iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

State Of The Climate Report: World Continues To Warm, Making Extreme Weather Events 'More Likely'

State Of The Climate 2011 Report

By RANDOLPH E. SCHMID   06/28/11 04:55 PM ET   AP

WASHINGTON -- The world's climate is not only continuing to warm, it's adding heat-trapping greenhouse gases even faster than in the past, researchers said Tuesday.

Indeed, the global temperature has been warmer than the 20th century average every month for more than 25 years, they said at a teleconference.

"The indicators show unequivocally that the world continues to warm," Thomas R. Karl, director of the National Climatic Data Center, said in releasing the annual State of the Climate report for 2010.

"There is a clear and unmistakable signal from the top of the atmosphere to the depths of the oceans," added Peter Thorne of the Cooperative Institute for Climate and Satellites, North Carolina State University.

Carbon dioxide increased by 2.60 parts per million in the atmosphere in 2010, which is more than the average annual increase seen from 1980-2010, Karl added. Carbon dioxide is the major greenhouse gas accumulating in the air that atmospheric scientists blame for warming the climate.

The warmer conditions are consistent with events such as heat waves and extreme rainfall, Karl said at a teleconference. However, it is more difficult to make a direct connection with things like tornado outbreaks, he said.

"Any single weather event is driven by a number of factors, from local conditions to global climate patterns and trends. Climate change is one of these," he said. "It is very likely that large-scale changes in climate, such as increased moisture in the atmosphere and warming temperatures, have influenced – and will continue to influence – many different types of extreme events, such as heavy rainfall, flooding, heat waves and droughts.

The report, being published by the American Meteorological Society, lists 2010 as tied with 2005 for the warmest year on record, according to studies by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and NASA. A separate analysis, done in Britain, lists 2010 as second warmest.

Deke Arndt, chief of the Climate Monitoring Branch at NCDC, noted that every month since early 1985 has been warmer than the 20th century average for the month.

Even more willing to attribute extreme weather events to climate change were speakers at a second briefing organized by the Pew Center on Climate Change.

"Scientists have concluded just recently that the link between climate change and extreme weather is not so much theoretical anymore as it is observational," Fred Guterl , executive editor of Scientific American magazine, said at that teleconference.

"Climate change is a risk factor for extreme weather just as eating salty foods is a risk factor for heart disease," said Jay Gulledge, director of the Science & Impacts Program at the Pew Center. "That doesn't mean we can predict the next flood in Iowa or drought in Georgia ... but it means they are more likely."

Meanwhile, a separate report from the Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences at the University of Colorado at Boulder said the Earth is getting thicker around the middle due to ice loss from the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets. "If you imagine the Earth is like a soccer ball and you push down on the North Pole, it would bulge out at its `equator,'" said CIRES fellow Steve Nerem, co-author of the study.

At the NOAA briefing, Karl added that the Greenland ice sheet lost more mass last year than any year in the last decade. Melting of the land-based ice sheets in places like Greenland, Antarctica and other regions has raised concerns about rising sea levels worldwide.

"The arctic is changing faster that most of the rest of the world," added Walt Meier, a research scientist at the National Snow and Ice Data Center, University of Colorado. "This has long been expected." In addition, he said, the September Arctic sea ice extent was the third smallest in 30 years, older, thicker sea ice is disappearing, there is a shorter duration of snow cover, and the permafrost is melting.

Thorne added that the conclusion that the earth is warming does not rest on a single type of data.

The 2010 report adds information on lake surfaces and permafrost temperatures for the first time, bringing the total number of climate indicators considered to 41. The report involved 368 researchers from 45 countries.

Other findings of the report:

_Alpine glaciers shrank for the 20th consecutive year.

_Even with a moderate-to-strong La Nina during the latter half of the year, which is associated with cooler equatorial waters in the tropical Pacific, the 2010 average global sea surface temperature was third warmest on record and sea level continued to rise.

