iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Gender Bias Fought At Egalia Preschool In Stockholm, Sweden

JENNY SOFFEL   06/26/11 08:01 PM ET  AP

STOCKHOLM — At the "Egalia" preschool, staff avoid using words like "him" or "her" and address the 33 kids as "friends" rather than girls and boys.

From the color and placement of toys to the choice of books, every detail has been carefully planned to make sure the children don't fall into gender stereotypes.

"Society expects girls to be girlie, nice and pretty and boys to be manly, rough and outgoing," says Jenny Johnsson, a 31-year-old teacher. "Egalia gives them a fantastic opportunity to be whoever they want to be."

The taxpayer-funded preschool which opened last year in the liberal Sodermalm district of Stockholm for kids aged 1 to 6 is among the most radical examples of Sweden's efforts to engineer equality between the sexes from childhood onward.

Breaking down gender roles is a core mission in the national curriculum for preschools, underpinned by the theory that even in highly egalitarian-minded Sweden, society gives boys an unfair edge.

To even things out, many preschools have hired "gender pedagogues" to help staff identify language and behavior that risk reinforcing stereotypes.

Some parents worry things have gone too far. An obsession with obliterating gender roles, they say, could make the children confused and ill-prepared to face the world outside kindergarten.

"Different gender roles aren't problematic as long as they are equally valued," says Tanja Bergkvist, a 37-year-old blogger and a leading voice against what she calls "gender madness" in Sweden.

Those bent on shattering gender roles "say there's a hierarchy where everything that boys do is given higher value, but I wonder who decides that it has higher value," she says. "Why is there higher value in playing with cars?"

At Egalia – the title connotes "equality" – boys and girls play together with a toy kitchen, waving plastic utensils and pretending to cook. One boy hides inside the toy stove, his head popping out through a hole.

Lego bricks and other building blocks are intentionally placed next to the kitchen, to make sure the children draw no mental barriers between cooking and construction.

Director Lotta Rajalin notes that Egalia places a special emphasis on fostering an environment tolerant of gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender people. From a bookcase, she pulls out a story about two male giraffes who are sad to be childless – until they come across an abandoned crocodile egg.

Nearly all the children's books deal with homosexual couples, single parents or adopted children. There are no "Snow White," "Cinderella" or other classic fairy tales seen as cementing stereotypes.

Rajalin, 52, says the staff also try to help the children discover new ideas when they play.

"A concrete example could be when they're playing 'house' and the role of the mom already is taken and they start to squabble," she says. "Then we suggest two moms or three moms and so on."

Egalia's methods are controversial; some say they amount to mind control. Rajalin says the staff have received threats from racists apparently upset about the preschool's use of black dolls.

But she says that there's a long waiting list for admission to Egalia, and that only one couple has pulled a child out of the school.

Jukka Korpi, 44, says he and his wife chose Egalia "to give our children all the possibilities based on who they are and not on their gender."

Sweden has promoted women's rights for decades, and more recently was a pioneer among European countries in allowing gay and lesbian couples to legalize their partnerships and adopt children.

Gender studies permeate academic life in Sweden. Bergkvist noted on her blog that the state-funded Swedish Science Council had granted $80,000 for a postdoctoral fellowship aimed at analyzing "the trumpet as a symbol of gender."

Jay Belsky, a child psychologist at the University of California, Davis, said he's not aware of any other school like Egalia, and he questioned whether it was the right way to go.

"The kind of things that boys like to do – run around and turn sticks into swords – will soon be disapproved of," he said. "So gender neutrality at its worst is emasculating maleness."

Egalia is unusual even for Sweden. Staff try to shed masculine and feminine references from their speech, including the pronouns him or her – "han" or "hon" in Swedish. Instead, they've have adopted the genderless "hen," a word that doesn't exist in Swedish but is used in some feminist and gay circles.

"We use the word "Hen" for example when a doctor, police, electrician or plumber or such is coming to the kindergarten," Rajalin says. "We don't know if it's a he or a she so we just say 'Hen is coming around 2 p.m.' Then the children can imagine both a man or a woman. This widens their view."

Egalia doesn't deny the biological differences between boys and girls – the dolls the children play with are anatomically correct.

What matters is that children understand that their biological differences "don't mean boys and girls have different interests and abilities," Rajalin says. "This is about democracy. About human equality."

