iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

New Jersey Anti-Union Bill Approved, Governor Chris Christie Signs Into Law

New Jersey Union Bill Chris Christie

ANGELA DELLI SANTI   06/28/11 09:25 PM ET   AP

TRENTON, N.J. — New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie on Tuesday signed landmark legislation that increases pension and health contributions paid by a half-million teachers, police and other public workers and removes the issue from collective bargaining for four years.

Christie said public employee benefits have been more generous than the state can afford and need to be scaled back. The latest actuary figures show the pension and health care systems $110 billion short of their eventual liabilities.

The Republican governor said the legislation achieves two main goals: helping New Jersey taxpayers and ensuring that health and retirement benefits are still secure for public workers in future years.

"New Jersey has become a model for America," Christie said.

"Not only does this save at least $132 billion over the next 30 years for the taxpayers of New Jersey," he said, "just as importantly is an assurance to the hardworking men and women in government all across New Jersey that when the time comes for them to retire, their pension will be there for them to collect and the health insurance they will need to help them during their retirement years will be there and affordable for them as well."

He said taxpayers – already paying an average of $7,576 in property taxes, the highest in the nation – could begin to see relief when municipal levies are billed in August 2012.

The legislation fractured the state's Democratic Party.

The law evokes sweeping changes affecting current and future workers and retirees. Current workers will be assessed a portion of their health care premiums based on how much they earn and will see their pension contributions rise by at least 1 percent immediately. Future hires will have to work until they are 65, not 62, before retiring and will have to pay for health care in retirement, unlike retirees now. Workers already collecting a pension will see a suspension in their cost-of-living adjustments.

Employees who earn $60,000 and now pay $900 (1.5 percent of salary) toward health insurance will see their yearly costs more than double to $2,056 (3.4 percent of salary) for single coverage or more than triple $3,230 (5.4 percent of salary) for a family plan, after a four-year phase-in.

That amounts to 27 percent of the premium cost for single coverage and 17 percent for family coverage.

A Kaiser Family Foundation survey last year found that workers with employer-sponsored health plans paid 19 percent of the premium on average for single coverage and 30 percent for family coverage. State and local government workers paid the lowest percentage of their premiums – an average of 9 percent for single coverage and 25 percent for a family plan, according to the survey.

Public worker unions fought the changes and lost. A majority of Democrats in both houses of the Legislature bucked party leaders and opposed the plan. But it was muscled through with support from minority Republicans and a few Democrats after Christie struck a deal with legislative leaders of both parties.

A leading opponent, Assembly Majority Leader Joe Cryan, said Christie divided Democrats and weakened unions to achieve his goal.

"Crushing collective bargaining was the culmination of a premeditated crusade pitting neighbor against neighbor in an effort to drive a conservative agenda that would appeal to even the most ardent national Republicans," Cryan said. "Mission accomplished."

Christie said he anticipates legal challenges to the legislation.

Other states have been seeking to force public employees to pay more for benefits and limit collective bargaining rights. A GOP-led effort in Wisconsin calls for public workers to pay more for health and pension benefits beginning in late August unless a lawsuit by a coalition of unions is successful.

In Ohio, Gov. John Kasich in March signed a law limiting bargaining rights, which has yet to go into effect. In Michigan, the Republican state Senate has passed measures to require most public employees to cover at least 20 percent of the cost of buying their health insurance coverage, with some flexibility for local bargaining units.

The Massachusetts House passed a bill in late April stripping public-sector unions of the right to bargain over health care.

Christie said other states could learn from New Jersey's bipartisan cooperation to get similar legislation passed and from the creation of employer-employee pension management boards to oversee the public-sector retirement funds.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
TRENTON, N.J. — New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie on Tuesday signed landmark legislation that increases pension and health contributions paid by a half-million teachers, police and other public wor...
TRENTON, N.J. — New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie on Tuesday signed landmark legislation that increases pension and health contributions paid by a half-million teachers, police and other public wor...
Filed by Alexander Belenky  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 6,116
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (77 total)
10:13 AM on 08/01/2011
Why is everyone okay with the standard of living decreasing for most Americans while the wealthy earn more and pay less in taxes. When governors like Christie talk about the "new norm" what they mean is that they think all American workers are overpaid - and yes that includes you.
09:54 AM on 08/01/2011
I think it's only fair then that NJ elected officials also contribute to their pension and benefits. Where's your bill for this Christie?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
china6
09:02 AM on 08/01/2011
Why does the left keep putting teachers in with firemen and police, maybe teachers should get 4 weeks vacation like them?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
StephenDedalus82
08:33 AM on 08/01/2011
Yes the real problem in this country us that teachers and firefighters are too privileged...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BruntLIVE
Deal with my fullboreness
07:23 AM on 08/01/2011
Karma is coming
11:24 AM on 07/12/2011
I need to write Christie again.
photo
stevechengmead
Vietnam Veteran, Retired Fireman, Regan Republican
12:09 AM on 07/04/2011
New Jersey can't just print money like the Fed so, they must live within their budget. I think $3000 a year for a state employees health insurance per family is reasonable, in fact, its a bargain ! I pay $2200 per MONTH for my family's health ins. ( 22% of that in an increase started this year due to new Fed requirements......THANKS TO OBAMACARE ! ).
10:57 AM on 07/05/2011
You are so right, I'd bet that all those dems don't know a darn thing about Obamasoncare.,
Seniors are already paying more co-pay. The Feds have the right to go into your bank account and take money as they see fit. They also took 500 billion dollars out of medicare to pay for that stupid Obamasoncare.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pinknlynn
I Am My Brother's Keeper
03:12 PM on 08/24/2011
You obviously got this from FOX News.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chadizzy
12:21 PM on 07/01/2011
I wonder who you folks care about more workers, taxpayers, or the children? If its the children then you need to step back and think. What happened in WI has been great for the children. Smaller class sizes, teachers having to teach 6 classes instead of 5 out of seven which makes for the smaller class sizes. One school has a 1.5 million dollar surplus opposed to the 400k they were in the hole for the budget. So take a step back and ask yourself who is what is more important the teachers benefits and pay or the students who are benefiting?