_Oceans were saltier than average in areas of high evaporation and fresher than average in areas of high precipitation, suggesting that the water cycle is intensifying.

_A strong warm El Nino climate pattern at the beginning of 2010 transitioned to a cool La Nina by July, contributing to some unusual weather patterns around the world and impacting global regions in different ways.

_Tropical cyclone activity was below normal in nearly all basins around the globe, especially in much of the Pacific Ocean. The Atlantic basin was the exception, with near-record high North Atlantic basin hurricane activity.

_Heavy rains led to a record wet spring (September to November) in Australia, ending a decade-long drought.

_The Arctic Oscillation affected large parts of the Northern Hemisphere causing frigid arctic air to plunge southward and warm air to surge northward. Canada had its warmest year on record while Britain had its coldest winter at the beginning of the year and coldest December at the end of the year.

_An atmospheric pattern related to the strength and persistence of the storm track circling the Antarctic led to an all-time maximum in 2010 of average sea ice volume in the Antarctic.

___

Online:

Array

Array

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

WASHINGTON -- The world's climate is not only continuing to warm, it's adding heat-trapping greenhouse gases even faster than in the past, researchers said Tuesday. Indeed, the global temperature has...
WASHINGTON -- The world's climate is not only continuing to warm, it's adding heat-trapping greenhouse gases even faster than in the past, researchers said Tuesday. Indeed, the global temperature has...
Filed by Travis Donovan  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,194
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (12 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:31 AM on 07/29/2011
HAHAHA we have been on this planet measuring temps, gasses etc. for a very short time. To think that ANY of you have any idea what Earth will do next is laughable. It has warmed and cooled without us here to harsh extremes both directions. She will warm and cool whenever she feels like it... No matter what we do.(how much CO2 comes off a volcano...a lil' bigger pipe than the one mentioned in the article, and how many are active???) BUT do try to conserve...we have to live here for a long time.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Demetrios423
11:22 PM on 07/21/2011
Should we file this under "duh'?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
eaarth2
“An era ends when its illusions are exhausted
10:15 PM on 07/21/2011
What is strange about this 'new world' we are entering, is that Red States stand to suffer the most from climate change- and blue states the least.”
10:43 AM on 07/19/2011
A rather disturbing change in summer precipitation in the southeastern US is illustrated in this graphic. Large portions of NC,VA, and Arkansas are seeing 20-30% less precipitation in the summer than 100 years ago.
http://www.nc-climate.ncsu.edu/secc_edu/images/precipchanges.png
photo
StephenBP
What's he building in there?
09:44 PM on 07/18/2011
It is widely recognized by scientists and sensible people, that water vapor, even though it is in many respects the major green house gas, has one real drawback in terms of protecting earth from the chill of space..... it precipitates out at zero C. On cold dry nights or at altitudes where the temperature is below freezing, it does squat. CO2 keeps us from being frozen solid when water vapor falls down on the job. It is believed that episodes of "snowball earth" have occurred when, among other things, atmospheric CO2 levels were low.

So CO2 is not an insignificant greenhouse gas. Anyone who says that it is insignificant is just wrong.

Which leads to this thought experiment.... We are currently putting carbon dioxide into the atmosphere at 950 metric tons per second, which is like having an exhaust pipe a quarter mile in diameter shooting 15% CO2 exhaust out at 65 miles per hour, 24 hours a day, 365.25 days per year.....if we are putting this important greenhouse gas into the air at this rate, how long will it be before we start to feel some sort of effect from it?
photo
Terry
Singin Amazing Grace All the Way to the Swiss Bank
10:07 AM on 07/19/2011
The trolls often use this water vapor as a Greenhouse gas to say it is all no problem. CO2 is just like water. But it is not. Water vapor is constantly changing to liquid and falling back to Earth. It takes the CO2 over 100 years to come back to earth in equivalent volumes. So as the results show, the CO2 builds up consistently. And the Greenhouse effect continues building. F&F
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Chris 1
04:02 PM on 07/18/2011
Climate Lysenkoism at it again;

http://calderup.wordpress.com/2011/07/17/%E2%80%9Cno-you-mustnt-say-what-it-means%E2%80%9D/

