More

Google Execs Eric Schmidt, Larry Page Threatened With Senate Subpoena

Larry Page Eric Schmidt Google Subpoena Senate Ant

The Huffington Post   First Posted: 06/23/11 01:26 PM ET Updated: 08/23/11 06:12 AM ET

Google CEO Larry Page and Chairman Eric Schmidt could be subpoenaed by the Senate to appear at a hearing regarding its search dominance, following their refusal to do so.

Google is scheduled to appear before the antitrust committee in a probe of its power in the search engine market. But according to Politico, despite a letter from two senators that suggested both Schmidt and Page could be subpoenaed if they did not agree to testify, the two executives declined the request.

“Google is the preeminent provider of Internet search, and a hearing on this important topic would be incomplete without the direct perspective and views from one of Google’s top executives, each of whom has played a prominent role at the company throughout the last decade,” Senators Herb Kohl and Mike Lee wrote in a June 10 letter. “We would very much prefer to work this out by agreement rather than needing to resort to more formal procedures.”

The likely "procedures" may involve subpoenaing Schmidt and Page. Acquiring the subpoena requires a majority vote of the full Judiciary Committee, which would publicly debate whether or not the two executives should be made to testify.

Google has offered to send Chief Legal Officer David Drummond to the stand, but the senators were not satisfied with the suggestion.

"We strongly prefer to have [Page or Schmidt] as the witness representing Google at the hearing, which will address fundamental questions of business operations rather than merely legal issues,” the letter said.

According to Bloomberg, a Google spokesperson said that the company plans to “send them the executive who can best answer their questions."

Still, Senator Lee remains unhappy with having Drummond rather than Page or Schmidt at the hearing. “I’m very disappointed in Google’s response to the request to have Larry Page or Eric Schmidt testify at our subcommittee hearing,” he said in an email to Bloomberg. “I’m committed to work with Senator Kohl and others on the committee to ensure we have the opportunity to investigate these issues thoroughly and receive adequate responses from Google.”

A spokesperson for Senator Kohl added that he “feels it’s imperative that Mr. Schmidt or Mr. Page participate and is hopeful their attendance can be confirmed soon.”

The senate isn't the only one with its sights on Google. According to the Wall Street Journal, the Federal Trade Commission will soon serve Google with subpoenas as part of an antitrust investigation into whether Google has unfairly used its power over the search market. The WSJ called the probe Google's "most serious to date in the U.S.."

Google has come under federal scrutiny before, as when it moved to purchase travel software ITA, outbidding other travel sites in the process. Its $400 million acquisition of AdMeld has also reportedly come under Department of Justice review.

Google is also facing antitrust investigations in the European Union, and has come under scrutiny South Korea.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST TECH

Google CEO Larry Page and Chairman Eric Schmidt could be subpoenaed by the Senate to appear at a hearing regarding its search dominance, following their refusal to do so. Google is scheduled to ap...
Google CEO Larry Page and Chairman Eric Schmidt could be subpoenaed by the Senate to appear at a hearing regarding its search dominance, following their refusal to do so. Google is scheduled to ap...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 23
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
04:21 AM on 06/24/2011
Eric Schmidt is an outdated figure. Some consequences from his misbehaviors as google ceo in the past is irreparable and unforgivable. Eric Schmidt's real boss is in Germany and he represents Germany power to counter the native U.S. authorities. To reinstall his control power to google would be a curse to google people, to Stanford people and to U.S. authorities as well as be an unfair treatment to average U.S. citizens.

