iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Schumer Brings Medicare Into Heart Of Debt Negotiations

Schumer

First Posted: 06/24/11 02:40 PM ET Updated: 08/24/11 06:12 AM ET

WASHINGTON -- Democrats laid out additional details on Friday of their plans to cut the deficit, signaling they would be willing to negotiate some Medicare cuts on the provider side as part of a deal to raise the debt ceiling this summer.

Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) and Rep. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) told reporters they would be willing to look at "delivery system reform" of Medicare, which would change the way providers on the senior health care system are paid. Although it could be positive for negotiations, the move could give Democrats less political cover for hammering Republicans on the Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) budget plan, which would transform Medicare into a voucher-like system for future seniors.

"There are three approaches: One is the Republican approach to end Medicare as we know it, transfer it all to insurance companies, which will not reduce costs, it will simply shift costs to beneficiaries," Schumer said on a call with reporters. "Second is to do nothing. We reject both of those."

Instead, Schumer said the Democrats will push for changes to the "delivery side" of Medicare, such as implementing more information technology and putting more emphasis on prevention.

"We believe that Medicare provides very good health care but it does it inefficiently," he said. "The way to bring savings out of Medicare while at the same time preserving the benefits is to make it more efficient in terms of the delivery system."

Democrats have consistently rebuked Republicans for voting to change Medicare using the Ryan plan, meaning it may be a political loss to allow for Medicare changes themselves. But Schumer and Van Hollen argued that Democrats are in a good political position in debt ceiling talks, particularly after Republican representatives in the talks quit on Thursday.

Since House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-Va.) and Senate Minority Whip Jon Kyl (R-Ariz.) announced they would not participate in the talks, Democratic votes will be needed to pass an eventual deal, they said, giving the Democrats more power over negotiations.

"They need Democrats to get a deal passed, and that means the final deal will have to include some Democratic priorities," Schumer said. "Thus it will have some messy realities for Republicans."

Among them, Democrats hope, will be an end to subsidies for major oil and gas companies, along with deductions for private planes and tax preferences for men and women who make more than half a million dollars per year, Van Hollen said.

Republicans have said repeatedly that tax increases cannot be a part of the final deal to end the deficit, part of a pledge they sign each year with Americans for Tax Reform, the organization led by Grover Norquist.

House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) reiterated in a statement on Friday that a package with tax increases "cannot pass the House."

"Until the Republicans are more worried about reducing the deficit than they are about Grover Norquist, then we've got a problem," Van Hollen said. "Every serious solution to this issue requires a balance."

Congress must approve an increase in the debt ceiling -- which currently stands at $14.29 trillion -- by about Aug. 2 to avoid the government defaulting on its loans, according to Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner.

The White House announced this morning it will hold separate meetings next week with Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) and Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) to discuss the debt ceiling talks, focusing on a "balanced approach" -- revenue increases along with spending cuts -- for the eventual deal.

McConnell signaled in a statement on Friday that he will not be receptive to discussions about revenue increases for shrinking the deficit.

"The President needs to decide between his goal of massive tax hikes, and a bipartisan plan to address our deficit," he said. "But he can’t have both."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- Democrats laid out additional details on Friday of their plans to cut the deficit, signaling they would be willing to negotiate some Medicare cuts on the provider side as part of a deal ...
WASHINGTON -- Democrats laid out additional details on Friday of their plans to cut the deficit, signaling they would be willing to negotiate some Medicare cuts on the provider side as part of a deal ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 6,252
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (91 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Berryives
02:34 PM on 07/06/2011
As usual, the sacred cow, which is military expenditures, is not even mentioned. Public spending on health is always questioned, but spending on war? The war mongers are false patriots.
05:03 PM on 07/04/2011
Hey Van Hollen,do not borrow 1000 billion for a 2 yr tax cut an try an balance that out on the backs of our seniors.

1000 billion = 1 trillion dollars all borrowed for nothing a 2 yr tax cut ?. Just let the build in sunset law expire these Bush now 12 yr tax cuts ? These tax cuts are the deficit problem / no more war Schumer no more Libya Schumer .
photo
RUKidding0
Freedom is Fundamental
10:07 AM on 06/27/2011
”Dems Willing To Negotiate Medicare Cuts As Part Of Debt Deal” should come as no surprise, since ObamaCare already cuts half a Trillion dollars from it.