http://washingtonexaminer.com/politics/2011/06/union-curbs-rescue-wisconsin-school-district
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rajb1037
Fortis Fortuna Adiuvat
03:32 PM on 06/30/2011
I'm not sure that I agree with the headline or that this is an especially anti-union bill.

Yes, these issues are removed from collective bargaining for four years, but they also have a four-year phase-in. At the end of the day, the unions still exist, collective bargaining still exists, these individuals are still receiving decent wages, and will be responsible for a very reasonable (and still below average) % of their benefits. Lets not get carried away, folks. This is not the same situation as in Wisconsin.
photo
Joanne B
Enjoy this day!
04:45 PM on 06/30/2011
I agree with you somewhat, I just pray it deosn't go the way Wisconsin went, that seems unconstituional what they did to the State workers there, you don't legislate collective bargening or override the existance of Unions...we have taken a step back in time in that State and I sure hope NJ and this crazt Governor doesn't mimic Wisconsin anytime soon!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chadizzy
12:06 PM on 07/01/2011
Actually WI plan has helped the schools.

http://washingtonexaminer.com/politics/2011/06/union-curbs-rescue-wisconsin-school-district
11:03 AM on 07/05/2011
Christy is the man if you like it or not. Go Christy, dump the unions all over this country
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
snesich
04:01 AM on 06/30/2011
Don't worry, people. It'll all turn out fine.

Conservatives succeeded in helping big business destroy the private sector unions years ago.

Now, they're out to destroy the last remaining unions, those comprised of teachers, cops, fire fighters, and other public servants.

By why would this worry anyone? Don't people know that when all the unions are gone, big corporations will still provide American workers with really good wages and salaries. And they'll still give us very good health care coverage. And, we'll all have very solid, reliable, guaranteed pensions. And more.

And why will corporations do this? Well, because they just like us. That's what motivates them. Not profit. Not earnings. Not maximizing their gains. Not minimizing labor costs. Absolutely not.

The motivation for any corporation is to be nice to people---especially their work force---and to consider their needs before anything else.

When corporations---both unionized and non-unionized---started paying people a living wage, and giving them good benefits and pensions, they only did it to be nice. The fact that unions grew strong, organized and forced them to respect and reward the people who actually produced the wealth had absolutely nothing to do with it.

In fact, if the unions never came along, the corporations would have still gladly given us all of that and more.

Unions never helped anyone or anything. They were just a bunch of lazy bums.

Trust the corporations. They'll take care of you. Hate your government. Hate taxes. Hate unions.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BreezyinVA
Be True!
04:12 PM on 06/30/2011
People may not realize that the term red necks came from the coal miners trying to unionize in West Virginia. They wore red bandanas to signify their support.

They were systematically k i l l e d for it.

Unions had to be tough. They went up against big powerful businesses.

Fanned for clarity.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WARHUKKER
“My country, right or wrong
01:40 AM on 07/01/2011
I guess all is fair since Unions succeeded in destroying manufacturing in this country with unreasonable wage,and work rule demands,and putting out crappy products.
01:39 AM on 06/30/2011
At work in PA the local unions tried to get us to unionize. My company relocated here because PA is a non union, employment at will state and we proud of it. The only reason why the unions want us is because we are the largest employer in the county and they would benefit with our expensive union dues. Unions today are nothing more than a money making business that promote laziness and complacency among the workforce.

We are continuing to make a profit and hiring's been escalating lately without the help of a union.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WARHUKKER
“My country, right or wrong
01:42 AM on 07/01/2011
I couldn't agree more,Unions had there place at one time but third and fourth generation Union members look at their jobs as a right ,not a privilege.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JosephHill
03:39 PM on 07/01/2011
Obviously, the employing class, with a big boost from the media, have been so successful at propagandizing against unions and their members, someone can make a statement such as the last sentence [above] and expect to be taken seriously. Of course you're "continuing to make a profit".