____

Karl Ritter contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST EDUCATION

Filed by Joanna Zelman  |  Report Corrections
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,167
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (25 total)
foresure
Brash and Harsh
01:27 AM on 07/02/2011
angelcake

You are like the Taliban because you choose to believe what a closed group of idealogues believe, and ignore common sense.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
timbeaux
Novelist, anti-professional politicians, liberal l
05:13 PM on 06/29/2011
Will a boy who hits a girl be treated differently from a girl who hits a boy?
02:37 PM on 06/30/2011
I take it you don't work with children - at least not in environments like the ones this article focuses on.

With young children hitting is *very, very* common and usually not that physically dangerous to the child (a shove for stealing a toy) so condemning the act of hitting and reinforcing more appropriate methods of expression is the primary means of addressing the situation. Gender, particularly in alternative schools like this, isn't even a factor that registers. It can't be because boys and girls are *constantly* hitting each other - they, themselves, don't see any gender motivations and the adults usually don't either.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ayesha Khan
09:55 AM on 06/29/2011
Now here again another Episode of Madness--- Self created Issues, it seems they have ample time and nothing constructive to do --- What Point they are trying to prove--- By calling them Friend and not Boys or Girls or his or Her -- The staff is making the Gender Discrimination more obvious. The Right and sane approach should be to Accept as you are-- This discrimination is a self created issue and its been prevalent since Antiquity in every corner of the World.. We can Expect such Illogical attitude from Un-educated People but when your Own Peers are stressing without the awareness that what impact it will have -- Then what to Talk about---- Is there a Possibility to Change the Behavior of Biological Facts. It is a Proven Fact That Males are more Muscular than Females-- But this concept is not to make the females less Superior.--- Review --- Intense review is required by the staff----for curriculum ----- Stop--Don't Take the Identity of The Males and Females----- or we might hear one day --- Hey Hubby!! i have given Birth to 2 Kids--- Now its Your Turn------..
photo
angelcakesinc
Silence is death
11:23 PM on 06/30/2011
Okay most of your statement is incoherent but at the end the article DID specifically say that they were not ignoring or hiding the BIOLOGICAL differences between males and females, simply trying to do away with the SOCIAL differences, which tend to be arbitrary and enforced, rather than natural.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ayesha Khan
06:25 AM on 07/01/2011
Maybe there is a possibility that my Statement for you was incoherent--- But there lies another possibility --that your approach of Reading the Statement under the Light of the Issue in Debate --- was Far more In Capable--- But however , somehow you Caught the Central Theme by Stating------ "the SOCIAL difference­s, which tend to be arbitrary and enforced, rather than natural"-------
04:35 AM on 06/29/2011
Eliminating gender references is not the solution to equality: changes in attitudes is a solution. Once they leave preschooler that support is gone, kids will be confused, and the experiment fails. Changing attitudes will continue beyond preschool and have a much better result. Instead of "sheltering" these kids from mere words that they will encounter in literature, media, and society, train the teachers to use the words without bias and provide experiences that allow freedom of choices without embarrassment. Why do they have to make such a big deal out of something so simple?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Stephen B Kidde
Human Rights Rule!
12:03 AM on 06/29/2011
The elimination of references to gender is extreme. I support equal opportunity in employment and equal pay for equal work. Adjustments for said rights begins in pre-school.

The effort to eliminate gender references however, diminishes social efforts to mirror natural differences. Women that are feminine and men that are masculine seem natural and healthy. It is wrong to eliminate all social guidance based on gender as indicator of expectations for behavior based on sex.

Overcompensation and reverse discrimination become issues with the radical shift in language use. It is important to keep the focus on respect for people with regard to human rights. Being non-discriminatory is a baseline behavior. Improving the fairness of society is the goal, not replacing one form of discrimination with another.
02:50 PM on 06/30/2011
I agree that eliminating "him" and "her" from vocabulary is stupid and needless but your comment that, "Women that are feminine and men that are masculine seem natural and healthy. It is wrong to eliminate all social guidance based on gender as indicator of expectatio­ns for behavior based on sex" is deeply uncritical and misses the point, as evidenced by the further assertion that challenging these norms and stereotypes will some how lead to reverse discrimination.

These norms and stereotypes are the very elements that *enable* discrimination against women. When *all* women are expected to behave in a predetermined "womanly" way, imposed by society, ceilings are erected that become ever more difficult to break through. Ask any woman with a better knowledge of mechanics than her husband, boyfriend, or male friend, what it is like to to take *her* car into the shop with him present. Truly being non-discriminatory *is* to challenge our conventional notions of gender expectations but, you are correct that we need not do it in the way this article talks about.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Stephen B Kidde
Human Rights Rule!
10:03 AM on 07/01/2011
Stereotypes enable discrimination. Norms that correspond with natural design do not.
photo
FaceTheTruth00
I'm a girl.
05:51 PM on 06/28/2011
I don't think this is equal. They admit that their literature about family is "homosexual couples, single parents or adopted children." So, where are the two-parent, heterosexual families in there?