Duh !!!
09:58 AM on 06/27/2011
What a joke. Medicare saves the US billions annually by providing the most cost effective means of financing medical care for seniors. Even considering Medicare as part of the negotiations is nothing short of reckless endangerment. Unbelievable. The math is not difficult, which I know Schumer understands. Instead of going with whats the mathematically advantageous solution, they sell out to the lowest common denominator.
09:04 AM on 06/27/2011
A more accurate description of the Ryan plan is that it would formalize financial rationing. Those with illness would be charged more for their coverage, have higher deductibles and co-pays. Much of their coverage would be inadequate for high expense items--all currently experienced in the individual health insurance market.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
robert horwitz
07:49 AM on 06/27/2011
Most folks might believe that our elected representatives in Washington can't agree on anything. Well if you are one of those people you would be wrong. There is one thing that the folks in Washington can agree on. "It's Time To Take Another Vacation". So as the Fourth of July approaches I just want to wish all of our hard working elected Legislators a great Holiday. Say just how many days off have they taken this session? I lost count. Anyway this will give them some time to Barbeque something other than us.
photo
isb782
JM is the Man!
02:26 AM on 06/27/2011
I have had enough of both sides now, I mean nothing gets done and we the people loose.
03:07 AM on 06/27/2011
really??? where have you been for the last 2 1/2 years of teapublican'ts obstruction? Pelosi lead house passed jobs bills that died in the senate along with 250 other pieces of legislation
HR2847
HR5297
S1470
S2923
HR5980

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hkodTydUR0E
photo
isb782
JM is the Man!
02:37 AM on 06/30/2011
I should have said this year so far since Gop took over.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
robeson
12:55 AM on 06/27/2011
I agree with Boehner and Schumer all items that caused the debt (wars, malfeasance, revenue) are off the table.
12:20 AM on 06/27/2011
Raising the debt ceiling helps banks.

Cutting medicare helps the Insurance Industry.

It's a lose - lose proposition for we the people.
11:30 AM on 06/27/2011
If they don't raise the debt ceiling they won't be able to pay Social Security.
12:25 PM on 06/27/2011
That's because the government borrowed all the money that was in Social Security to pay for wars and tax cuts for the rich.

How about we borrow some money from the ATF, the DEA, the DOD, or Homeland Security to issue Social Security checks? How about we institute a surcharge on Wall Street trades? You don't hear those ideas, because the ultra-wealthy aren't going to lose any money to keep social security checks going.

Do you think all 100,000 soldiers are going to have to leave Afghanistan if the debt ceiling isn't raised and they don't have any more money? I doubt it, they will come up with that money to keep a war going.
11:50 PM on 06/26/2011
Of course they are. The dems are always willing to bend over and sell out their constituency!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:18 AM on 06/27/2011
Democrats take a page from Obama telling us they hope to end to subsidies. Republicans tell Democrats to keep hoping, telling us to forget about change. Clowns to the left of us, jokers on the right.......
11:50 PM on 06/26/2011
OBAMA u sir r A Destroyer of D
11:46 PM on 06/26/2011
Mcconnel those guys r icky owls
11:22 PM on 06/26/2011
It is almost a lost cause to explain the difference between socialism and capitalism to many of our fellow Americans. There is not one socialist government in the world where the majority of their citizens have it as good as 80% of our citizens. Even those American that are considered at or below the poverty level in the USA have a higher standard of living then most of those living in communist or socialist countries like Cuba or Russia. Our capitalistic system built around private industry coupled with broader individual freedom is the drivetrain of the economic health of the USA. This trend toward more and more control of our citizens, the massive regulation of private industry, and the huge growth and cost of the federal government coupled with unsustainable government entitlement programs is the root cause of our
economic problems. We are well on our well toward socialism and the deterioration of our exceptional country.
06:15 AM on 06/27/2011
I know I won't be able to change your mind, but I have to put my version out there. Capitalism failed in the depression era. Only the rich were happy. Many of the others were in dire straights. They were talking about overthrowing the government. Franklin Rosevelt saved Capitalism by his jobs program and the New Deal. Social Security has helped keep the elderly out of poverty.

Pure Capitalism only works for the rich.
10:17 AM on 06/27/2011
Obviously you have never traveled to Germany, France, Norway, Denmark or Sweden (to name a few) They have a higher standard of living than the US with a longer lifespan, lower infant mortality and excellent health care paid for by the state. Except for the USA, no one in every other industrialized country has lost their home because of illness. And Cuba has excellent health care by the way.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Patriot86
Compassion is the basis of all morality.
11:14 PM on 06/26/2011
If this is true...the Dems are finished and will lose in 2012..let us hope it is not true.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
follygirl
Obama/Biden 2012
10:38 PM on 06/26/2011
Just.....say.......NO.