More

Daniel Walsh Resigns: Bishop Embroiled In Sex Abuse Cases Is 'Very Tired'

Bishop Daniel Walsh Resigns

ROBIN HINDERY   06/30/11 08:40 PM ET   AP

SAN FRANCISCO — A Catholic bishop in Northern California whose diocese has recently been embroiled in priest sex abuse cases resigned Thursday from his post after 11 years.

The Vatican announced that Pope Benedict XVI accepted the resignation of Bishop Daniel Walsh of Roman Catholic Diocese of Santa Rosa.

Diocese spokeswoman Deirdre Frontczak said Walsh is "very tired" and has been seeking to hand over his responsibilities for about two years. His resignation, effective Thursday, comes a year short of his mandatory retirement at age 75, Frontczak said.

"It's been a difficult decade," she said. "He walked into miserable situation and has done a heroic job of restoring the diocese financially and restoring the dignity of the priesthood."

The diocese has been hit with several lawsuits under Walsh's tenure involving alleged child sex abuse by former priests.

In 2006, Walsh was threatened with criminal charges for failing to report accusations of misconduct against the Rev. Xavier Ochoa for five days after the priest admitted the abuses to Walsh. Authorities said the delay allowed Ochoa time to flee to Mexico before he could be arrested.

California law requires clergymen to immediately report suspicion of child sex abuse and to follow up by fax or email within 36 hours. Walsh agreed to participate in a four-month counseling program and was not charged.

The Vatican announcement of Walsh's resignation said he was stepping down under the code of canon law that says bishops are asked to offer their resignation for some serious issue that makes them unfit for office. Often it is used for bishops who are ill or have been dogged by scandal.

The Vatican spokesman, the Rev. Federico Lombardi, said he had no information on why Walsh was resigning a year ahead of schedule, but he noted that a co-adjutor bishop was already in place in Santa Rosa, Monsignor Robert Vasa.

Co-adjutor bishops are appointed by the pope to automatically succeed bishops when they retire. Frontczak said Vasa, 59, will take over as Santa Rosa bishop Friday.

Vasa's presence in the diocese was a signal that Wash's resignation wasn't a sudden decision but had rather been in the works for some time, Lombardi said.

Vasa was appointed in January and arrived in March.

A spokeswoman for the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops said that after 30 years as a bishop in several dioceses, Walsh felt that the timing was right to step down. He had brought the diocese through hard times and Vasa was in place and could immediately take over, said Sister Mary Ann Walsh, who is not related to the departing bishop.

Frontczak did not respond to a query about whether Walsh's resignation was tied to the lawsuits or the accusations surrounding his handling of the Ochoa case. She said the diocese staff was saddened by his departure.

"We'll really miss him. For all the difficulties he's encountered, we love him as a person and think he's made contribution," she said of Walsh, who has led the diocese since 2000.

The diocese in 2007 settled a sex abuse lawsuit involving Ochoa by agreeing to pay more than $5 million to 10 alleged victims. The former priest still has not been found.

Last year, the diocese was named in lawsuits filed by four men who said another former priest, Patrick Joseph McCabe, molested them during his two years at St. Bernard's Parish in Eureka from 1983 to 1985. The men said the diocese knew McCabe already faced child sex abuse charges in his native Ireland but failed to warn parishioners.

Walsh was not bishop during the time in question. The lawsuits were withdrawn earlier this year.

The Diocese of Santa Rosa includes a Catholic population of 150,000 and encompasses more than 11,700 square miles in the counties of Sonoma, Napa, Mendocino, Lake, Humboldt and Del Norte.

___

Associated Press writer Nicole Winfield in Rome and religion writer Rachel Zoll in New York contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST RELIGION

SAN FRANCISCO — A Catholic bishop in Northern California whose diocese has recently been embroiled in priest sex abuse cases resigned Thursday from his post after 11 years. The Vatican announce...
SAN FRANCISCO — A Catholic bishop in Northern California whose diocese has recently been embroiled in priest sex abuse cases resigned Thursday from his post after 11 years. The Vatican announce...
Filed by Alana Horowitz  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 528
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (11 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
joeyfoto
“Écraser l'infamie!”
10:57 AM on 07/05/2011
These are criminal charges that should be dealt with in the criminal justice system. This is not a mater of religion; it's a criminal conspiracy.

Despite the crocodile tears of the commentator below, these conspiracies have been proven repeatedly. That is why the big payouts have been made — usually outside of court. Corporations, like RCC Inc., don't pay out big cash settlements out of the kindness of their heart. They pay when they are not confident that they can prevail in court.

