iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Democrats Reintroduce Equal Rights Amendment Following Walmart Ruling

Democrats Reintroduce Era

First Posted: 06/22/11 06:40 PM ET Updated: 08/22/11 06:12 AM ET

On the heels of the Supreme Court's controversial ruling that female employees could not bring a class-action sex discrimination suit against Wal-mart, lawmakers are reintroducing the Equal Rights Amendment. If the Amendment passes, the U.S. Constitution will explicitly ban gender discrimination.

Democrats Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-N.Y.) and Sen. Robert Menendez (D-N.J.) reintroduced the 88-year-old amendment at an event just outside the Capitol today.

In a press release, Maloney explained:

The Equal Rights Amendment is still needed because the only way for women to achieve permanent equality in the U.S. is to write it into the constitution ... Making women’s equality a constitutional right—after Congress passes and 38 states ratify the ERA—would place the United States on record, albeit more than 200 years late, that women are fully equal in the eyes of the law.

Her words were echoed by Menendez who called it a "disgrace that American women are still not constitutionally guaranteed equal rights under the law."

First introduced in 1923, the ERA is considered one of the pioneer acts of the women's rights movement in the United States, even though it was never ratified. Today, the ERA currently has 160 co-sponsors including Congresswoman Gwen Moore (D-WI), Chair of the Congressional Women's Caucus, reports Ms. magazine. According to The Hill, it has been reintroduced every year since it fell three votes short of ratification in 1982.

“The Wal-Mart case decided by the Supreme Court this week is a classic example of how far attitudes must still come. The facts of the case support the view that over a million women were systematically denied equal pay by the world’s largest employer," Maloney said in the release.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WOMEN

On the heels of the Supreme Court's controversial ruling that female employees could not bring a class-action sex discrimination suit against Wal-mart, lawmakers are reintroducing the Equal Rights Ame...
On the heels of the Supreme Court's controversial ruling that female employees could not bring a class-action sex discrimination suit against Wal-mart, lawmakers are reintroducing the Equal Rights Ame...
Filed by Stephanie Marcus  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 61
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
03:12 PM on 07/02/2011
Unfortunately, Wal Mart is a bigger person than those 1.5 Million women. You believe that the GOP would act more adversely than the Dems in this case. However, companies like this, and Monsanto, and Bit Pharma, have BOTH parties in their pockets. There isn't a dramatic difference between the two any more.
hgus
It's not about the economy, stupid
10:55 PM on 06/28/2011
I am so embarrassed that i missed this story. But so completely thrilled to have found it.

This is the most basic issue that we could address and surprisingly this is going to split the country along party lines.

Republicans will be opposed to this and their logic and arguments are going to show to the world how extreme the GOP has become over the past few years. No woman, and all reasonable men will be able to sleep at night after voting the GOP.

Take a look at this Anti-ERA hit piece from Arkansas Republicans to see how crazy these guys really are.

http://www.arragopwing.com/eraposition.html
hgus
It's not about the economy, stupid
10:07 PM on 06/28/2011
This could be the issue that turns this country around.
How did i miss this story!!!!!
09:16 PM on 06/27/2011
Read it again: "If the Amendment passes, the U.S. Constitution will explicitly ban gender discrimination."

That's why we need it. But really, the discrimination-based-on-SEX part needs to be much more clear. "Gender" is anything people want it to be, it's too vague.
03:09 PM on 06/27/2011
There is no such thing as Equal Right to a job. Jobs are not a right, they are an opportunity. Everyone should have equal opportunity.
hgus
It's not about the economy, stupid
10:07 PM on 06/28/2011
LOL. You guys... Crack me up.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:46 PM on 06/26/2011
And this is not front page news why?
hgus
It's not about the economy, stupid
10:08 PM on 06/28/2011
Fanned for getting how important this is, unfortunately few know about it- Including me who just heard on Rachel Maddow
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:39 PM on 06/26/2011
AMEN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:05 PM on 06/23/2011
We have the worst courts money can buy!
'justice Thomas' now this is an oxymoron if there ever was one.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
madisonhack
I prefer not to......
09:13 PM on 06/23/2011
Perhaps we could start with a Constitutional Amendment that explicitly defined who was human and who was not. Corporations are not people, and they are not - should not - be accorded rights of free speech or assembly.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tara Wright
Forget voter IDs..let's check IQ's instead!
05:10 AM on 06/24/2011
It's pretty sad that corporations actually have been given more equal legal status than 51% of our human population in this country. What does that really say about America and her claim of 'freedom' for all?
07:05 PM on 06/23/2011
Part of the original issue with the ERA was that it was redundant. If the Constitution was interpreted as not conferring equal rights to women as included where it referred to "persons", then you would have to have a boat load of amendments to separately include asians, blacks, whites, part whites, various religious groups....it will be one gigantic amendment.

So better to argue about who is included in "persons" .
hgus
It's not about the economy, stupid
10:10 PM on 06/28/2011
Hillarious. Are you kidding? If you are, please reply. Cause i want to Fan you. But if you are being serious, then man, thats pathetic.
01:37 PM on 06/29/2011
14th amendment:

"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."

So if "person" includes females, then females have equal protection under the law.
But, lawyers can argue over anything ("depends on what your definition of is, is") and some might argue that given the timing of the 14th amendment, it wasn't supposed to include females. I would argue that is tortured reasoning...but..
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:20 PM on 06/23/2011
I’m so tired of all this “rights” crap. How about some responsibilities?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
super
07:29 PM on 06/23/2011
YES! The responsibility of corporations such as Walmart to pay their employees fairly!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:19 PM on 06/23/2011
I agree…fair pay for equal work. Except my female employees overwhelmingly were out much more often for pregnancy and sick kids. So to be fair they deserved less.
hgus
It's not about the economy, stupid
10:11 PM on 06/28/2011
I so want this to be the issue that we debate this year. It will show the true colors of the republican party!
05:56 PM on 06/23/2011
The problem is not the principle, it is the nightmare of enforcement and regulation.
The ERA would be a catastrophe in a country with so many attorneys.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
super
07:30 PM on 06/23/2011
like the Civil Rights Act was, I suppose? Hooray for such catastrophes.
hgus
It's not about the economy, stupid
10:12 PM on 06/28/2011
By chance are you originally from North Korea? Because that might explain you comment.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
firefly echo
sister outsider
03:40 PM on 06/23/2011
Are we ready for this?

I really, really hope we are, because I'm fed up, frankly.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Valerie Finnigan
can only be herself.
11:31 AM on 06/23/2011
This should have happened back in the '70's.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
firefly echo
sister outsider
03:38 PM on 06/23/2011
agreed
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lindsay Schutz
slower minds keep to the right....
10:11 AM on 06/23/2011
Expect a cave-in in 3...2...1...