proven by the survival of those who were stuck in- I think it was- the B stairwell of the north tower. Why didn't the other stairwells fare as well if the collapse was, as you put it, "so symmetrical"?

[KayDGee]

07:40 PM on 06/23/2011

The fireball went out the other side of the tower on the second strike. More than likely, the stairwell on the exit side was impacted. What is interesting is that from the original bombing, the absence of ceiling sprinklers was identified... and never fixed. They started but never made it past the 10th floor, ostensibly due to fighting over the contract.

[vino22]

09:55 PM on 06/23/2011

Many peer reviewed article on nano thermite also...you wil have to change your story soon enough

[David F Kyte]

01:22 AM on 06/24/2011

You mean the paper Steven Jones PAID a vanity publishing journal called Bentham to publish? Yep, got $800 and you too can say your were "Peer Reviewed" Even though NO respectable scientist considers Bentham a real science journal. You are being played by the conspiracy theorist.

[David F Kyte]

12:03 PM on 06/23/2011

What caused the WTC to fail was heat caused the floors to sag, this pulled the outer structural wall inward, at that point you had the normal compressive loads on the outer wall being turned into more of a bending force. At that point one to two floors failed causing the upper floors to crash down on the floors below. So now you had the static loads being turned into dynamic loads that the lower floors could not handle.

[FirstGame72]

12:41 PM on 06/23/2011

It's pretty clear that both planes hit the towers well off center. It seems logical that impact damage to one side of the building(s) would cause it/them to stress and collapse in an uneven way towards the more damaged side first (which would cause tumbling).
The problem is not completely that there was a collapse at all but that two buildings that were impacted off center came down so symmetrically.

[David F Kyte]

04:37 PM on 06/23/2011

These building clearly did not fall symmetrically. WTC2 learned over several degrees failing exactly on the side the aircraft did the most damage and the fires were biggest. WTC1 did too, but not to the same extent, BOTH failed at the points the fires were hottest, Very un-controlled demolition like. This is something you can clearly see if you bother to look.

[Bill le chard]

07:13 PM on 06/23/2011

Please. Its been almost 10 years. Its just sad at this point that people still harbor these beliefs.

http://algoxy.com/psych/images/superimp.spire.wtc1.jpg

[vino22]

12:58 PM on 06/25/2011

What you are saying is impossible....it was turned to dust...and burned for four months after

[John Denton]

10:40 AM on 06/23/2011

Looks like the pro-conspiracy (government) shills have appeared to lecture us on how kerosene can melt steel, and how the first three steel skyscrapers in history fell down without any physical help. Nice try, folks, if late, now back to your dreary cubicles.

[David F Kyte]

11:54 AM on 06/23/2011

Fact is structural steel requires external insulation (fireproofing) in order to prevent the steel from weakening in the event of a fire. When heated, steel expands and softens, eventually losing its structural integrity. At 800 degrees steel has only about 30% of its original strength so it bend and sags as in WTC. You don’t need to melt to have a failure.

[John Denton]

05:07 PM on 06/23/2011

Hmm, maybe the dozens of other skyscrapers that caught fire didn't get the memo.

[mowgo]

08:46 PM on 06/23/2011

The truthers keep saying that a fire can't "melt" steel, even though they know that the steel didn't need to melt, only get hot enough to weaken the strength. Yet they still keep using that straw man argurment that steel can't "melt" in a fire.

[Bill le chard]

07:16 PM on 06/23/2011

Looks like another drone for 9/11 truth is parading around his ignorance since no govt report any time anywhere ever say kerosene melted steel. But yeah, no physical help. Gravity doesn't exist int he land of truth I guess.

[BlaneReigns]

09:52 AM on 06/23/2011

To all those advocating the pancake theory: Please understand that this theory is in direct violation of Newton's third law of motion and the Law of Conservation of Momentum. You may remember from high school physics the saying "For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction." Let me explain this in terms of the Twin towers...If the plane hit exactly 2/3 of the way up the building, removing every single beam and instantaneously sending the entire upper 1/3 crashing down on the lower 2/3's, the lower 2/3's pushes back UP on the top 1/3 with an equal and opposite force as that of the upper third pushing Down on the lower 2/3. This means all of the energy in the system should have been expended once the upper third crashed down through the third below it, leaving the bottom third still standing. Similarly, if the plane hit 75% of the way up leaving only a 25% top section, this top section would only have enough momentum to pancake through the 25% below it, leaving the bottom 50% of the building still standing. The simple fact that the upper parts of the towers were able to pancake all the way to the ground level is proof positive that energy must have been added to the system to remove the lower floors. The official pancake theory of collapse and Newtonian physics are mutually exclusive.

