More

Illinois Death Row Shuts Down

Illinois Death Row

DON BABWIN   07/ 2/11 12:36 AM ET   AP

CHICAGO — After spending years at the center of heated national debate over capital punishment, Illinois' death row officially died Friday when a state law abolishing the death penalty quietly took effect.

The state garnered international attention when then-Republican Gov. George Ryan declared a moratorium in 2000 after several inmates' death sentences were overturned and he cleared death row three years later. One man who came within 48 hours of being executed was among those later declared innocent.

The fate of executions in the state was sealed in March when Democratic Gov. Pat Quinn signed legislation ending the death penalty, following years of stories of men sentenced to death for crimes they did not commit and families of murder victims angrily demanding their loved ones' killers pay with their own lives.

Illinois has executed 12 men since 1977, when the death penalty was reinstated, but none since 1999.

Quinn subsequently commuted the sentences of the 15 men on death row to life in prison without the possibility of parole. Fourteen are now in maximum security prisons, while one is in a medium-high security prison with a mental health facility.

Ironically, the state's death row at the prison in Pontiac, about 100 miles southwest of Chicago, has been turned into a place where inmates go when they're deemed worthy of leaving the state's super-maximum prison in southern Illinois, the Tamms Correctional Center, and enter a less-restrictive program.

"It is a step down from Tamms," said Stacey Solano, spokeswoman for the Illinois Department of Corrections. "When they transition out, it is a restrictive environment but not as restrictive as Tamms."

As for the death chamber itself, no decision has been made about what – if anything – will be done with it, Solano said.

The legislation abolishing the death penalty was signed by Quinn amid much fanfare, but Friday's finality was barely noted around the state. Solano said the department received just two calls for information from the media on Friday.

That lack of interest stands in contrast to the last dozen years or so when Illinois was often at the forefront of debate over the death penalty.

Ryan, who imposed the execution moratorium after the death sentences of 13 men were overturned, called the state's capital punishment system "haunted by the demon of error." He cleared death row shortly before leaving office in 2003, by commuting the sentences of 167 condemned inmates to life in prison.

Even as lawmakers debated the death penalty and the moratorium, prosecutors continued to seek the death penalty. By the time Quinn signed the bill in March, there were 15 men on death row.

Among them was Brian Dugan, who was convicted in 2009 in the 1983 slaying of 10-year-old Jeanine Nicarico – years after two men were sentenced to death for the same slaying before they were ultimately exonerated and released from prison.

His attorney, Steven Greenberg, said Friday that shutting down death row was proper given that people were convicted and sentenced to death for that crime and others they did not commit.

"Anytime you've got a system where there is a danger of providing retribution on the wrong person, that's no different than vigilante justice, which is what we had," he said.

Greenberg said some juries, with their decisions not to recommend the death penalty in other cases in recent years, were already sending a message that they remained concerned about the possibility of executing an innocent person.

Former Cook County State's Attorney Dick Devine, a proponent of the death penalty and a vocal critic of Ryan's decision to clear death row, pointed out that among those who benefit from the ban is a man who raped a mother and daughter in front of one another before stabbing them to death.

"I believe there are some people who do such terrible things that they forfeit their right to be among us," he said.

Devine said he doesn't believe the death penalty is gone forever in Illinois, and that the debate will begin anew when there is a particularly horrific crime.

"I suspect when the next John Wayne Gacy, Timothy McVeigh ... happens there will be some discussion of bringing it back," he said. "Nothing is carved in stone."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
CHICAGO — After spending years at the center of heated national debate over capital punishment, Illinois' death row officially died Friday when a state law abolishing the death penalty quietly t...
CHICAGO — After spending years at the center of heated national debate over capital punishment, Illinois' death row officially died Friday when a state law abolishing the death penalty quietly t...
Filed by Alana Horowitz  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 984
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (16 total)
  1 of 2  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
photo
bryanzth 11:09 AM on 07/01/2011
I would like to see the comparison of outcomes: Death Penalty vs. 80/20 Life Imprisonment/Release.

