iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

AB32: California Cap And Trade Delayed Another Year

California Cap And Trade Ab32

By JASON DEAREN   06/30/11 12:00 AM ET   AP

SAN FRANCISCO -- California regulators on Wednesday said they would give power plants, refineries and other major polluters another year to comply with a new state program that provides financial incentives to emit fewer greenhouse gases.

Mary Nichols, chairwoman of the Air Resources Board, said in testimony before a state Senate committee that the government is giving California's major polluters until 2013 to comply with its cap-and-trade program.

Most polluters previously were to have begun cutting emissions under the program in 2012. The program was passed in December by the board, which said it hoped other states would follow suit since Congress had failed to pass national climate change legislation.

"This would not affect the stringency of the program or change the amount of emission reductions that the program will achieve, keeping us on track to meet the 2020 target required by AB32," Nichols said.

Cap and trade is the key piece of the California's 2006 climate law – called AB32 – and will cover 85 percent of the state's worst polluters.

Nichols said the state would still initiate the regulatory framework for cap and trade in 2012, pending the outcome of an appeal of a lawsuit challenging the program.

In general terms, California's cap-and-trade program works by requiring companies that produce pollution, such as a utility or a refinery, to buy permits from the state that allow it to send a specified amount of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases into the air each year. Those permits could then be bought and sold by the polluters in a marketplace.

If a company in Long Beach is 20 percent under its pollution allowance, for example, it can sell the unused portion to a company in San Francisco that has exceeded its quota.

The seller company gets to keep the money, so polluters can even make a profit, if the marketplace sets a price above the initial cost of the permit.

The amount of emissions allowed would be reduced over time, and the regulations would expand in 2015 to include refineries and fuel distributors, such as oil companies.

The cap would reach its lowest level in 2020, when California wants its greenhouse gas emissions reduced to 1990 levels.

The delay announced Wednesday comes about three months after a San Francisco Superior Court judge halted work on the program, saying the air board had not properly considered alternative programs, as required by state law.

But a state appeals court on Friday allowed the board to resume work on the program, pending an appeal. That has allowed the board to schedule two public hearings on July 8 and 15 to discuss the plan.

"The delay in initial compliance lets the program get on its feet without the angst of everybody asking the question `are they ready?'" said Jon Costantino, a senior adviser at a Sacramento law firm who served formerly as the climate change planning manager at the Air Resources Board. He said the delay gives the board a full year to put finishing touches on the program without having to deal with companies dealing with compliance for the first time.

"Pressure was building on the program. This lets some of that go," he said.

Some environmental groups applauded the board's efforts to allow more time to hone the regulation while not giving up its overall goals.

"This is a smart and responsible step that also ensures that the greenhouse gas pollution reductions required by the program remain unchanged," said Derek Walker, director of strategic climate initiatives for the Environmental Defense Fund.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

SAN FRANCISCO -- California regulators on Wednesday said they would give power plants, refineries and other major polluters another year to comply with a new state program that provides financial ince...
SAN FRANCISCO -- California regulators on Wednesday said they would give power plants, refineries and other major polluters another year to comply with a new state program that provides financial ince...
Filed by Travis Donovan  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 46
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
04:46 PM on 07/19/2011
Yawn. They are pretending a court did not order a stop to cap and trade to find if it was the most judicious system (it is not).

The United States Supreme Court recently approvingly cited a global warming skeptic.

That is a message to all judges.

The cap and traders in CalGov are trying to pretend you are in power. Guess what happens when the judge says a carbon tax is less insane than cap and trade? Bye bye big business jobs down the line for bureaucrats!!
12:01 AM on 07/10/2011
Hmmmm..

Could it be continuing science that says that the Bull Sheet from the IPCC is exactly that, Bull Sheet.

Like this latest piece of REAL SCIENCE: http://pielkeclimatesci.wordpress.com/2011/07/05/new-paper-estimating-annual-numbers-of-atlantic-hurricanes-missing-from-the-hurdat-database-1878-1965-using-ship-track-density-by-vecchi-and-knutson-2011/

Yeah, it seems that there really isn't any noticable increase in hurricanes. Turns out, we just have the ability to SEE more of them.

Oh well. Yet more REAL SCIENCE that proves that Global Warmongers are nothing more than SCIENCE DENIERS and in reality are not more than religious fanatics whose green message is based upon pseudo-science and unscientific religious-like 'faith' not fact.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Moose Luck 99
GEOENGINEERINGWATCH DOT ORG
12:42 PM on 07/04/2011
Transmitting Smart Meters
Transmitting smart meters are a public health threat ... of great concern because the exposure to microwave and radiowave radiation from these meters ...
www.electricalpollution.com/smartmeters.htm
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Moose Luck 99
GEOENGINEERINGWATCH DOT ORG
12:36 PM on 07/04/2011
REDUCE GRID STRESS 20%

I reduced my electric bill by over 20% for 100 clams :)
Reduces line noise too.