[David F Kyte]

12:13 PM on 06/23/2011

You do understand the difference between static load and dynamic loads, right? And the uppers floor didn't pancake to ground level, a good 5 stories stood, and you had 6 more stories below ground level intact. In WTC1 12 people survived inside the intact core

You do understand in real controlled demolitions explosives are NOT used to force the building to fall, Gravity does ALL the work, Any structure contains enough potential gravitational energy to destroy itself.

[BlaneReigns]

01:54 PM on 06/23/2011

I understand all of that very well. You however, clearly do not understand Newtons Third Law. The buildings were 110 stories. If the top 10 stories were somehow severed and dropped onto the lower 100 stories, Newtons third law says that there is only enough energy in the system to crush the 10 floors immediately below the severed section, leaving a full 90 floors standing and structurally sound. The only way those 10 stories could crush more than the 10 stories below is if they were dropped from a significant height, which they obviously weren't. The fact remains that small portions of the tops of both towers were able to crush straight through way more material than newtons third law says they could have. If you are like me and believe that lower Manhattan obeys the same physical principles as the rest of the known universe, then the only conclusion you are left with is controlled demolition.

[Bill le chard]

07:20 PM on 06/23/2011

"To all those advocating the pancake theory"
No one has advocated that since around 2005. Way to keep up.

"Please understand that this theory is in direct violation of Newton's third law of motion and the Law of Conservati­on of Momentum."
Which only applies int he terms you describe in a closed system. The fact is that if you jump on your scale at home you don't bounce back up equally to the force you exerted down. Since gravity is involved the system is open and will not have equal effects. However, you may want ot argue with the french since they use this method of demolition regularly with 0 explosives or preweakening. See verinage.

[BlaneReigns]

08:51 AM on 06/24/2011

There were several people on this forum advocating the pancake theory which is why I addressed it. The official theory of collapse relies on floors pancaking all the way down to the ground level as well. And the scale absolutely does push back up on you with an equal and opposite force as you pushing down. That's among the most fundamental laws of physics. You have a lot to learn.

[Luis Soto]

01:02 AM on 06/23/2011

'i think therefore i don't exist' (: for the censors, nothing like guiding the herd with 'moderation'
www.economicstruth.com

[Valerie Finnigan]

05:49 PM on 06/22/2011

Okay, so I am capable of admitting I am wrong about something. I did indeed do a small web search, which showed that the melting point of steel is actually much lower than the four thousand degrees to which I alluded. 1370 is more in the ballpark, depending on the type of steel in question. But that actually is another blow against the conspiracy theorists. It just proves that it takes much less than even I had originally imagined to damage steel, and given that there were more fuels than just exploding jet fuel in a building that ended up functioning as an oven, well, let's just say I wasn't surprised when the buildings first came down, and I'm less surprised now.

[BreezyinVA]

06:24 PM on 06/22/2011

The first casualty after the fact was Kevin Ryan who worked for Underwriters Laboratory.

http://911review.com/articles/ryan/letter.html He was fired for sending this email to NIST. Burned up fireballs of kerosene did not cause the buildings to blow up and then fall at almost freefall.

[Bill le chard]

09:09 AM on 06/23/2011

Kevin Ryan worked for a UL subsidiary doing water testing. No one at NIST or FEMA said the fireballs collapsed the buildings and they didn't fall at near FFA; whatever thats supposed to mean. 66% is not "near". Fact is that Kevin Ryan presents his beliefs as an official of UL and falsely stated that they certified the steel. They didn't. He simply made a lot of claims based on 0 evidence. Not to mention that he cites Gayle's report indicating a max temp of 250C. Yet steel softens around 230C. So the steel had at least met its weakening point plus had the stress of the weakening columns plus the pull in from the floor trusses. That fact plus interweaving the weakening of steel and melting demonstrates he is either incompetent, a liar, or both.

[BreezyinVA]

09:21 PM on 06/22/2011

Further down the thread you insisted there was no one standing in the hole made by the plane. There were two women. May they rest in peace.

Here is one:
http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/wtc1_woman.html

I keep hoping you get curious about what really happened that day. Instead you post about steel that was NOT used in WTC. These were class A Steel buildings. Rules about flammables. The steel was intermeshed like a screen. A pencil going into a screen does not take the screen down.

[KayDGee]

07:04 PM on 06/23/2011

VERY interesting link - Thank you.

[Bill le chard]

07:28 PM on 06/23/2011

You do know heat rises right?