They're excluded, so how does that make it equal? Equal means giving ALL groups and circumstances the same attention. They are admitting to not doing that.

Why are they preventing fairy tales like "Snow White" and "Cinderella"? Maybe they're sexist, but to me they were just fairy tales which had no impact on my life as a child or an adult. However, they are intentionally EXCLUDING them, which again, is not "equal".

In order to be equal, they should be teaching the so-called "norms" plus the non-traditional p.o.v.

To me, their excluding what they don't like and teaching only what they approve of makes them just like the "traditional" schooling that they are supposedly rebelling against. It's just opposites sides of the same coin.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
multidoc
Re-animating the dead since 1922
10:16 PM on 06/28/2011
No it isn't. Kids are exposed to the conventional continually. It permeates the culture and all the socializing they do. The conventional does not need to be taught; kids already know that it is there and that it is "normal". Oh, sorry, I just realized that it's you again in this post. Well, never mind, good to write it again anyway.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Stephen B Kidde
Human Rights Rule!
12:14 AM on 06/29/2011
It used to be the conservatives that cautioned "you can't legislate morality" in relation to privacy in sexual relations. I am against hate crimes. I support the right for adults to choose with whom they will live, but I don't endorse gay marriage.

If that which I support politically were to become the social norm, there were still be homosexual couples, single parents and adopted children. Of course, the point of pre-school education should not only be to prepare the children for dealing with people from unusual living situations. They have yet to learn that which is considered normal. If unusual situations are presented as THE "norm," then mental health problems and social instability are likely to result. It sounds like an ultra-liberal approach to me.
03:15 PM on 06/28/2011
"The taxpayer-funded preschool which opened last year in the liberal Sodermalm district of Stockholm..."

"...Egalia places a special emphasis on fostering an environment tolerant of gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender people."

What will liberals think of next? I suppose this is coming soon to America. It opens up a new front in the war on heterosexuals, alongside making gay marriage mainstream.

See also the US Department of Agriculture sensitivity training to combat heterosexism.

This is all good news for neo-Malthists since the building block of society going back thousands of years has been the hetero (reproductive) family unit. Indoctrinating pre-schoolers will undoubtedly contribute to the demise of this building block (not very egalitarian).

Either Darwin was wrong (homosexuals should have naturally selected to non-existence) or the case that homosexuality is in the genes is all wrong - in which case it's a lifestyle choice and not an immutable characteristic that warrants legislation granting rights.
photo
angelcakesinc
Silence is death
11:33 PM on 06/30/2011
Yes because teaching acceptance of those who are different from you is SO wrong... Also, your argument against homosexuality being natural is flawed. There is no gay 'gene,' that is to say, no ONE biological factor that makes one gay. But there is no one gene that influences many aspects of an individual's being. Being gay isn't a choice. I can tell you for a fact I never CHOSE to be gay. I just am. Always have been, and very likely always will be. But both of my parents are also straight. So the argument about gay people breeding themselves out of existence... not really a viable argument. But thanks for playing. Next time try making arguments that haven't already been disproved by people a lot more knowledgeable about the subject than you or anyone else likely to be found on this forum.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
syntax facit saltum
We do not live in a 2 story universe
02:18 PM on 06/28/2011
Even chimpanzees have a gender based division of labor: male chimpanzees tend to hunt and female chimpanzees tend to make and use tools to fish for insects and to collect other food. That means our LCA (Last Common Ancestor) what-- 65 million years ago-- had a gender based division of labor. There are *some* differences that are not socially constructed. Not that the type of social scientists that are behind a school like this care anything about real science.

references: Boesch and Boesch-Achermann 2000; McGrew 1979 a.o.
photo
angelcakesinc
Silence is death
11:38 PM on 06/30/2011
So... girls who like to play sports and boys who like to play with dolls are... what then? Tell me the biological directive behind THAT.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
syntax facit saltum
We do not live in a 2 story universe
12:58 AM on 07/01/2011
Note the word "tend." It means that in chimpanzees (our closest relatives) there is a gender based division of labor that can be defined by a *tendency* for males to engage in one kind of activity and a tendency for females to engage in another. It was only with the emergence of more or less (social-- not strictly genetic) monogamy, that male primates begin to engage in caring for their own offspring-- in species without social monogamy males occasionally cared for their sisters' offspring.