http://electricsaver1200.com/
11:46 PM on 07/03/2011
on a side note, does the person who posted this realize that the link to this article has the word delay's instead of delays. Not to be an ***hole but it's those kinds of mistakes that really show what great, professional editors we have working on the post. If I have to close out your pop up advertisements, than you should at least no ur Nglish.
07:25 PM on 07/02/2011
So extortion from the state that can be bought and sold on the open market. When is California going to start selling get outta jail free cards to murders?
01:29 PM on 07/01/2011
This is such a shame!! Us Texans are gonna have to wait another year before the rest of California businesses pack up and head over here.
photo
emperance
You / Josephine. I care, too.
02:37 AM on 07/01/2011
This is such BS.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
westcoastsc
Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhe
06:05 PM on 06/30/2011
Cap and trade does not work. Remember Enron? A direct energy tax is best.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
timosides
Fly your colors.
03:52 PM on 06/30/2011
As a native california from pasadena growing up with 2nd & 3rd stage smog alerts ALL SUMMER, my family had to leave the state for the summer to breathe..we've come a long way baby! Cap and Trade is regulation...no different than wearin your seatbelt...don't like it move to TX..
MrStat1
I believe in the rule of law
04:51 PM on 06/30/2011
A lot of people are getting out of California and business is not coming in.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
timosides
Fly your colors.
05:09 PM on 06/30/2011
Allergan,Apple,Applied Materials,Chevron,Cisco Systems,DaVita,Edison Int,1st Am Corp, Ingram Micro, Oracle, Safeway, Qualcomm, Sempra Energy, Visa Interactive,Walt Disney, to name a few of the Fortune 500 companies based HERE in CA..these guys ain't goin anywhere
02:34 PM on 06/30/2011
This will help the economy a bit, useful as the state recovers. As energy costs in CA increase further (currently 50% or more than our neighboring states) it will make it difficult for companies that use significant energy to remain or locate in the state. In turn this will keep CA per capital energy use down...and give CA better air. Fewer manufacturing jobs, but probably a good trade off.
03:33 AM on 07/31/2011
Wow. That's just INSANE. What about lost jobs? What about the effect on CA's economy?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
makebofapay
01:43 PM on 06/30/2011
This is too little and too slow.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
shooter486
I am the 53%
01:51 PM on 06/30/2011
As long as there is industry in CA, there needs to be more regulation and more barriers to have a profitable business in CA. Just imagine how much better off CA will be without those blasted jobs.--TX Dept of Employment
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Visionary Excellence
02:00 PM on 06/30/2011
whenever the gov steps in and needs to regulate, its a sign of massive industry failure. In this case, power companies have decided that its okay to kill people to make a little more pocket change. Its completely unnecessary. If they want to murder for money, they should move to texas. or act like a citizen instead of mafia.
02:07 PM on 06/30/2011
lol
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Malcolm Hensley
Last of the Reagan Republicans
01:29 PM on 06/30/2011
Well California also tried it with NOx. One year a pound of Nox cost $0.45/lb 1998 - the next year it was $45.00/lb. Our cost to keep the manufacturing plant I worked at open went from $7,500.00 to $750,000!

Many closed but the Wall Street type traders made a fortune! It's worked every since but the damage was done! California's percentage of people in manufacturing has decreased as manufacturers have closed or moved to other states and nations.

California in terms of industrial electricity already averages greater than $0.12/kwh where, Arizona is about $0.07/kwh, Oregon is about $0.06/kwh, and Washington is about $0.04/kwh.

Do you think this Cap & Trade and the increase electricity cost will improve our jobs situation? Heck it's only - what - 12%!
05:01 PM on 07/19/2011
"Our cost to keep the manufactur­ing plant I worked at open went from $7,500.00 to $750,000!"

The whole point of cap and trade schemes. Not to decrease emissions, but to find the highest price which emitters will pay NOT to decrease emissions. Credulous "progressives" who think they cannot have their values used against them by scammers cannot see this.

If you want to see real crazy look for HP posters who use the spaghetti graph from IPCC AR3 as their icon/avatar. Totally debunked, even AR4 2007 dared not reuse it. But the believers in that graph will adore it and call it "settled science."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Malcolm Hensley
Last of the Reagan Republicans
10:18 PM on 07/19/2011
I was under the impression it was a tool to stop manufacturing in this country!
Look at the number of employees working in manufacturing today verse 15 years ago!
01:17 PM on 06/30/2011
Pol pot wrote cal's green laws...lol
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Richard2
01:17 PM on 06/30/2011
Cap and trade has become unpopular everywhere. It indirectly drives up the cost of electricity. And what pollution are we talking about? Colorless, odorless, harmless CO2.

CO2 levels have clearly increased from decade to decade. Yet air temperatures, ocean temperatures and sea level trends have not followed in step. The CO2 hypothesis is no longer credible to the public, due to the physical evidence everyone can see.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
shooter486
I am the 53%
01:52 PM on 06/30/2011
There was a great invention made quite a while ago that was able to scrub excess amounts of CO2 out of the air.

Trees.