The "consensus" is a sham, greenbat politics taken to the extreme by power hunger.
photo
DocSkull
My questions aren't rhetorical.
08:42 AM on 07/19/2011
You deniers love wordpress. What does it have to do with the nearly complete consensus on global warming?
photo
gallon
Those who fail to remember history are, um
04:14 PM on 07/20/2011
Chris1, once again, continues the anti science 'AGW is a scam' denier agenda encouraged by the professional denier campaign.
12:52 PM on 07/18/2011
The weather extremes of late are basically a result of a wandering jetstream vs. a laminar jetstream. Jetstream is affected/controlled by the Solar wind which has been very low for this and the last 11 year cycle. Expect it to continue diminishing until around 2030. Expect extreme weather anomalies to continue.

I love the quote about how the CO2 level increased 2.6 ppm or 0.00000026% if you prefer. What do you think their degree of accuracy is? Less than 0.000000001%? Give me a break. Plug that change into the equation of Beers-Lambert Gas Law and see what type of absorption increase you get. Bupkus.

The statement that "Carbon dioxide is the major greenhouse gas" is wrong, water vapor is THE major greenhouse gas. Ever notice clouds?

CO2 is not the problem and never has been, even when it was much higher than it is today. Let me ask you a question. What should level of CO2 in the atmosphere be in your opinion?
photo
AGooglyMinotaur
Ahh, Theseus. It appears you are out of thread.
02:08 PM on 07/18/2011
Right event with wrong causality.
Wrong, lack of understanding of measuring mechanisms.
Wrong, incomplete reading of sentence.
Wrong.

The jet stream is not affected by "solar wind," which is a stream of charged particles. If you meant to say that the jet stream is affected by solar OUTPUT, you would be very slightly correct, except that you fail to note the various subsequent terrestrial processes that compound these effects. While lower layers of atmosphere have warmed, the upper layers of atmosphere have cooled, as more heat captured by greenhouse gases is trapped closer to the Earth's surface. The resulting increase in temperature instability at the tropopause, the barrier between troposphere and stratosphere, has affected the influence of the Rossby waves that shape the jet stream current. The magnified increase in temperature at the Earth's poles decreases the temperature differential with sub-Arctic jet stream currents. Therefore, warming is the primary force driving changes in jet stream activity. Not solar wind. You may also find NASA's Solar Radiation and Climate Experiment instructive: http://lasp.colorado.edu/sorce/index.htm
photo
AGooglyMinotaur
Ahh, Theseus. It appears you are out of thread.
02:15 PM on 07/18/2011
Part 2:

This practice of showing several leading zeroes to call into question the accuracy of measurement in misleading in the highest degree. Suggesting that we have a lower level of precision than we do (not to mention name-dropping the Beers-Lambert law) simply panders to an uneducated reader. There are a good many scientific-minded people on these threads who will not let you get away with that rubbish. For instance, a scanning electron microscope can accurately measure particles at a resolution of 0.000000001 meters. That's also a very small number. Durr. Molecular correlation spectrography and Raman scatter spectrography are more than capable of accurately measuring atmospheric CO2 at those concentrations.

