iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Stephen Colbert Gets Answers On Campaign Finance, Super PAC Approved By FEC

Stephen Colbert Campaign Finance

AP/The Huffington Post   First Posted: 06/30/11 09:50 AM ET Updated: 08/30/11 06:12 AM ET

WASHINGTON (AP/The Huffington Post) -- Stephen Colbert won approval from the Federal Election Commission Thursday to set up a Super PAC. "You may form your super PAC and proceed," the panel told Colbert.

Colbert, who plays a conservative TV pundit on "The Colbert Report," wants to launch Colbert Super PAC, a type of political action committee that would allow him to raise unlimited amounts of money from corporations, unions and individuals to support or oppose candidates in the 2012 elections through independent expenditures such as TV ads.

Colbert asked the commission on Thursday for a so-called media exemption to allow him to use his show's airtime, staff and other resources for his political action committee without having to publicly disclose them as in-kind contributions from Comedy Central's parent company, Viacom Inc.

Colbert has said those undisclosed contributions could include the use of his show's staff to create TV advertisements about candidates that would air as paid commercials on other shows and networks.

According to National Journal, the commission opted for a narrow interpretation of the media exemption, voting five to one that the advertisements could not be run outside of Colbert's show.

The Campaign Legal Center and Democracy 21 urged the election commission to reject Colbert's request because they said it could open a "gaping loophole" in campaign disclosure laws.

"I would suspect that Mr. Colbert would not want his activities to serve as a vehicle for opening up major loopholes in the campaign finance laws that would allow companies to provide secret money to influence elections," said Fred Wertheimer, president of Democracy 21.

The two campaign finance watchdog groups warned that a favorable ruling for Colbert could spur many more undisclosed contributions to political figures who are TV hosts or commentators and who could opt to create their own super PACs to take advantage of any new loopholes.

The groups cited politicians such Sarah Palin, Mike Huckabee, Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum who already have traditional political action committees and are either working now, or have worked, as TV hosts or commentators.

"Many television show hosts who are serious politicians have political committees that could reap great financial benefit" if Colbert wins a favorable ruling, the groups wrote in a joint letter to the Federal Election Commission.

Trevor Potter, a prominent campaign finance attorney and a former Federal Election Commission chairman who is representing Colbert, declined to comment.

Potter heads The Campaign Legal Center but said he is acting solely as Colbert's attorney and has disqualified himself from having any role in the group's actions on the Colbert matter.

"The Colbert Report" has used satire to shine a light on campaign finance rules following the Citizens United ruling by the Supreme Court that helped pave the way for super PACs. Campaign finance reform advocates complained the ruling gave wealthy donors, particularly companies and unions, considerably more sway in politics.

Super PACs can accept unlimited contributions from corporations, labor unions or individuals, unlike candidates or traditional political action committees. Super PACs cannot contribute directly to candidates, however.

Asked if Colbert's effort to form a super PAC is serious or more of a stunt, Potter said Wednesday that the comic is raising important and complex questions that the Federal Election Commission is wrestling with.

"There are serious, legitimate, questions about what such a PAC has to report to the FEC," Potter said in an email response to The Associated Press. "Those questions are the subject of Mr. Colbert's advisory opinion request to the commission."

Colbert's campaign to create a political action committee is not without some comic jabs. His political action committee slogan is "Making a better tomorrow, tomorrow."

Colbert's comic flair surfaced in a recent letter to the Federal Election Commission.

"Colbert Super PAC will also pay usual and normal administrative expenses, including but not limited to luxury hotel stays, private jet travel and PAC mementos from Saks Fifth Avenue and Neiman Marcus," Colbert's lawyers wrote to the commissioners.

"This is not just about the cash," the comedian said during Wednesday night's episode of "The Colbert Report." "I will also accept credit cards."

In March, Colbert said he was forming a traditional political action committee. But that kind of committee has stricter rules on fundraising, so he announced plans to form his own super PAC instead.

Colbert has said any ads for Colbert Super PAC would not be coordinated with any candidate or party.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON (AP/The Huffington Post) -- Stephen Colbert won approval from the Federal Election Commission Thursday to set up a Super PAC. "You may form your super PAC and proceed," the panel told Colbe...
WASHINGTON (AP/The Huffington Post) -- Stephen Colbert won approval from the Federal Election Commission Thursday to set up a Super PAC. "You may form your super PAC and proceed," the panel told Colbe...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 634
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (19 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mangafreak2128
Atheist, progressive activist, democrat socialist
10:54 PM on 07/01/2011
Colbert (and Stewart) 2012? What the hell. Can't be worse than than Obama and the Republicans.
08:52 AM on 07/01/2011
I think this is great. We had the Boon Pickens assinine Swiftboat lies during Kerry's run, I hope he does a national ad the night before the election that paints the bozo candidates from both parties as who they really are. The voter can then decide which one is the lesser of two evils, as usual.
01:39 PM on 07/01/2011
So, free speech for all, and the voters decide? Great. So what's the parody part?
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
ReedYoung
global mean temperature, obviously INCREASING
02:02 PM on 07/01/2011
Are you paid for your comments?
If so, by whom or what organization?
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
ReedYoung
global mean temperature, obviously INCREASING
02:53 PM on 07/01/2011
In truth, it is a well documented fact that people are paid to comment on Internet forums, and other "personas" are not persons at all.

http://www.monbiot.com/archives/2010/12/13/reclaim-the-cyber-commons/
http://www.desmogblog.com/are-climate-deniers-and-front-groups-polluting-online-conversation-denier-bots

The parody part is you, fighting against your own best interests.