Now, let me explain first. We all know that the Death Penalty involves a costly trial (given the risks of both a truly guilty vs. not guilty defendant) as well as a costly appeals process. But we don't know the difference of costs of the trial/appeals vs. life imprisonment, so that should be briefly  Read More...
10:51 AM on 07/06/2011
if we killed more criminals there would be less criminals
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
HotelDrama
12:08 PM on 07/06/2011
And we'd be more and more like those dictatorial regimes we love to demonize. Its funny how the pro-death penalty camp loves to use places like Saudi Arabia, North Korea and China as examples of how mass executions keep crime down. But then turn around and complain about those countries human rights violations. You can't have it both ways.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
HotelDrama
01:04 PM on 07/05/2011
Where are the studies from the pro-death penalty camp that show that the death penalty is a deterrent to crime? That shows that it is cheaper and more cost effective to execute people compared to a life in prison sentence? That show that only guilty people have been executed and no innocent people have lost their lives to this policy? The studies that show that the death penalty isn't racist or classist and treats all equally and doesn't discriminate?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kelly Hayes
This is what plutocracy looks like.
01:41 AM on 07/05/2011
My state finally got something right.
07:51 AM on 07/04/2011
Illinois sucks, now we have to pay taxes on these ppl even longer to stay in prison? SMDFH!
05:26 PM on 07/04/2011
Actually, leaving out all other factors, execution is significantly more expensive than life imprisonment. All those mandatory appeals and death row facilities cost a lot more than regular imprisonment. Not to mention death row appeals are notoriously lengthy, and more men on death row have died from old age than an actual execution.
10:52 AM on 07/06/2011
not if they only got 2 appeals and than BANG!
10:14 AM on 07/02/2011
I keep hearing about the inocent people convicted and sentenced to death on death row. Then the arguement that if they were serving life instead they would have a chance to be proven inocent.
When someone is sentanced to death by trial everyone seems to forget that it goes into automatic appeals. Some as long as 15 years or longer before the sentence is actually carried out after the endless appeals runs out. If you can't be proven inocent in at least 10 years of appeals then you did it in my book. Sorry but I think that is a lame excuse for commuting a death sentence to life in prison. We have over crowded prisons already with almost bankrupt state economies, and people want to take care of these monsters for the rest of their lifes, feed, clothe, free medical, free education. Our senior citizens don't have it that good. If you were able to talk to most inmates in prisons, most would say they were inocent of the crime(s) they were convicted of. (fact). If you are too touchy- feely to carry out the sentence then move over and let someone push the button that can. If you don't want someone sentenced to death in court, then change the laws. Stop moaning and crying in your beer over it. We have a society now that wants to disarm the law abiding honest people but yet have bleeding hearts for violent killers.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
HotelDrama
11:12 AM on 07/02/2011
Obviously, "your book" is wrong. I just posted a link to a movie about a guy named Juan Melendez. He spent 18 years on death row. He didn't do the crime. 18 years is significantly longer than your arbitrary 10 years it should take to get free. Our prisons are not overcrowded because of death row. They are overcrowded because of the war on drugs. Death row inmates take up a miniscule amount of space in prison. And I think that you think our criminal justice system is wonderful and works exactly how it should. Obviously, if an innocent man/women was sent to death row, it failed. Why do you think that the same system that sent an innocent person to death row should be able to fix their own mistake in an arbitrary 10 year time?
11:33 PM on 07/02/2011
Sadly NOTHING in life is perfect. The system works most of the time. It's the best in the world. Maybe you'd like to be accused of something in England and be guilty until proven inocent? Stopping capital punishment just because a FEW cases are inocent. Most of these inocent people have records anyway and just happened to have been caught in the wrong place at the wrong time. I didn't say that the prisons were over crowed because of death row inmates, I said they are over crowed period.And about the war on drugs, do you think these inmates that are in there because of drugs haven't or wouldn't commint a violent crime most of them are gang members and would cut your throat for a dime? And they have appeals, and if turned down then they've been given a chance. Most cases that are found to be inocent are from DNA that was not available 20 or more years ago and proved they didn't do it. That is not the case now days with DNA as an accepted crime fighting/solving tool. Movies are 20% fact and 80% fiction in most cases. I still stand by what I said in my post.
photo
golions
Real Americans drink coffee, not tea.
12:00 PM on 07/02/2011
How is a life sentence soft on crime?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
HotelDrama
01:09 PM on 07/03/2011
It certainly isn't, but the pro death penalty camp likes to throw that around.
01:28 AM on 07/02/2011
Saves alot of money when a murderer beyond a reasonable doubt is executed. You should give your life if you take one. Man's free will. God can sort out their soul.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:43 PM on 07/04/2011
Now you just need to show me how it saves money, and I don't mean in your head-- I mean in fact.

