iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

CIA Interrogation Deaths: Justice Department To Investigate Deaths Of Two Detainees

Cia Interrogation Deaths Justice Department

PETE YOST and ADAM GOLDMAN   06/30/11 06:43 PM ET   AP

WASHINGTON — The Justice Department inquiry into CIA interrogations of terrorist detainees has led to a full criminal investigation into the deaths of two people while they were in custody in Iraq and Afghanistan, Attorney General Eric Holder announced Thursday.

The attorney general said that he accepted the recommendation of a federal prosecutor, John Durham, who since August 2009 has conducted an inquiry into CIA interrogation practices during the Bush administration. Holder said Durham looked at the treatment of 101 detainees in U.S. custody since the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks and concluded that only these two deaths warranted criminal investigation. Holder said Durham found some of the 101 had never been held by the CIA.

Holder did not identify the two death cases. But former and current U.S. officials who requested anonymity to discuss an ongoing investigation said Durham was looking at the deaths of Gul Rahman and Manadel al-Jamadi.

Rahman died in the early hours of Nov. 20, 2002, after being shackled to a cold concrete wall in a secret CIA prison in northern Kabul, Afghanistan, known as the Salt Pit. He was suspected of links to the terrorist group al-Qaida. Rahman is the only detainee known to have died in a CIA-run prison.

Al-Jamadi died in 2003 at the Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq. The death has been known to the public for years and a military autopsy declared al-Jamadi's death a homicide.

This month, a former Abu Ghraib prison guard at the time of al-Jamadi's death, Lynndie England, was ordered to testify in a grand jury probe in Alexandria, Va. A subpoena signed by Durham for England's appearance says her testimony is needed in a probe of federal criminal laws involving war crimes, torture and other offenses. The Associated Press obtained a copy of the subpoena.

England, an Army reservist serving as a military policeman at Abu Ghraib, was among 11 soldiers found guilty of wrongdoing in the mistreatment of prisoners at Abu Ghraib prison in 2003 and 2004. Photographs showed England holding a restraint around a man's neck, and giving a thumbs-up and pointing at the genitals of naked, hooded men, a cigarette dangling from her mouth.

England's attorney, Roy Hardy, said that England testified along with former MPs Chip Frederick and Sabrina Harman before the grand jury earlier this month.

Another person who testified told the AP that prosecutors asked about a hood placed over al-Jamadi's head that later disappeared and who shackled al-Jamadi's arms behind his back and bound them to a barred window. This witness requested anonymity to avoid being connected publicly with the case.

On his last day as CIA director, Leon Panetta emphasized the wide scope of Durham's preliminary review.

"After extensive examination of more than 100 instances in which CIA had contact or was alleged to have had contact with terrorist detainees," the prosecutor "has determined that no further law enforcement action is appropriate in all but two discrete cases," Panetta, who will be sworn in Friday as the new defense secretary, said in a statement.

Panetta added that "both cases were previously reviewed by career federal prosecutors who subsequently declined prosecution."

"I welcome the news that the broader inquiries are behind us," Panetta said. "We are now finally about to close this chapter of our agency's history."

Rep. Mike Rogers, R-Mich., the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, said he welcomes the Justice Department's decision to end criminal investigations "against the vast majority of CIA interrogators."

However, the American Civil Liberties Union faulted Durham's review as failing to scrutinize senior officials.

"Durham's mandate was far too narrow," said Hina Shamsi, director of the American Civil Liberties Union's National Security Project. "Durham was tasked principally with investigating interrogations that went beyond the bounds set by the Justice Department. However, the central problem was not with interrogators who disobeyed orders, but with senior officials who authorized a program of torture."

The outlines of al-Jamadi's death have long been known.

A CIA officer at Abu Ghraib was sanctioned for not having a doctor examine al-Jamadi when he arrived at the prison badly injured from a struggle with Navy SEALs.

That officer, whom the AP is identifying only as Steve because he worked undercover, was a focus of the CIA's internal investigation. Steve ran the detainee exploitation cell at Abu Ghraib and had done similar work with the agency in Afghanistan. Steve later retired from the CIA. The AP also has identified another CIA officer with the agency's Special Activities Division connected to al-Jamadi's death. He remains undercover.

Rahman's identity was not known until revealed by an AP investigation.

Former CIA officials say Rahman was acting as a conduit between militant Gulbuddin Hekmatyar and al-Qaida. Hekmatyar's insurgent group is believed to be allied with al-Qaida. The former officials said the CIA had been tracking Rahman's cell phone at the time of his Oct. 29, 2002, capture and were hoping the suspected militant would provide information about Hekmatyar's whereabouts.

