iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

US Airways Lets Man In Women's Panties Fly

06/22/11 03:36 PM ET   AP

HH Code: Usairpanties
A woman photographed this man boarding a US Airways flight days before University of New Mexico football player Deshon Marman was arrested after a dispute about his baggy pants with airline officials.

SAN FRANCISCO — Days before a college football player was arrested on a US Airways flight at San Francisco airport following a dispute over his saggy pants, the airline allowed another man wearing skimpy women's panties and mid-thigh stockings to fly, according to a passenger and airline spokeswoman.

Jill Tarlow, a passenger on a June 9 flight from Fort Lauderdale, Fla., to Phoenix, took a photo of the scantily clad man, which she provided to the San Francisco Chronicle. The newspaper published the photo in its Wednesday edition.

The man flew six days before University of New Mexico football player DeShon Marman was arrested on a US Airways flight at San Francisco airport following allegations he refused to pull up his pants.

Tarlow told the Chronicle she and other passengers complained before boarding the plane, but US Airways employees did not prevent the unidentified man from flying.

"No one would believe me if I didn't take his picture," Tarlow, 40, of Phoenix said. "It was unbelievable."

US Airways spokeswoman Valerie Wunder defended the airline's decision to let the man fly, saying employees acted correctly.

"We don't have a dress code policy," Wunder said. "Obviously, if their private parts are exposed, that's not appropriate...So if they're not exposing their private parts, they're allowed to fly."

The airline has said Marman was exposing a body part on June 15 when he was repeatedly asked to pull up his pants.

His attorney, Joe O'Sullivan, said surveillance video would show his client's skin was not showing. He accused the airline of racial discrimination. Marman is African American.

"It just shows the hypocrisy involved," O'Sullivan told the Chronicle. "A white man is allowed to fly in underwear without question, but my client was asked to pull up his pajama pants because they hung below his waist."

Wunder said Marman was asked to leave the flight not because of his clothing, but because he refused an employee's request.

Marman was arrested on suspicion of trespassing, battery of a police officer and obstruction after refusing to leave the plane on the captain's orders, according to police. Police have also said he injured an officer while being taken into custody.

Prosecutors have until July 18 to file any charges against him.

___

Information from: San Francisco Chronicle, http://www.sfgate.com/chronicle

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WEIRD NEWS

Filed by Michael McLaughlin  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 27
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Allyatx
established in 1979
04:54 PM on 07/19/2011
I find it quite interesting when a racial news story pops on HuffPost, all the bad grammar and n-bombs start flying. Let's use our rational brains to discuss this topic and if you don't have anything helpful or nice to say, do what your Mama told you, "don't say anything at all."
09:26 PM on 07/16/2011
If I were TSA that is the last person I would frisk. Old SOB finally has his 15 minutes and probably doesn't know it.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:01 PM on 06/24/2011
I'm confused. You guys won't post my super-clean intelligent comment, but you'll post PaulKas and his 'N*GG*RS' comment? Really? Pathetic. I'll remember that, trust me.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lmclaurin
09:26 PM on 06/23/2011
Last week when the story came out about the football player being arrested, you would have thought some irate thug was steamrolling his way through the plane. Instead, you hear the young man, as he's seated, repeatedly saying in a quiet, calm, voice "Sir, I didn't touch anybody." "The lady had a problem, and Itook care of the problem, and now I'm seated. I didn't do nothing to anyone." Yet, you have these THUGS who are standing over him as if he has a gun.

What I want to know is where are those loud mouths who were on that thread now that the video has been published. Bottom line? D. Marman, the football player, is going to sue and he will win. As he should.
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
05:27 PM on 06/23/2011
The young man who was thrown off the airline in San Francisco and then arrested by SF police for tresspassing (uuuugh how can someone with a valid ticket be trasspassing) is about to be paaaaiiid. San Francisco has SOOO many discrimination lawsuits pending. Them white liberals just don't know how to treat Black folks.
03:41 AM on 06/24/2011
Yeah, your right,....San Fran ain't figured out how to treat black folk yet...Texas has got it down though, 8 yr olds can tie a noose in Texas
03:45 AM on 06/24/2011
"Paaaaiiiid"....."SOOO"..."Them white liberals" (corr. Those White liberals)

GOVERNMENT CHEESE MAKES YOU STUPID....It's a conspiracy by "The Man"
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
intellifran
insert clever line here...
09:57 AM on 06/23/2011
Here is the situation: You have an old white guy who did not disobey any directions that was able to fly wearing his drag garb. Then you have a young Black man who refused directions given to him and apparently you could see the outline of his man hood, and he was not allowed to fly. Moral of the story: Follow directions! and wear drag...
06:50 PM on 06/23/2011
So I guess you believe that African-Americans should ride in the back of the bus, don't you?
09:14 PM on 06/23/2011
Where I live, they are the only ones who ride the bus...so I guess they can sit wherever they want.
08:59 PM on 06/22/2011
This is pretty outrageous. There is no way that pervert in the panties should have flown while a young African American man is thrown off a plane.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
intellifran
insert clever line here...
09:55 AM on 06/23/2011
The young Black (he's not from Africa) man refused to follow directions given to him and you could apparently see the outline of his manhood. If the white man had refused to comply with orders and flew anyway you'd have an argument.
06:52 PM on 06/23/2011
You could see the outline of the drag's "manhood". Just face it, you think it is ok, simply for the reason that the other guy is black. Your argument is beyond week, it comes directly from the 1950's.
photo
laterthanyouthink
My snark font is: ON
05:29 AM on 06/24/2011
This white man's manhood isn't likely to show through clothing so ...

never mind ...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:09 PM on 06/24/2011
Dude, 'that pervert in the panties'? Are you for real? Do you know that guy personally? No? I didn't think so. So grow up and stop casting judgement.
06:21 PM on 06/22/2011
I've seen this ingrate on the internet before!!! IF you go to http://poorlydressed.failblog.org/ you can find them there!! It's so gross.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
happyblackman
Gotta have more cowbell baby!
05:54 PM on 06/22/2011
Just another day in America.
03:53 PM on 06/22/2011
Although I am not offended by the "Baggy jeans" look I would be offended by a man in drag wearing woman's lingerie sitting next to me. I am a white female and I think this is such a stupid, obviously, offensive discrimination! I cannot believe this drag queen could fly but a guy wearing baggy pants could not. Shame on US Airways!
makemesmile
it makes you wonder
08:18 PM on 06/24/2011
I am glad that it was a white woman who had the photo of the white man dressed in women's undergarments who was allowed to fly without a problem. I found that man to be offensive-looking.
makemesmile
it makes you wonder
08:22 PM on 06/24/2011
I dislike the "Sagging Pants" look because it looks foolish to have your pants around your knees while trying to walk. Also, I don't want to look at anyone's underwear or butt crack in public.
02:35 PM on 06/22/2011
Question: You know why so many Greeks never leave home?

Answer: Because they don't want to leave their brother's behind...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mek0123
Merle from Michigan
01:20 PM on 06/22/2011
What were the ethic nationalites of the two people involved? That might tell the whole story. "Sagging" is NOT professional at all, actually kinda trifling, and unfortunately, most of those "sagging" don't know what it actually means. Women's panties and heels.............with or without pants? (Kinda a answered my own question probably...........but I'm justa asking!