Also, after you die, the martians I believe in will ensure that your eternal essence juice is well taken care, now doesn't that make you feel better about dying?
03:08 PM on 07/07/2011
Do you think that housing a inmate, feeding them 3 meals a day does not cost money?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
HotelDrama
01:14 AM on 07/02/2011
Juan Melendez spent 18 years on death row for a crime he didn't commit.
There are hundreds of people across the country who have been released from death row because they were actually innocent. Many people here want to execute them on the spot. How is that justice? You can't undo killing the wrong person.

http://nylatino.bside.com/2009/films/juanmelendez6446_nylatino2009
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
The Mad Guesser
People are alike all over.
01:14 PM on 07/04/2011
Justice has nothing to do with whether a person is "actually" guilty, but has everything to do with maintaining the illusion of "control" as the fabric of a just society. Prosecutors understand this when they argue "finality" as trumping innocence in opposing a stay for a DNA test. Justice is, in fact, obtained most efficiently by preventing the discovery of actual innocence, since it is through maintaining the public's neurologically hardwired illusion of judicial perfection that keeps us deterrable citizens from killing. With unpunished murders rampant, our sense of control yields to jealousy, helplessness; then anarchy, since people can't grasp right from wrong unless "right" is the winning team in control. Since "right" can't be in actual control, we can at least gain simulated control, hence finality trumps fact, making "on the spot" justice the only effective kind to forestall that catastrophic lynchesque "run on the bank" of justice. Like a dollar bill, justice becomes worthless paper without blind faith in its value. As the Apostle, Saint Timotheus Geiterus wrote as Jesus's economic advisor, "Crucifixion is the monetary policy of the currency of justice."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ev3ryWord
"We're not hiring until morale improves."
12:11 AM on 07/02/2011
I worked as a guard in an Illinois prison from 1978-1983. I was 19 when I started, and Death Row in Joliet was my first post. Our state has had some of most infamous murderers in history (Richard Speck, John Wayne Gacy, Henry Brisbon) and also the more common typology of someone who kills in a fit of anger or other passion, with the victim usually being a spouse, relative, or friend. In any of these cases, the death penalty would never have been a deterrent, simply because the perpetrator acted in the moment, or while high on drugs and alcohol, or while too psychotic to control their own behavior.

One might think these are good enough reasons to have the death penalty, but unfortunately, cops and juries sometimes act in the passion of the moment as well, and convict the wrong person on tenuous evidence. Life imprisonment, at the very least, gives the wrongly-convicted an opportunity to reopen a case and pursue freedom, usually when DNA evidence is found to be available.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:49 PM on 07/04/2011
This last part of your argument, the entire second paragraph, is exactly why anyone alive right now should give this entire subject extra pause-- it's not just conjecture, we've seen the rise of a new technology that has unequivocally proven men convicted long ago were innocent.