The pattern of conspiracy has become obvious, to hundreds of investigators, even through the cloaks of silence. I am with those who believe that more co-conspiritors should see the inside of prison, for these repeated patterns of criminal abuse of the innocent.
firstamendment3
Ex pede Herculem
05:17 PM on 07/04/2011
Why isn't he in jail with the rest of them?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Andres64
Religion is a sectually transmitted disease.
12:32 PM on 07/05/2011
Because the Christians won't allow it.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:30 PM on 07/04/2011
The laws apply to the clergy. Prove a cover up in court. Prove a conspiracy. Prove it!. Do it! Don't post about it! Put your action where your mouths are!

It costs nothing for board commentators to accuse the Church of cover up and conspiracy.

Lawyers make false accusations routinely in order to taint jury pools and imply they have evidence for RICO trials It's a fine art among Plaintiff attorneys: The smear job of innuendo in the press to influence the outcome of a lawsuit.


If they had 1/1000th of the facts they claim they do this would be a massive war crimes trial.

I have a local attorney on the ethical ropes over his false accusations and attempts to taint a jury pool by claiming there was an Archdiocese coverup. The case against the Archdiocese is in the process of being dismissed.

The individual claims against a dead doctor who worked in a Catholic Hospital will continue. The conspiracy crap died a death with the "put up or shut up" demands to the attorney from Citizens like myself to either make their case or drop it or face a libel suit and demands for disbarment..

Here's a hint to other Catholics: hound those attorneys making those claims.

In short, push back. Lawyers do not like it one bit being caught empty handed and full of slander and libel and missing the most important thing----a conspiracy or cover up or RICO case.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
joeyfoto
“Écraser l'infamie!”
10:57 AM on 07/05/2011
Nonsense...jt
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JohnTheMac
Now, why don't you go home and get your shine box?
03:30 PM on 07/04/2011
They're still covering it up, right here in Trenton NJ.
The diocese is sitting on info of cases from the 40's, hoping the victims die without blowing the story.
There's a Monsignor, deceased, who actually has a High School named after him, who molested boys in the 1940s in Trenton.
Not sure why HP is deleting this post though.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JohnTheMac
Now, why don't you go home and get your shine box?
03:22 PM on 07/04/2011
The Church is STILL covering up anything they can!
Here in New Jersey, the Diocese of Trenton has sat on information of a child molesting priest who committed acts back in the 1940's. Many of the victims are gone now, along with Monsignor Donovan, and so they will not revoke his status as "Monsignor", nor change the name of the High School named after him. It's a slap in the face to his victims to see him celebrated still.
One victim, a relative of mine, was told a few years ago that they should just let it go, since they were older, and had a successful career. You know, it's not like the attacks affected them to the point of causing them to be homeless, etc.
The bishops, etc, should be put in jail for what they covered up. Instead, after higher ups knew of Father Donovan's issues with children, they put him in charge of an ORPHANAGE in Pennington NJ! I can't imagine the horrors he could have perpetrated there!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Asmodean1
Truth is only true if based on facts.
11:15 PM on 07/03/2011
If a worker/manager/supervisor or owner of a day care center didn't report/failed to report or aided in the escape of - a perpetrator of a heinous crime against a child.... what would happen ?
Boomerwoman
Momma said there'd be days like this
04:30 PM on 07/03/2011
Covering up scandals and pedophelia is REALLY EXHAUSTING!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Johnd139
07:13 PM on 07/03/2011
Applause!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:52 PM on 07/03/2011
What respectworthy physician or scientist or philsopher will undertake to examine the hideous story of the priesthood morphing worldwide into a army of sexual molesters and criminal deviants under the noses of the flock? Who will show the origins, development, and actual state of this criminal priest hierarchy and why the ruling class shielded them from justice then and now? Who will examine the parallels of the evolution and develpment of this monstrous organization with other failures of humanity that destroyed and maimed the souls of millions of innocents? Who will tell this story truthfully?
photo
lackofoversight
A nickel isn't worth a dime today... Y. Berra
07:24 AM on 07/04/2011
One thing we know for sure .... we won't hear it from the Catholic Church.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:27 PM on 07/03/2011
What can you say about a man that abetted the sexual abuse of uncounted children by assisting the criminals in their flight from justice. that man belongs in prison as surely as any citizen who assists in the commission of other criminal offenses.
02:10 PM on 07/03/2011
"In 2006, Walsh was threatened with criminal charges for failing to report the alleged misconduct of the Rev. Xavier Ochoa, allowing him time to flee to Mexico. Walsh agreed to participate in counseling and was not charged.'