The article doesn't say "Carbon dioxide is the major greenhouse gas." It says, "Carbon dioxide is the major greenhouse gas accumulating in the air that atmospheric scientists blame for warming the climate." This statement is true. Everyone knows that water vapor (like all triatomic and larger molecules) is subject to the same infrared absorption/emission spectra effects as CO2. However, water vapor is not "accumulating" in the air, as noted in that sentence. We do not emit 30 gigatons of water vapor every year. We have not raised atmospheric concentrations of water vapor by 40% since the industrial revolution. Water vapor acts as a magnifier for the warmth captured by accumulating CO2; when infrared radiation is absorbed and radiated by carbon dioxide, it can then be absorbed by water vapor, compounding the effect.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Counterintuitive
We'll steer by the beacon of our 100 year forecast
12:37 PM on 07/18/2011
I notice that a lot of the Science Deniers seem to be angry people. Things will improve as we create a Safe Atmosphere for everyone to work and live within. A Safe Atmosphere means bringing CO2 down to 350 ppm. But it also means keeping scientists safe from threats, character attack, and bullying. It also means keeping the media free of corporate manipulation.
11:56 AM on 07/18/2011
Not only burning fossil fuels contributes to global warming, but also deforestation in the Amazon. All or the food conumption of cattle and concentrated farming of a single crop. Trees supply oxygen to the atmosphere while cutting them down contributes to carbon dioxide. When the permafrost melts, there is a treasure-trove of carbon dioxide just waiting to be released. The global warming naysayers will be the first to complain about the rising sea levels and heat. This is not just a cycle. There are more people on this planet than ever before.
04:39 PM on 07/18/2011
How long, do you think, before we have to start talking population control? Humans are as parasitic as bugs (so says the Matrix) and we are doing this damage to the planet, through a multitude of means, of course.
photo
DocSkull
My questions aren't rhetorical.
09:22 AM on 07/19/2011
"How long, do you think, before we have to start talking population control?"

With renewable sources of energy, never.
10:28 AM on 07/19/2011
Advanced societies already control their populations voluntarily. Consumption however is not.
03:09 PM on 07/21/2011
The problem with overpopulation hinges greatly on religion and accepted traditions within a culture. That is very difficult to change. This planet is able to support only so many people before it finds itself unable to heal itself.
photo
farmilyman
everything is illusion
06:39 AM on 07/18/2011
Oil companies spend billions of dollars on PR firms to make it seem as if the science is unclear.
photo
Terry
Singin Amazing Grace All the Way to the Swiss Bank
10:09 AM on 07/19/2011
Just imagine how much good will they could earn if they spent that money on renwable energy R&D
02:04 AM on 07/18/2011
I have never seen so many Bald Face Lies in one article in my entire life. Mr. Schmid, you really need to do your homework. It is a fact the the last decade has been actually cooler than the last five. Who are these unknown researchers and just where did the aquire thist information. I noticed that Mr. Karl overlooked the fact that the North polar region has almost doubled in the last ten years.
Most of the information in this article is either wrong, taken from out dated information, facts have been scued or miss q;uoted or worse case changed to help the green economy grow.
The plain fact of the matter is this. If every automobile, train, bus, factory, aircraft and anything else that may produce CO2 gases stopped right now 100 years nothing wourld change. There have been countless core samples taken from the polar caps that indicate the Co2 gases were worse several thousand years ago.
I know I am really wasting my time. You got everyone so paranoid over this gloom and doom fantacy, you should be ashamed of yourself.
Besides your moderators, or should I say censors won't let my comments see the light of day.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jim Milks
Ecologist
11:49 AM on 07/18/2011
I've never read so much misinformation in one post. You really should bone up on the scientific evidence, as your main point that CO2 was worse 800,000 years ago is blatantly wrong (see http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v453/n7193/full/nature06949.html). Furthermore, CO2 records now extend back to 20 million years (Tripati et al. 2009; http://www.sciencemag.org/content/326/5958/1394.abstract). Today's CO2 levels are higher than any in the past 15 million years.

Your point that if no CO2 had been emitted the world would have warmed anyway is true to a point. Increased radiation from the sun drove warming from the 1880s to the 1940s as the Little Ice Age ended. However, since the 1940s, the sun has cooled and is now in a deep solar minimum. As such, temperatures should be falling IF the sun was still the primary driver. Instead, temperatures have risen, particularly since the 1970s when pollution controls helped scrub SO2 (a known atmospheric coolant) out of the air.

