More

Forecasters Predict Spending On Campaign Ads Will Reach Nightmarish Levels In 2012

First Posted: 06/22/11 12:45 PM ET Updated: 08/22/11 06:12 AM ET

Demon Sheep
Remember Carly Fiorina's "Demon Sheep" ad from 2010? Good times.

Here's some good news for people who work in broadcast television: the 2012 campaign season is ramping up, and it seems that your sector of the economy is about to be stimulated. By billions of terrible political ads! So this is also good news for people who like to watch their lawmakers shoot legislation with guns. Pretty terrible news for everyone else, though. Here's the Hollywood Reporter, with news of the coming Babylon:

Moody's Investors Service in a new 
report predicts that political advertising tied to
 presidential, Congressional and governor elections next year are "all but certain" to break records, providing a windfall for TV station groups.



The report from the credit ratings agency, entitled "U.S. Broadcasters Get Ready for Record-Breaking Political Ad Spending in 2012,"
 sees political ad revenue grow 9 percent to 18 percent in 2012 over 2010 levels in a base case scenario for pure-play broadcast firms. 2010 had set a record of an estimated $2.3 billion in political broadcast TV ad spending.

"Broadcasters benefited from a Jan. 2010 Supreme Court decision that effectively ended spending caps for political ads," reports the Reporter, referring to the Citizens United decision that heralded the beginning of the unlimited corporate cash perma-orgy, all but guaranteeing that 2012 will eclipse the spending record set in 2010.

Which, by the way, eclipsed the record set in 2008, which eclipsed the record set in 2004, according to Reuters' 2008 version of the "spending on political ads will set new records" story:

As Democrat Barack Obama and Republican John McCain barnstorm across the country before the November election, they will spend heavily on ads that will increasingly reflect the cut-and-thrust of the campaign.

Total spending on TV ads in the presidential race is expected to top $800 million (403 million pounds), said Evan Tracey, chief operating officer of the Campaign Media Analysis Group, which tracks political advertising. Such spending totalled $500 million, the previous record, in the 2004 race.

That's good news for the television business, which is suffering from a pullback in spending from automotive, real estate and financial service advertisers.

(Ha, yes: because back then, those advertisers and the economic sectors they supported were in ruin.)

Was there ever a time in our lives where political ads on the teevee weren't an immense psychic burden? It's hard to believe, but it looks like we'll remember the 2004 campaign cycle and its modest $500 million worth of ads as a golden age of peace and quiet.

The only way to survive the forthcoming deluge is to turn off your teevees altogether. Of course, even if you do that, they'll get you with their robocalls. So unplug your phones. Just sit there in the dark, clinging to your loved ones. Oh, hey, you say that you've already had your power turned off because you're out of work and it was either have electricity or be able to eat some food occasionally? Congratulations, you already have a leg up on everyone else! (Though they'll probably find a way to advertise on food pretty soon.)

[Would you like to follow me on Twitter? Because why not? Also, please send tips to tv@huffingtonpost.com -- learn more about our media monitoring project here.]

FOLLOW HUFFPOST MEDIA

Here's some good news for people who work in broadcast television: the 2012 campaign season is ramping up, and it seems that your sector of the economy is about to be stimulated. By billions of terrib...
Here's some good news for people who work in broadcast television: the 2012 campaign season is ramping up, and it seems that your sector of the economy is about to be stimulated. By billions of terrib...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 157
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (6 total)
03:39 PM on 06/23/2011
Stay home. Don't vote. My dad would have called me communist. This is money injected into their pockets, not the economy. It's time again for the old, "you wash my back, I'll wash your's" and I will no longer fall to this crap. Who benefits from this? The Media! Get informed...DON'T VOTE!!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Vic22
"I write to make it right, don't like what I see"
03:05 PM on 06/23/2011
If people actually paid attention (and became informed, instead of misinformed), instead of making their decisions based on 30 second commercials, we would be in better shape. With that being said, that is money injected into the economy
10:45 AM on 06/23/2011
What a sin. Maybe if all these big corporations would use that money to create jobs instead of buying members of congress and senate we would be in a better postion to move forward.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gnorrfa
emitte lucem et veritatem
09:15 AM on 06/23/2011
Billions of dollars to create intricate and ingenious machinery functioning loudly and elaborately to put skin on baloney.
03:57 PM on 06/23/2011
And lots of lubricant, degreaser, plastics, and other invironmental hazzards!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
seanparnell
09:08 AM on 06/23/2011
Not real sure why this is supposed to be a windfall for broadcasters, as candidate advertisers by law pay lower rates than others (at least for federal races), making an ad sold to Barack Obama's campaign less profitable then one sold to Tide detergent. Also, unlike newspapers, online media, and the mail, broadcasters can't expand the inventory of available ad space all that easily. They might shave 30 seconds off a local news broadcast or run a few less public service ads, but it's not like they can suddenly go from selling 6 minutes of ad time per half hour to selling 9 minutes.

And while some bemoan the freedoms of the First Amendment that allow candidates and others to speak directly to voters in a way they find effective, I think it's much better than the alternative, where political speech is tightly regulated and guided by the government.