Good luck with that.  I mean it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dblshell
St. George to the crazies
07:30 AM on 07/01/2011
Steven Colbert is trying to draw your attention to what is happening to this nation. The question is: Will you listen?

On June 7th 2011, a Republican trial judge reaffirmed his decision permitting corporations to contribute directly to political campaigns — also known as the ‘Citizens United on Steroids Decision’ - a decision that will end all restrictions on campaign finance because it will allow the super rich to funnel UNLIMITED DONATIONS to candidates THROUGH MULTIPLE SHELL CORPORATIONS.

It's over folks. The world's biggest corporations and Wall Street just took complete control of your government. And by "world's biggest corporations", understand that means STATE OWNED CORPORATIONS of FOREIGN GOVERNMENTS.

Time to hone your foreign language skills America.
01:05 PM on 07/01/2011
Now THIS case does what everyone falsely thinks Citizens United did - drops the ban on corporate donations.

And it is not over.
Boopsie2008
Hold the Vision-Trust the Process: Obama/Biden
05:47 AM on 07/01/2011
You knew Colbert was onto something when he announced on his show that he was going to try to take advantage of the Citizens United decision to get unlimited donations to help pay for his show's coverage of the 2012 elections. I think it's great (and great fun) that he got the Super PAC. He'll surely make it worth our donations.

I hope Steven uses it to irritate the h*ll out of the Chief Justice John Roberts and his gang of Repressive­s while he's at it, and chronicle every Palin whine, Bachman mistake, Romney flip-flop, etc., as well as the shrilly biased coverage of the allegedly "actual news" media.

Oh, yes indeedy, this is going to be Must See TV.
01:12 AM on 07/01/2011
The Campaign Legal Center and Democracy 21 urged the election commission to reject Colbert's request because they said it could open a "gaping loophole" in campaign disclosure laws.

http://tinyurl.com/6arsf74
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nunnenj
Einstein, disguised as Robin Hood
12:23 AM on 07/01/2011
It was a proud day in the Colbert Nation!
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
ReedYoung
global mean temperature, obviously INCREASING
08:46 PM on 06/30/2011
So, Fox "News" can't play his ads?

According to National Journal, the commission opted for a narrow interpretation of the media exemption, voting five to one that the advertisements could not be run outside of Colbert's show.

I wonder if it will even be legal for Fox "News" to report on what Steven Colbert does after this?
11:50 AM on 07/01/2011
Ah, someone's starting to see all the problems with trying to mess with free speech.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
ReedYoung
global mean temperature, obviously INCREASING
11:54 AM on 07/01/2011
The problems I see come from granting human rights to corporations.

Unsurprisingly, the dude calling itself "poohtoo" is confused, too.
01:07 PM on 07/01/2011
Nobody has granted human rights to corporations.

Citizens United never said that. Not once.

It simply said that the First Amendment protects speech, regardless of its source. Period. Freedom of speech doesn't apply to humans or corporations or anything else, it applies to speech.

And it had nothing to do with campaign donations either.
05:52 PM on 06/30/2011
Who cares?! Watch Food Network's new show Extreme Chef! Airs tonight @ 10/9c! tinyurl.com/6zcdsum RT!
Also, like us on facebook! www.facebook.com/extreme.chef
photo
Watchdogsniffer
Progressive News, Views & Advocacy. We advocate fo
05:50 PM on 06/30/2011
Audacity of Colbert: maybe there is hope comedians will take over our politics;
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JanusDaniels
03:57 PM on 06/30/2011
"... reject Colbert's request... it could open a "gaping loophole" in campaign disclosure laws."
And we don't already have any of those....
11:50 AM on 07/01/2011
No, we don't.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MoreFreedom
03:41 PM on 06/30/2011
The good thing about not disclosing contributions, is that politicians won't know who's supporting their competition, and then they can't use the power of government to harass and intimidate them.

Government officials have already sent in the IRS for costly and time consuming audits, health inspectors to shut down restaurants, have given the word to not approve plans for companies to expand, etc. Disclosure of campaign contributors increases corruption. Voters can decide on candidates regardless of their advertising.
11:53 AM on 07/01/2011
"The good thing about not disclosing contributi­ons, is that politician­s won't know who's supporting their competitio­n, and then they can't use the power of government to harass and intimidate them."

Yes - that is exactly right, because this has nothing to do with contributions to candidates. It is only about giving money to an independent group to fund free speech. And many years ago, the government tried to force the NAACP to make it's membership rolls public - in order to intimidate them. The Supreme Court overturned that law.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
zetacplus
Conservatism has failed America
03:34 PM on 06/30/2011
I can hear the religious right complaining now about how insane this is and how if this is allowed to occur then what's to stop goats from being able to start a super pac.
11:53 AM on 07/01/2011
Colbert isn't a human?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
TheOuroborus
It's NOT paranoia if they really R out to get U.
03:11 PM on 06/30/2011
Colbert 2012
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BBQribsNOnapkin
tl; dr
03:09 PM on 06/30/2011
Stephen Colbert is doing more than anybody else to expose the fraud that PAC's and campaign financing have become, and the people that hide behind them. This guy is a deep, deep patriot whose combination intellect, wisdom and foresight is nearly unparalleled.
11:54 AM on 07/01/2011
What fraud is that exactly? There is no fraud.

This is not about campaign finance. Not at all. A super PAC is not like a PAC that gives donations. It's unfortunate that it is called a "PAC" because it confuses everyone. All a super PAC does is pay for free speech. Doesn't give money to anyone else.
09:39 AM on 07/03/2011
Isn't the issue less about corporations being people and more about money being speech?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:56 PM on 06/30/2011
AWWWWWW YEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAH!

LET JOKE-ADS AND ROBOCALLS PROCEED!