I think one has to be cautious about interpreting these facts, but they do indicate that there is some gender-based divisions of labor/activities that cannot be analyzed as being gender based due to social construction of gender differences.
09:28 PM on 07/01/2011
There is no relevance in making conclusions by comparing the culture of humans and chimpanzees. If you look at the Bonobos (dwarf chimpanzees), they are genetically very close to the chimps, but their societies are structured in a totally different manner. They live in matriarchies with the females in charge of the group, and they use sex instead of violence to resolve conflicts. Two such very alike spices, that got genetically divided long after humans did, have came up with two totally different cultures.

If you instead look at how our common african predeessors lived just 100.000 years ago, you will find that they lived in very egalitarian societies formed in small groups (around 30 people) of hunters and collectors. Sure, females back then also gave birth and breast fed their kids, but the kids were raised by the whole group. There were no "natural" division of labour. Small parties, consisting of both men and women, young and old, left the group during the day to hunt or collect food. The catch was brought back to the group and equally divided by the community. Connection between different groups were very peacful, becuase no group could afford loosing memebers in conflicts and wars. A lot of time and energy were used to communicate, prevent social conflict and keep the group together. There is still a few tribes and races who live like this. For instance the San-people in the Kalahari desert.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jeremy Perron
02:10 PM on 06/28/2011
First point, while I think what this school is doing is really bad idea, the comments I have been reading here are often just as bad. Something about opposites attracting extreme feminism meets extreme sexism. What some of rightwing commenters don’t understand is that some of the biggest critics come from the left.

Second point, nearly every culture that has ever exists and all that were of any significant size has had some sort of gender roles. Now granted those gender roles do change from culture to culture and across time periods but they are still there. Gender is an aspect of humanity not something that is artificially imposed on it. The school is trying to pretend there is no such thing as gender and have tried to label anything that is traditional as bad.

Examples
“staff avoid using words like "him" or "her" and address the 33 kids as "friends" rather than girls and boys.”

Whatever you do, don’t call a boy a boy and girl a girl. That is messed up. Don’t say ‘he’ or ‘she’ that is sexist.

“Nearly all the children's books deal with homosexual couples, single parents or adopted children. There are no "Snow White," "Cinderella" or other classic fairy tales seen as cementing stereotypes.”

Any stories that show men masculine and women acting feminine needs to be banned, clearly they are messing with the children’s minds.
photo
angelcakesinc
Silence is death
11:47 PM on 06/30/2011
Why does their literature need to show masculine men, feminine women, and heterosexual couples? All they have to do is step outside the bounds of the school to see that. It's not as if they're locked up inside there all day every day and not allowed to see anything else. What they're experiencing in there can't be found anywhere else. Is something so different from what's typical really such a bad thing? Why are alternative views from the mainstream so bad? Just because it's typical doesn't mean it's right. Though I do agree the exclusion of pronouns is a little bit odd, but I guess I can kinda see the reasoning behind it. I like the idea of letting children be who they are rather than who society thinks they ought to be. People who don't think girls and boys are routinely forced into roles they might not be comfortable in... obviously hasn't been one of the many boys or girls uncomfortable with their preassigned gender roles. As a young boy all I wanted to do was play with dolls and other typically 'girlie' toys, but I never got to. Whenever I was playing pretend with my friends I'd always take on the feminine role. Nobody is saying boys SHOULDN'T act masculine if they feel that way, it just says that boys don't NEED to act traditionally masculine if they don't want to. It's an environment where they can play however they want. How is that bad?
01:01 PM on 06/28/2011
Brilliant! Why give them any sort of sexual guidance when they can just figure it out for themselves and experience the exhilaration of sexual confusion? This is truly a triumph for the GLBT community and the theories of Dr. John Money, Phd.

While they're at it, they should also let children decide if language, math, and science courses are really "for them," rather than forcing them to study things they might not like -things which aren't really "who they are".

"Nearly all the children's books deal with homosexual couples, single parents or adopted children." Even better! Give them a foundation of dysfunctionality, rather than normality.

The elitist crowd wants to cut the world's population in half, and sexually messing up the next generation is a good way to do it.