But Rahman never cracked under questioning, refusing to help the CIA find Hekmatyar. Former CIA officials described him as one of the toughest detainees to pass through the CIA's network of secret prisons.

The young CIA officer running the prison at the time was never formally reprimanded in the case and remains working undercover for the agency.

The same day in August 2009 that the government complied with a court order to make public a CIA inspector general's report that said the agency had used some "unauthorized, improvised, inhumane" tactics in terrorist interrogations, Holder directed Durham to look into claims of abuse during CIA interrogations. At the time, Durham was already investigating the destruction of CIA interrogation videos showing waterboarding of terrorist suspects. That part of Durham's investigation ended last November, when Durham cleared the CIA's former top clandestine officer and others of any charges for destroying the agency videotapes of waterboarding, which evokes the sensation of drowning.

___

AP Intelligence Writer Kimberly Dozier in Washington and AP writer Vicki Smith in Morgantown, W.Va., contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON — The Justice Department inquiry into CIA interrogations of terrorist detainees has led to a full criminal investigation into the deaths of two people while they were in custody in Ir...
WASHINGTON — The Justice Department inquiry into CIA interrogations of terrorist detainees has led to a full criminal investigation into the deaths of two people while they were in custody in Ir...
Filed by Mark Hanrahan  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 750
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (14 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
guntotinganglion
Moe, Larry, THE CHEESE!
06:31 PM on 07/04/2011
I think people's actual words speak far more eloquently than all the pundits in the world....

"Waterboarding is torture." This is a quote from then Attorney General nominee Eric Holder on Jan. 15, 2009.

“Three people were waterboarded and I believe that decision saved lives,” said Mr Bush. When asked if he authorised waterboarding, he responded: “Damn right!” November 9, 2010

Where's the wiggle room here? Holder is on record stating unambiguously that waterboarding is torture, and George W. Bush is on record in his book and in public appearances and interviews, that he ordered waterboarding, aka torture.

Doing nothing in regards to war crimes, is not acceptable. Doing nothing is, in reality, supporting the continued use of torture. Eric Holder, and his boss, by doing nothing to bring these self-professed war criminals to justice, are themselves accessories after the fact.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robgrut
07:26 AM on 07/03/2011
Holder has now dropped the investigations. Why isn't this on the front page of HuffPo?

Vindicating the CIA

Ending a disgraceful investigation.

REVIEW & OUTLOOK JULY 2, 2011

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304450604576419781341125102.html?mod=googlenews_wsj

The education of the Obama Administration on antiterror policy has been remarkable to behold, and the latest installment is Attorney General Eric Holder's decision to pull the plug on the investigation into most CIA interrogations. The disgrace is that this probe was ever undertaken.

In 2009, Mr. Holder appointed prosecutor John Durham to look into the possible mistreatment of some 100 detainees by the CIA, with an eye toward possible prosecution. On Thursday, Justice said it would proceed with investigations in two cases where prisoners died in CIA custody, but that any more investigation of the others "is not warranted."..
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:18 PM on 07/01/2011
This may be Obamas greatest legacy- that he and his Justice Department shielded Americas war criminals from justice now, and forever more. Amen.
Too bad this legacy of torture goes un-purged and unpunished and is now permanently part of our history and national psyche.
photo
Boduognat
Lasciate ogne speranza, voi ch'entrate.
05:07 PM on 07/04/2011
Well, the legacy of torture does not fall on the shoulders of President Obama.

I have to admit, as a foreigner, he has disappointed me on most of his electoral promises regarding foreign policy (Guantanamo, Iraq, Palestine), but I imagine he has done so as well with a LOT of progressive Americans (healthcare, gay marriage, etc)

However, the only ones that ought to be held accountable for the torture policies that have now de facto been accepted as official US policy are the ones that actually established it: George Bush, Dick Cheney, John Yoo, Gonzo, and everybody else who has publicly expressed their preference of it.