Pre-industrial CO2 levels were around 278 ppm. Today's levels are ~393 ppm. If no CO2 had been emitted, then the CO2 levels should have stayed around 278 ppm. To think that we can increase CO2 by 41% and that it wouldn't have any effect at all is naive at best.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chrisd3
Excelsior!
10:53 PM on 07/18/2011
"It is a fact the the last decade has been actually cooler than the last five."

I sure would like to see your documentation for that.
photo
Publicola
Reality has a scientific bias
07:06 PM on 07/16/2011
National Academy of Sciences, 2010
------------------------------------------------------------

What is Known about Climate Change

Science has made enormous progress toward understanding climate change. As a result, there is a strong, credible body of evidence, based on multiple lines of research, documenting that Earth is warming. Strong evidence also indicates that recent warming is largely caused by human activities, especially the release of greenhouse gases through the burning of fossil fuels. 

Global warming is closely associated with other climate changes and impacts, including rising sea levels, increases in intense rainfall events, decreases in snow cover and sea ice, more frequent and intense heat waves, increases in wildfires, longer growing seasons, and ocean acidification. Individually and collectively, these changes pose risks for a wide range of human and environmental systems. While much remains to be learned, the core phenomenon, scientific questions, and hypotheses have been examined thoroughly and have stood firm in the face of serious scientific debate and careful evaluation of alternative explanations.

http://dels.nas.edu/resources/static-assets/materials-based-on-reports/reports-in-brief/Science-Report-Brief-final.pdf
11:33 AM on 07/10/2011
Please help us stop more carbon emissions and pollution and protect our farmland. All help would be appreciated.

http://www.avaaz.org/en/stop_the_quarry/97.php?cl_tta_sign=0efde73b3f67db2ae73d9c3957adc992
03:43 PM on 07/05/2011
Global warming is real but not man made. The fact that the earth warms itself from time to time is simply nature. Gore is joke. People were snow skiing on the 4th of July in Lake Tahoe, CA. Let's import some polar bears to Lake Tahoe, CA. By the way, the polar bear population is increasing, not decreasing.
photo
ILoveFiction
That's unbelievable!
04:09 PM on 07/05/2011
I guess that settles it.

I was worried for a while there.
07:57 PM on 07/06/2011
Ilovefiction, not that doesn't settle it. I'm not your idol Al Gore who really think the science is settled on this issue. Just read something intelligent about the earth's weather patterns over millions of years and you will find that the earth has warmed and cooled many times well before man had anything to do with it.
photo
Publicola
Reality has a scientific bias
04:56 PM on 07/16/2011
TomDi's papa a generation ago, in the context of the smoking-causes-cancer "debate":

"Just read something intelligen­t about the cancer patterns over millions of years and you will find that the man has gotten cancer many times well before smoking had anything to do with it."

Science denier rhetoric is stupefying.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mamma Roma
Contrarian and proud of it
01:23 AM on 07/06/2011
I have a question. I do believe the earth warms itself from the core, in which case, do you think the world having been blacktopped from continent to continent, would prevent it from releasing enough pressure or heat or what ever, to cool off, thereby heating us up even more, kind of like a cast iron skillet on top of a flame?
photo
ILoveFiction
That's unbelievable!
05:43 AM on 07/06/2011
That's what I always thought.
08:00 PM on 07/06/2011
First of all, most of the earth is covered with water. therefore, the 30% or so left is not completly covered in blacktop. So, for the sake of argument, we agree that 15% of all land is covered in blacktop. Based on that, it appears unlikely that this would cause a rise in temperature.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dlo2
MS RN
11:41 AM on 07/04/2011
Please read NEJM 2010; 362:1061-1063 Shuman's article; JAMA 2011 last month has an article; JAMA 2002;287(17):2282; JAMA 2004:291(1):99-103; JAMA 2006; 296(8):913-920; JAMA 1996; 275(3):217-223...and many more journals that you might find via your favorite search engine.