[pita143]

02:30 PM on 06/22/2011

I have had a number of comments from people who totally ignore the idea that implosion of a building takes a very long time and extensive set ups. The preparation for an implosion is not something that can be hidden, it can be seen easily by anyone using the building. The Preparation can not be done and finished on a weekend.

http://www.phillyblast.com/HollanderRidge/hrt-prep.htm

Scroll down and look at the drilling that takes place to seat the explosives in. NOW, these are rebar columns, and the WTC had a steel framework which means you would have to strip off the sheet rock, weaken the steel structure by burning holes in them, run your explosive bundles and wire them with primer cord......this could NEVER be done in a weekend, and you could never do it so no one would see it.

I am sorry, unless you people can PROVE what you are saying, you belong in a rubber room right next to the Area 51 group.

[BreezyinVA]

03:52 PM on 06/22/2011

Our messages are being scrubbed. So answers aren't forthcoming.

[pita143]

06:09 PM on 06/22/2011

I bet they are printing them out and making paper airplanes....they sail the planes and if they do not fall into the trash basket they post them....other wise...bye bye.

[mowgo]

06:23 PM on 06/23/2011

"Because the towers were in VIOLATION of asbestos and where going to cost millions to correct."

They stopped using asbestos in the WTC in April 1970, during the construction of the towers. Some had been used, but the primary fire retardants used before and after April 1970 were Gypsum and Vermiculite. No asbestos was used at all in the other WTC buildings.

"Yet Silverstei­n took them over."

The WTC was actually a desirable property that had number of companies bid on the 99 year lease for the WTC. It was actually won by Vornado Realty. Vornado wanted to change the terms to a 39 year lease, so the Port Authority then rejected their bid and went to the 2nd place bidder Silverstein Properties.

[Simon J Copping Patton]

06:05 PM on 06/22/2011

There was a large amount of vacant space in the buildings, Pita. In addition to this, the security companies that ran the buildings (Securacom, Kroll) were both shady outfits that had close ties to the US Military/Intelligence community.

What's more, there were reports of unusual evacuations and large power-downs in which people with wires would enter the building to do hours of unsupervised work. There were also large amounts of unsupervised "renovations" and "elevator repairs" in the months leading up to 9/11 that could have easily served as a cover for the transport/placement of explosives.

And no, speculation doesn't put you "in a rubber room". If you can undermine the official version of the collapses or crashes with valid evidence, then only

Also, I am a bit offended that you make derogatory remarks about "the Area 51 group". The only reason why you would immediately discredit everyone who expresses interest in covert military bases or UFOlogy is a sign that you've really been programmed by society/culture. Why are these people crazy? Is there any objective reason why they are? Or is your basis for that opinion the fact that they're always wearing tinfoil hats in the cartoons?

I apologize for the hostility in my tone, but conspiracy theories should never be discredited simply for being "conspiracy theories". The main reason why they are is because of societal/cultural generalizations.

[pita143]

06:48 PM on 06/22/2011

There is NO WAY you can hide the prep work that it takes to implode a building. You want something to compare it to? Think about landing a Jumbo Jet in the middle of a town. You have to grade the land, you have to pave the land you have to clear the way to insure you have enough length for it to land......you can not hid the preparation for that.

Please take time and research what it takes to do the prep work for an implosion. You can not do it in a weekend or two or three without someone seeing what you are doing. You can not do it in a vacant office here, or there, those offices have to be very specifically placed. Then you will have the construction trash that comes with that type of work. You have to take down the sheet rock, and start burning holes into the steel structure. You can not do that without someone knowing what you are doing.

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080710140129AA01RQy

[David F Kyte]

12:28 PM on 06/23/2011

FACT: Securacom was NOT in charge of security at the WTC. They only did some work after the 1993 attack and that ended in 1998. They were just a contractor. The New Your Port Authority did the securing on the building. Conspiracy theorist are discredited when they get the facts wrong.

[Luis Soto]

01:16 PM on 06/22/2011

The maine was also imploding from inside, the Reichtag burned by Goring, but if they did it then there is no hope for america not limit to evil. That they know seems to be fairly established as FBI and german agents repeatedly explained it and those people were very primitive, 'lucky' guys. In any case they won history. Now we live in an age of perpetual war, the fastest growing industry is that of terminators and robots that kick us out of work, the open, optimist, giving american way of life has changed in to its reversed side, as Live is the inverse word of eviL and the profits of war, called 'keynesian militarism' ensures the orwellian nightmare will take us till the end of history. Moreover as someone explained here, whatever was left of the 'humanist party' is even more corrupted. The policies of Obama, once you take out his smiles are to the right of those of Bush. He has more wars, he gave more money to the bankers... The path of history is written, the blind will follow it, lined up.
www.economicstruth.com