Off course, it needs to be defined first. If a majority of Americans think torture is not torture if it is done on Arabs, who am I to disagree with them?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:42 PM on 07/05/2011
I am clear in my opinion.
The debate is over. The masterminds and perpetrators of the policy are going un-punished.
Obama is shielding those responsible which makes him responsible for the LEGACY of the evil deeds- and this legacy may as well be etched in stone.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:49 AM on 07/01/2011
"It's almost an out of body experience to me to listen to this debate going on [whether these techniques were torture]. We should never as a policy maltreat people under our control, detainees. We tortured people unmercifully. We probably murdered dozens of them during a course of that, both by the armed forces and CIA...There is a good argument in my view for reviewing the White House justice council and the Attorney General's office who okayed this.
I think as a policy matter we better find out how thing went so wrong." - Gen. Barry McCaffrey, MSNBC, April 20, 2009

"There is no longer any doubt as to whether the [Bush] administration has committed war crimes. The only question that remains to be answered is whether those who ordered the use of torture will be held to account." - Maj. Gen. Antonio Taguba, McClatchy, June 18, 2008

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2009/4/22/723297/-4-Star-General-Calls-for-Probe-of-Bush-White-House

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2008/06/18/41514/general-who-probed-abu-ghraib.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
donnyraindog
Grass shack nailed to a pinewood floor
08:54 AM on 07/01/2011
During ww2 and the height of the cold war this country has at least in principle held all branches of the armed services and intelligence agencies to high standards.That so many are openly arguing against even this extremely limited accountability shows how low we have sank!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
istvan13
The world needs more thinkers.
08:39 AM on 07/01/2011
About time....
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:16 AM on 07/01/2011
What a great PR opportunity this will be be for the Justice Department to provide a smoke screen for the failed Fast and Furious debacle in Mexico.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
raffa657
08:07 AM on 07/01/2011
The Justice process can be awful slow it seems.
It's way past time to have these incidents investigated. Better late than never I guess.
I just hope that real justice is done and the folks at the top are investigated too.
11:39 AM on 07/01/2011
No chance of that. Remember Abu Ghraib?
07:43 AM on 07/01/2011
Yep they had had their heads cut off bodies dragged thru the streets burned and then hung from a bridge. Oops that was the good guys.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:51 AM on 07/01/2011
Great "logic."
That's like saying, "A murderer lives in Florida, therefore we should execute all Floridians."
photo
Boduognat
Lasciate ogne speranza, voi ch'entrate.
04:35 PM on 07/04/2011
It depends on what you call the good guys. If you are referring to what happened in Falluhjah, you had a number of Blackwater operatives that passed there on a "fun" killing spree.

The bodies dragged through the streets were the ones that fell into the hands of the locals.
It could be argued that they actually deserved what was coming to them.

If you're not convinced, try watching the documentary "kill team" that appeared in the German "Der Spiegel".

Then, when you have done so, come back and tell us some more about the "good guys".
07:30 AM on 07/01/2011
The Headline Should Read:

Justice Department has decided to do a little something to keep up the pretense that the U.S. is still a nation of laws.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Angrysheepherder
Foil hats everywhere.....
07:23 AM on 07/01/2011
While all of this sounds good, I don't buy that this will go anywhere. There have been and continue to be innumerable 'incidents'. Everything that's gone to court gets tossed due to national security with hardly a blink by the presiding judges. Our government is nothing without it's secrecy and tyrannical liberty dissolving tools like the Patriot Act.
photo
SiameseTrainer
...we are Sia..mese if you don't please..
06:31 AM on 07/01/2011
There we go, cover-up managed, now lets go whack that Englaqnd broad around some more, blow off a little steam without stirring up the mud.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sunil Weliwitigoda
05:53 AM on 07/01/2011
Time for an Internal or more rightfully an Independent International Criminal Investigation of the Justice Department, the CIA, and all Political Leaders and Defense Department Personnel involved in the systematic exploitation and suppression of fundamental human rights under the broad plank and excuse of the so - called "War on Terror".
photo
European1919
I am the Pigmâ’¶n
07:11 AM on 07/01/2011
Sadly this will never happen.
07:33 AM on 07/01/2011
Perhaps after we've entirely bankrupted our nation in the commission of our wars for profit and our war crimes and the rest of the world finally decides it has had enough...
03:28 AM on 07/01/2011
But they won't investigate Operation Fast and Furious, that led to hundreds of deaths in Mexico
07:49 AM on 07/01/2011
of course, can't have the Obama cronies investigating themselves now.....
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
healthanalyst
Banned from commenting, so?
03:02 AM on 07/01/2011
They'll find nothing. Heck, they couldn't find torture as a warcrime after Bush and Cheney admitted it on TV, in their memoirs and in speeches. And its a legal obligation for a nation state to prosecute this. Oh well. So much for law and order.
06:52 AM on 07/01/2011
You have correctly stated the obvious and I agree wholeheartedly, this is nothing but a "dog and pony" show for the upcoming election. Those people are preparing to put the US Constitution into the annals of history.