Sean Parnell
President
Center for Competitive Politics
http://www.campaignfreedom.org
http://www.twitter.com/seanparnellccp
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:04 AM on 06/23/2011
Turn off ad sponsored media and all will be well.
lastpost
see biography
05:52 AM on 06/23/2011
"billions of terrible political ads"
But never mind the quality, feel the width.

"watch their lawmakers shoot legislation with guns"
Sometimes, it the only way to keep under control a potential pest.

"the Citizens United decision"
It was either have that, or super-glue the population’s lips.

"Was there ever a time in our lives where political ads on the teevee weren't an immense psychic burden?"
Shouldn’t there be a (mental)health warning from the Surgeon General underneath? Or at least, the sums invested and names of the sponsors.

"turn off your teevees altogether"
Maybe someone could give away TV (bumper) stickers, to attach just below the screen.
..Unquestioning Belief Can Prove Injurious To Your Wealth..

"they'll get you with their robocalls"
Unless you immediately put THEM on hold.
photo
Coffee4Me
Fancy Flip Flops Belong On Your Feet. Obama 2012
05:07 AM on 06/23/2011
We need an opt-out system to stop these unwanted ads from reaching the TV. Something along the lines of the National Do Not Call registry, but it needs to actually block the ads.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
seanparnell
09:11 AM on 06/23/2011
So, we'd be better off if we could just suppress political dissent? Fortunately the First Amendment really doesn't tolerate that sort of thing.

Sean Parnell
President
Center for Competitiv­e Politics
http://www­.campaignf­reedom.org
http://www­.twitter.c­om/seanpar­nellccp
photo
Coffee4Me
Fancy Flip Flops Belong On Your Feet. Obama 2012
02:29 PM on 06/23/2011
Who is we? Lol, I was speaking for myself. I think I will be able to tolerate an educated vote without demon sheep. By the way, I was kind of making fun of the do not call registry since telemarketers get through anyway. Loosen your suspenders a bit, I think you are getting a wedgie.
03:52 PM on 06/23/2011
Dude, the whole bunch of you "we's" can go to...I mean get off the boat! Do you really know what the first amendment is about? How about the third, fourth, and so on? Really full of yourself, aren't you?
photo
ConnieInCleveland
One Lonely Voice trying to make a difference
05:00 AM on 06/23/2011
Just think about it. If all the money spent on the looooong campaigns in America were spent on things, which could improve life in America, instead of tearing our country apart, what a better country we would be.

Politicians are spending large sums of money, to tear us apart, one nasty ad after another. American media prospers from our bad politics. Sad, sad, sad.
03:53 PM on 06/23/2011
Only in America!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Agy Wilson
For something to be a belief, it needs testing.
02:15 PM on 06/24/2011
Eggs Zachery! You know for a poor country (isn't that what the media, pols, banks, and corporations are telling us?) there's an awful lot of money to blow on this kind of bs. Kind of like Christie cutting education funding and then taking the helicopter and limos to his sons game, eh?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
outofstepper
Turn off Fox News and turn on reality
03:29 AM on 06/23/2011
"Broadcasters benefited from a Jan. 2010 Supreme Court decision that effectively ended spending caps for political ads..."

I would amend that statement to say: "....effectively ended democracy as we know it..."
12:36 AM on 06/23/2011
For at least 40 years our politicians have said we must have campaign finance reform....level the playing field, etc. Yet here we are on the eve of the 2012 elections and spending enormously increased amounts on politicking through, primarily, advertising; with the way cleared by the Supreme Court (no less). I can only conclude, that when push comes to shove, neither the democrats nor the republicans can bear the thought of turning down all that corporate cash!. Give up chartering private jets, 5 star hotels, $200 dinners????? Uh uh! Live like ordinary mortals, not potentates? Not a chance! Thus our egalitarian democracy and the American Dream ( the real possibility of upward mobility through hard work) threaten to walk the path of extinction as wealthy special interests gain a stranglehold on our "public servants". Should we prepare to change the name of our country to "The Corporate States of America"?
03:55 PM on 06/23/2011
And the price keeps going up, and up, ...but when the walls come down, it will be their's!
12:03 AM on 06/23/2011
Election season is to Broadcasters what Christmas is to Retailers. Vast periodic wealth transfers driven by grand illusion.
09:39 PM on 06/22/2011
For some small market stations, all the expected political ads can mean a diffrence from a profit or going bankrupt. That means they will do what it takes to keep more spending on ads with them, no matter the poor quality or uselessness of them. I guess when the ads come on here, I will just turn to the internet or do some household stuff.
photo
Rational Thought Plz
Is the Micro Bio Half
08:59 PM on 06/22/2011
Could they please just make it legal to sell your vote? I could use the money.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Michael Valentine
Retired SEIU Member
09:16 PM on 06/22/2011
Only once you're elected.
photo
Rational Thought Plz
Is the Micro Bio Half
09:18 PM on 06/22/2011
Sharp wit you have there, beautifully done. Fanned.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
reliure
06:43 AM on 06/23/2011
in Belize it has actually come to that in an informal but rampant way. they have an informal price structure for their votes. SCALP YOUR VOTE!
photo
oldgrendel
tired old computer guy
07:31 PM on 06/22/2011
Newt needs to get some more money ads coming in so he can get wife #4 some new bling.