It is inappropriate any more to keep Eric Schmidt a public face of Google either, otherwise, who could safeguard Stanford people and Google people when Germany power intrude their sovereignty ...
04:13 AM on 06/24/2011
Eric Schmidt had abused his google power to support crimes in a Stanford campus atrocity case, in which Eric Schmidt for years had act as an agitator to intrude sovereignty of Stanford University with the back up of powers from Germany. One could find the case details and photo evidence at my blog:
http://blog.tianya.cn/blogger/post_read.asp?BlogID=2478701&PostID=32478367
There is a case number one could track. This is the case where all the crimes from the suspect lady's side started. The power that back up their crimes is from Germany Eric Schmidt is just one of them. Eric Schmidt had even sent me message to threaten my life with the mysterious death of Stanford student May Zhou http://www.mayzhou.com during his fight with Stanford in this case, and U.S. authorities investigation indicates that he is not innocent in May Zhou's case.
01:31 AM on 06/24/2011
The results of the Google search business model tend to be limited by ad profit margin and political correctness. When someone invents a better, more direct and exacting search engine, they will indeed become the new MS.
fanetiks
Sense in spelling and everything else
08:26 PM on 06/23/2011
The Senate has no business subpenaing anybody at this point. The Justice Department or FCC or some other executive agency with investigatory powers has the staff -- investigators and lawyers -- to look into any possible wrongdoing. If the Senate wishes to propose legislation that might adversely affect Google, I suspect Google would GLADLY send someone to fite it.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
propackage
10:16 PM on 06/23/2011
The senators need to divert attention from the economy. Be it the Steroid situation, football strick, and now google. The people at google work for a living. Maybe our senators should look into doing that
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
karen lyons kalmenson
i poem/paint, sometimes, i ain't
07:34 PM on 06/23/2011
subpoena for what
i solemnly ask
our senate has in
front of it
more serious tasks
06:46 PM on 06/23/2011
Advertising is the business, not search. So seems odd to be investigating a search "business" that is free. Not only are there viable search competitors: Microsoft Bing, Yahoo to say nothing of Baidu, but there are many, many advertising competitors, including in mobile advertising, Apple, and of course Facebook. Likewise there are many competitive travel business sites.

It's simply a publicity stunt by the committee, and the executives cannot answer every question when an investigation is active, though their attorney can.

Note one of those senators had a major contribution from Microsoft in the last election.
06:06 PM on 06/23/2011
Bogus charges...you sign up for google advertising...they bill you per click...only trouble is..their billing you for clicks that never were clicked..and it will be proved.
02:02 PM on 06/23/2011
Sharks invite fish to go fishing.
photo
DTree
Progressive Biconceptualist
01:18 PM on 06/23/2011
In other words, "Google, you are too good at what you do - there must be something wrong here."

The solution for those who are not pleased with Google's dominance over the search market: learn to do it better, like google does.
MtnGeek
Partisan thinking is an oxymoron
01:52 PM on 06/23/2011
Too good at what they do? You must have really low standards. Google's search has degraded significantly as they boost up search results from people who advertise with them. It skews the searches towards their business interests. This at least needs to be publicly acknowledged so people understand what a "Google search" actually represents.
fanetiks
Sense in spelling and everything else
08:23 PM on 06/23/2011
Yes, I have seen a stark change for the worse in the past year and even more. They keep changing the algorithm, and each time things seem to get worse.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
propackage
10:18 PM on 06/23/2011
If youi don't like google there is Bing, Yahoo, Lycos and others. This is what a free society offeres. What we really need is a choice of governments!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:21 PM on 06/23/2011
Google has just gotten us used to poor search results.
photo
DTree
Progressive Biconceptualist
03:26 PM on 06/24/2011
It's never failed me - finds everything I need it to find, and I have yet to see any search engine that comes close. What is missing here, that would make the results better in your opinion?
12:44 PM on 06/23/2011
HP, I know you've been having some trouble with your headlines, so here's a suggestion: "Senators unhappy the Google CEOs resist sending an executive most able to boost the Senators' public profile."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
theveggiedude
my body is a temple, not a living graveyard
01:27 PM on 06/23/2011
It doesn't look good when the CEO and ex-CEO wants to send a lawyer in their place. Just go and answer some questions could be good PR for Google.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dusty Farmer
Someone's poisoned the water hole!
01:39 PM on 06/23/2011
The attorney is the person that would know most about how Google either is or is not violating antitrust laws. If that is what the Senate intends to question them about, then it makes sense that they would want the attorney to speak for them. Why inadvertently say something that could get them into "trouble" when they can avoid it?
12:36 PM on 06/23/2011
Wow...this could either end badly or very well. I'm waiting in anticipation!

//Chicago Creative Agency - http://www.integraphix.com