What kind of 'counseling' does one receive for being immoral?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MMMMarilyn
01:02 PM on 07/03/2011
A tired old queen, alright.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ami Toben
Plenty more where that came from
11:08 AM on 07/03/2011
More and more and more and more proof of how criminal and how hypocritical this organization is.
photo
lostnacfgop
Tiny Ripples of Hope from a Blue State's Red spot
10:18 AM on 07/03/2011
Compared to many stories which have broken over the decade on this sordid, sinful, criminal topic, this particular story seems awfully tame to use the word "Embroiled in scandal" in the title. Doesn't mean that there is not more to Walsh's involvement in the "scandal," but even if there is more to it, it is noticeably absent from this story. The headline would have the reader believe this retiring bishop was another Cardinal Law or Roger (the Dodger) Mahony.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
mrkurtzhedead
I'll be back, when it's dark!
11:03 AM on 07/03/2011
"In 2006, Walsh was threatened with criminal charges for failing to report the alleged misconduct of the Rev. Xavier Ochoa, allowing him time to flee to Mexico. Walsh agreed to participate in counseling and was not charged"

Yeah, no problem there.
photo
lostnacfgop
Tiny Ripples of Hope from a Blue State's Red spot
12:05 AM on 07/04/2011
you've actually made my point. This was the only example cited in the article of Walsh's "embroilment" in the scandal, and it was five years old. The described conduct is morally reprehensible, sure, but it is not near the sorry exploits of serial shell-gamers like the two Cardinals mentioned in my original post (Law and Mahony). The latter was involved in shuttling perpetrators around in two different California Dioceses for years, and then kept making up reasons why files on the perpetrators didn't have to be turned over in litigation. Law "presided" over some of the worst serial offenders in this country, and was spirited away to the Vatican when things got really ugly for him in Boston. So, by comparison if nothing else, Walsh's single cited instance of bad behavior seems less severe.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:32 PM on 07/03/2011
It's because "highly educated" editors, writers, and publishers have no moral compass. They write what sells without creating personal consequences. They believe what their powerful connections, friends and subjects tell them. In short, they are paragons of the ruling class and disseminators of that class' point of view. Why alse would you paint these heinous crimes so lightly?
09:43 PM on 07/02/2011
I don't understand fundamentalist relegions. They protect child molestors and let them back in their church around the children, but say that gay people are ruining the world and are an "abomination." Using common sense one could come to the conclusion that a child who is molested is emotionally scarred for life. Apparently, a child seeing two people of the same sex kissing or even holding hands is the worst thing a child can be around (because they think it says so in the bible. However, there is nothing said about child molestation so it is o.k. to forgive the molestors and expose kids to them.)

I am so glad that the majority of people in this country aren't full of fear and are able to think for themselves. Imagine where we would be if that wasn't true.
10:46 PM on 07/02/2011
I have never been able to understand fundamentalist religions using common sense.
KennebunkportIndependent
Back in my day, we had NINE planets.
03:01 AM on 07/04/2011
The whole point of fundamentalism is to give up thinking for oneself.
photo
DRaymond
Network administrator, voiceovers
09:14 PM on 07/02/2011
Hey everyone, you are on this thing called the internet, which means that you can look up the facts on something when the site is too lazy or has too much of an agenda to do it themselves.  I see page after page of comments yet nobody, nor the original article, actually looked up the details:

At a meeting on April 28 Ochoa admitted to the sexual misconduct.  It was the first time that they had learned of the misconduct.  He was immediately removed from the priesthood and a letter was sent to Child Protective Services on May 1.  Ochoa left a voice mail to another priest on May 4th saying that he was in a Tuijuana hospital.  Currently nobody knows where Ochoa is.

Walsh was threatened with prosecution not because he didn't report the abuse but because he didn't report the abuse within 24 hours.  The failure to meet the deadline is a misdemeanor.

However, to equate his actions, as many seem to want to do, with the bad old days when allegations were ignored or never reported or priests were shuffled around after some period of counseling is simply  witch-hunting.
12:14 AM on 07/03/2011
While in this case the Church seems to have responded in a timely manner, what is overlooked is the dysfunctional policy of celibacy that underlies most of these cases of abuse. When is the Church going to do something about this?
photo
DRaymond
Network administrator, voiceovers
09:40 PM on 07/03/2011
Well, strictly speaking timely would have been within the 24 hour requirement. And while I think that allowing married priests would be a good thing for a number of other reasons the statistics show that the rate of pedophilia is not significantly different between priests and other adult men. There were certainly a large number of cases but they were from a relatively limited number of offenders.
01:05 AM on 07/03/2011
Interesting that you used the term witch-hunting in regards to a Catholic priest...A little turn-about perhaps? They were quite proficient at that for a long time.