'We use the word "Hen" for example when a doctor, police, electrician or plumber or such is coming to the kindergarten,' Rajalin says. But all becomes clear when the giant chicken comes through the door.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
edayres
Comedian with a New Jersey attitude commenting on
11:36 AM on 06/28/2011
Unless they're going live in a "Hen" world this seems to be one big experiment in denial. Ironic, how the gender neutral term in Swedish connotes female in English.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
SageFire
Research Vote by Mail
12:31 AM on 06/28/2011
The Chinese language (Han anyway) doesn't have gender differences. EVERY thing is a ta, a person, a pear, a dog, a rock. There are words for sister and brother and other relatives but no he, she, everything is "it". That is one really big already existing experiment in language and gender if they wanted to know it if would work.
photo
angelcakesinc
Silence is death
11:53 PM on 06/30/2011
Japanese is the same way. They don't actually use any sort of pronoun at all, really, as far as I could tell. Damn them and their implied subjects. Ironically, when I was taking Japanese 102 in college I was criticized for speaking too much like a woman (subtle intonation and pronunciation differences in the bloody language.) It's not my fault my voice fell more comfortably into that range! Of course one of my girl friends in that class preferred speaking like a man. I think she just did it because it was funny though. There IS something highly entertaining in her lowering her voice as much as she can and saying 'Boku wa Anagumo desu.'
09:07 PM on 08/21/2011
Was linked to this today from a random link of a friend's a while ago, and I saw this comment thread. In Chinese, it's true that the word "ta" is used to describe "him", "her", or "it", but in written language, you actually add a radical to them to differentiate "he", "she", "God", "it", etc. For instance, "he" is 他, while "she" is 她, the pronoun for God is 祂, and the pronoun for animals is 牠. So actually, in Chinese we imply both gender and type of being (human, God, animal). Sorry if this seems totally random/pointless to point out...I'm a ling minor (and Chinese) so it bothered me... :/ Japanese works in a similar way, right? I'm learning it right now on my own.
foresure
Brash and Harsh
08:56 PM on 06/27/2011
The comments by the radical feminists are very similar to those of the Tea Bag people.

Deny the fact of phsics, chemistry, geology and of course biology.

Historical and scientific evidence means nothing if it is not in conformity with your ideology.
photo
angelcakesinc
Silence is death
11:55 PM on 06/30/2011
Yes because playing with kitchen sets is totally biologically programmed... Why can't we let the kids play with the toys that they want to? That seems to be the point here. Showing that boys and girls can do the same things if they want to.
foresure
Brash and Harsh
03:30 PM on 07/01/2011
angelcakeinc

I agree with everything you say, except the accusation that I think that all gender behavior is biologically programmed.

However to say that we should ignore the fact that there are two genders, is simply a dogmatic statement of a value system, not based on objective observations.

That would be as silly as arguing that it makes absolutely no difference that males have penises and females have uteruses.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:41 PM on 06/27/2011
And what happens when a friend that is a male just want to be boyish and a female just want to be girlish? will this social engineering present such gender like behavior, will parents be accused if they buy their children the wrong kind of toy? Will the program be a failure if after 6 years the male friend like a female friend? Let's stop playing God and let children be children, not programs of our own making.
08:17 PM on 06/27/2011
I think the idea is that when a boy does something "boyish" that it's not looked at as being "boyish" but rather just being a kid. I don't think the school is going to scold boys from playing sports, or scold girls from play with dolls, but rather not put any term like "girly/boyish things" to what the children do. It seems like they want to push the idea that kids should be kids, and not put any thoughts into the kids minds that they should be playing with "certain" kinds of toys.

I've seen a lot of people mention something along the lines of thinking that the school is going to punish a child or that the school is going to "fail" if a child grows up and is heterosexual. I think the schools hope is that the child learns for themselves what they are and that that's okay.
08:57 PM on 06/27/2011
The idea that the preschool is trying to get people not to grow up to heterosexuals is, of course, absurd. Statistically, most of them will be, and I don't think Egalia expects to change anyone's sexual orientation whatsoever. They aim to get the kids, no matter their sexual preferences when they grow up, to accept the fact that other people may have a different sexual orientation than their own.
09:57 PM on 07/01/2011
Of course boys are allowed to be boyish, but above all kids are allowed to be kids.

We think we are free - but when we interact with our kids we almost always suggest something within the gender categories. And most kids comply and accomodate. But some can´t - they won´t fit our constrained moulds. No one will fare badly by beeing given all the possabilities in life.
07:32 PM on 06/27/2011
I have taught preschool for 6 years and have a degree in Early Childhood Ed. Kids are gonna be who they are gonna be. If you really want to change things you have to start at home. Studies have shown that 80% of the time kids mirror their parents values. I believe in giving them access to many things and letting them choose. I always encouraged both gender's to use the kitchen and play with blocks. I have 2 boys who will, on occasion, pick up a doll, or "cook", but they prefer cars and trains. I would never dissuade them from playing with "girl toys". In my house my husband and I take turns with the chores so that our boys see daddy cooking and mommy putting things together and mowing the yard. I think that "forcing" them either way-into or out of gender roles is not a good idea.