As long as you can get away with compensating your workers with a smaller and smaller piece of the pie, your profits will continue to soar! How large do profits have to grow before they are called "obscene"?

As long as there is a very large pool of unemployed workers who are desperate for ANY kind of income, employers can pick and choose the most compliant and subservient among them. Hiring will continue to escalate when you can hire an entire family for less than you'd have to pay a unionized worker. Who's gonna get in your way if you mistreat or shortchange your employees? Anybody who might speak up can expect to lose his/her job when you can hire another desperate worker for even less money.

Without the solidarity of union members and ALL those who work for a living, an employer could conceivably hire half the working class to kill the other half. I believe it was Jay Gould who made this observation many years ago. Please see snesich's post above [June 30...4:01 am]. S/he sums up employer-employee relationships in a nutshell.
05:36 PM on 07/02/2011
Hey Joe there is no greater propaganda than that which the Unions are trying to push down our throats and by force at that. I worked in Union shops and on Union contract jobs and when you are threatened to slow down because you are making the Union Boys look bad (who by the way spent most of the morning eating, the lunch hour drinking and the afternoon sleeping). I believe the Unions were good back in the days when child labor went unchecked and employees were getting screwed left and right by big business thugs but today is a different story and a different time. How about an honest day’s wages for an honest day’s work and a little pride in the workmanship would help too! Jobs are not a right for anyone, they are a privilege and if you take advantage of an employer’s generosity then you ought to expect to lose your job period and no employer should be held hostage by Union thugs whether they are a government employer or in the private sector. We are not European Socialist and if we continue to act like them we will end up like them… Flat broke and rioting in the streets for money and food!
12:50 AM on 06/30/2011
Anybody reading what's happening in Wisconsin? The GOP hasn't a clue on how to fix this economy. You can't live on minimum wage alone and if it weren't for unions that's exactly what would happen to most employees. If big business is making money, the employees deserve their fair share. Big business doesn't want to pay their fair share and the GOP spins it into unions and pensions to protect big business. No new taxes and you cut the salaries of the people that benefit the state most. Wisconsin will be coming to a town near you very soon and we'll see how happy the taxpayers are then.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BreezyinVA
Be True!
04:14 PM on 06/30/2011
Remember how bush sent us shopping. They forget that people with no money can't shop. They want to hurt the economy so the wrong person(s) get blamed.
06:48 AM on 07/01/2011
My wife, a teacher, has not paid a dime into her pension yet. 14 yrs. and it is a very lucrative pension. now she has to contribute a small percentage. She pays alot less into her pension than I have to put into my 401k, and her fund will be bigger and safer. Health Care also goes through my wife, because the plan at my private employer is still greatly more expensive than the public plan. ( even after the changes)

The business climate is improving here, so we aren't going to see the mass exodus that you predict.

Most importantly, this is PROTECTING taxpayers. Govt isn't formed to create jobs and give handouts to their employees funded by taxpayers. The more benefits the public union gets, the more money is taken from the taxpayers.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BreezyinVA
Be True!
01:00 PM on 07/01/2011
It is called a benefit and means she gets paid less because of it.
01:23 PM on 07/01/2011
Who wants to teach in NJ? It's very hard to find teachers for the eastern states because of those rough winters. They have to recruit from the south and they have to entice them someway. Just don't complain about bad teachers or overcrowded classrooms. Also, this isn't going to solve your budget crisis by a long shot.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tom Langley
Successful Beer Guy
11:32 PM on 06/29/2011
New Jersy may be a model for North Kore! But it's no model for the US, much less all of America, you flap jeweled jack wagon!
09:18 PM on 06/29/2011
Score: -1
rundu4
11:19 AM on June 29, 2011
There was a time and place for unions. The greed and abuse of management and near slave-labor conditions created the unions. However, those conditions don't exist in American government.

The unions destroyed GM and Chrysler, destroyed America's heavy industries such as rubber & steel, and now they are destroying the Post Office and other government services.

AFSCME and their wh-res such as Quinn, Cullerton and Madigan have nearly bankrupted Illinois and their pension plan is ruining state services.

I hope Emanuel stands his ground. We need the recent Wisconsin collective bargaining bill in Illinois before the unions destroy Chicago, Illinois, and our assets such as McCormick Place.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WARHUKKER
“My country, right or wrong
09:01 PM on 06/29/2011
Do you live in New Jersey,if you don't, then shut the Fu!k up.
01:41 AM on 06/30/2011
I was born and raised in Morris County, but moved to PA 3 years ago. I was frustrated with the Corzine regime and how high property taxes drove many residents and businesses out of the state. Now with Christie in charge and standing up to these corrupt unions, I might consider moving back to the Garden State someday.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BreezyinVA
Be True!
04:17 PM on 06/30/2011
States had to raise property taxes since their shared revenues from the federal goverment were cut so much when bush gave tax cuts to the most wealthy. Every state had to raise taxes. See the big picture. Tax cuts for those who don't need them are destroying our way of life.
11:09 AM on 07/05/2011
Christy is the man, and those dems in NJ know it and can't do a thing about it.