Well said.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kelly Hayes
This is what plutocracy looks like.
01:40 AM on 07/05/2011
Excellent post.
11:17 PM on 07/01/2011
Just look at the_shameful conduct of Texas. They almost certainly_executed an innocent man (Todd Willingham) in 2004. Last week, they_executed a man who was mentally_retarded. All in the name of civilized values, Texas style!
photo
Randy Harris
I like your christ. I do not like your xtians.
11:52 PM on 07/01/2011
yet they preach "from conception to NATURAL death"... in their fight to limit women's choices.
03:17 AM on 08/23/2011
Big difference between capital punishment and abortion. The former is an act of meting out justice, the other is the murder of an innocent human being. If abortion advocates think a woman (or man, for that matter) has *that* right, they are mistaken. We should not have the choice to engage in such an act.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
James Bridges
Blue Texan
10:55 PM on 07/01/2011
Crimes of passion are seldom prevented by thoughts of the penalties to be suffered later. Then there are the killers who fully expect to die for their crimes, either suicide by cop or on the gurney. In neither of these cases is the death penalty a deterrent. Also, remember that some criminals are simply insane, just ask any prison guard if you don't believe that. Still, I might go along with requiring cruel and unusual punishment if it is imposed only by juries fully aware of what they are prescribing and for whom and how it is to be administered. Not many juries will do that unless it is really a truly horrendous crime - like mass murder.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
highflag
10:05 PM on 07/01/2011
I am delighted to offer my congratulations to the State of Illinois. Welcome to the Age of Enlightenment. Would that the other 49 might find their way out of the Dark Ages.

Just how many statistics and studies must be done before The United States accepts the FACTS? Capital punishment does nothing to deter future crimes.

Prisoners who have been sentenced to die have been later proved to be innocent. While that's a good thing, you would have to be awfully naive to believe that every condemned person who was innocent has been discovered. That leaves the inescapable truth that innocent men have been executed by states in our nation.

If you are taking comfort in the notion that it could never happen to you, or someone you care for, you're kidding yourself. It can happen to anyone.

The only reason we continue to have state-sponsered killings is to satisfy our blood-lust for revenge. We're supposed to be better than that...
11:10 PM on 07/01/2011
Thank you. My sentiments exactly.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
onebluebrick
10:03 PM on 07/01/2011
Thank God. I was a Correctional Nurse for 22 years. In my state, there was only one execution in all that time. I did not have to attend. I pitied my Director, also a nurse. who was required to witness the event.
I do not consider financial cost to be a factor in this situation. A life has a different value.
01:49 AM on 07/03/2011
But cost SHOULD be a factor. It costs less to keep someone alive than to kill them. Google the system in CA they did the same thing after an intensive look at the budget and the information may be the most recent.

This is one issue that seems to cross party lines. Hopefully we will soon see an end to the Death Penalty nation wide.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:06 PM on 07/01/2011
Can you believe that in the 21st century there are still third World Nations that execute people, Torture, spy on their citizens, and refuse their residents health care, I sure woulldn't want to live in a Country like that,,,,,wait a minute, disregard that comment.
11:12 PM on 07/01/2011
You couldn't be talking about THIS country could you? Nah!
03:33 AM on 07/02/2011
In that case, I challenge you both to go find a better one to live in. If you don't like it, you have other options.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:52 PM on 07/04/2011
It's like a strange game, where the soviets moved to america and became us.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Eugene Berkovich
Unapologetic Socialist
06:59 PM on 07/01/2011
When a person is sentenced to long prison sentences, this person can still fight for innocence and, sometimes, actually prove it. Death sentence is final. As soon as sentence is carried out - it is over. The death of a criminal (whether guilty or not) will not make the victims' and their families' loss hurt less
05:39 PM on 07/01/2011
The libs mantra... Murder babies not murderers. Nuff said.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Eugene Berkovich
Unapologetic Socialist
06:56 PM on 07/01/2011
What babies?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
shaddowiarl
10:22 PM on 07/01/2011
i guess you would typify the Christian philosophy .....i suprised the GOP hasnt broken out the Inquisition yet ...but i sure the century is still young... and like rats you will all multiply